Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter

7.5K posts

Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter banner
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter

Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter

@NYCMICA

My words are my own, and if I offend you, it's you.

Floating to next destination Katılım Haziran 2022
659 Takip Edilen886 Takipçiler
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter
An actual withdrawal from the Cardano treasury that will bring value to the ecosystem... Not to mention an actual plan to replenish the withdrawal. Send this to your grift-luencer trying to grab thousands for their pitiful YouTube video.
Strike | Onchain Perps@strikeperps

🚨 Official Notice 🚨 Today we publicly announce we’re submitting a Cardano treasury withdrawal proposal to supply 7.5M ADA to our protocol. The term is one year and the proposed full amount plus all yield will be returned to treasury. Overview: 🛥️ @strikecardano/cardano-governance-proposal-sustainable-yield-for-the-treasury-31db26c4b681?postPublishedType=initial" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@strikecardano

English
0
0
0
25
Charles Hoskinson
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles·
@TheRealWeb3Kat @angrycryptoshow It was. I pushed for a Sovereign wealth fund with 100 million dollars worth of Ada converted to stablecoins and then deployed to generate yield. Whale and others killed it, then left the ecosystem. If we had done it when I asked, we would have made over 200 percent returns
English
14
3
80
1.2K
Angry Crypto Show
Angry Crypto Show@angrycryptoshow·
UPDATE: #Cardano $ADA Founder Charles Hoskinson says "my company has an office in Argentina—it's a $700 billion economy, and there's $100 billion of cryptocurrencies in it, mostly stablecoins. All of our employees want to be paid in stablecoins, we pay our rent in stablecoins."
English
7
29
293
11.8K
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Jvnior
Jvnior@Jvnior·
5 minutes of IDF soldiers bragging about murdering children. Repost this for God’s sake.
English
186
12.1K
14.4K
194.7K
⛏️Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal
Charles, when every critic becomes a villain, the pattern is not everyone else. The pattern is you. You just listed Optim, Iagon, Cardano Whale, Dave, Rick, Adam and others like this is an "inventory." It is not an inventory. It is a list of people in this ecosystem who have questioned you, disagreed with you, did something you didn't like, challenged IOG, challenged a narrative or refused to act like Cardano governance exists only to ratify what you want. And instead of reflecting on why so many serious people keep ending up on the other side of your megaphone, you reach for the same playbook every time - Dismiss the substance. - Attack the person. - Recast yourself as the victim. - Then tell everyone else to "grow up." So let's take the Iagon part of your "inventory," since you brought us into it. You say Iagon "started bullying and harassing" Midnight ambassadors. That is a convenient story, but it is not what happened. I as a dRep asked a governance question, NOT Iagon. A dRep asked whether people with roles connected to Midnight or IOG linked interests, who also held meaningful dRep voting power, should abstain on IOG related treasury proposals. That is governance. That is literally what dReps are supposed to do - ask hard questions, examine conflicts, protect treasury neutrality and represent the $ADA holders who delegated voting power to them. If a person is participating in governance with delegated $ADA while also holding a role connected to a project or organization affected by that vote, asking about conflicts is not an attack. It is accountability. And let's be very clear - ambassadors are not above scrutiny. dReps are not above scrutiny. Iagon is not above scrutiny. IOG is not above scrutiny. Midnight is not above scrutiny. You are not above scrutiny. This is supposed to be decentralized governance, not a court where certain people get protected status because they are useful to Charles Hoskinson. The moment a person participates in public governance with public voting power, the public is allowed to ask public questions. You did not answer the conflict question. You reframed it as "bullying" - ironically this is exactly what you have been doing in this ecosystem. Then you escalated it into an attack on Iagon, my leadership and the holders. You used your platform to tell the market you had "no more time" for the project unless leadership changed. You warned that Iagon could fail and destroy value for token holders. You called into question the ethics and integrity my leadership. You accused us of acting out of spite rather than engaging with the actual governance concern. And then, after the damage was done, you turned around and said people are "playing the