Milei English

@MAGAVoice @D0nnasue1

@John51423Steven @MAGAVoice Exactly - see AZ

@MAGAVoice We’re about to see how stolen our elections are……… if he loses.

Raise your hand if you think EVERYBODY in Los Angeles should vote for Spencer Pratt

Hear hear

The Gracchi brothers destroyed Rome's property rights in 133 BC, then wondered why their republic collapsed within a century. Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus seized private land through legislative force, redistributing it to landless citizens under the banner of "reform." They created the template for every socialist redistribution scheme that followed. Rome's wealthy families had legitimately acquired vast estates (latifundia) through conquest, purchase, and development. The land generated wealth, employed thousands, and fed the empire. The Gracchi saw inequality and decided government theft would solve it. Tiberius bypassed the Senate entirely, appealing directly to popular assemblies who voted themselves other people's property. When senators objected to this constitutional violation, Tiberius had his colleague Octavius deposed. Pure mob rule. The economic consequences arrived swiftly. Landowners stopped investing in improvements, knowing politicians could seize their property at will. Agricultural productivity declined as redistributed plots went to inexperienced farmers who lacked capital for proper cultivation. Food shortages followed. The Gracchi had broken the link between productive effort and reward, destroying incentives across the entire system. Worse than the economic damage was the political precedent. Future demagogues learned they could buy votes by promising to redistribute wealth from productive citizens to political supporters. Marius, Sulla, Pompey, and Caesar all followed the Gracchi playbook, using land redistribution to build personal armies of grateful beneficiaries. Property rights form the foundation of civilization itself. When politicians can seize private property through majority vote, you get warlords fighting over the spoils while your economy burns.

Clearly

Notice how these corrupt politicians always wanna talk about *their* experience, because they really don’t wanna talk about *your* experience…living under their failed leadership.

The Military being involved in Politics is 3rd world shit and Uncostitutionsl

Fun Fact of the Day: These Four Republicans Byron Donalds (FL-19), Wesley Hunt (TX-38), John James (MI-10), and Burgess Owens (UT-4) represent majority white congressional districts, and NOT one of them was allowed to join the Black Congressional Caucus. Are they not black enough? 🤔 I’m starting to think the democrats are being very disingenuous about all this talk of black people being unable to be elected or represented, the black vote being repressed, and the “Jim Crow 2.0” bullshit. 🤨

Sounds like Locke JOHN LOCKE the GREATEST POLITICAL PHILOSOPHER “The empirical evidence that John Locke was the greatest political philosopher is overwhelming if you value human life and happiness” The Genius of John Locke was to reject “the common good” as the goal of Government as every other philosopher had done. Instead Locke set the goal of protecting each individual’s Natural Rights as explained in the US Declaration of Independence “ That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men” Instead of “the common good”, which is inherently collectivist, vague, subject to demagoguery and treats people as sacrificial animals, i. e., Slaves, Locke set the goal of Government to be protecting the Rights of every person, in other words Freedom. Locke argued every person should be free. a FREE person owns themselves and the fruits of their labor. NOT FREE = SLAVE thus a SLAVE does not own themselves or the fruits of their labor. “The common good” rejects that you own yourself or your labor and is the primitive thought process of Tribes and early man that Marxists love to point to as their model society. youtu.be/c0bILemMkQA

