Nemo Salus 🇬🇧

‘Climate Change’ is the most ruinously expensive social contagion in history (so far).

@ShangguanJiewen China is a land empire and has been for hundreds of years. It even added Tibet to its empire in many of our lifetimes.

🇨🇳China is the ONLY modern world power to ascend to its status, in peace. Spain was an empire. France was an empire. The UK was an empire. The USA is an empire. China is a global trading partner. We should learn from China's example. Facts matter.✔️

Daily reminder: When something requires decades of relentless propaganda and indoctrination, upheld by tyrannical law and the threat of force, it is not truth sustaining itself. It is a lie, held in place at the barrel of a gun.

@englishexit @boot15_vu They would say that, wouldn’t they.

@boot15_vu No, that is wrong. The supreme court and attorney general have both said that it wrong. It is limited by the constitution and the people.

In the United Kingdom, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, able to create or abolish any law, and that no other body can override or set aside its legislation. This principle is a cornerstone of the UK 🇬🇧 constitution.

@KNRmarketing Yes indeed. Culturally, the BBC needs to become excited by diverse opinion.

@NemoSalus More diversity of opinion, recruitment & editorial instead of just employing people with the same political beliefs & world view.

One word of advice for regaining trust in the BBC: broaden. The stupid thing people say in defence of the BBC is that if the left and right are both angry with it, then it must be doing OK, case closed. No. It is simply excluding or monstering every idea that lies outside the progressive consensus. That means it is excluding or monstering at least half of its audience, both on the traditional and far left and all of the right. telegraph.co.uk/tv/2026/03/25/…

#OnThisDay 1807 the Abolition of Slave Trade act gains Royal assent making trade of African slaves illegal in the Empire. In the decades that followed the Royal Navy captured over 1600 ships, freeing over 150,000 slaves. The cost was 2% of Government spending or half of RN budget

There. Is. No. Global. Price. For. Gas. How often do you need to be told this? What’s the Henry Hub price today? What’s the UK price today? Are they the same … or even close? Let me tell you, for April 2026 contracts. Henry Hub, right now: $2.87/MMBtu UK NBP right now: $16.79/MMBtu So UK prices are 5.8x US prices. I don’t like calling people liars but you must know this, so what else is there to say?

James Orr and Danny Kruger are the thinking part of Reform. Listen to them in conversation here. podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/fir…

There is no plan.

Good job 👍🏻

The red pin marks the Russian oil terminal that Ukraine has destroyed. ‘Aggressors regret’ must now be quite advanced.

They’re literally telling us their plan.

Jews are not the 'canaries in the coalmine'. Pubescent English girls were, and nobody cared.

The Great Pyramids of Giza used to be entirely faced in dressed limestone and topped with gold leaf. The locals robbed it all because they didn’t give a shit about their own culture. Britain, uniquely, cared. We preserved it and make it available for everyone in the world to experience first hand in the first universal museum of human history. The words you’re looking for are ‘thank you, Britain.’

All the EU needed to do was wait a few years for a new Britain-hating govt. Then they knew it would blame everything on Brexit, weaken our borders even more and damage our military position. In a two-party system, all they needed to do was wait. Boy, did they get their man...

I've been saying this for years. The reason public art is so ugly now is it's meant to erode your pride in your community and culture so those in power can reshape it with minimal resistance.

@JChimirie66677 @redfeathers Gimli son of Gloin, “Certainty of death. Small chance of succcess. What are we waiting for?” EU membership is to commit national suicide, as the evidence shows. Brexit still presents Britain with a chance to succeed, if only we would take it.

They Never Accepted Brexit. Now They're Reversing It In her interview with The Economist, Rachel Reeves said: "If we could go back in time I would have voted again to Remain. I wish we had voted to Remain." She is not a minister reluctantly implementing a democratic result she inherited. She is a minister who never accepted it and is now in a position to reverse it. Everything she has said this week flows from that position: the claim of economic damage, the insistence that Brexit is the exception rather than the norm, the promise of gains through closer alignment. This is not dispassionate analysis. It is a settled conviction finally given power. Starmer will use the King's Speech in May to introduce legislation bringing 76 EU directives back onto the UK statute book. The government calls this technical alignment. Lord Frost, who negotiated Britain's departure, calls it what it is: subordination. The bill will make EU laws applicable in Britain without Parliament having any meaningful say in shaping them. The scope is wide; food standards, pesticides, animal health, and the regulatory framework governing genetically modified organisms. That last area cuts straight through one of the few clear gains ministers themselves once claimed for Brexit: the freedom to set our own approach to gene editing. Bringing those rules back under EU alignment contradicts that position directly, and no one in government has explained why. Peter Kyle made the position plain. The government's red lines on the single market and customs union apply to "the moment we're in". Not permanent. Not binding. A holding position. Chris Bryant went further, calling the 2016 referendum a pack of lies and refusing to rule out a rejoin pledge. Sadiq Khan has already called for Labour to fight the next election on a commitment to full membership. Within Labour, the direction of travel is not debated. It is assumed. Downing Street rejected Khan's demand. But it's worth looking at what that rejection actually said. The Prime Minister's spokesman confirmed the red lines stand for now, while also stating that where alignment serves the national interest it will be pursued and that the prize is considerable. The denial and the programme sit side by side, delivered in the same breath. That is not a government holding a line. That is a government managing a timetable. The Cabinet Office is already reviewing automotive and chemicals for the next wave of EU law adoption. The agrifood bill is described as the first in a series of sector-wide deals. The summit planned for the tenth anniversary of the Brexit vote in June is the intended moment for the food and agriculture agreement to be concluded. Sector by sector, law by law, the architecture is being rebuilt. The only question left is pace. Labour's 2024 manifesto was explicit. No return to the single market. No return to the customs union. No freedom of movement. That promise has now been exposed for what it was: not a commitment but a lie, used to neutralise opposition long enough to win the election. Kyle has said the red lines are temporary. Bryant has said the referendum cannot be trusted. Reeves has said she wishes it had gone the other way. The intent is no longer hidden. It is stated plainly, on the record. If the government has stopped pretending, the question is simple. When does the opposition stop pretending too? "Chris Bryant went further, calling the 2016 referendum a pack of lies and refusing to rule out a rejoin pledge."

Never - never - vote for anyone who is in anyway sympathetic to socialism. They are terrible people and will ruin you.

Classical parenting resembles modern pet ownership Modern parenting resembles endangered-species conservation