MB

534 posts

MB

MB

@MoiraBates11

Katılım Ağustos 2022
5 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
MB
MB@MoiraBates11·
@Keir_Starmer Is that right? Why have they thrown you out, then?
English
0
0
0
1
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
Change promised by a Labour government. Change delivered by a Labour government.
English
8.4K
1K
6.4K
593.8K
NATHAN
NATHAN@mbga_uk·
@ZackPolanski You don't even support England. You support Terrorists & Extremists... Hypocrite..
NATHAN tweet media
English
1
0
3
125
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
Hey Jude!!!!! 🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
English
357
387
9.6K
168.6K
Oscar
Oscar@Oscarrussell123·
@ZackPolanski Don’t think he likes lunatic lefties!
Oscar tweet media
English
4
1
76
2.8K
Tom Niedrich
Tom Niedrich@tomniedrich·
@Martina It's a legitimate FIFA rules option. Trump Derangement Syndrome demands that you'll blame Trump for everything, but he cannot affect FIFA regulations, which exist. fifa.com/en/tournaments…
English
25
1
27
2.9K
MB retweetledi
FactOrFiction99
FactOrFiction99@Gail654353·
@StephenM Laying it on a little thick even for you. You are a cartoon.
FactOrFiction99 tweet media
English
36
76
806
19.5K
MB
MB@MoiraBates11·
@StephenM Goodness me. Are you sick?
English
0
0
0
3
Stephen Miller
Stephen Miller@StephenM·
It is impossible to review the events of the last decade and conclude that it is anything other than divine providence that Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States on the year of America 250, July 4th, 2026.
English
8.9K
13.7K
89.6K
2.7M
MB
MB@MoiraBates11·
@caton_duane @SamCKx There's no one like the arch grifter Farage. Lock him up
English
0
0
0
12
Duane
Duane@caton_duane·
@SamCKx You all think the other politicians and political parties are any different? Really? There are very few people in parliament and politics that are honorable these days. That's the majority view.
GIF
English
17
0
14
1.7K
Sam
Sam@SamCKx·
The more I dig, the more I realise that Nigel Farage is literally done for. It's over for him. The £5 million bung is big enough to take the entire Reform movement down and possibly land Nigel in jail. 1) The fact the donation was made BEFORE Nigel was MP is absolutely irrelevant. Parliamentary Code of Conduct requires all receipts for the full 12 months before election. Nigel receiving his bung just a few days before he announced his candidacy makes it so much worse, not better. 2) "Category 5: Gifts and benefits from sources outside the UK - THRESHOLD FOR REGISTRATION Section 39. Members must register, subject to the paragraphs below, any gifts or benefits with a value of over £300 which they receive from a source outside the UK." Nigel argues this was 'purely personal' but the Code refers to partners or families when it comes to personal gifts... this takes us to the next issue... 3) Christopher Harborne has a long track record of making SUBSTANTIAL political contributions to Nigel's parties, first to The Brexit Party, and later to Reform. He is a POLITICAL DONOR - any "gift" he made to Farage CANNOT be argued as personal or without political context due to this track record. 4) Using his platform as an MP, Nigel went on to promote 2 companies in which Christopher Harborne holds $ billions in stock - Nigel NEVER publicly endorsed or mentioned these companies prior to the "gift". Nigel also began actively pushing for policy that would directly interest Christopher Harborne and his business affairs. These were not interests that any could argue could possibly be of interest to his constituents - deregulation of crypto, and lowering of taxes on crypto gains. Nigel spent a substantial amount of time and effort pushing these policies. It is beyond a doubt that this is the biggest breach of Parliamentary Code of Conduct rules in relation to donations in parliamentary history. But even more concerning for Nigel will be that if it can be proven he was secretly incentivised to use his public office to push for policies to support a wealthy donor, then he should very likely face a criminal probe for corruption and bribery. I suspect Harborne might also be exposed to this. The United Kingdom and Thailand have a bilateral extradition treaty. Maximum prison sentences of up to 10 years for the offence. This is not going to go away.
English
924
2.8K
10.1K
563.3K
MB
MB@MoiraBates11·
@Keir_Starmer Why are you posting this today?
English
0
0
0
2
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
Big global issues, that have a real impact back at home - that’s what these summits are all about.
English
4.6K
363
2.1K
429K
Reform UK Exposed 🇬🇧
Reform UK Exposed 🇬🇧@reformexposed·
Reform UK Councillors Gone Since The Local Elections: Updated Since Local elections (less than a week): ➡️ Lost Seat Mike Morris Clarence Mitchell Alan Cook Mark Shooter Kira Gabbert ➡️ Resigned Daniel Devaney Stuart Prior Jay Cooper Ashley Monk Jo Monk ➡️ Defected Nick Farmer ➡️ Suspended Ben Rowe Glenn Gibbins Paul Heyward
English
106
1.3K
3.5K
168.4K
Kevin Maguire
Kevin Maguire@Kevin_Maguire·
The people have spoken and it is Starmergeddon for Labour and the and the end of traditional two party politics with the Conservatives also taking a kicking. The Greens eating Labour’s lunch on the Left is powering Reform’s rise on the Hard Right in fractured politics.
English
535
101
533
74.9K
Lady Laura
Lady Laura@lauran1902·
@frankbrunoboxer Please stop saying people ‘passed’. They die. Sad but the truth. It is highly offensive to ignore the painful reality by making it sound like a transition to Neverland. Face the truth.
English
350
3
86
23.1K
Frank Bruno MBE 🇬🇧
Frank Bruno MBE 🇬🇧@frankbrunoboxer·
It is with a heavy heart that I write this. I have just learned of the passing of Stanley Batten. You may remember I asked people for financial help towards a last holiday then Birthday cards for his Birthday. I have been asked by the family to thank you again for your generosity and those of you that sent cards, thank you so much. I am sure you will join me in wishing sincere condolences to his family. RIP Stanley.
Frank Bruno MBE 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
1.2K
1K
17.2K
419.9K
MB retweetledi
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
This is outrageous from the BBC. What's your excuse, @bbcpress? You're supposed to answer to us, the licence payers. So how can you excuse these outrageous violations of journalistic standards?
Paul Holden@pauleholden

