Neil G

@andywalkerhq The dispersion of reviews isn’t a deterrent? Better to have 50 on one account vs. 5 on 10 accounts

@NeilGranberry Yes, that is the strategy to have multiple servicing multiple regions. You might have one more north in Nashville, west, south etc.

Is your Google Business Profile named just your company name? That's why you're invisible. Google uses your business name as a ranking signal. It looks at what your profile is called and uses that to decide what searches to show you for. If your business name is just "Rocket Roofing" Google has no idea which part of the city you're trying to serve. But if your profile says "Rocket Roofing South Dallas" now Google knows exactly where to show you. This is not a hack. This is just understanding how Google reads your profile and using it to your advantage. Every new profile you create should have the location baked directly into the name. City. Neighborhood. Region. Whatever territory that profile is meant to own. "Rocket Roofing North Dallas." "Rocket Roofing East Dallas." "Rocket Roofing Suburbs." Simple change. Massive difference in how Google ranks you. Most roofers never do this. The ones who do show up everywhere the others don't.

@rabi_guha @TwoFiveOne42 100%

This is a hill I'm willing on die on Voice is the best input modality but the worst output modality. I want to tell the machine that I need to buy a bicycle Under no circumstance do I want to hear back a 10 mins description of all bicycles available. I still want a Shopify screen

notice something? Linear, PostHog, Attio - all shipped the same thing in the last few weeks. Homepage is a chat bar - not a dashboard. This is the SaaS industry quietly admitting that traditional UI doesn't work anymore. Every user is different. One homepage can't serve them all. The playbook is shifting: → expose your core APIs → connect an agentic layer → let users use software the way they want SaaS became chat. Chat will become Generative UI - the agent won't just reply in text, it will compose the interface itself. We're closer than people think.

@lucianocribeiro @burkov Where is the downvote button

Based on months of daily work with Claude Code, I conclude that Opus 4.6, in its current state, is dumber than Opus 4.4 was when it was just released. Anthropic probably isn't cheating with benchmarks, and when they release a new model you get the real performance, but then they gradually extract the model's mojo probably the same way Fat Bastard did with Austin Powers.

@denohawari Llm

we helped a SaaS company rank #1 in ChatGPT • $1.8M+ total revenue • 8,200%+ traffic growth • $35K+ monthly SEO traffic value all powered by our LLM SEO framework. most companies have no idea this is even happening: buyers are rapidly moving to LLM-driven discovery tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini if your brand isn’t showing up there, your competitors are straight up stealing your traffic and conversions. I broke down our entire methodology into a 800-word guide: • how we structure content LLMs consistently surface • data from the 8,200% growth case study • the step-by-step system that drove the $1.8M+ revenue lift • the AI-first keyword discovery framework we use across LLM platforms • the on-page signals that unlock visibility in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini this SaaS company's entire organic engine was built through this new AI-first SEO method now you can just steal it want the full breakdown? 1. like + follow 2. comment “LLM” and I’ll send it to you

@mikefutia Seo

I just built a Claude Code SEO agent that replaces your $200/mo. Ahrefs subscription 🤯 One prompt → keyword gaps found, competitors analyzed, content written in your brand voice, rankings tracked weekly. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who know SEO matters but never have the bandwidth to actually do it consistently. This agent runs the entire loop for you: → Connects to Google Search Console and pulls your real ranking data → Finds your "gap zone" — keywords sitting at positions 5–20 → Scrapes who's outranking you and breaks down exactly why they're winning → Interviews you once about your brand, customers, and positioning → Writes content in your voice — not generic AI slop that tanks after 90 days → Tracks rankings weekly and feeds results back into the next cycle No expensive tools you barely open. No freelancers writing content that sounds like everyone else. No manually checking rankings and forgetting to act on it. What you get: - Keyword cards with a specific action for each gap zone opportunity - A competitive breakdown showing who's beating you and the exact fix - A weekly content plan generated from your real GSC data - A brand voice profile Claude uses for every article it writes Built 100% in Claude Code with Google Search Console. I put together a full playbook with the skill files, brand interview, and the exact weekly workflow. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "SEO" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@lukepierceops What is the audit process like?