victim." That is not leadership. That is deflection. You cannot threaten a Cardano native project, watch real holders suffer, then accuse the people objecting to the threat of being childish. You cannot say you care about token holders while dismissing "your token holders" when those holders happen to be in a project that challenged you. There are no "Iagon holders" over there and "Cardano holders" over here. $IAG holders are $ADA holders. They are stake pool operators. They are voters. They are dReps. They are builders. They are community members. They are families. They are the same ecosystem you claim to defend. When you attack a Cardano project, you are not attacking some foreign body. You are attacking people inside Cardano. That is the part you keep avoiding. You talk about ambassadors being bullied. Fine. I will say this clearly - I do not condone harassment of any ambassador, volunteer, dRep, builder, SPO or community member. Anyone who crosses into personal abuse should stop. But do not use "protecting ambassadors" as a shield to make governance questions untouchable. Do not use volunteers as human armor around treasury proposals. Do not say "decentralized governance" when the rule is really - vote,but do not question my side - ask question but not about my people - participate but only if you accept the consequences of my platform turning on you. That is not governance. That is intimidation. And since we are talking about red lines, where were those red lines when Iagon was being called a scam? Where were those red lines when IOG aligned voices and consultants were smearing Iagon publicly? Where were those red lines when defamatory claims, racial slurs and personal attacks were being thrown at builders who have spent years building on Cardano? Where was the concern for "bullying" then? The standard cannot be: When your side attacks, it is criticism. When others ask questions, it is harassment. When you escalate, it is leadership. When people respond, they are victims. When you use a 1M+ follower account, it is accountability. When a dRep asks about conflicts, it is a mob. That double standard is exactly why people are speaking up. You say people "lash out, get hit hard and then play the victim." No. People ask legitimate questions. You hit hard. Then you call their injuries proof that they were wrong to ask. That is the pattern. A dRep raises a conflict of interest concern. You call it bullying. A project CEO disagrees with IOG proposals. You call it spite. A community member challenges your narrative. You diagnose them, mock them, block them or write them off. Then, when people notice the pattern, you call them children. Charles, the lack of self-reflection here is breathtaking. At some point, when the same story keeps happening with different people, different projects, different dReps, different critics,and different cycles, maybe the common denominator is not that everyone else is irrational. Maybe the common denominator is that you treat disagreement as disloyalty. Maybe the common denominator is that you confuse criticism with attack. Maybe the common denominator is that you cannot separate Cardano from yourself. That is dangerous in a decentralized ecosystem. Because Cardano does not belong to you. It does not belong to IOG. It does not belong to Iagon. It does not belong to Midnight. It does not belong to any ambassador group, any DRep bloc, any founder, any company or any whale. It belongs to the $ADA holders and the people building, maintaining, securing, voting, delegating, questioning and participating in it. And if those people cannot ask whether conflicts exist without being threatened, mocked, financially harmed or publicly targeted, then governance is not free. You said "grow up kids." Here is the adult version: Answer the question. Should dReps with roles, incentives, payments, affiliations or obligations connected to an organization seeking treasury funds disclose those overlaps and consider abstaining? Yes or no? That was the issue. Not your ego. Not my tone. Not Iagon’s existence. Not whether Midnight ambassadors are good people. Not whether Charles feels attacked. Not whether people should be afraid to ask next time. The question was about conflict, disclosure and treasury integrity. If there is no conflict, explain why. If there is a conflict, disclose it. If abstention is not necessary, make the case. If the Constitution already provides the standard, apply it equally. But do not turn a governance question into a loyalty test. Do not demand apologies for asking what every serious governance system must be willing to ask. Do not pretend you are defending decentralization while using centralized influence to punish dissent. And do not tell people to "grow up" while threatening to burn projects down. The Cardano community should be able to disagree without fear. dReps should be able to