Voici ma grille de lecture. Mes prémisses. Tout tient en 5 axiomes. On a enfumé l'humanité en complexifiant l'humanité. Sciences humaines, économie, philosophie politique. Des milliers de pages, des thèses, des écoles, des courants, des contre-courants. Pour aboutir à quoi ? À une bouillie où plus personne ne sait ce qui est vrai. Alors que tout tient en 5 axiomes. Lisibles par un enfant de 12 ans. Axiome 1 — Tu es propriétaire de toi-même.Ton corps, ton temps, ton esprit, ton travail. Personne d'autre. Tout ce qui contredit ça est une forme d'esclavage, même habillé en "solidarité", "redistribution" ou "intérêt général". Axiome 2 — Ce que tu produis t'appartient. Si tu es propriétaire de toi-même, tu es propriétaire de ce qui sort de toi. Ton travail, tes idées, ton capital accumulé. La propriété privée n'est pas une convention bourgeoise. C'est l'extension logique de l'axiome 1. Axiome 3 — Tu n'as pas le droit d'initier la violence. Ni physique, ni par procuration via l'État. Tu peux te défendre. Tu ne peux pas agresser. Une taxe non consentie, une réglementation qui t'empêche de produire, une expropriation "pour le bien commun" : ce sont des violences déguisées en lois. Axiome 4 — Les échanges libres sont positifs par définition. Si A et B échangent volontairement, c'est que chacun valorise ce qu'il reçoit plus que ce qu'il donne. Sinon ils ne le feraient pas. Tout échange libre crée de la valeur. Tout échange forcé en détruit. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est une tautologie. Axiome 5 — L'État de droit existe pour protéger 1, 2, 3, 4. Pas pour les violer.Le rôle légitime du droit : faire respecter les contrats, punir l'agression, protéger la propriété. Point. Tout ce qui dépasse ce périmètre est une dérive. Et toute dérive, historiquement, finit en tyrannie. C'est tout. Pas besoin de 800 pages de Piketty. Pas besoin d'un agrégé de socio. Pas besoin de Bourdieu, Habermas, Stiglitz. Ces 5 axiomes suffisent à analyser n'importe quel discours économique, politique, social. Le test est simple : quand quelqu'un parle d'économie ou de politique, vérifie si son raisonnement respecte ces 5 prémisses. S'il dit "il faut redistribuer" → il viole l'axiome 2. S'il dit "il faut réguler ce marché" → il viole l'axiome 4. S'il dit "l'État doit décider à ta place pour ton bien" → il viole l'axiome 1. S'il dit "la propriété est un vol" → il viole tout le socle. S'il contredit ces axiomes, il est en train de te pisser dans le cerveau. Peu importe son diplôme. Peu importe sa chaire. Peu importe ses 30 ans de carrière. Il te ment. Ou il se ment. L'humanité est simple. Ce sont les parasites intellectuels qui ont intérêt à te faire croire qu'elle est compliquée. Parce que tant que tu crois que c'est compliqué, tu as besoin d'eux pour te l'expliquer. Et tant que tu as besoin d'eux, ils existent.

@Aznul20 @RockChartrand Create the problem then complain about it

@RockChartrand The people trying to insist that capitalism somehow "enslaves" you are the ones who want to replace it with literal slavery.

“Debt slavery” is one of the most pathetic communist phrases imaginable because it compares voluntarily borrowing money for something you chose to buy with literal slavery. If someone loans you money and expects repayment, that isn’t oppression. It’s the recognition that other people are not your unpaid servants. And the irony is that the people promoting the term usually advocate systems where the state controls property, production, wages, and redistribution by force. So the argument becomes: voluntarily repaying a loan you agreed to is “slavery,” but forcing strangers to subsidize your debts through taxation is “justice.”

@Harrison_Jodeit @RockChartrand Perhaps but

@RockChartrand Frankly, if "slavery" just means having to pay back loans you borrow or working a job (as in "wage slavery") it really doesn't sound all that bad. If that's all "slavery" means then history has been extremely unfair to the Confederacy.

@JeffMarshalek @RockChartrand Abolish the FED

@RockChartrand There's a simple fix for this. Abolish the ability to give out loans. Then you'll see they don't care so much about the loans, just that they now still can't afford to buy the things they want nor get those same things for free, which was the point.

EVIL

Perhaps but when one group is legally allowed to counterfeit I think that makes everyone else debt slaves - see below Greatest Criminals in History In 1914 Ford autoworker made $5 a day for a yearly wage of $1250, which was the equivalent to 60 ounces of gold. 60 ounces of gold is worth $177k in 2025 dollars. The Federal Reserve are the Greatest Criminals in History. youtu.be/px4Dayn9ihk

@RockChartrand Perhaps Slavery never ended it just morphed into Socialism and debt slaves to Central Banks and Child Trafficking youtube.com/watch?v=1kKoqE…

Marxist SCUM pushing Racism Democrats crying about voting rights - what HYPOCRITES youtu.be/DillM-70uII

@brivael Equality of outcomes never work Every individual is different in skillsets, capabilities and they get rewarded accordingly Pushing equality of outcomes despite their skill levels falls flat on its face