morty

@rabbi_rabbit69 @MIQS82046556 @I_Find_Antis dumbest question ive ever seen. Ppl who watches loli or whatever the content is can still recognize fiction and fantasiy, we dont hallucinate, fantasize anything that we see irl as similar to fiction

@MIQS82046556 @I_Find_Antis Do you go out of your way to see your mother or your sister in sexualized outfits/situations? Because that’s gross if you do

@WLKER66 see thats why no one should immediately trusts one side, the info might be biased, moral framing or misinfo

Read the Kiwifarms thread. It tried to link Mimi’s online persona based on someone having a similar username to an eBay account? I might have been wrong this whole time. I’ll make a thread seeing what weak points I can criticise, maybe Kiwifarms IS making some shit up

@WLKER66 meh idk, its just leaks from one side and forth while we havent actually known who is the real person behind that name is unless the police announce the identity. Atp, just stay neutral until more news show up

And no, this doesn't mean that the UK is right in enforcing censorship either - They arrested Jordan over the drawings, with the other shit being discovered thanks to Kiwifarms. The UK police didn't know about this, hence why they left Jordan on a bail.

I retire my defenses towards Mimi Yanagi, who turns out wasn't even a woman, but a man going by Jordan who did some heinous fucking shit. While I loathe the UK government for arresting people over fiction, they should've arrested Jordan anyway for the other shit he did

*sigh* Imagine trying to call me out for being a lolicon but having loli OCs. I love hypocrites.

@Sirikamiloli ppl have traumas but using it to weaponize to blame on an entire community is apperently isnt a good person either with bad faith

For the record: I have never downplayed any traumatic experience that victims have gone through. I’m sorry for what happened to you, but you can’t use your trauma—in this case, an anecdotal experience—to prove that a community is this or that. Just because you had to go through it doesn’t mean everyone is like that or that they will be soon. And mind you, that doesn’t mean I don’t care about real victims. I can dismiss anecdotal evidence, but I can also understand the pain and hope everything works out perfectly for you. Another thing: I don’t condone people who insult or mock these victims for expressing their trauma, saying it’s fake, or calling them “the raped.” I have no control over those people, but at least you won’t see that coming from ME.

@FawntheDawn @ProficFicus doesnt work the same

@ProficFicus "its not child abuse material!" ??? also epsteins private jet that transported children was dubbed "Lolicon express"

There's no fucking wat they're using a PEDOPHILE to try and make their point... This has to be satire. He jests, surely.

@Sirikamiloli its always the troonie and the pronounce said everything 😭

First lovely dm

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli JUST DROP IT OR STFU, I DONT BELIEVE IN SHIT TALKS

@Mortybarb @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Ofc u wanna see it nonce

Loli content by itself does not increase risk

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli WHERE THE FUCK IS IT, SHIT TALK? ALL I READ FROM THE POST IS FROM A LEAK OF KIWI FARMS REAVEALING IDENITY?

@Mortybarb @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Well there was a drawing BASED OF A REAL LIFE CHILD YOU FUCKING DEGEN

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Basically of happened of what? Not able to comprehend one is drawing fictional while one is tracing photo of children therefore saying both are bad becuz they all draw cp fucking imbecile????

@Mortybarb @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Cause thats basicly what happend you dense mf

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli then again why did u compare her to shadman u ignorant, thats clearly a fucking orange and apple comparison

@Mortybarb @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli When the fuck did i even say could you dumb fucking bitch

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli She "could" is a not even an accurate way to compare her to shadman. She has no history of interaction or grooming minors therefore u cant affirm that she has such tendenies. On the contrary, shadman has everything to say he's very into obsession of real minors

@Mortybarb @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Cause with the new alligations against mimi “she” done the exact same thing/consumed something based off one of the underaged actors from lazy town which is highly disturbing

@transfemdolly @acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli why are u comparing an vile artist who actually used photos of celebrity's kid to draw to a vtuber who actually made a character of her own?

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli No but basically did what shadman did

@TheNumber1Ace @AI_EmeraldApple Hey what about the Chirstopher Handley case, wasnt that he was charged with possession of cpwith purely only imported manga that police found to be very obscene?