vote NO without being branded enemies. Builders should be able to compete without being targeted. Token holders should not become collateral damage in personality conflicts. Ambassadors should be respected, yes. But they should not be used to make legitimate governance scrutiny off limits. So yes, let's take inventory. Who asked a governance question? Who answered with escalation? Who raised a possible conflict? Who turned it into a campaign against a project? Who claims to care about token holders? Who publicly attacked leadership of a project whose holders are also Cardano community members? Who says others play the victim? Who keeps casting himself as the victim whenever accountability arrives? That is the pattern people are seeing. And no amount of "grow up kids" changes it. Iagon will continue building. I will continue voting my conscience as a dRep. I will continue asking questions when treasury neutrality, conflicts of interest and governance integrity are at stake. If I am wrong, answer with facts. If you disagree, make the argument. But threats, mockery, blocks and public intimidation are not arguments. They are the behavior of someone who wants decentralized governance only until it decentralizes power away from him. Cardano deserves better than that.
⛏️Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal tweet media
English
89
127
596
20.9K
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter
@strikeperps 5) A platform that has produced significant if not majority of transaction volume on the Cardano blockchain, with real potential to crossover to many other chains.
English
1
0
0
24
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter
1) Been in the Cardano ecosystem since 2021, and this is probably the most bearish I've been. Cardano will live on but the ecosystem will continue to be hollowed out by wolves in sheep skin, pretending their work is essential only to retrieve treasury funds...
English
1
0
1
44
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Heidi Matthews
Heidi Matthews@Heidi__Matthews·
Flotilla participants are arriving at Istanbul airport. This is what Israel military and prison personnel did to them.
Heidi Matthews tweet mediaHeidi Matthews tweet media
English
5.6K
70.7K
171.5K
4.7M
Charles Hoskinson
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles·
一部の日本のdRepが私たちの研究提案に反対票を投じたことに、深い悲しみを覚えています。 もしこの提案が可決されなければ、カルダノ(Cardano)はその科学者たちを失い、私たちのラボは閉鎖に追い込まれるということを、日本のコミュニティ全体に再認識していただきたいと考えています。私たちは10年以上の歳月をかけて努力と成長を積み重ね、暗号資産分野において世界最強の研究グループを築き上げてきました。 一部の断片的な資金援助だけで、この成果をバラバラに崩壊させるわけにはいきません。私たちの科学者たちは、より確実性と敬意のある場所へと去ってしまうでしょう。 どうか、カルダノの研究アジェンダを支持するdRepへの委任をお願いいたします。
日本語
362
219
1.5K
197.3K
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
🚨 JUST IN — Thomas Massie concedes the race: “I would've come out sooner, but I had to call my opponent and concede.” “And it took a while to find Ed Gallrein in Tel Aviv.” That line is going to detonate across Washington. Massie just turned his concession speech into a missile aimed directly at the flood of outside money and foreign policy influence that consumed this race. The most expensive House primary in U.S. history ends with one final message: This wasn’t just Kentucky voting. This was the political establishment making an example out of someone who refused to fall in line.
English
1.2K
12.7K
59.3K
2M
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
sarah
sarah@sahouraxo·
BREAKING : The UN accuses Israel of committing EXTERMINATION in Gaza. EXTERMINATION. Repeat it. Spread it. Let the world know. “Israel is responsible for extermination, murder, using starvation as a method of war..” —The UN Human Rights Council
English
2.4K
99K
142.8K
4.7M
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
sarah
sarah@sahouraxo·
This is beyond horrifying. New data shows Israel has killed over 680,000 Palestinians in Gaza. Among them: • 380,000 infants under 5 • 99,000 children over 5 That’s 479,000 children murdered by Israel. Israel isn’t “defending itself.” It is wiping out Palestinian life.
sarah tweet media
English
4.7K
67.6K
122.3K
5M
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Erik Warsaw
Erik Warsaw@WarsawErik·
🔴 This is somehow a real news article. Please read the whole thing.
Erik Warsaw tweet media
English
827
4.7K
18.6K
610.3K
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Aom Ucing
Aom Ucing@taosophie·
Anak2 Palestina disiksa, termasuk yg dewasa, kaki diamputasi dan mata dibutakan pake besi. Kek gini yg dibela siwo2. Ikut dosa lu. Jahanam.
Indonesia
759
22K
38.3K
409.1K
Dr. SSO | $stonedseaotter retweetledi
Hakan Bostancı
Hakan Bostancı@hakanbostanciii·
Gazze'de İsrail askerleri tarafından kaçırılan 6 yaşındaki çocuk darp edildi ve bazı önemli organları israil tarafından çalındı Çocuk yaralı şekilde ailesine verildi Kendi çocuğun değil diye mi susuyorsun? Susma. Hemen paylaş
Türkçe
1.3K
18.4K
35.5K
2.2M