Just Renee

@elonmusk @Rothmus Haha

@Rothmus Yup

@kekmaximusk 😫

Sydney Sweeney is pregnant with Elon’s baby

@elonmusk @DrewPavlou @AlboMP Nothing he says ever does

@DrewPavlou @AlboMP His statement makes no sense

So the Islamic terrorists at Bondi weren’t “radicalised”? They were just like this normally then? @AlboMP

🇦🇺 X WINS: AUSTRALIA LIFTS BAN ON CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION FOOTAGE Free speech: 1. Government censorship: 0. Australia's Classification Review Board overturned the eSafety Commissioner's ban on videos showing the September 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk after X successfully appealed the ruling. The eSafety Commissioner had classified footage of Kirk's shooting and the stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska as "Refused Classification," meaning completely banned from all platforms in Australia. X fought back, arguing the Kirk video was "a neutral objective record of a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse." The platform compared it to the Zapruder film of JFK's assassination. The Review Board agreed. Despite "the heinous nature of the event," the majority ruled the video was not gratuitous, exploitative, or offensive enough to justify a total ban. It was reclassified to R18+. Australia tried to memory-hole a political assassination. @elonmusk said no. The same government that banned teenagers from social media wanted to ban adults from seeing reality. Source: The Guardian / @GlobalAffairs

Elon Musk: "I think many in the public don't realize how much deception is really going on with the media."

@criprights Just like so many of them, they create a website and $$ cash in

Can someone explain to me what this agency actually does, and what it is? nema.gov.au

JULIAN ASSANGE FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NOBEL FOUNDATION OVER “INSTRUMENT OF WAR” PEACE PRIZE WikiLeaks Founder Alleges 2025 Award to María Corina Machado Constitutes Misappropriation, Facilitation of War Crimes Under Swedish Law, Seeks Freeze of 11 million SEK ($1.18 million USD) of Pending Transfers to Machado STOCKHOLM — 11:00am CET December 17, 2025 Julian Assange today filed a criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 individuals associated with the Nobel Foundation, including its leadership, of committing serious suspected crimes, including the crime of gross misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the financing of the crime of aggression. The complaint shows that Alfred Nobel's 1895 will explicitly mandates that the peace prize go to the individual who during the proceeding year “conferred the greatest benefit to humankind” by doing “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Assange argues that “The political decision of the Norwegian selection committee does not suspend the fiduciary duty of Swedish funds administrators”. “Any disbursement contradicting this mandate constitutes misappropriation from the endowment”. The complaint, submitted simultaneously to the Swedish Economic Crime Authority (Ekobrottsmyndigheten) and the Swedish War Crimes Unit (Krigsbrottsenheten), states that the suspects, including Nobel Foundation Chair Astrid Söderbergh Widding and Executive Director Hanna Stjärne, converted “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” through suspected “serious criminality” including: 1) Breach of trust, gross misappropriation and conspiracy in relation to the pending 11 million SEK ($1.18 million) disbursement of the Peace prize monies to Maria Corina Machado, whose prior and ongoing actions categorically exclude her from the criteria set out in Alfred Nobel's will; 2) Facilitation of war crimes, including the crime of aggression and crimes against humanity, breaching Sweden's obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, because the accused are aware of Machado's incitement and endorsement of the U.S. commission of international crimes, and knew or ought to have known that the disbursement of Nobel monies would contribute to extrajudicial killings of civilians and shipwrecked survivors at sea and are in breach of their obligation to cease disbursements. Assange notes that the members of the Nobel Foundation have previously exercised their supervisory authority over the prizes and their disbursements by withholding Literature Prize disbursements in 2018. “Failure to intervene here, despite U.S. war crimes off the Venezuelan coast and Machado’s key role in furthering aggression” incurs criminal liability. “Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange states. The accused have concrete legal obligations because they are tasked with “ensuring the fulfillment of the intended purpose of Alfred Nobel’s will, that is, to end wars and war crimes, and not to enable them.” MACHADO'S INCITEMENT OF THE LARGEST U.S. MILITARY BUILDUP SINCE THE IRAQ WAR MAKE HER CATEGORICALLY INELIGIBLE The complaint notes how the Nobel announcement and ceremony have occurred in what military analysts describe as “the largest U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis”—now exceeding 15,000 personnel, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford. The escalation continues as President Trump announced on December 10, two days after the Nobel ceremony, that U.S. strikes would be “starting by land.” The Venezuela strategy is part of what Trump’s Secretary for War, Peter Hegseth, calls a shift toward “maximum lethality, not tepid legality” and “going on the offence”. Against this backdrop, Assange states that “Machado has continued to incite the Trump Administration to pursue its escalatory path”, including by entering into a conspiracy to give the U.S. administration access to $1.7 trillion in oil reserves and other natural resources through privatization once Maduro is ousted. “Using her elevated position as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favour of war, facilitated by the named suspects.” Assange states in the criminal complaint. The complaint lists evidence of this incitement of U.S. military intervention, as well as praising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct in Gaza. Her statements include: - “Military escalation may be the only way... the United States may need to intervene directly” (30 October 2025) - Machado called U.S. military strikes on civilian vessels, which have killed at least 95 people to date, “justified” and “visionary”. - Machado dedicated the prize to U.S. President Trump, because he “finally has put Venezuela... in terms of a priority for the United States national security” - Historical statements including 2014 testimony before U.S. Congress where she said: “The only path left is the use of force” The filing cites extensive third-party expert and institutional opposition to Machado receiving the award: - 21 Norwegian peace organizations declared: “Machado is the opposite of a peace laureate.” - Nobel Peace Prize laureate Adolfo Pérez Esquivel stated: “Giving the prize to someone who calls for foreign invasion is a mockery of Alfred Nobel's will.” - The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) confirmed Machado “has called for military intervention in Venezuela.” REQUESTED ACTION The complaint notes that “There is a real risk that the funds derived from Nobel’s endowment have been or will be intentionally or negligently diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.” Assange requests that Swedish authorities: 1. Immediately freeze of the pending SEK 11,000,000 monetary prize transfer and any remaining related budget and secure return of the medal. 2. Investigate the named persons and Foundation officers and associated entities for breach of trust, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and conspiracy. 3. Seize of board minutes, emails, group chats, financial records. 4. Interrogate Widding, Stjärne and other suspects. 5. Fully investigate domestically or refer the matter to the ICC (Rome Statute Art. 25(3)(c)). “This complaint seeks the immediate freezing of all remaining funds and a full criminal investigation lest the Nobel Peace Prize be permanently converted from an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” Assange concludes.

