MustardClementine

This is the political class in one headline: Run the country into debt for over a decade, blow money on every boutique ideology, consultant racket, subsidy scheme, failed program, foreign cheque, and bureaucratic empire, then suddenly discover “fiscal responsibility” when it is time to cut seniors. No. Start with Ottawa’s waste machine. Cut MP salaries. Cut the consultants. Cut the corporate welfare. Cut the bloated bureaucracy. Cut the ideological departments. Cut the vanity climate spending. Cut the foreign virtue-signalling cheques. Cut the CBC. Cut MSM subsidies. Cut the programs that do nothing except employ people who write reports about programs. But elderly benefits? That is always where the technocrat brain goes first. Not because it is smart. Because seniors are easier to guilt than bureaucracies are to fire. Canada does not have a “seniors are too expensive” problem. Canada has a government-is-too-bloated problem. The same crowd that told us endless borrowing was compassion now wants Grandma to pay the invoice. That is not courage. That is cowardice dressed up as accounting.

Hello, I would like your opinion on my grandmother's haircut and hair color. She is 65 years old. Thank you.

Trump announces he will not attend his son's wedding

The City of Toronto is buying ads to tell residents that the World Cup is not for them and they need to stay away from downtown. (This one is on Browns Line in Etobicoke)

The $28 lunch obviously isn’t the cause of the housing crisis, but another consequence of it. People living with parents further into adulthood often spend more on little treats they can afford, look for reasons not to be home, and don’t really learn to budget.