PAUL HOLDEN STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO INTERVIEW WITH JOSH SIMONS ON BBC NEWSCAST Yesterday, BBC Newscast published a lengthy, forty-minute interview with former Cabinet Minister Josh Simons MP. The interview addressed how Simons, as a director of @LabourTogether, had appointed a firm called APCO Worldwide to investigate me and my colleagues. I was not told by the BBC ahead of the broadcast that the episode was being recorded or aired. I was not approached to respond to the lengthy comments made about me or the small anti-corruption organisation, @ShadowWorldInv1 , that I run with my colleague @andrewfeinstein. Andrew, who is also repeatedly mentioned, was also not approached for comment. I only found out last night, when a friend texted me, that the person who hired a major multinational reputation management firm that produced a despicable and defamatory report on me and my colleagues, and who reported me on the basis of these false and defamatory reports to the UK’s security services, was being given forty minutes to give his version of events on a major podcast published by our national broadcaster. To be clear, the BBC has NEVER - not once - approached me to comment on a story that is, ultimately, about me, my investigations, my family and my colleagues. They did not approach me when the story first broke, and they did not approach me for this episode. If the BBC had done so, I would have raised several issues with the way in which matters related to me were discussed. For example, Simons repeatedly stated in the interview that he instructed APCO to investigate whether my reporting or sourcing derived from a ‘hack’ of the Electoral Commission. The word ‘hack’ is used eight times in the interview. At no time was it acknowledged in this discussion that this allegation – that I might have received hacked materials – is entirely false, and I have repeatedly proven it to be false. Following the broadcast, I contacted the BBC to complain and to raise serious issues with the broadcast. I was contacted by the Newscast editor, Sam Bonham, to say the BBC would update the Newscast episode and further reporting to reflect some of my concerns. This has not yet happened with regards to the podcast, although I note some online reporting finally reflects a very small and limited sampling of my comments. I will wait to see if amendments and updates will follow. If they do not, I will be escalating this matter to OFCOM. In the interim, I have decided to share the full statement I provided to the BBC, which is produced below: I would like to put certain things on the record. First, my reporting on Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney was entirely factually accurate and based on impeccable, legal sourcing. My sourcing has been reviewed by multiple media outlets, who confirmed the authenticity and legal provenance of my sources. Revelations based on my book, The Fraud, has subsequently been covered widely across the mainstream media, including in multiple front-page scoops, in outlets such as The Times, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The National and ITV. The stories I produced in 2023 and 2024, and which prompted Labour Together's investigation into me, were subject to extensive editorial and legal checks. They were, I believe, entirely accurate reporting on matters of profound public interest, which included raising concerns about the character of powerful individuals like Morgan McSweeney. Considering the recent Mandelson affair, I believe I have been entirely vindicated in attempting to alert the public about McSweeney's past, including how McSweeney made use of £700,000 in funding that he unlawfully failed to declare to the Electoral Commission to procure power and influence for himself and Sir Keir Starmer. Second, Josh Simons states that he never intended for APCO Worldwide to investigate me or my journalistic colleagues. However, a copy of the contract between APCO Worldwide and Labour Together, addressed to Simons, has now been published. The contract sets out a scope of work written in plain English. It states that APCO will 'investigate the sourcing, funding, origins of a Sunday Times article as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi.' The contract then states that the aim of the APCO investigation will be to 'provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together.' The contract then sets out a range of potentially invasive investigative methods that will be used to generate this 'package', including 'financial investigations' and 'human intelligence investigations.' I provide the full text of this contract below. This contract is clear. APCO were hired to investigate me to produce materials that would 'proactively undermine' my factually accurate, public interest reporting. They would use a range of investigative techniques to do so. APCO then did exactly as was suggested in the contract, using these investigative methods to "investigate" me. This investigation has caused me and my family significant anxiety and distress. Third, Josh Simons was provided with a report called Operation Cannon. It is the result of a lengthy investigation into me and my colleagues by APCO Worldwide. I have seen a copy of this report. It makes a series of extremely defamatory and utterly false allegations against me. It identifies my home address and sets out private information about my family. I cannot express how profoundly shocking, outrageous and defamatory this report truly is. Simons may claim he never intended for APCO to investigate me, but on receipt of this despicable report, he then chose to use it. He submitted sections of the report to the National Cyber Security Centre to convince them to investigate me. The Guardian has published the email correspondence in which Simons repeated some of the substance of the allegations in the APCO reports. Fourth, multiple media freedom advocacy organisations, including the NUJ, have strongly criticised the APCO investigation and these related matters. They have all, to my mind correctly, strongly criticised Labour Together and APCO for investigating journalists producing factually accurate reporting in the public interest. Finally, I am still reviewing the Newscast interview. I will be responding in due course and I hope that the BBC will, this time, give me the platform to set out what really happened and why. Text of Contract Between Labour Together and APCO Worldwide, addressed to Josh Simons Dear Mr Simons We are pleased that you have selected APCO Worldwide Limited (“APCO”) to provide the following scope of work (“services”) during Term: APCO will devise a concise strategy to aid Labour Together. APCO will investigate the sourcing, funding and origins of a Sunday Times article about Labour Together, as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi – to establish who and what are behind the coordinated attacks on Labour Together. The approach should provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up for use in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together. The material can also inform any future legal strategy that Labour Together might wish to pursue against any of these parties. The work will include: • Open Source Investigations (OSINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Human Intelligence Investigation (HUMINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Financial Investigation: Forensic Accounting Focus • Digital Forensics Investigation: Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Stakeholder Outreach • Media Packaging and Dissemination

