⭐️Michelle⭐️

BREAKING If Ken Paxton wins by +10, democrats have pledged to LEAVE Texas & find another home. This is a huge endorsement for Ken Paxton!

NEW QUANTUS INSIGHTS POLL | May 25, 2026 Texas Republicans vote tomorrow in the U.S. Senate runoff, and our final survey finds Ken Paxton entering Election Day with the edge over John Cornyn. 📊 Texas GOP Senate Runoff 🔴 Ken Paxton: 52.7% 🔴 John Cornyn: 43.4% ⚪️ Undecided: 3.9% –––––––––––––––––––––––––– 📊 Key Takeaway Paxton begins Election Day above 50% and leads Cornyn by 9.3 points among likely Republican runoff voters. President Trump’s endorsement was widely known, with 87.8% aware of it. Most voters said it did not affect their vote, but among those who said it moved them, the movement broke toward Paxton: 61.7% moved toward Paxton, compared with 38.3% toward Cornyn.

Tomorrow in Texas...

Apology owed to Chip Roy. A week ago he called in a frenzy, claiming Mayes Middleton lied about his amendment to the Protect Children’s Innocence Act - that it would let Blue states keep mutilating kids by narrowing jurisdiction. Roy was right - Middleton didn't mention it would have castrated federal authority in red states too. The gist of Roy's amendment is that it narrowed jurisdiction (i.e. enforcement) to gender clinics with “direct federal funding.” (see screenshot) "Direct" being the key word since direct federal funding has legislative/legal precedent - this is federal money that goes directly to recipient (i.e. CDC, NIH, grants/awards). This would provide a carve out not only for private gender clinics but also those with “indirect” funding like Medicaid (i.e. gender clinics at major children's hospitals) - federal funds go to state and then state Medicaid agencies manage payments for services, hence, "indirect." This is a big deal because "indirect" funding applies regardless of whether its a Blue/Red state. So, if the law was passed with Roy's amendment, it would have castrated the Fed's jurisdiction (original law was written to allow broad enforcement), leaving it up to Red state legislation banning pediatric gender interventions - most of which are also neutered in terms of enforcement capacity (i.e. SB14 in Texas does not even grant Texas AG's office civil investigative authority). In my estimation, the only gender clinics Chip Roy's amendment would apply to would be if RFK opened one up at the CDC (direct federal funding) and started offloading his extra supply of T to angsty teenagers. What makes this totally insane is this was only a few months ago, December 2025 - way long after the average normie was convinced on the gender issue. Roy eventually pulled the amendment but the fact that it was even proposed is apex treachery. If he was willing to attempt a gambit like this, just imagine what else he would do as Texas AG. All those major victories from the Texas AG (i.e. $10 million TCH gender clinic settlement, big tech censorship settlements, etc) you could kiss goodbye. I bring this up because tomorrow is election day for Texas Republicans and I have an important reminder for everyone: John Cornyn will appear twice on your ballot: 1) First, in the U.S. Senate race against Ken Paxton. 2) Second, in the Texas AG's race against Mayes Middleton - but as a reincarnation manifesting as Chip Roy.

Cornyn is nothing like Tillis or Cassidy. He’ll probably lose tomorrow but if he wins, it’ll be because he’s handled himself much better than any other primaried senator or Congressman. I personally never understood the hate he gets. That said, no one is entitled to a seat so it’s not like Paxton was breaking the law by running in a primary. And “nice guy” Hunt ran in the primary too! Massie had to go. Cassidy was way out of step with his state. But if Cornyn does win, it’s just a couple of Senate votes difference between him and Paxton over this coming term.