@HighStakesCap @veH0rny Do you think Warsh trade could be.. memes? Imagine how funny it would be memes pumping ballistic signaling corrupt US leaders taking control of FED
English
MrExamples
1.4K posts
@matthew_sigel @WClemente Stablecoins revenue should be literally flowing back to crypto, fullstop using corposlop stables than funnels revenue to private companies & extract it to other assets.
Thats why usdm matters, if we want crypto to win, we need to be collectively smarter.
@bread_ @hotpot_dao
English
Tether is buying more Gold than China
English
@DIAdata_org Okay but what are you going to do with @IMFCrypto? Which message you want to send to ecosystem using dia as oracle? We are waiting for updates on DIA oracle missfunctioning & recovery plans
English
DeFi vault infrastructure mapped: 3,900+ pools across 80+ chains.
See where capital flows, which teams curate risk, and how protocols stack.
Resource built for understanding the institutional DeFi landscape.
→ diadata.org/map/defi-vault…
English
@R89Capital I give you the point the best founder is no founder for crypto.
But, if you need a founder (for projects in active development and future vision) V is the best one in the industry. I was talking about examples of active founders better than vitalik.
English
@MrExamples Satoshi
Charlie Lee cause he sold and left and never looked back years ago
And whoever created Shib
English
MrExamples retweetledi
Most digital worlds don't matter because they lack hardness and true scarcity.
Etheria is a glaring exception.
English
@gainzy222 @pleyuh Big V is the best founder of the space and no one is even close. The guy could have extracted much more than anyone/launch memecoins/launch infinite L2s and a big interminable list… and he is one of the only that have not done it & still fighting for cypto original values
English
If pavel’s arrested, ton goes to 0$
If vitalik’s arrested, eth pumps because whoever takes over can’t possibly be worse
Advantage: ethereum
Hardy@Degen_Hardy
$TON founder vs $ETH founder.
English
@IMFCrypto @DIAdata_org For depositors exposed on that 62,5% LLTV vaults, what should we expect? Is full recovery of the deposits possible?
Appreciate the communications and please keep on this transparency
English
UPDATE - DIA Oracle Incident
Following internal review and legal analysis, the IMF ecosystem’s direct exposure from the @DIAdata_org oracle incident is currently estimated at approximately ~$450K, made up of:
~$417K of borrower collateral liquidated across IMF-serviced markets, and
~$33.3K of IMF-USDS vault bad debt
The IMF deployed the safer 62.5% LLTV markets in October 2025 and formally deprecated the older 77% LLTV markets as part of an ongoing risk reduction and migration process.
Current recovery efforts are focused on users and exposure connected to the actively serviced IMF markets.
Although the deprecated 77% LLTV markets were no longer actively supported by IMF, they remained permissionlessly accessible through third-party interfaces and direct Morpho interaction.
Users affected through those deprecated markets should also contact the providers or interfaces through which they accessed them.
The team is actively working with all relevant parties, including DIA, to explore recovery pathways and recover as much IMF-linked impact as possible.
Full incident analysis and methodology below:
dia-incident.imf.bz
Thank you for your patience and continued support during a very difficult period for the entire ecosystem.
— The IMF Team
English
English
Hello Gracy.
The community has not received any update about the investigation of RAVE.
While now LAB is running yet another market manipulation scheme via Bitget spot.
Every new token running similar scams only hurts the credibility of the industry further.
Yes CEXs want fees generated by volume however is destroying retail traders the best way to drive it?
(Also Binance/OKX/Bybit perps seems to be a potential source)
Specter@SpecterAnalyst
Price manipulation now happens almost every week, with $LAB by @LABtrade_ becoming the latest pump-and-dump token while Bitget continues playing the usual CEX role. The LAB team, @vsadkovv, appears to control a significant portion of the supply. Wallets linked to the team still hold large allocations: 0x7Cfd8d2d8626B287bEA569b5e65AB5CBb75E9265 0x78a79D0fa0Eaf58741f5Bde7E05b5CC8F33D24d3 0x36FC85Ec486C254c9564d66de8c4210a1A20C291 0xf79ff8a5052E969a6d13E18c4E439fE5202B02Fa 0xB4b74D63F30076870d54aB9E8E6a7D18293273c3 0xe03722dedBf090Ad7A1C8F82ceB86637053E21dd On April 8, a wallet linked to the team (0xe037) deposited 40M LAB worth $13.6M to Bitget: 0x77156a0a621d2Ac7A075C0AC3172707C2e4aa191 The LAB price started pumping on May 1, but a week earlier wallets linked to the team deposited 96M LAB worth around $63M to Bitget: 0xDd77BFbDc11Cd37fD255AE35A4ac39Df1F9d570a 0x6593aa6c31C88397c37f71259625EC92Fe4EE0bF This looks coordinated. Gas fees (0.14 BNB) were distributed a week earlier 0x50f2760fd5E6d546EE7dcEB617F33497A3C38593 0x0559694BbB47dbA8Bc3B7ac93004EF401F2da16d The wallet below has also been aggressively buying $LAB on-chain and depositing to Gate and Bitget, including tokens like $SkyAI, which surged 1000% in the last 30 days: 0x11fc12b988933966688d33B70651B5f2f450963C It has been weeks since @GracyBitget promised an investigation, yet there has been no public update. If platforms cannot conduct internal investigations, identify coordinated manipulation, or provide transparency on who is behind these activities, confidence in market integrity keeps declining. ZachXBT still has a reward open for credible intel that lead to identifying the actors behind this operation. Stay smart.