We audited a $8M company's workflows and found 23 hours of waste per week. The fix took 11 days. The founder thought his bottleneck was hiring. He wanted two more ops people. That's $120k+ per year in salary before you count management overhead and onboarding time. We mapped every workflow from lead intake to project delivery. Step by step. Who does what, where data moves, what gets duplicated, where things stall. Three things jumped out immediately: 1. Status updates were manual. Every project manager spent 45 minutes a day updating spreadsheets that nobody read in real time. We automated status tracking into a single dashboard that updates itself. 2. Client onboarding had 9 handoff points between 3 people. Four of those handoffs were just passing the same information to the next person. We cut it to 2 handoffs with one automated intake flow. 3. Invoicing required someone to manually pull data from two systems, cross-reference it, and create the invoice. Took 3 hours per week. Now it happens automatically when a project hits "complete." 23 hours recovered with no new hires. The system paid for itself in the first month. The majority of companies need to see how their existing process actually works. Once you map it, the waste is obvious. You just have to look.

@Davisg207 Could we force this without everyone taking action?

Having everyone send a quick weekly report on how they’re using Claude. Claude reviews it and flags who’s becoming a power user versus who needs support. It’s not about monitoring or efficiency, it’s genuinely because I care about the people I work with and want them to succeed.

@bprintco We do R&D external partnering, typically billion dollar enterprise on demand side and researchers or small startups on supply

Okay, let's do something for fun... tell me what your business is and I'll give you the best marketing strategy I can think of.

@jasondavisseo Tool

Right now, someone in your city is asking ChatGPT for the best HVAC company nearby. Do you know if it's recommending you or your competitor? Most contractors have never checked. 👇 We built a free tool that tells you in 30 seconds. Enter your business name, service, and city. It runs 6 simultaneous searches across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google Gemini, real customer searches + direct name searches. You get: → ✅ or ❌ per platform → Exact text AI returned → AI Visibility Score out of 6 → Prioritized action plan to close the gaps No sign-up. No cost. 30 seconds. Want the link? → Must follow → Comment "TOOL" → I'll send it. Follow me for AI + local SEO for home services. ♻️ Repost if you've never searched your business in ChatGPT, but know you should.

@dino11 @illscience More like why build the UI in the first place

@illscience wait this is wild to think about if computer use agents can just navigate any UI, why would anyone build official integrations anymore? they'd just automate through the front door does this basically kill API moats?

if you thought saas-pocalypse was bad just wait for computer use to get really good later this year the implications for incumbents are 100x more than coding agents because computer use asymmetrically benefits “hostile” integrators & expect a race to commoditize complements

@ron_ecomm This is a Moltbot reference

@ron_ecomm Ycombinator 2 weeks ago

I don't know about you guys but I actually haven't really spent that much time learning how to use AI. I obviously know the basics and know what the current "80% of gold standard" is but as a founder I think it's best to focus on hiring people who know how to use it instead of using it yourself. I don't know how you can actually become excellent on AI while juggling all the other responsibilities which are higher leverage. Surely managing many people at once who're each learning how to use AI is a higher leverage activity than actually learning it yourself. When I look across my business, there are so many basic workflow and ops optimization to be done that does not involve AI at all. Further, no matter the workflow it will require humans in the loop as of 2026. Because of this the human becomes the bottleneck not the AI, therefore the ops and workflow needs to be *pristine* in order for the human in the loop to be less of a bottleneck. Your org needs to fully embrace AI but you don't.

