Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Approaching The Cup is done! Sylvan Bookworks is the publisher (handmade books).
Snubstack link below for more details.
English
Nathan Woods
4.6K posts
Nathan Woods
@MisterW00
Writes @ https://t.co/BQk2wTz3wT.
PA Katılım Nisan 2021
531 Takip Edilen530 Takipçiler
Nathan Woods retweetledi
@ColeyMick Messi has bathed thousands of babies so something like this was bound to happen
English
You can actually see the moment Anderson realizes that Jude screwed up bad
Vusi.Mz🦉🇿🇦🇫🇷@YouDunnoVusi
It was at this point Messi realised he had to lock in😭😭😭😭
English
Yeah Bellingham the Madridista lost England the game
Mûriëlo@LordMurielo
How it started / How it ended
English
Nathan Woods retweetledi
Nathan Woods retweetledi
Gen Alpha will be a massive vibe shift, imo.
Born to the least neurotic millennials, into the chaos of covid and demographic collapse, there's a chance they'll be the first generation with a truly American level of risk tolerance in a century. Dystopian techno cowboys.
English
@MourningTalk Honestly, I've barely read him.
Blake was my first master. I don't know enough about Jung, but I think Blake would have nothing but scorn for his Active Imagination, as counterintuitive as that may seem.
English
I support this 100%
Just want to point out the phrase "We could tell"
"We" should start planning for a time when no one can
Susannah Black Roberts@suzania
We once again got a submission to Plough which the author had run through an LLM as (his terms) "a proofread and polish." We could tell, and although the piece was something we would have loved to publish, we cannot and will not accept pieces which use AI at any stage.
English
@MourningTalk I read, or perhaps imagined I read, that Jung dismissed Blake in large part because he consciously created his own mythos in a systematic manner, which didn't fit into Jung's models.
English
@MisterW00 Yeah briefly. Some of Blake’s writings are consistent with Jung’s “active imagination.” I think there were resonances between them but not perfect.
English
@MourningTalk He did, right? Briefly?
My understanding is he didn't jive with Blake.
English
@MisterW00 I’m actually fairly new to the world of academic papers but I’ve written a couple now and I have to ask things like “did Carl Jung ever write explicitly about the works of William Blake?” Then I have to find out if its answer is correct. But it’s good for that.
English
Nathan Woods retweetledi
@MourningTalk I use it almost entirely because Google is useless.
English
@MisterW00 The most I would use AI for is as the most coarse research tool. But everything it says has to be confirmed because it lies.
English
I'm coup coup for coco puffs
Shadow of Ezra@ShadowofEzra
Lindsey Graham's sister, Darline Graham, has now officially been sworn in to take her brother's place as a U.S. senator from South Carolina. She is expected to support Section 219, which would merge the United States military with the Israeli military.
English
When reading about Owen Barfield’s evolution unconsciousness, it is easy to forget the fact that Barfield believed our future consciousness will be better than any we have experienced in the past. We are experiencing its birth pains.
English
@nguyenhdi I would like to say Ben Jonson for the poetry in his plays, but he has not held the stage. Wilde?
English
A recent conversation makes me wanna ask #BookTwitter: Who's the greatest English playwright after Shakespeare?
& who's your favourite?
Why?
English
Ultimately, things like Barfield's evolution of consciousness or McGilchrist's hemispheric drift provide a far more satisfying account of modernity's genealogy than this stuff. Nietzsche, Scheler, Sombart, Weber, too. These thinkers encompass an understanding that philosophical tendencies shape history without being autistic or myopic and ascribing entire historical processes to people making arcane metaphysical errors.
Defiant Ghost@TheDefiantGhost
Jay Dyer on Tucker Carlson: How Medieval Philosophy Nominalism created modern transgender ideology: “Nominalism is the idea that there are only names to things, not essences. So there’s no human nature. No dog nature. The ancient world believed things have real essences. Words described metaphysical reality. Occam started denying that. It influenced Luther. Then Hume, Kant, the Enlightenment… If things don’t have essences, then they don’t have genders objectively — everything is just a name. So I can just name myself he, him, Zer, Z. That’s the logical train from medieval philosophy to postmodern gender ideology. It flies in the face of lived experience. You basically have to be indoctrinated to believe it.”
English
Nathan Woods retweetledi
@WallaceMack_ @MisterW00 Reviewbrah documented the decline of America through fast food reviews
English
