Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️

1.7K posts

Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️ banner
Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️

Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️

@MostlyData_

PhD in Physics - Cosmology - Quant. Team Lead @Bitwise Onchain Solutions

Katılım Nisan 2013
1.4K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Brian
Brian@brian_smith_0·
@minnus Will be interesting to rerun this in a week with maker priority changes captured
English
3
0
11
381
Matthias Schmitz
Matthias Schmitz@StakingMatthias·
Highest IBRL score among the top 10 highest-staked Solana validators: Staking Facilities Built through long-term focus on reliability and steady improvements If you care about Solana’s future, it matters who you stake with ibrl.wtf
Matthias Schmitz tweet media
English
1
5
29
1.3K
Sam Schubert
Sam Schubert@minnus·
A better oracle update placement chart, highlighting the lack of uniformity across Solana block builders. For each propAMM update, we measure where it lands in the block as: tx index / total txs in block Then bucket the result into 5% slices.
Sam Schubert tweet media
Sam Schubert@minnus

Data we collected earlier this year also shows how oracle updates vary greatly from scheduler to scheduler. Validators run a mix of schedulers, so maker transactions (oracle updates) land at unpredictable positions across blocks. Prop AMMs respond by either spamming multiple copies of every update or quoting defensively wide to absorb being picked off by takers. @jito_sol's Maker Priority Plugin replaces that fee/CU race with a deterministic top of batch execution every 50ms. The plugin should not only tighten @Solana spreads further on majors, but help prop AMMs extend coverage to more pairs.

English
9
8
70
21.7K
dr cavey phd ∿
dr cavey phd ∿@cavemanloverboy·
the italians were right about a lot of things
English
2
0
10
2.2K
vitorpy
vitorpy@vitorpy·
@cavemanloverboy except for pineapple pizza. pineapple pizza is legit and that's a hill i'm willing to die on
English
3
0
2
183
Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️
What people mostly miss in the FBO vs FBA vs FCFS debate is that in a distributed system you have an additional player: the validator. This change the equilibrium. FBO does not eliminate the rent from stale state. It turns that rent into an auction object: the right to move the state first. This distinction matters. In FBO, the price is not updated through a single batch-level clearing step. The state price updates transaction by transaction, according to the ordering chosen inside the batch. Paying more priority lets a participant buy an earlier position in that state transition sequence. So FBO can be better than FCFS if it replaces an opaque latency race with an explicit priority market, and if the resulting rent can be redistributed to the protocol. But FBO can also be equivalent to, or worse than, FCFS if the validator or builder can appropriate the auction, accept side deals, censor competing bids, or self-preference their own transaction. It can also reintroduce a latency race if priority bids are observable and continuously updatable until the batch closes. In that case, the race is no longer only about who arrives first, but about who can update their bid last. So you can see why the combo MCP+FBO is a powerful combo if designed properly.
English
1
2
7
657
Wintermute
Wintermute@wintermute_t·
In 2020, we had DeFi Summer In 2026, it’s _____ Summer
English
505
23
470
107.2K
Raiku 🐉
Raiku 🐉@raikucom·
My assumption is that by refusing to include any other transactions, they're trying to ensure minimal state changes to maximize the odds of being able to include any and all high-value txs/bundles even if they were to arrive during the last tick of the block Refusing to update state also creates additional price dislocations between CEXs and onchain markets, in a way generating their own artificial demand for high-value transactions
English
1
0
0
31
Cetipo
Cetipo@Cetipo·
solscan.io/block/416414661 Only 8 tx in this block. Validator trying to maximize its profit by only landing tx with fat jito tip.
English
3
2
31
21.4K
Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️ retweetledi
blade
blade@bl8_runner·
in case you're curious how rare it is to have a block with >0 AND <10 non vote transactions, on median it happens 65 times/epoch or 0.015% of the time
blade tweet media
Cetipo@Cetipo

solscan.io/block/416414661 Only 8 tx in this block. Validator trying to maximize its profit by only landing tx with fat jito tip.

English
1
1
17
2K
Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️ retweetledi
buffalu
buffalu@buffalu__·
@jarxiao @solana just seeing this. issue was on our side in BAM that we've been running down. these were the highest reward/cu txs at the top of the block, so they naturally got selected first.
English
2
1
23
2.5K
Lachezar Kolev
Lachezar Kolev@lbkolev·
@MostlyData_ @Cetipo unless u have an under the table deal for more $ than the cumulative sum of all (potential) tips from the other txs
English
1
0
0
97
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
@MostlyData_ @MaxResnick If we migrate to pqc, that gives us the right to FUD everyone who hasn’t yet, and that’s the real benefit of pqc.
English
18
3
62
11.4K
Max Resnick
Max Resnick@MaxResnick·
If physical error rates continue to decline on trend for rubidium based neutral atoms architecture, a quantum computer capable of breaking Ed25519 signatures could be ready is as little as 5 years on the most aggressive timeline. Q day is most likely still 10-15 years away but there is a chance it could come sooner. Read more about how we plan to secure the Solana protocol against a powerful quantum adversary in our new blog w/ @samkimcrypto. Work has already begun on some of the preliminary aspects of transition like increasing transaction sizes and adding a FALCON verification system call. This blog post goes into the other aspects of the protocol that need to be upgraded as well as migration strategies.
Max Resnick tweet media
Anza@anza_xyz

What would it take to secure Solana against a powerful quantum adversary? A new Anza blog on where the protocol could be affected, the post-quantum toolbox, and the engineering work already underway. Read full blog here: anza.xyz/blog/securing-…

English
15
13
80
38.3K
Ig Mos
Ig Mos@IgMosqueira·
Yes... Plus I am not saying that there couldn't be a sensible crypto design. But MCP doesn't make you better than Nasdaq no matter what Toly says But whatever design you come up with has to survive the fact that arbitrageurs will always pit clobs against each other so saying Frequent Batch Auctions compete in price whereas continuous time trading competes in latency sounds good but it is wrong as currently proposed...
English
1
0
1
39
Ig Mos
Ig Mos@IgMosqueira·
As is his custom @toly obscures what is already misleading. Two simple points for the braniacs out there: 1) if Budish is modeling this correctly, then what is the optimal batch auction delay in his view 2) if batch auctions remove the need for latency... x.com/toly/status/20…
toly 🇺🇸@toly

If the boffins are off, they aren’t off by much from the theoretically best design for all markets, not just decentralized markets. htfu and ship mcp already.

English
4
1
1
2.6K
Umberto | Mostly Data 🧙‍♂️
If I have to quantify, 80% yes 20% no. There are some nice properties of FBO that FCFS doesn't have. Solana largely proved that you can have low spread and high liquidity on spot even w/o continuous markets. So I don't buy the story that FCFS is superior because in tradFi it works better.
English
0
0
1
59
Dorax ⚛️
Dorax ⚛️@dktrpo·
@MostlyData_ @IgMosqueira @toly But you do agree that FCFS would likely be superior, if we _could_ have a fair implementation of FCFS in Byzantine settings like blockchains?
English
2
0
0
47