English
Recruiters may ignore PDFs, but who would say no to pizza? 😋🍕
Ready to have your career delivered hot? 🔥
Bitget@bitget
75% of resumes get shredded. 100% of pizza boxes get opened. This Blockchain4Youth Anniversary, we're turning your potential into a career by hand-delivering your resume directly to the world's top Web3 employers. More details 👇
English
@Zodomo yep that happened on all vaults, so the only hope is for @DIAdata_org and/or @IMFCrypto to cover the losses right?
English
@MrExamples unfortunately its likely the lending market contracts themselves worked properly after receiving an improper price update and liquidated the CULT to pay back lenders. it's likely gone. up to IMF and their oracle provider to make it right.
English
Ethereum and Pectra-enabled EVM chains also have native AA that enables a better UX where apps can bundle authorization and execution in the same transaction, so users don’t need unlimited approvals. The issue is that frontend devs needlessly use unlimited token approvals.
StarkWare 🥷@StarkWareLtd
Starknet is not affected by the Ekubo router incident. The issue happened on EVM, where users often leave unlimited token approvals behind. On Starknet, native Account Abstraction enables a better UX: apps can bundle authorization and execution in the same transaction, so users don’t need to rely on standing unlimited approvals for every action.
English
@Zodomo do you know what happens on this cases? is it posible for depositors to recover?
English
@MrExamples I'm so sorry to hear that man. There's been times I've used IMF too. Brutal.
English
@tom777kruise I’m done, this really sucks almost all my cult gone
English
@IMFCrypto Yikes. Centralized oracle risk strikes again. Sooooooooooo glad that I had no borrows and wasn't deposited. What's the scope of liquidations? Is it a small percentage, or did basically everyone get wiped out?
English
IMF Community: Incident Notice
We're aware of unexpected liquidations that occurred across IMF markets today. Here's what happened.
DIA, IMF's oracle provider, has confirmed that their infrastructure was temporarily misconfigured, publishing prices with incorrect decimals across all assets. This caused artificially low price feeds to hit our markets, triggering liquidations that would not have occurred under correct pricing.
IMF's contracts performed as designed. The issue originated entirely within DIA's oracle system.
Our engineering team has already completed a preliminary investigation on our end and confirmed that IMF's systems operated exactly as designed, responding to the price data they received. We are now in direct communication with DIA to determine the full scope of impact.
We ask the community to stand by while we complete a thorough post-mortem. We'll publish a full report once we've concluded our investigation and discussions with DIA.
More to follow.
English
@rostyketh performing ZK L2 settling each eth block and interoperating in the EEZ is the natural endgame.
Remove all bridges & maximize eth liquidity, with eth scaling 3x per year is how we all win
English
People calling themselves “experts” will see this and think:
“Base is moving towards an L1, I can bet my entire bloodline on this”
Succinct@SuccinctLabs
Base is partnering with Succinct to bring zero-knowledge proofs to Base Azul. SP1 will prove $7.4 billion in deposits as @Base joins a growing list of major L2s adding validity proofs to their roadmap with Succinct.
English
@MrExamples This is really sad. I know how it feels getting hacked. Had similar situation recently. Have you been able to get help recovery your loss?
English
@Zodomo Yes its so fucked up, i have been playing around milady & cult for years and now completely lost all my cult.. luckily, it was a small pool where i was like 50% of it
English
@MrExamples Oh shit this is fucked up. Wouldn't jump to calling it a rug, it seems clear that it's an oracle problem, but I'm not aware if there's any team overlap and won't immediately rule out this feeling like an insider thing.
x.com/i/status/20517…
IMF@IMFCrypto
IMF Community: Incident Notice We're aware of unexpected liquidations that occurred across IMF markets today. Here's what happened. DIA, IMF's oracle provider, has confirmed that their infrastructure was temporarily misconfigured, publishing prices with incorrect decimals across all assets. This caused artificially low price feeds to hit our markets, triggering liquidations that would not have occurred under correct pricing. IMF's contracts performed as designed. The issue originated entirely within DIA's oracle system. Our engineering team has already completed a preliminary investigation on our end and confirmed that IMF's systems operated exactly as designed, responding to the price data they received. We are now in direct communication with DIA to determine the full scope of impact. We ask the community to stand by while we complete a thorough post-mortem. We'll publish a full report once we've concluded our investigation and discussions with DIA. More to follow.
English