Jay Couture 🇨🇦

12K posts

Jay Couture 🇨🇦 banner
Jay Couture 🇨🇦

Jay Couture 🇨🇦

@NeoLithicJay

I build high-end electronics for military and commercial uses. Single dad of 3. @neolithicx.bsky.social

Ontario, Canada Katılım Eylül 2011
465 Takip Edilen494 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
Are we really going to let @fordnation dismantle public health care and education? He is intentionally setting them up to fail to justify privatization. Fight for your OHIP card and your children's future! #onpoli #VoteFordOut2022
English
41
584
2.2K
0
Jay Couture 🇨🇦 retweetledi
Damien Willey (Kernow Damo) 🟢 🔴
The most revealing thing in this post is that the worker’s need to live never appears as a real business cost. VAT is real. Business rates are real. Energy bills are real. National Insurance is real. Rent is real. Beans, milk, cups, insurance, accountants, card fees, compliance, all real. But the person making the coffee needing enough money to pay rent, eat, heat their home, travel to work and not rely on state top-ups? Suddenly that is “silly socialism”. No. That is the cost of labour. If your business model depends on paying people less than they need to live, then the state is not attacking your business by demanding higher wages. The state is currently propping your business up by letting taxpayers subsidise the gap between what you pay and what your staff need to survive. That is the bit you cannot grasp, or do not want to grasp. You say businesses fail because they are unprofitable. Fine. Businesses do fail. But “I can only make a profit if my workers stay poor” is not a serious moral defence of a business. It is a confession. You say a cup of coffee has to absorb lots of costs. Yes. Welcome to business. But you are treating wages as the flexible bit that must always be squeezed so your business model survives. Nobody says, “If you can’t afford coffee beans, just get the taxpayer to provide the beans.” Nobody says, “If you can’t afford electricity, tell the staff to sit in the dark and call it prosperity.” But when the unaffordable item is the person being doing the work, suddenly everyone is supposed to become very mature and economically literate about poverty pay. You also get VAT badly muddled. VAT-registered businesses can generally reclaim VAT on goods and services bought for business use, and the VAT registration threshold is turnover above £90,000. So this line about 20% VAT and inputs not being claimable is not the killer argument you think it is. The bigger point is simpler. Workers do not get to tell landlords, supermarkets, energy firms and train companies that their boss has “compounding costs” so everyone must please wait quietly while they are paid less than a living wage. The worker’s bills have compounded too. Their rent has gone up. Their food has gone up. Their energy has gone up. Their council tax has gone up. Their travel has gone up. Funny how “proper economics” always discovers pressure when it lands on the owner, but turns into a lecture on realism when it lands on the staff. The Green proposal is £15 an hour by April 2027. The real Living Wage is already £13.45 across the UK and £14.80 in London, calculated on what people need to live, not what a struggling employer would prefer to pay. And even before that, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that a single working-age adult on the National Living Wage was nearly £7,000 short of the gross income needed for a minimum acceptable standard of living in 2025. So spare us the sob story that £15 is some wild Bolshevik fantasy. It is much closer to the actual cost of surviving than poverty pay dressed up as realism. You say jobs will disappear. That is always the threat. Every time wages rise, the same people emerge to announce that civilisation will collapse because a cleaner, waiter, carer or barista might be able to pay a bill without choosing which meal to skip. Yet the Low Pay Commission’s latest judgement was that recent National Living Wage increases have not had a significant negative impact on employment. That does not mean every business has no pressure. Of course small businesses are under pressure. Business rates need reform. Energy costs are brutal. Rents are often obscene. Big chains can absorb shocks that small independents cannot. But none of that proves workers should be the shock absorber. It proves the economy has been built so badly that the smallest businesses and the lowest-paid workers are set against each other while landlords, energy firms, banks and large corporations walk away with the margin. Your welfare argument is even worse. Universal Credit is explicitly available to people who are working but on low incomes, and as earnings rise, Universal Credit is tapered down. That means low wages and public spending are already linked. The taxpayer is already helping cover the living costs that low-pay employers do not meet. So when you ask “where does the money come from?”, one answer is: from the business that uses the labour. That is not extremist. That is basic decency. Profit is not ugly. Profit made by selling a product people want, paying suppliers properly, paying workers enough to live, and still having something left over is perfectly defensible. Profit made by underpaying staff and then expecting the public to top them up through benefits is not heroic enterprise. It is a business model leaning on the state while pretending to despise the state. And this “read a book” routine is always funny from people whose entire economic theory seems to be: owners must be protected from hardship, workers must be exposed to it, and taxpayers must quietly make up the difference while being lectured about socialism. A liveable wage is not a luxury add-on. It is the price of employing a human being. If a business cannot pay rent, it cannot use the building. If it cannot pay suppliers, it cannot use the stock. If it cannot pay energy bills, it cannot keep the lights on. And if it cannot pay workers enough to live, it should not expect applause for creating jobs that keep people poor.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A simple message to the silly socialists. You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business. I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage. So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis. To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs: - 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back) - Business rates (a tax before you earn) - Rising NI costs - Employment rights load - Rising energy costs - Inflation All these are imposed by the state. There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses. Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts. If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country. So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had. So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status. So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich. I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs. So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas. Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.

