Musta Kebab

@rnovak1988 @dave_alive @davepl1968 @FFRF There's no proof of "god's" existance at all, Life itself is not proof of a god.

Here's the thing though - what would you actually accept as proof? At the end of the day, everyone has faith in something. There's proof of God's existence all around us. Life itself is proof.

No. Atheism isn’t a belief system—it’s the absence of one. It doesn’t come with doctrines, rituals, or a required worldview. It simply means you’re not convinced that gods exist. What you believe beyond that is up to you.

@robmcallen9565 @Vegas82 @D_Preacher_1 "keep alive for yourselves" with the virginity context implies sexual servitude.

@Vegas82 @D_Preacher_1 Where does it say they were to be sex slaves?

In 1 Samuel 15:3, God commands killing infants and animals. Infants. Let that sink in. And people say atheists have no morality.

@genebbyy W bait

won a game and lost sr today

@A70578286811 @Synjhin @buperac @realDark_Star Thermal softening is a thing btw

@Synjhin @buperac @realDark_Star Of course!! Office fires caused steel beams to melt and collapse entirely in its own footprint. Tell me, how many other times has this happened? I'll tell you, zero.

So you mean to tell me, an airplane can go right through the World Trade Center that had steel structure beams of 4 inch plate every 40” using 12 different grades of steel with a yield strength of 100,000 psi but if the same plane were to run into a firetruck on a runway the plane is completely destroyed. Got it!

@NekoStarchild @Maximumatheist Where did the light come from?

@Maximumatheist To be fair, light DID exist before the Sun and Lazarus syndrome DOES happen. Of course, I would pay a lot of money to read the part they left out where Lazarus dies again a few days later, but still.

They still need your money.

@mark_petereit @D_Preacher_1 Where did the light come? Stars dont give enough to be relevant to plant.

@D_Preacher_1 Plants don’t need the sun to live. They just need light. Light was created on day 1.

Christians often say “the Bible predicted science.” Yet Genesis claims plants existed before the sun. Even basic biology disagrees.

@WesInman1 @fjc0000 @AtheistPhoenix Ahh yes the best source of credible information, youtube shorts.

@fjc0000 @AtheistPhoenix You are wrong, and if you were a real scientist that understood genetics you would know that macro-evolution is impossible. You might be a scientist in an unrelated field. youtube.com/shorts/lvSNJjK…

@Cig_OW This isnt accurate anymore

이건좀신기하다 플골에 유저65%이상이존재한다고? 아아,,, 수준차이가이정도나는것도신기한일이아니었음. 이래서마스터부터진짜란인식이있는거아닐까 나머진 사람이 너무 많아서,,,

@KingJeremiah510 @DeeWaynee94 @MarkAnthonyNel4 On what metric was Rome the greatest empire? And it didnt even fall to christianity...

@DeeWaynee94 @MarkAnthonyNel4 Biblical history and all the kingdoms that have risen and fallen are imagination… right The greatest empire Rome fell to Christianity and it’s not enough evidence for you. Lack sense

Why would I follow religion? I don’t follow nonsense. Any worldview that needs obedience before evidence can keep walking. I’ll stick with reality.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Prove it with empirical evidence that "god is the uncreated source of everything".

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike That's a misconception. God is the uncreated source of everything. Without that concept in your worldview, all your conclusions suffer from the infinite regress paradox.

No one in their right mind would believe the story of Noah's Ark. Did carnivorous animals suddenly become vegetarians?

@original420360 @_Ochiedike The common census is that there was something before the big bang, we just dont know about it. And at the same time you believe in a being that came from nothing.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike Less schitzo than believing everything came from nothing.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike You need to go see a doctor for skitsofrenia.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike Yes, daily.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Have you seen jesus with your own eyes or anything that happen in the bible?

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike It's not something you have perceived, it's something you were told to believe.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Another deflection, being a cast away isnt quite building a boat. And continental drift is also a thing.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike Do you know why there are monkeys on islands, according to science? They built boats and drifted over. Your books are way sillier than mine.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Continental splitting sea ways tend to do that but once again that doesnt prove a world wide flood.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike The Paleocene age is the worst thing you could bring up. Only a handful of animals have ever been found from that era, and most of them came from N-America. Which, when you look at it on google maps, you can see flood damage EVERYWHERE

@original420360 @_Ochiedike For one there never was any flood and fossil records show miacidae back like 60 milloin years.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike Can you prove that lions existed preflood?

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Can you prove that the ancestors of modern Lions survived only on plants with a short digestive system.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike Doubt they use those words, it's implied. You can also use some common sense. Here's an illustration to show the differences between cattle from 300 years ago and today.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Correlation doesnt equal causation, just because a thing has similar themes it doesnt mean its the same thing.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike I don't think we'll be able to really have this discussion as neither of us can type more than a paragraph at a time. The whiskey jack myth goes hard, read it, and then read the gospel of thomas. It's literally the same story.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike Site a verse where that was stated.

@MustaKebab @_Ochiedike You're assuming that those animals were the same animals we have today. But it clearly wasnt. They were proto-animals.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike It not being mainstream isnt related to science, also none of this explains how animals unable to effectively gain nutrients of plants survived on plants.

@original420360 @_Ochiedike So things are harder to detect and figure out than others but this just means that science actually corrected it self "A correction is a change made to improve accuracy, mend errors, or adjust something, often involving modification of text, data, or behavior" 1/2