Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar

2.9K posts

Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar banner
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar

Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar

@MoarPart

Consultant/educator. All problems have solutions. Everything is connected to everything else. Book: 'Technology & Engineering Strategies' (Routledge, 2025).

UK, North West England Katılım Aralık 2017
232 Takip Edilen129 Takipçiler
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@faisalislam There are an unquantifiable number of people making just a few thousand every year from home-based 'side hustles' (especially crafts-based) who feel obliged to take card payments from customers. They were previously cash-only businesses.
English
0
0
0
51
Faisal Islam
Faisal Islam@faisalislam·
This is a very interesting observation on the UK from a significant Silicon Valley tech CEO… There’s the specific issue about the accuracy of stats… in this case potentially understating some better economic news There’s a more general separate issue in economics about the timeliness of official economic numbers compared with the real time mountain of rich data being processed by tech companies. Worth a read.
Patrick Collison@patrickc

It's been interesting and puzzling to witness the problems with accuracy in UK economic statistics over the past few years. (See the links in the next tweet for more.) It seems that the Office for National Statistics, ONS, now struggles to effectively measure basic figures such as employment, trade, and inflation. This resulted in a quite scathing government report published last summer, where Robert Devereux, a former permanent secretary, concluded that "most of the well-publicised problems with core economic statistics are the consequence of ONS’s own performance." There's a lot of discussion about the travails facing the UK these days (including this big piece in The Atlantic a few weeks ago[1]), and the problems with the ONS feel like an unsettling microcosm of diffuse decline in broader institutional competence. Anyhow: at Stripe, we became curious about the UK's published entrepreneurship data. While we observe a boom in many parts of the world, official figures don't show a similar increase in the UK. In the latest Stripe Economics post, we dug into the data, and, as far as we can tell, the official figures are probably misleading. The good and the bad news (mostly good, I think!) is that the UK is almost certainly witnessing an unmeasured boom in entrepreneurship: stripeeconomics.com/p/is-the-uk-mi… UK-specific issues aside, I suspect that this measurement question is illustrative of forthcoming econometric challenges. Keeping the world's macro indicators up-to-date in response to the faster-than-usual changes wrought by AI will be both increasingly difficult and increasingly important in the coming years. [1] theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/…

English
19
27
177
102.3K
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast@IsntWorkingPod·
Posted this 6 months ago... and standing by it!
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast@IsntWorkingPod

@CharlotteCGill Sadly concluding that the UK charity sector will collapse before it fixes itself. It's run by activists, full of group think, no free speech and haemorrhaging public trust - yet more self-righteous than ever. A sector that deserves to survive would be panicking by now.

English
7
31
217
6.8K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
There is an overdue national debate to be had about Britain’s bloated charity sector. The subject is a sacred cow, because any reform will create both winners and losers, and no reformer wants to be accused of denying support to babies, cute animals, or the disabled. But that’s what it will take to put the whole sector back on an even footing. The original topic of this thread is one symptom of a much wider malaise.
English
0
0
0
12
Eleanor Greene
Eleanor Greene@elniedunne·
@MoarPart @IsntWorkingPod Look up how many charities are dormant (income of zero) The Charity Sector needs to be blitzed. Bring in £50 annual filing fees to properly fund the commission Strike off non compliant charities Force a LOT of mergers
English
1
0
1
26
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast@IsntWorkingPod·
@MoarPart No expert on their finances but sending a 'the grown-ups have all left!' bat signal are: Women's Institute, Scope, Mind, Girlguiding, Volunteering Matters. Too big to fail for now but in dire shape: Oxfam, Macmillan, NSPCC, National Trust. Oh and all the LGBT+ ones, obvs.
English
2
0
14
187
Josh Hunt
Josh Hunt@Bouje99·
@MoarPart @MFordFuture @NewYorker @elonmusk @finkd In the next few years? Nope. In 10-15 years I’ll be somewhat surprised if humanoid robots aren’t in , say, 10-20% of homes doing laundry and dishes And maybe some other chores. It is bound to happen.
English
1
0
0
32
Martin Ford
Martin Ford@MFordFuture·
Terrific article by Stephen Witt in the @NewYorker about progress in humanoid robotics. I'd be happy to be wrong, but I fear the people making big investments in building humanoids (including @elonmusk) are making the same mistake that Zuckerberg (@finkd) made with his investments in VR and the metaverse: Someday it will be huge--but just not yet. However, non-humanoid robots in more controlled environments like warehouses and factories are continuing to become more capable and dexterous and will have a significant impact on jobs. Amazon, for example, has already declared its intention to scale the business via efficiency improvements (#AI and #robotics) rather than hiring large numbers of new workers. I cover all this in more depth in the new edition of my book "Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future." (Link to article in the reply) #RiseoftheRobots
Martin Ford tweet media
English
10
18
43
10.8K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@whippletom The engineering, particularly controlling the plasma (analogous to herding demented cats), is incredibly hard. AI may eventually solve this, but it’s a huge challenge for mere humans.
English
0
0
2
807
Tom Whipple
Tom Whipple@whippletom·
When I chat to people about fusion (the ones who don't say, "it's 30 years away and was 30 years away 30 years ago" then chortle), they say the science is done, it's just an engineering problem - and it'll be solved. If true, why aren't we brute forcing it? What am I missing?
English
33
0
43
23.3K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@ron_eisele After WWII, Mantz reportedly paid scrap value for 400 surplus US military aircraft. In a smart move, he drained the unused fuel from their wings and sold it to achieve a net profit. At that moment, he still owned 400 airworthy machines: the largest private air force in the world.
English
3
1
8
311
Ron Eisele
Ron Eisele@ron_eisele·
8 July 1965. Death of Albert Paul Mantz (b.2 August 1903), American noted air racing pilot and movie stunt pilot, while flying the very unusual aircraft (Tallmantz Phoenix P-1) for the movie 'The Flight of the Phoenix'.
Ron Eisele tweet media
English
7
18
143
11.7K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
A reminder that it's wise to invest in tunnels because they constitute a type of fixed, resilient infrastructure, enabling a lengthy return on investment (ROI). This partly explains the appeal of urban underground rail networks, which the UK refuses to construct in most of its major cities. Norway greenlights world’s first full-scale ship tunnel eandt.theiet.org/2026/06/18/nor…
English
0
0
0
51
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
I call it 'the price of free'. From the very outset, the email infrastructure was free to use. This created an overwhelming reliance upon email, including billions of junk messages. Sometimes it's better to pay for things. Just 10p per message would make everyone think twice before sending. It would also kill the junk mail industry. £1 per message is probably optimal. But it will never happen. That horse bolted decades ago.🐎
English
0
0
2
145
Rory Sutherland
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland·
The entire tech world has sold people a plausible fiction: that digitising everything will inevitably make it better, and that money spent on tech magically does not incur an opportunity cost.
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland

