Nina Fenko

250 YEARS OF AMERICA!🇺🇸 On July 4, 1776, 56 signers adopted the Declaration of Independence — 13 colonies declared freedom from Great Britain. From a small nation (~2.5 million people) to a superpower with over 340 million people, the world’s largest economy, and the oldest republic on Earth. 250 years of: Revolution → Constitution → Expansion → Moon landing → Civil Rights → Technology & Freedom. “AMERICA IS BACK… This is our heritage, this is our history, and this is the destiny of America: to be the greatest, most incredible country to ever grace the Earth.” – President Donald Trump God Bless America! 🇺🇸 What do you love most about America? Comment below 👇 #America250 #250YearsOfAmerica #July4th #USA250 #Trump #Freedom250

Managing X when we reach AGI and have space datacenters

@ABC 😊🚀🚀

Japan's experimental reusable rocket took off and safely landed in a first test flight as the country seeks to achieve the technology key to cutting launch costs and competing in the global space market dominated by SpaceX. abcnews.link/jp5UH2u

@Grummz 😊😊🚀🚀

Europe is just woke legislating itself into the stone age. An entire continent and culture lost to bureaucracy and self destructive policies.

@laozhouhengmei 🚀🚀🚀🚀

中国实现火箭回收后，反共圈子里很多人都在冷嘲热讽：就会抄袭、落后美国十年、甚至还有说是AI做的视频等等。 我觉得大可不必。 中国没有0到1的创新能力，是事实；但只要你给出一个0到1的idea，他必然能非常快速弄出1~99，而且经常还搞得非常便宜，这也是事实。 像火箭回收这件事，确实不是中国的创新主意，但欧洲、日本、韩国，所有发达国家，也没有人抄得出来， 那么这事情的含金量就不低。（我觉得日本JAXA那个暂时不算） 当然你可以说这是举国之力。举国制的缺点很明显，优势也很明显。我们既然要批评一个制度的劣势，就必须整体、客观、全面地去看。 你可以说：举国制是国强民弱、是牺牲个体利益来满足宏大叙事。这都没问题，但你不能不承认客观事实。 半年前Seedance 2.0出来的时候我就说过了，我觉得有一部分海外反共人士最大的问题是：不愿意面对现实。 我当然希望中国能够脱离中共的统治，最起码，应该有其它竞争政治党派的存在，这是毋庸置疑的。但如果说你反共，却不愿意正视中共强大的地方，一看到中国哪里取得了成果，就找各种理由来给自己找心理安慰，什么AI做的啦、什么别人早就有啦，那你只是一只鸵鸟，跟那些说美国要崩溃说了几十年的小粉红，并无本质区别。 承认现实，并不意味着放弃价值判断； 恰恰相反 —— 不自欺欺人、不掩耳盗铃，才有资格讨论制度的优劣。

El video más detallado que he visto hasta ahora. Se ve perfectamente el funcionamiento de los ganchos y los cables. Me llamaban loco, pero yo sabía que sería un buen sistema de recuperación! 🤪 #LongMarch10B Via: h5.video.weibo.com/show/1034:5319…

@DimaZeniuk 🚀

SpaceX is on track to surpass last year's record pace for Starlink satellite deployments

@CNSpaceflight 🚀🚀🚀🚀

The return of Long March 10 booster, view from the ship

@cb_doge 🚀🚀🚀🚀

SpaceX doing SpaceX things 🔥

@BetterCallMedhi 🚀🚀🚀🚀

vous vous rappelez quand je vous disais que le monopole de SpaceX serait bien plus fragile qu'il n'y paraît pendant que tout le monde s'extasiait sur l'IPO ? dans un silence assourdissant la Chine vient de récupérer le premier étage de sa fusée long march 10b dès son vol inaugural et attention à la prouesse, ils n'ont pas copié SpaceX là où falcon 9 se pose sur ses pattes par poussée inversée, le long march 10b redescend en vol contrôlé puis se fait capturer en pleine mer par un système de câbles tendus, un crochet du lanceur accroche les filins qui absorbent l'énergie cinétique et le verrouillent sur une plateforme flottante (une première mondiale )sans train d'atterrissage donc moins de masse morte & plus de charge utile et personne au monde SpaceX compris n'avait jamais réussi une récupération orbitale dès le premier vol cependant pour moi le vrai génie est ailleurs, la réutilisation c'est le seul levier qui effondre le coût du lancement et le coût du lancement c'est le verrou qui commande toute l'économie spatiale (j’en ai déjà très largement parlé ici) les constellations, internet en orbite basse, l'observation de la terre, l'agriculture de précision, la navigation, la fabrication en orbite (zone de microgravité) , l'énergie solaire spatiale et le programme lunaire habité visé pour 2030, au fond sachez quils ont construit bien plus qu'une fusée, ils ont posé la rampe d'accès à une dizaine d'industries à 1000 milliards pendant que l'occident mesurait l'espace à la valorisation boursière d'une seule boîte, la Chine jouait la partie à 30 ans ENCORE UNE FOIS avec une verticale patiente et holistique, c'est toute la différence entre parier sur un seul champion et bâtir la capacité d'une civilisation

