Neil 𝕏

13.8K posts

Neil 𝕏 banner
Neil 𝕏

Neil 𝕏

@Neil_X10

Disruption Investor | Business & Stock Analyst | Due Diligence | Institutional Pedigree | Tech. & AI-fanatic | Concentrated Multi-year 10X+ Investments | 🇺🇸

Katılım Haziran 2016
1.5K Takip Edilen5.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
During periods like this, I think the best use of time for $LMND investors is to go deeper on the business itself. If you want to strengthen or challenge your view, here’s the material I’d recommend working through: • Investor Days 1 and 2 • Interviews with Daniel Schreiber • Interviews with Shai Wininger • Interviews with key team members, including: - Tim Bixby (financials) - Michal Langer (product) - Maya Prosor (product) - Adina Eckstein (product) - Sean Burgess (claims) - Ori Erez (engineering) There really is a lot of substance out there if one is willing to do the work, and the community is generally happy to help point people in the right direction as well. I’ll try to host another Space in the next couple of weeks. If there are specific topics people would like to see covered, drop them below.
English
5
3
74
7.1K
DeHyped
DeHyped@dehyped_·
@Neil_X10 @theallinpod lemonade already uses in-house models for claims. podcast chatter won't change that.
English
1
0
0
38
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
Last week's @theallinpod had a section on AI-related valuation impacts, moats and disruption (from 36:56). Useful insights for $LMND investors.
Neil 𝕏 tweet media
English
5
0
18
2.6K
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
@ShadyJosh5 @grok @Ironic_Ape didn’t you recently highlight the overhaul LMND did with their pet pricing models? My understanding was its precision pricing vs parametric.
English
1
0
0
98
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
"Parametric insurance—automated, trigger-based payouts that slash LAE toward zero—is exactly the kind of efficiency play Lemonade was built for. Chubb’s move validates the model Lemonade has been executing since launch, but Chubb brings massive scale, balance-sheet strength, and now retail distribution (PetSmart)." Makes it sound like Lemonade is following a parametric insurance model as well. I thought they had a precision pricing model.
English
1
0
0
83
Neil 𝕏 retweetledi
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Dubai just put robot dogs on the front lines of firefighting These quadrupeds charge into 500°C+ infernos, toxic smoke & collapsing structures with 60 m water cannons blasting 2,400 L/min. AI locks on hotspots, humans stay safe.
English
41
277
1.4K
102K
Tydirium
Tydirium@TeslaUberRide·
$LMND is boring.
English
5
1
13
3.7K
mhmmokey
mhmmokey@johlarss·
Isn’t it pretty quiet in terms of news from the company’s management? Are they not entering any new states or markets, or anything else in the pipeline? Or is my patience just off… $LMND
English
4
0
1
744
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
Updated bear thesis $LMND
Mackattack@HardYackaMacka

@ASchulz888 Everything they do is replicable. Value in insurance isn’t software user interface anymore, it’s the actual product (the product being balance sheet). They have no IP data and no software edge anymore

English
3
0
16
5.6K
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
If you’ve watched all of them with the experience you claim to have, and this is your conclusion, then you have a deficiency in your interpretative ability as well a lack of understanding of how large organizations actually work. Why don’t you share your thesis fully fleshed out instead of spamming every LMND post with FUD-inspired commentary?
English
1
0
0
32
Mackattack
Mackattack@HardYackaMacka·
I have! And every earnings call, blog post and interview danny schreiber / shai have ever done. Address the argument technically if you're appealing to technicalities or just take a belief based view. Mine is based on the compounding nature of AI shifting value from electron to the atom. Software UX, claims and underwriting will be completely commoditised and the hard asset in insurance that has a right to earn the same notional cost of capital is BALANCE SHEET. As a wise man once said, "I beseech you in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken" (don't be dogmatic)
English
1
0
0
22
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
@CedarStResearch Thats perfect. Thanks for sharing and for clarifying. This will be very interesting to track overtime.
English
0
0
1
66
Cedar Street Research
Cedar Street Research@CedarStResearch·
@Neil_X10 Yeah wasn't saying one is better then the other simply reposting the data. It's the U.S. Statutory direct written premium and direct loss ratio data. I think NAIC started tracking Pet separately from inland marine in 2024 so it's relatively new.
English
2
0
0
115
Cedar Street Research
Cedar Street Research@CedarStResearch·
Anyone sees JABs growth in 2025? $TRUP $LMND curious to see if this new parametric structure $CB launched changes the landscape as well.
Cedar Street Research tweet media
English
2
0
1
1.7K
Neil 𝕏
Neil 𝕏@Neil_X10·
@HardYackaMacka Yep, it’s you. Still spamming LMND posts I see…
Mackattack@HardYackaMacka

@ASchulz888 Everything they do is replicable. Value in insurance isn’t software user interface anymore, it’s the actual product (the product being balance sheet). They have no IP data and no software edge anymore

English
0
0
1
133