Mike

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team