English
164
449
1.7K
74.8K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦 retweetledi
Commie Trucker
Commie Trucker@commie_trucker·
No. My labor feeds and houses my family, it feeds and houses my CEO’s family as well.
Bruce Varney@varneybe

@commie_trucker Your bosses made it possible for you to support your family.

English
88
1.2K
10.1K
104.9K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
@EricRStPierre If we just refined our own, this wouldn't happen. We're forced to sell to the US at a discount, and then buy it back at a premium. That is why gas will always cost more here. We should be investing in refineries and east-west pipelines.
English
0
0
0
8
Eric St-Pierre
Eric St-Pierre@EricRStPierre·
Luna walk → gas sticker shock at $1.90/L and climbing. BC already over $2. Canada sits on the 3rd-largest oil reserves on Earth… yet we’re getting gouged while Liberals chose ideology over pipelines. Full story + why $2+/L is coming 👇 What are you seeing at the pump?
Eric St-Pierre tweet media
Eric St-Pierre@EricRStPierre

I was taking Luna out for a walk today with my wife. A friendly woman with her dog joined us for a bit. She was super chatty, gave Luna a delicious treat, and her big fluffy dog got one too. She was especially fired up about the price of gas. She seemed pretty savvy, sharing all the tips she uses to save at the pump, and she kept saying how brutal it is for regular folks now that it’s climbing toward $1.90 a litre. I told her I was surprised we haven’t hit $2.00 yet, like they’ve already seen in B.C. She looked absolutely stunned. And you know what? Millions of Canadians are going to wear that exact same stunned look when gas really starts marching north of $2.00 a litre — because it’s coming, folks. It’s coming hard. Millions of us are already tapped out and broke. We’re the ones staring at the pump in disbelief, doing the mental math on whether we can afford to drive to work, pick up the kids from hockey, or even run to the grocery store without wincing. And while we’re scraping by, Canada, this massive, resource-rich beast of a country, could be an absolute economic powerhouse. We could be the energy capital of the world. We could be creating wealth, lowering prices for every family from coast to coast, creating hundreds of thousands of high-paying jobs, and telling the world “come and get it” on our terms. If the Liberals had just positioned us properly. Instead? They sold us out to ideology and handed the Americans the keys to our own wallet. Think about it. Canada sits on the third-largest proven oil reserves on the planet, the oil sands alone are an absolute monster. We’ve got natural gas for days, hydro power that could light up half the continent, and the geography to be the energy bridge between North America, Asia, and Europe. Done right, we could be exporting clean, reliable Canadian energy to the world at full price. No more selling our raw bitumen at a massive discount to the Americans while they refine it and sell the finished product back to us at a premium. No more begging for pipeline capacity. No more watching our own oil get bottlenecked and discounted because Ottawa spent years demonizing the very industry that could have made us rich. We could have had pipelines running east, west, and south, Energy East, Northern Gateway, a properly fast-tracked Trans Mountain that didn’t balloon into a multi-billion-dollar clown show. We could have had west-coast ports shipping our product straight to hungry markets in Asia instead of forcing 97% of our crude down a single leaky pipeline into the U.S. market where they set the terms. We could have built refineries here at home so Canadian families aren’t getting gouged at the pump while American refiners laugh all the way to the bank. But no. The Liberals, with their virtue-signaling, their endless environmental reviews, their Bill C-69 that basically made it illegal to build anything bigger than a lemonade stand, and their carbon tax that punishes every driver, trucker, farmer, and senior just trying to heat their home, chose ideology over infrastructure. They killed project after project. They delayed, they regulated, they virtue-posted on social media while the rest of us watched our lifeblood get siphoned off. And now? The Americans have us by the throat. They control the pipelines. They control the refining capacity. They buy our heavy crude cheap because we have nowhere else to send it, then sell us back gasoline and diesel at whatever price the market (and their profit margins) will bear. Every time global tensions spike or a refinery hiccup happens south of the border, we feel it immediately at the pump, while our own vast reserves sit there like a trapped gold mine we’re not allowed to fully develop. This isn’t bad luck. This is policy failure on a national scale. This is why your wife is cutting back on groceries. This is why the single mom down the street is choosing between gas money and rent. This is why truckers are idling their rigs because the numbers don’t add up anymore. This is why small businesses in every province are closing their doors. Energy is the foundation of everything, heating, transportation, manufacturing, food production. When you let ideologues strangle that foundation, the entire economy starts to crumble. And the worst part? The Liberals had the chance, hell, they still have the chance under Carney, to flip this script. To say “Canada first,” to fast-track the infrastructure, to partner with industry and Indigenous communities the right way, and to turn our energy advantage into real sovereignty and real prosperity. We could be the envy of the world instead of the cautionary tale. We could have 85 cent gas and a booming economy funding better healthcare, better roads, and actual climate innovation that doesn’t bankrupt families. But they chose the opposite. They chose the photo-ops, the international applause, the net-zero fairy tales while real Canadians get hammered at the pump and in the wallet. So the next time you’re standing at that gas station watching the numbers climb, remember this: it didn’t have to be this way. Canada didn’t have to be held hostage by American leverage. We could have been the energy powerhouse of the planet, rich, independent, and thriving. Instead we got weak leadership, neglected infrastructure, and a government that would rather lecture you about your carbon footprint than secure your future. Wake up, Canada. It’s time to demand better. Because at $2.00 a litre and rising, we’re not just paying at the pump anymore, we’re paying for decades of Liberal failure. And Luna and I are tired of watching good, hardworking people get stunned into silence while the country we love gets sold short. What do you think, am I wrong? Or is this the conversation we all need to be having before it’s too late?

