ArcNephilim

Omg! This video of January 6 is a display of the violent attempt to stop the transfer of power. Oh wait... this is a video from 2017 of Leftists trying to stop Trump's inauguration.... oops twitter.com/KyleKashuv/sta…

@OliLondonTV Omfg... did they add a gun because he's black?!?! 🤣😂 That seems pretty racist

Singer Kelis shows off her black ‘Toy Story’ Woody doll. “We took a lot of time to make sure all the details were right.” Toy company ‘Make it Brown’ says it turns toys black so the black community can feel “represented & included.”

@RollingupSticcy @raccoon_r By this logic, every villain in every movie should just die immediately without a fight. You can't be this dumb, right?

@raccoon_r Y'all wanted an epic moment for a rapist superhero?🤣

I don’t care what anyone says, this ending would have been perfect. The fandom wanted to see Deep actually fight back instead of getting taken out so easily. 🤷‍♂️💯

According to the CIA's own glossary, you are prescribing too specific of a definition. Claiming that the attack at Pulse was an attack on gay people completely ignores that he didn't even know it was a gay bar. His original target was Disney World and he adjusted his target en route. His attack was a result of the killing of Abu Waheeb - aka blowback. You can call him American all you want, but he told people in Pulse that he was doing this to "stop America from bombing his country" - he didn't view himself as an American, whether or not you do. The reality is that these radical Mosques are able to radicalize attendees by pointing to things we do in ME countries. Even if you support bombing those countries, you should at least understand what their grievances are.

@Pointer_Chaser And "blowback" had a specific meaning: when the government ARMED another group and then that group used those arms against them/unintended targets. Someone miffed 6,000 miles away and sperging on a murder spree against randos isn't "blowback."

I agree. And here's a story contextualizing why. I was at Tom Woods’ house for a meetup and Scott Horton was giving a short talk. During the talk, Horton claimed that the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orland where 49 people were murdered by Omar Mateen was a consequence of "blowback." As I heard him say this, my face turned to a scowl. I knew this story. I knew that "blowback" made absolutely no sense. You see, Omar Mateen mentioned in his 911 call that this was made about the attacks in Syria and he was pledging his life to ISIS. Here's the thing: Omar Mateen wasn't Syrian. In fact, Omar Mateen's family moved from Afghanistan in the 1980s and Omar was birthed in a JEWISH HOSPITAL in NEW YORK! So how is it that an American man, who's family is not from Syria, who was born in New York in a Jewish hospital, is a product of "blowback?" The CIA did not run him any weapons. He was not personally affected by the attacks where maybe a family member could have died. His attack was on random gay people at a gay night club. It was at this moment that I realized Scott Horton had no sense of cause-and-effect relationships. Instead of being accurate that Omar Mateen was radicalized by teachings from joining a Mosque, he tried to turn Omar's mass murder of random gay people into an "underdog" cry of resistance. There was nothing about "resistance" with this act. It was depraved mass murder against people completely unrelated to anything going on in Syria. I started to deep-dive Scott Horton's history and I saw this pattern I just witnessed up-close. Gross generalizations about people and events where the actors and actions did not align with the cause and effects. He would use the anecdotal fallacy to draw deep demonization of anyone or anything he stood against, which was especially anything to do with Israel, Zionism, or Western state hegemony. It was a turning point for me as I finally came to understand who Scott Horton really is. He never really drifted from his core history of being a leftist punk skateboarder who simply took his leftist class theories and applied them lop-sided through the veneer of "libertarianism." There was never any nuance about the actors and actions when it came to what he critiqued. And how could he possible have it? The man has spent a career podcasting and writing on global affairs yet has never himself been to these places and done the hard work of actually observing up-close the conflicts and interviewing people on both sides to get an understanding. As his ideas are donated because they're not coming from primary sourcing, you can see the pattern of how he gets his ideas. He cites to Al Jazeera, The Gaza Health Ministry, Russia Today, The Grayzone, and a host of leftist media whose socialist and communist media heads share his "antiwar" mentality - just from an even stronger leftist bent. I want you to actually fact check me on this. Go look at his sourcing on all his 30+ years of articles with Antiwar dot com. It's out there in the open to see. So Scott Horton does not help libertarians become better thinkers for liberty by giving them a more robust and nuanced approach to foreign conflicts that properly weighs the totality of real foreign threats and terror groups. In his worldview, the world is largely just captured by Israeli Zionists and nobody has any material blame, agency, or threat to pose as compared to the Zionist class. Just like communists blame capitalists and the bourgeois, so does Horton blame "Zionists/Zionism" as his boogeyman for every ill in the world. He will downplay mass murder in Iran and Chinese state takeovers of industry so long as it maintains a focus on Israel and "Western Zionism" as the ultimate threats. And this is why I completely distanced and dissociated from Horton and his lot of comrades whose worldview is actually just the leftist/third-worldist view that hates America and Israel under the premises that they are "Zionist colonialist occupiers." This type of warped thinking is what gets you the results like in South Africa where the "anti-colonialists" take over in the name of "social justice" for "blowback," and it's just a ruse to institute state central planning for socialist ends. This messaging does not help libertarianism. It doesn't ground people in truth and reality. It just causes them to become allied with communists, socialists, and other third-world leftists in the name of being "Anti-US hegemony" and "anti-Zionism," while, in reality, aiding and promoting those who want to both end Western capitalism and bring about a radical Marxist order. I want nothing to do with these people and I want nothing to do with those who are trying to upend the Western enlightenment because they think they are being, "anti-war." NONE of it is "anti-war," because they pooh-pooh the violence of third worldist governments when they mass murder and kidnap people over free speech and free market issues. They downplay anything they believe will give the CIA and neocons a boner. That's not dealing in reality. That's dismissing REAL state violence just because it doesn't go along with the narrative you want to pose. That's dishonest and shameful. If you want to have true liberty, you need to reject this all-or-nothing third-worldist mentality that has you rationalizing the violent takeover by socialists, communists, and Islamic-aligned anti-capitalist third worldists who wear the skinsuit of "America first" to get you to support vile socialists like Mamdani under the pretense that they're at least "anti-Zionism" and "for going after the Epstein class." This rhetoric is being weaponized against you to TRICK YOU into support those who want to actually enslave you and end capitalism. And I will, for one, will not stand for it. I can only hope you also agree and do the same. "¡Viva la libertad, carajo!