Police don’t shoot Terrorist and seen hiding Random Hero disarms Terrorist Police shoot the random Hero who disarmed the Terrorist Turns out it was a Woman Police Officer who shot the Hero Weird.

“I said at the beginning of the vaccine rollout that I would not put that shit into my body…” Australian Senator Pauline Hanson went scorched earth on the Vaccine Tyrants that forced people to be injected with poison.

🚨 POLICE OFFICERS DID NOT RETURN FIRE AT TERRORISTS. An eyewitness says the shooting went on for nearly 20 minutes. Two attackers. Repeated reloads. Sustained fire into a crowd of civilians. And yet — according to that testimony — four armed police officers were present and did not return fire. That fact alone demands serious, immediate answers. Why was no return fire initiated? Were officers ordered to stand down? Were they waiting for authorisation? Were they inadequately equipped? Was there a command failure? These are not accusations. They are necessary questions when civilians are being shot for 20 minutes in a public space. Every second matters in an active shooter scenario. Every delay costs lives. If officers were prevented from acting, the public deserves to know who made that call and why. If they were unable to act, the public deserves to know what failed. Transparency is not optional after an event like this. Silence only deepens fear and erodes trust. The victims deserve truth. The public deserves answers.

@elonmusk @TheBabylonBee Not fake news

@TheBabylonBee Indeed (sigh)

FAKE NEWS: Media Reports Mass Shooting In Australia But That's Impossible Because Guns Are Illegal There buff.ly/hOCU3Cq

Most of your life was given to you, not earned. That’s the part we never want to look at. The most honest kind of gratitude isn’t “I deserve this.” It’s “I was given a life millions will never get.” If your life is mostly a gift, not a reward—how are you using this precious gift?

Of course it's ALL Scripted👇

@elonmusk @jk_rowling Agreed

@jk_rowling Time for this fever dream to end

Please explain what differentiates a trans woman from 'a man in a dress and make up', because I've been playing close attention to trans activists for a decade now and the most common explanation I've been given is 'he says he's a woman, so play along or you're evil.' Runner up explanations: A man is a trans woman if he's put in a lot of effort into looking like a woman. However, a man who's made no such effort is just as valid a trans woman as one who does. Trans women with beards and penises are completely valid. The existence of men and women with differences of sexual development ('intersex' people) prove that a completely different group of people who don't have such disorders are trans if they say they are. The true mark of who's a man or a woman isn't biological sex, but the untestable gender identity that resides in all human beings, whether or not they believe in it. At the same time, trans people must be given easy, automatic access to cross-sex hormones and surgeries so they can alter themselves to more closely resemble the opposite biological sex.

Tucker states the obvious. Albo’s been bought off.

@elonmusk @GovPressOffice 🫶🫶🫶

I assume you’re referring to my son, Xavier, who has a tragic mental illness caused by the evil woke mind virus you push on vulnerable children. I love Xavier very much and hope he recovers. My daughters are Azure, Exa (she goes by Y) and Arcadia, and they do indeed love me very much.

Correct. We’re sorry your daughter hates you, Elon.

It turns out “safe and effective” really meant “cancer and myocarditis”. And they all knew. Pure evil.

Hide Digital ID inside an age gate and pray nobody notices. Because the fastest way to make Australians accept Digital ID? Don’t announce it. Just require identity to: watch a YouTube video And by the time anyone notices, they’re already locked in. linkedin.com/posts/renee-m-…

@RositaDaz48 Australia is building China’s social credit system but calling it “age assurance”.

Tech giant Reddit has filed a challenge in the High Court to overturn the Albanese government’s under-16 social media ban. In a major blow for the government less than two days after its world-first ban came into effect, Reddit confirmed it launched proceedings on Friday morning. The move makes US-based company the first social media giant to contest the ban after Reddit was made a late addition to the blacklist of services in November.