@AI_EmeraldApple There was already a case like this in 2008, United States v. Whorley. They decided that loli porn fell under 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which was not protected under the First Amendment. Safe for work loli art is protected under the First Amendment.

Mimi Yanagi update... and an unpopular take. Various people have been dropping evidence on Kiwifarms, Reddit, The Virtual Asylum, and here on X of disturbing new information. The person was not an artist or a VTuber in the normal sense, but was a transgender communist by the name of Jordan Williams. The person commissioned art from various artists on FurAffinity, Pixiv, Baraag, Deviant Art, and VGen. Specifically, Jordan paid Imeoowto about $200 to make the rigged Vtuber model. Jordan was the client and not the creator of these artworks and drawings. Most of the artists he commissioned from are unnamed or anonymous... not tied to any known artist. The drawings contained extreme fe****es, and themes... like b******ity, multi p********tion, ga******gs, depicting this character and others in every combination of these disgusting scenarios possible. Is it gross? Yes. Is it offensive? Yes. Is it obscene? Yes. Is it evil? Yes. It's something I'd rather not see or be exposed to. Based on what is uncovered so far, no real children, no photos, no actual victims, no real animals, just illustrations. The worst one is the LazyTown Stephanie art, which is based on an animated character design and not from the actual child actress. Any association with real children appears to be a misattribution to artists who did "shadman" style art, and no actual real children were involved in the production of the materials. If that changes ill update it, but so far I don't see anything connected to real victims. That said, the person is likely to be a real pedophile, someone who is attracted to real children, by his saying it's a sub for CSAM and by the evidence uncovered. But "likely" is not a criminally prosecutable bar that holds up in court unless you are in the UK. This kind of "art" is perfectly legal in Japan, and one would assume, because of that, child SA must be rampant. The UK claims that these kinds of materials can normalize pedophilic ideation and be used in grooming, but without any backing based on real data. Instead, Japan is one of the safest countries in the world, while the UK is one of the least safe, where sex crimes are anywhere from 10x to over 50x Japan's rate. Here is the unpopular take... Based on the UK's law, I knew to some extent that this was likely the nature of the artwork in question. They don't arrest you for just the run-of-the-mill lolicon illustration. Despite all that, it is still a waste of money, time, and effort... all a symbolic effort to protect the kids, while the actual victims in the UK, being r***ed, get ignored. Even if it's absolutely disgusting, it is still in the 'thought crime' category, and it's a slippery slope. It's this kind of issue that is why the UK is in the quandary it is right now with hate speech laws, online monitoring of speech, and the Online Safety Act. Places like the US are more resilient when it comes to offensive political speech because the law in the states clearly distinguishes between fiction and reality. The US's First Amendment was crafted precisely because of the UK's tendency towards tyrannical framing of opinions and political speech. We shouldn't decide what is allowed and not allowed based on disgust, because if that becomes normalized, the First Amendment is no more.

@ChudKiller9000 @berserker144 ight, expect from a moral grandstander who has psychosis over a drawing and imgine it like real kids

@Mortybarb @berserker144 "You don't like pedophiles you're a moralfag" Nothing to expect from a retarded third worlder

Y’all never call out those death threats until someone like me points it out or until it’s too late like that letter being sent through his mail. You actively want his death to happen with how often you dehumanize him. You just won’t say it cause of optics

@Kira2259415 @berserker144 stfu moral chud

@berserker144 Shut up pedo

@Hideo_Fufujima whoever uses this as a fucking argument should really have brain check to see if there is a lump of tumour inside

This version is better

@KyuunSai @Michael75364462 *correlation =/= causation

@KyuunSai @Michael75364462 u brought a study that includes drawings are part of vcsam to prove that pedos associate mainly with drawings? Well here's a clarification: police uses lolis as a secondary evidence to fortify the convict who actually has real csam before. Loli isnt the main cause

Literally nobody is treating them as real people. They're fictional characters. The question is why do you LOVE to get off to FICTIONAL CHILDREN being sexually abused? Why are you so obsessed with this niche? Why naked child-coded characters in particular? 🤔