@TheEarleBird2 @Mykolageto @lxrdkensv His point was still valid.. Homelander begging to live at that point didn't make sense with the way they changed his character. Having Homelander kill Black Noir was such a dumb choice. But everything gets dumb when people inject their "message"

@Mykolageto @lxrdkensv Except, that isn't Homelander. The "person" Butcher is standing over had just KILLED Homelander before those panels. Try *actually* reading the comic. You're mad that the bad guy you weirdly identify with/admire went out like a bitch. Just say that.

THE ENDING WAS GREAT STOP BEING CRYING BABYS AND ENJOY ONCE IN A LIFETIME

The funding matters especially considering what generation the funding works on. Massie lost because the older generations still have a bit more sway in election results in certain areas of the country. Ad funding works on boomers, not as much on the younger Gen that use social media. Pumping massive amounts of money into smear campaigns won't work as well in the next 10-20+ years.

@observer_0x0000 @alexbruesewitz Defend it? I've been generally favorable towards Massie, I like him The context of the discussion was influencers not funding, of course funding matters too

The Thomas Massie race proved that a lot of “influencers” on this app have no real world influence

@alexbruesewitz This race proves that there's a generational divide in politics and that boomers still have a few percentage points over the younger generations at the polls now - but not for long.

@PatrickSimel28 @supernalmystic @AsianDigest Because they are goats. That poster is incorrect.

@supernalmystic @AsianDigest some of them look too big to be cats

In India Hindus flinging Cats to air to celebrate their Festival of Holi

@AsianDigest I believe they are goats, but still disgusting 3rd world behavior that should leave everyone questioning immigration policies.

You literally couldn't be more wrong. Criminal Trespass: Climbing on a bridge (especially on restricted areas like towers, cables, or trusses) is considered unlawful entry onto public infrastructure. Reckless Endangerment: Many climbers are charged with this because they put themselves, motorists below, and first responders at risk. Public Nuisance: Unauthorized climbing, particularly for stunts, is often classified as a public nuisance. Specific City/State Laws: Many cities have specific ordinances that explicitly forbid climbing on, under, or around bridges.