English
28
12
68
2.8K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
@colewhogan @PierrePoilievre You call it fundraising, but I call it grifting, since those who donate aren't getting sweet dick all in return. But Pierre gets a massive expense account as a result. Enjoy your cult of personality, which lacks the "personality" part.
English
4
4
15
409
Cole Hogan
Cole Hogan@colewhogan·
Ottawa, ON –The Conservative Party of Canada announced today it raised over $9.4 million in the first quarter of 2026, marking the Party’s second-best non-election Q1 fundraising result on record. Under @PierrePoilievre, Conservatives continue to build strong grassroots support. In Q1 alone, 40,410 contributors gave a total of $9,430,682. As Canadians struggle with the rising cost of housing, food, and fuel, tens of thousands are choosing to back the Conservative vision with their hard-earned dollars.
English
131
144
754
105.2K
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
This is my first interview with Pierre. I asked 9 rapid-fire questions, in less than 90 seconds. Bro is so chill. No one can ever make me not like him. He’s our guy.
English
427
1.3K
7.3K
87.8K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
@PeterSweden7 How hard is it to look up what communism ACTUALLY is? You're not being edgy, you look fucking stupid. Open a book ffs.
English
0
0
0
17
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7·
A Canadian provincial Minister just said that parents have no rights over their children in the context of gender identity and pronouns at school. This is Communism.
English
161
461
2.3K
22.4K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
All I got from this nonsense post is pure small dick energy with a side of snowflake. Do you not know how to tell reality from fiction? Is everything you don't like "inciting violence?" As Soldier Boy would say, stop being so fucking pathetic and weak.
Jon Del Arroz | Pop Culture & Gaming 🎮@jondelarroz