@BuzzPatterson 🚀🚀🚀🚀

The perfect depiction of the differences right now on the global stage: America creates. China copies. Europe regulates. Case closed.

@Alex8282019 🚀🚀🚀🚀

有没有懂行的同学说说中国为啥采用这种火箭回收方式？相比SpaceX的筷子，优劣如何？

@Truthful_ast 🚀🚀

It's insane how genius yet simple this booster reuse concept is 100x better than landing legs and I wonder if this could've been done with just 1990s technology

SpaceX might finally have a real competitor: the Chinese state-owned space program. China just caught an orbital rocket in a giant net in the middle of the ocean, on the rocket's very first flight! that's 2 world firsts in a single launch: 1. no booster had ever been recovered this way. the rocket has zero landing legs. it flies itself back to a ship where 4 hooks catch a tensioned net stretched over the deck. 2. no one had ever recovered a booster on a maiden flight. SpaceX crashed boosters for over 2 years before its first landing in December 2015. sticking a landing on a ship took them 5 attempts. China is 1 for 1. and deleting the landing legs is arguably even more genius, for 3 reasons: > legs are dead weight. Falcon 9 hauls roughly 2 tons of them on every flight, weight that could be cargo. hooks weigh a fraction of that, so China's rocket carries 16 tons of cargo per launch even in reusable mode. that puts it in Falcon 9's class on its very first version > the net absorbs the landing impact instead of the rocket. less stress on the booster means fewer parts to inspect and repair between flights, which is where reuse actually gets cheap > a net forgives error. legs need a near-perfect touchdown on a small pad. cables can catch a booster that drifts off target, so more landings survive for 10 years, reusable orbital rockets were an American monopoly. China says they'll fly exact booster again before the end of the year. if that flight works...the 21st Century Space Race is officially on.

@elonmusk 🚀🚀🚀🚀❤️❤️❤️❤️

Anyone can visit the Starship factory and launch site in Texas, as it is right next to on the public highway. It is incredibly inspiring to see!

@elonmusk 🚀🚀🚀🚀

@RoundtableSpace Grok👍🏻❤️❤️

Everyone is always deciding between one model or the next When you get two models to work together like Fable 5 + Grok 4.5 it can do some crazy things Start experimenting and building.

@minchoi 🚀🚀🚀🚀

China just caught a rocket booster with a giant net at sea. People are calling it China's Starship moment. Wrong. Long March-10B is much closer to Falcon 9. SpaceX reached this milestone in 2015. China's Falcon 9 moment... 10 years later.

@Truthful_ast ❤️❤️🚀🔥

It's crazy how China locked in realizing NASA's path for SLS was awful and cancelled their SLS class rocket to go all in on a Falcon 9/Starship reusable based architecture for cargo flights and crew missions to both Earth orbit and the Moon Goes to show how much of a fumble and flawed NASA is, post 90s NASA could never dream of making a rocket like the Long March 10 and Long March 9 Also being able to do such a drastic design switch shows how ballsy CNSA and CASC are, they're not standing back and doing nothing like modern day Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, etc Unbelievable that in 5 years will we see dozens of humans each year fly to the Moon carried by both American and Chinese rockets

@SpaceX ❤️🚀🚀🚀

Full-duration, 33-engine static fire of Super Heavy V3

@NASASpaceflight ❤️🚀🚀🚀

Starship Flight 13: Starbase Pad 2 - a broken actuator has been removed ahead of replacement. This has delayed lifting Booster 20 off the pad for transport back to the Production Site for closeouts. Latest road closure is now aiming for Sunday morning. nsf.live/starbase