@thatwoudbme @FordFischer @WashProbs The police don’t have to be there, he’s committed no crime

NOW: “Guido, I see you up there taking pictures, if you can do that, you can look at your text messages that I sent you!” Police announce to Guido Reichstadter, there since Friday. “Be the man of your word, come down at noon!” “Pack up all of your things, today is the day!”

To be fair, she got the ink for free with the terms of the subscription. She didn't "buy ink" as she claimed. The subscription ink stops working when you cancel your subscription. The subscription model is actually good for people who don't print often. Everyone going crazy is actually hurting infrequent printer users who don't want to waste money on costly ink cartridges.

I just bought a new Epson printer a few weeks ago. Nothing like this with Epson yet. I hope at least one major brand never does this subscription BS. That brand will dominate the market.

@kangminlee Problem is that now you can't grab your baby and run while some lunatic is stabbing her/him in the shopping cart

Women will do this then vote to import infinity third world child rapists into our country

@PapaDaddio72 @ericmmatheny I'm a 3x Trump voter. You don't know anything about my views.

BuT ItS bLaSpHeMy

@Jess4u @MrJesseMN @ericmmatheny @AnamaMOSS The Left has always had double standards and uses weaponized outrage to control people... That's something we have rightly criticized them for. Doesn't mean the Right should behave that way.

@MrJesseMN @ericmmatheny @AnamaMOSS True. But the issue is most of the people screaming didn’t have a problem with those.

@mdfarnie @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 Ask Gaza what happens when another country controls your civilian utilities.... America would never stand for another country having control over our civilian power and research programs (rightfully so). Yet people like you act like this is an unreasonable hill to die on 🤣😂

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 US literally said they would provide all the nuclear material needed at no cost, and better quality than they could make. They don't need any for years, but that is the poison pill? Only way that is true is if the uranium is for bombs.

It appears that the zero enrichment poison pill killed the Islamabad negotiations yesterday. We have 9 more days in this cease fire to fix this, but we must pursue our goals not Israel's. Trump's redline has always been no nuclear weapons for Iran, not zero enrichment. Iran agrees with this and has not sought to develop or obtain a nuke since 2003 but needs to retain the ability to enrich for their "not Saddam but not Qaddafi" policy to work. This makes negotiations between the U.S. & Iran workable as the dispute is on levels of enrichment and monitoring. This is a threat to Israel getting us to do the heavy lifting in the regime change/decapitation war they want. Israel needs us chasing every trace of uranium in Iran because that ensures we stay engaged militarily in Iran, because how do we ever fully make sure Iran can't enrich without taking out the regime? This is the recipe for an endless bloody war or supporting/turning a blind eye to Israel using a WMD on Iran. Restrain Israel, get a deal, open the SOH, focus on saving our Republic, not playing empire.

@mdfarnie @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 I literally said 20%... Which one is higher? 0% or 20%? Zero enrichment is a ridiculous ask. It's obviously a poison pill.

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 You mean the reactor that we GAVE them 60 years ago? The reactor that currently has YEARS of fuel stocked up? The reactor that needs 20%, not the 60% they are making?

@mdfarnie @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 The Tehran Research Reactor (TRR), produces medical radioisotopes like Molybdenum-99 for local hospitals.

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 They have no nuclear power generation. They charge $.02 per liter for gas. Why would they want nuclear energy?

Literally no country would take that deal. Iran would then be energy dependent to the US and Israel. So any time we decide to attack them again, we just shut off the power and kill them by the thousands (see Gaza for how that plays out). Yes, it's a poison pill. Stop lying to yourself. America and Israel would never allow another nation to control their civilian energy.

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 It's not a poison pill if the administration offered to supply them with enriched uranium for civilian use, which they did.

@n4uva @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 Dummy. There's no civilian use for 60% But there is for up to 20% Demanding zero is a poison pill Keep it up - these types of dishonest takes are what's turning people away from the War Hawks

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 Thank you confirming that there's no civilian use for it, and your previous point is irrelevant.

@n4uva @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 Deterrent. The same reason Japan does it.

@NephilimArc @willchamberlain @joekent16jan19 So why do they brag about having enriched uranium to 60%?