English
19
325
1.2K
41.3K
MB retweetledi
Kalvexa
Kalvexa@StunnedD1·
@Keir_Starmer This is what nations that don't want to be dragged into the war in the Middle East do👇.
English
2
92
664
20.3K
MB
MB@MoiraBates11·
@Keir_Starmer Hahaha hahaha ha ha ha hahaha 😮😂😂🤣🤣 ha hahaha hahahaha ha ha ha haha 😂😂
Filipino
0
0
0
3
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
I will always make decisions that are in the national interest. It’s why we aren’t getting dragged into the Middle East conflict, and why we are fighting to protect your living standards. And while opposition parties have responded by dividing communities, we respond with hope and pride. Pride in our communities, and the hope of a country that’s better for our children. That’s what we’re fighting for. Vote Labour on Thursday 7 May.
English
16.9K
2.1K
20.4K
4.2M
MB retweetledi
Craig Murray
Craig Murray@CraigMurrayOrg·
"For the first time in centuries" the Israeli authorities stopped the Roman Catholic cardinal from performing mass on Palm Sunday at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. In hundreds of years of Muslim rule this never happened. I really want to hear Christian zionists now.
Michael Haynes 🇻🇦@MLJHaynes

JUST IN: Israeli Police prevented Cardinal Pizzaballa from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre today, as he went to say Mass. @LPJerusalem calls it a “grave precedent” which “constitutes a manifestly unreasonable and grossly disproportionate measure.” Full statement from @LPJerusalem below —— Joint Press Release The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Custody of the Holy Land Holy City of Jerusalem Palm Sunday, 29 March 2026 This morning, the Israeli Police prevented the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, His Beatitude Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, Head of the Catholic Church in the Holy Land, together with the Custos of the Holy Land, the Most Reverend Fr. Francesco Ielpo, OFM, the official Guardian of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, as they made their way to celebrate the Palm Sunday Mass. The two were stopped en route, while proceeding privately and without any characteristics of a procession or ceremonial act, and were compelled to turn back. As a result, and for the first time in centuries, the Heads of the Church were prevented from celebrating the Palm Sunday Mass at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. This incident is a grave precedent,and disregard the sensibilities of billions of people around the world who, during this week, look to Jerusalem. The Heads of the Churches have acted with full responsibility and, since the outset of the war, have complied with all imposed restrictions: public gatherings were cancelled, attendance was prohibited, and arrangements were made to broadcast the celebrations to hundreds of millions of faithful worldwide, who, during these days of Easter, turn their eyes to Jerusalem and to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Preventing the entry of the Cardinal and the Custos, who bear the highest ecclesiastical responsibility for the Catholic Church and the Holy Places, constitutes a manifestly unreasonable and grossly disproportionate measure. This hasty and fundamentally flawed decision, tainted by improper considerations, represents an extreme departure from basic principles of reasonableness, freedom of worship, and respect for the Status Quo. The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Custody of the Holy Land express their profound sorrow to the Christian faithful in the Holy Land and throughout the world that prayer on one of the most sacred days of the Christian calendar has thus been prevented.

English
690
12.6K
30.8K
731K