The Boys showrunner Eric Kripke told TVLine yesterday exactly who the character Firecracker was based on, and why she was always going to die. "It's the most predictable pattern in the world, which is Trump demanding ultimate allegiance, making someone compromise every value they've ever had, and then kicking them out into the cold. It's just to make the point that it doesn't matter how much you kiss Homelander's a**. It doesn't matter how much you give up. Nothing will ever be enough, and you'll eventually get hoisted on your own petard, which just means stabbed on your own spear, and that's what happens to her." The character was modeled on Marjorie Taylor Greene, Megyn Kelly, Lauren Boebert, and Pam Bondi. He also called Pete Hegseth "a clown in charge of the military" in the Hollywood Reporter. He's compared Homelander to Trump by name for five years. When conservatives pushed back he told them to "go watch something else." The show has a 95% on Rotten Tomatoes. Amazon is making a prequel. He's getting Emmy buzz. If a conservative showrunner named AOC, Ilhan Omar, and Rachel Maddow as the inspiration for a character he wrote to be murdered, every journalist in the country would call it a threat. When Kripke does it, it's prestige satire. Should Kripke be investigated for inciting violence?

English
0
0
1
53
illuminatibot
illuminatibot@iluminatibot·
Justin Trudeau's net worth in 2020 was $10M. At the end of 2022 it's $385M. He made $351,000 as PM. Where are his tax returns?
English
448
6.3K
38.8K
701.4K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦 retweetledi
𝙰𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚗 🇨🇦 🇺🇦
Let's do this, 🇨🇦 The Welsh govt is in the process of introducing legislation to allow for the removal of politicians who lie to the public. The rules would allow for suspension/disqualification of MPs and election candidates found guilty of deliberate deception. Bye @CPC_HQ
𝙰𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚗 🇨🇦 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
60
349
765
78.8K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
This is a no-brainer. I'll never support surveillance pricing. It's purely predatory and a gross invasion of privacy and personal autonomy. Shit...almost sounds like a charter challenge...
David Moscrop@David_Moscrop

Banning surveillance pricing should be a no-brainer for governments. Companies shouldn't be allowed to spy on people so they can charge them more than the person standing next to them. Ban snitch pricing. Do it now. davidmoscrop.com/p/i-cant-belie…

English
0
0
1
14
Jay Couture 🇨🇦 retweetledi
Jay Couture 🇨🇦 retweetledi
TeeTee
TeeTee@InfragilisTee·
TeeTee tweet media
ZXX
51
165
1.3K
22.9K
Lorrie Goldstein
Lorrie Goldstein@sunlorrie·
"It’s a sad indictment ... when there are YouTubers who are finding out more about what’s happening within the Liberal government and the scandals and the connections of well-connected insiders, lobbyists and family members,”
Holly Doan@hollyanndoan

Chair of Commons #ethics committee tells reporters “do your goddamn job” as cabinet moves to quash committee scrutiny of spending & appointments. MP @JohnBrassardCPC says media are so Liberal-friendly the “Opposition party is held to a greater account than the government.” blacklocks.ca/do-your-gd-job… #cdnmedia #cdnpoli

English
48
395
1K
21.2K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
@RichardCityNews He's just trying to gaslight all of us because he got caught. Nothing but pathetic excuses that a child would make. Time to grow up and take accountability, Dougie.
English
0
0
3
138
Richard Southern
Richard Southern@RichardCityNews·
WATCH - "I've made mistakes” admits Premier Ford as he addresses selling a private jet days after buying it. But he makes the case for needing one “It makes like so much easier” Ford also complains coverage was unfair “The inconsistencies from the media are just mind-boggling”
English
214
36
184
59.2K
Jay Couture 🇨🇦
Jay Couture 🇨🇦@NeoLithicJay·
@Bigfoot784 @nativetongue68 @MichelleLA1981 I've seen MANY independents over the years. I've even seen some win. The last one was in 2008. While it doesn't happen often, it DOES happen. We have had many independents on our ridings ballot every election.
English
1
0
0
3
Bigfoot78
Bigfoot78@Bigfoot784·
@NeoLithicJay @nativetongue68 @MichelleLA1981 That makes no sense of course you elect the party. People who get elected run WITH a specific party they dont run independent then choose what side they are on once elected. If Jack Hoff is a friend, but not in the party i support, sorry Jack. The traitors betrayed their voters.
English
1
0
0
11
Bigfoot78
Bigfoot78@Bigfoot784·
@NeoLithicJay @nativetongue68 @MichelleLA1981 Well in one sense yeah obviously they were elected... but what @MichelleLA1981 is saying is they weren't all elected by liberals. So yes it was an unelected majority, he only got it by bribes and backroom deals. He bought his majority. So where is the misinformation? Do tell...
English
1
0
1
19