@CTW_SMB Sent you a dm

We are launching a position on this next weeks “Biz Ops Engineer” Professional Claude Tinkerer Ping me if you’re interested We’ve grown from $2.5M to $8M in 4.5 years (all self funded), goal is $20 in next 3 yrs. $50 after that. We want to be the best place to work in remote professional services. Many ProServ shops will disappear in 10 years. Not us, because we’re going to use AI to make our jobs so much more enjoyable. Eliminate the painful pats of jobs and just get to enjoy the best part of what we do - serving SMB owners Our plan on how we roll it out - wow folks internally with what we can streamline first w internal things. New client onboarding. Updating name changes in data bases, etc. Then, we’ll start building things for team to use in their day to day client work. But that will take some time. I think 12 -18 months focused internally

@cjquinn10 Interesting

I paid off my student debt and bought a house making warm intros within my network. No app. No gig work. Just people I already knew. Invited 10 friends to try it. Same results. Not everyone can be an influencer. Not everyone wants to Uber or DoorDash. But we all know people - and there's never been a real way to get paid for that quietly, with quality and trust at the center. Meanwhile AI is replacing SDRs, cold email is dead, and inboxes are full of slop. Businesses are starving for signal. A warm intro from someone you actually know converts at 10x anything an AI can generate. We built something around this. 1,000+ people in the beta making up to $20K/month just from their networks. Launching publicly soon. Want early access? DM me with your email.

@AizikZimerman To be honest, any overseas employee that you onboard in weeks is now an agent

I have over 50 overseas employees who power the back-end of my ~$40m plumbing company. These employees span areas including accounting, digital marketing, operations, and programming. I consider this to be one of our greatest unlocks for rapidly scaling. In the last 3 years, we’ve learned so much about how to hire and onboard these employees. If you own/run a business and are interested in global talent but don’t know where to start, shoot me a DM and I’ll give you my advice.

@niccruzpatane Industry has been aware of this leg up for Tesla for like 8 years, total incompetence to be blaming it today

Ford CEO Jim Farley, in a new interview, says he realized Ford had been doing EVs all wrong after his team ripped apart a Tesla: “When we ripped apart a Tesla, I was just absolutely flabbergasted. The Mach-E's wiring harness was 70 pounds heavier and 1.6 kilometers longer. We didn't know what was going on in [Tesla engineers' ] minds. But now we understand. They had no prejudice. We had prejudice. We'd gone to our supply-chain person and said, "Buy another wiring harness." [Tesla] said, "Let's design the vehicle for the lowest, smallest battery." Totally different approach.”

@danhockenmaier We're an RFP <> Proposal marketplace so in some ways we're facilitating the evaluation, not just search. I still fear we are on the left hand side though and need to start shifting

Takeaway from the Citrini backlash should not be that all marketplaces are immune to AI, just that DoorDash was a particularly bad example to choose. Defensibility is largely a product of how far they are to the right on this spectrum. The argument is "agents will just transact on your behalf and look for lowest price" This is massively flawed for two reasons in the case of DD: 1. Price is function of network density. You must be able to optimize routes and batch orders to win 2. Even if someone else could win on price, customers care about many other things (selection, quality, service, all of which DD has invested in heavily) So you can’t build a good agentic food delivery product without DD cooperation. And for obvious reasons, they will not cooperate. But it doesn’t follow that this will play out everywhere. The more heavily managed a marketplace is, the harder it is for someone else to cut in. There are basically 4 levels of marketplace: 1. Lead gen: just a list of suppliers 2. Transactional: also handle payment 3. Managed: also take on risk (returns, net terms) 4. Heavily managed: also manage service delivery Google has been trying to eat the marketplace profit pool for many years, and really only succeeded in taking most of it away from lead gen marketplaces. LLMs are another aggregation layer like Google, but with two big differences: search is much better, and critically, they can transact on your behalf. So LLMs should be able to push up one step farther in the stack, and take on transactional marketplaces directly. But is Anthropic going to try to do the final two jobs of managing risk or managing service delivery itself? Are they going to start accepting returns? Offering financing terms to buyers? Are they going to manage their own drivers or build their own logistics network. That seems very unlikely. As a result, managed marketplaces are largely safe. Marketplaces that do the hardest, most capital intensive, most scale-dependent stuff will get rewarded for it. I wrote an essay on this here: danhock.co/p/llms-vs-mark…

@danielbraden18 @ClayTravis Like when the Brits used to pack out stadiums for Farokh Bulsara

Would any other country in the world have their signature cultural event in a foreign language? I legit have no idea what just happened.