This is inarguably true. Email has made communication worse and decision-making inordinately slower and more bureaucratic. Yet nobody ever talks about it. yourleadgeneration.co.uk/2026/06/14/why…

Sundridge, South East 🇬🇧 English
36
46
302
41.3K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@rorysutherland It’s partly the cult of outsourcing, although the underlying reasons for this transport provision need to be fully understood, with the aim of finding alternatives.
English
0
0
2
484
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@AndyBounds @FT Yes. It does seem inconceivable that the UK could rejoin the EU without a lot of pushback from some members. It would be at least a decade-long process. Britain needs to negotiate from a position of strength, whereas we currently resemble a wounded animal.
English
0
1
1
400
Andrew Bounds
Andrew Bounds@AndyBounds·
UK would be blocked from rejoining ‘wounded’ EU, says Jean-Claude Juncker . Former commission president says no U.K. PM would be brave enough to take on Euro sceptic media and MPs via @FT as.ft.com/r/d9087dd8-600…
English
6
13
32
6.5K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar retweetledi
Engineering Dept
Engineering Dept@Cambridge_Eng·
📢 @ai_cam_mission's Local Gov #AI Accelerator pairs Cambridge researchers with local #councils to develop AI solutions that deliver tangible public value, from automating housing data collection to detecting fly-tipping using cameras on refuse vehicles eng.cam.ac.uk/news/universit…
English
1
7
4
1.6K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@rorysutherland They also know which numbers are being used by scammers, yet they presumably earn too much money from them to bother intervening on behalf of their majority customer base.
English
0
0
3
560
Rory Sutherland
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland·
One thing that confuses me here. Mobile phone networks presumably have tons of data on the precise locations where motorists and train passengers lose signal and are cut-off. Yet nothing ever improves.
Sundridge, South East 🇬🇧 English
66
23
543
121.2K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
@DamianPudner Yes. And sadly many of these great people choose not to enter politics or public service. Deterrents are likely to be low wages, media intrusion and insults. So why bother?
English
0
0
2
88
Damian Pudner
Damian Pudner@DamianPudner·
The last week has reminded me that Britain has outstanding people. Over lunches, pints & dinners I've had the privilege of spending time with editors, City economists, entrepreneurs & commentators. All serious about the UK's future. You know who you are, thank u for your insight.
English
3
0
17
1.8K
Peter (sometimes P.J.) Moar
Yes. There is a yawning gap between modelled human behaviour and real-world chaos. In addition to families with children, there are: -People sitting in the wrong seats (deliberately or in error); -People looking for overhead storage space; -Late arrivals at the gate; -Slow movers and fast movers. Humans are not machine components. Current practices cannot be significantly improved.
English
0
0
0
62