Mr E Research

5.7K posts

Mr E Research banner
Mr E Research

Mr E Research

@MisterEResearch

Not Financial Advice

United States Katılım Ağustos 2018
3.3K Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
Nobody cares, work harder.
English
4
5
35
7.7K
Nick Timiraos
Nick Timiraos@NickTimiraos·
Goldman tries to quantify the net effect of AI both substituting for and augmenting U.S. employment. Their conclusion: AI substitution in occupations like phone operations and insurance claims administration have reduced monthly payroll gains by around -25K and raised the unemployment rate by 0.16 pp over the past year. AI augmentation in occupations including medicine and education have added +9K to monthly payrolls and lowered the unemployment rate by 0.06 pp. This nets out to a slight -16K drag on payrolls and an increase in the unemployment rate by 0.1 pp. Caveat: This exercise doesn't account for the possible benefit from either construction hiring due to data-center buildout or AI-driven productivity/income gains.
Nick Timiraos tweet media
English
21
111
569
109.1K
Alphatica
Alphatica@alphaticaio·
"Low volume rallies are suspicious." No they're not. We tested it. 22 years of SPY and QQQ data. Every day where volume dropped below 50% of the 50-day average — the quietest of the quiet. 268 episodes. Forward 10-day win rate: SPY: 70.6% QQQ: 68.2% Forward 20-day win rate: SPY: 65.4% QQQ: 69.7% 7 out of 10 low-volume days, the market was higher two weeks later. Is the edge better than just being long? No — baseline win rate is 62%, so the difference isn't statistically significant (p = 0.21). But the claim isn't that low volume is bullish. The claim is that "low volume is suspicious" and bearish. The data says the opposite. Low volume days go up at a slightly higher rate than normal days, not lower. The logic is simple: If volume is low and price isn't dropping, sellers aren't showing up. That's not a fake rally. That's a market with no supply. Path of least resistance = up. "35M in volume today. DEAD." Dead volume, alive market. That's what 22 years of data shows. $SPY $QQQ
Alphatica tweet media
English
10
12
78
10.3K
Alphatica
Alphatica@alphaticaio·
@MisterEResearch @PrognosticApex We will post them tomorrow morning. We didn’t want to overwhelm the novice reader. But we will follow-up with it tomorrow morning.
English
1
0
3
53
Alphatica
Alphatica@alphaticaio·
Great question. We tested exactly this. SPY's baseline 10-day win rate across all 5,658 trading days since 2003 is 62.0%. The market does go up over time. Low volume days: 70.6%. So you're right to flag the bias. When we ran a two-sample test comparing low-volume days against all other days: • Difference in mean 10d return: +0.32% • Welch's t-test: p = 0.21 • Bootstrap (10,000 iterations): 95% CI includes zero • Mann-Whitney U: p = 0.12 Not statistically significant. Low volume days are not meaningfully better than any random day. But that's the point of the post. The claim on FinTwit isn't "low volume is better than average," it's "low volume is bearish" and "low volume rallies are suspicious." The data shows low volume days have a *higher* win rate than baseline (70.6% vs 62.0%), even if the excess isn't statistically significant. So at worst, low volume days perform the same as any other day. At best, slightly better. Either way not bearish. $SPY $QQQ
English
1
0
7
235
The Maverick of Wall Street
The Maverick of Wall Street@TheMaverickWS·
After the Iraq war debacle, I thought we will never be duped into foreign wars again. I stand corrected. Never underestimate the stupidity of humans.
English
23
10
181
5.3K
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
The situation with AI right now is kind of like when you got your first smartphone or laptop. There was so much potential but it took you years or decades to figure out how to actually use it effectively.
Spokane, WA 🇺🇸 English
0
0
1
55
Mr E Research retweetledi
حنانیا نفتالی
حنانیا نفتالی@HananyaPersian·
فراموش نکنید که به دنیا یادآوری کنید که رژیم در ماه‌های اخیر بیش از ۴۰ هزار نفر را به قتل رسانده است. تنها جرم آن‌ها اعتراض برای آزادی بود.
فارسی
347
3.3K
7.6K
107.8K
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
Reasons why the war won't end without a full scale invasion: 1. Trump won't accept a solution where the existing regime remains in power. 2. The existing regime will not relinquish power while they are alive. 3. The regime is too decentralized to destroy with airstrikes alone. Result: invading or suffocating the entire nation using medieval siege-like tactics until it is too physically weak from starvation or dehydration to resist or negotiate.
Spokane, WA 🇺🇸 English
0
0
1
72
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
@AutismCapital He can just delay another day though. How long can they force a human shield to stand in the desert?
English
3
0
2
345
Mr E Research retweetledi
The Maverick of Wall Street
The Maverick of Wall Street@TheMaverickWS·
Heard on the street: Tech companies are trying to fast track their IPO's to dump on moronic mom and pop investors before the economy crashes
English
22
23
217
7.9K
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
@GaaOptions Market makers are almost always delta neutral. That's there job. They sell puts, they short stock to hedge. They never lose.
English
0
0
0
22
Mr E Research
Mr E Research@MisterEResearch·
Iran will not stop until every single one of their decentralized command zones is systematically dismantled. Even then there will be Iranians hiding in the desert waiting like the Japanese after WWII. Theocratic regimes do not surrender. The only thing crazier than a religious person is a group of religious people.
Spokane, WA 🇺🇸 English
0
0
2
62