Nobody special

1.1K posts

Nobody special

Nobody special

@Nobodyspec4502

Katılım Ekim 2023
37 Takip Edilen21 Takipçiler
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@allenanalysis so hard to take. So a 1.4% vote margin was to take Virginia from a 6-5 split that matched the most recent presidential vote, to a 10-1 split in favor of Democrats. how about go screw with your "democracy is in peril" crap Also--the ballot amendment was deliberately misleading
English
0
0
0
8
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
Let me explain what just happened in Virginia. Yesterday, 2.5 million Virginians voted. They passed a redistricting amendment 50.7% to 49.3%. Today, one judge threw out every single vote. 🧵
Brian Allen tweet mediaBrian Allen tweet media
English
2.6K
512
2.2K
427.3K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@abierkhatib Perhaps they keep going because this video is more Palliwood propaganda because we can see the fancy restaurant meals also put on the internet by Gazans
English
1
0
8
965
Abier
Abier@abierkhatib·
I struggle to understand how they keep going in the middle of such an apocalyptic reality. Respect
English
325
2.9K
13.1K
502.7K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@MarinaMedvin I had also hoped SCOTUS would strike down Obamacare but the Chief said a penalty can be a tax or whatever.
English
0
0
0
1.2K
Marina Medvin 🇺🇸
Marina Medvin 🇺🇸@MarinaMedvin·
Yes, I hear the districting measure passed in Virginia. But I also firmly believe the question that was posed on the ballot violated Virginia law (which requires neutral presentation). I hope the Virginia Supreme Court does the right thing. The ballot question was fraud on its face and politically charged, claiming the purpose of the amendment was “to restore fairness.” It did the opposite; even democrats voting for it don’t believe this was about “fairness.” The Virginia Supreme Court has yet to rule on it.
English
142
795
4.6K
208K
Brandon
Brandon@BrandonLukeMc·
Perhaps the worst part, the part most insultingly annoying about these people being professors, is that they are seriously dumb. They’re not even intelligent. Most working class people are smarter than this type of professor.
English
172
169
1.6K
52.7K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@DanielTGoldkamp @JillFilipovic Appreciate the back and forth To me she is not blaming Bibi-Plenty of people blame him. To me she sounds like those who blame Israeli Jews and treat Palestinians as having no agency or blame. We heard the hideous "look mom and dad I killed some Jews" phone calls on Oct 7.
English
0
0
0
10
Daniel T. Goldkamp
Daniel T. Goldkamp@DanielTGoldkamp·
@Nobodyspec4502 @JillFilipovic You could argue that it's unfair of her to equate the current Israeli government to Hamas, but that's essentially her argument. She does not single out the entire Jewish population of Israel in assigning blame. Is a harsh condemnation of Bibi an insult against all Israeli Jews?
English
1
0
0
19
Jill Filipovic
Jill Filipovic@JillFilipovic·
btw I am not "anti-Israel." I'm not an "anti-Zionist," depending on how we're defining the word Zionist (I am like many normie liberals against the settlements, the occupation, and the brutalization of Palestinians, but supportive of a democratic Jewish state). I am a boring-ass two state solution person who thinks both Israelis and Palestinians would be best served by each group coexisting in side-by-side countries. Palestinians are incredibly ill-served by the murderous tyrants of Hamas (to put it very mildly). But if you think Israel is being well-served by its current government... then yeah we very much disagree.
English
248
134
1.3K
354.2K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@DanielTGoldkamp @JillFilipovic So I am NOT suggesting she is anti-Semitic. Did not intend that. Her point does strike me as unfair because Israel is always held to a higher standard and Palestinians get the victim status of blamelessness. I don't think Israelis are evil here. Thanks for the question.
English
0
0
0
8
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@DanielTGoldkamp @JillFilipovic The only people she points at for bad acts are Israeli Jews (for "brutalization") and Hamas (who she rightly calls "murderous"). Palestinians are mere passive victims who were "ill-served" even though they voted for Hamas, support Hamas, etc.
English
2
0
0
15
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@bonchieredstate that's like this idiot I dealt with who used to ask, like every day, "so did you see John Oliver last night?" like no. no one watches him except people who think like you
English
0
0
1
193
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
I'm not sure what's more hilarious here. The obvious use of AI to produce these posts, or the suggestion that an interview on Morning Joe represents a "shift" in global geopolitics.
Bonchie tweet mediaBonchie tweet media
English
8
11
116
6.8K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@DemzDeliver other states have been providing meals to kids in need at no cost for years. this is like when Eric Adams pretended he invented the trash can.
English
0
0
0
140
Democrats Deliver
Democrats Deliver@DemzDeliver·
🚨Democrats pass legislation guaranteeing free school breakfast and lunch for New York students.
Democrats Deliver tweet mediaDemocrats Deliver tweet media
English
553
1.4K
11.7K
3.5M
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@xnoesbueno That’s my view. Folks want a strong British navy but I don’t want a strong Islamic navy in the Atlantic. UK is dead and part of the Arab world now
English
1
0
2
168
Northern Barbarian
Northern Barbarian@xnoesbueno·
More recently Europe gave us socialism, communism, fascism and nazism. Plus the EU. Not really shedding any tears for Europe. But it's like leaving billions of dollars of military equipment in the hands of the Taliban. Do you really want Europe, with Britain and France's nukes, in the hands of Islamists? But this is what Europe has chosen. Which means, sooner or later, it will fall to the United States to sort out Europe's problems. Again.
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__

⚡️Europe is going to stop being a serious civilization within this generation and almost nobody is willing to say it in those terms. Europe is actually ending as the thing it has been for the last five hundred years. The continent that produced the scientific revolution, the industrial revolution, global empire, liberal democracy, and most of the intellectual and cultural inheritance the modern world runs on is genuinely going away. What replaces it will share some of the same geography and some of the same languages but it will not be the same civilization. The six weeks of jet fuel is not the story. The story is that this is the visible consequence of a civilization that has lost the will to sustain itself. Europe stopped having children. Europe stopped producing its own energy. Europe stopped defending itself militarily. Europe stopped building industrial capacity. Europe stopped growing its economies in real terms. Europe stopped believing in its own cultural inheritance enough to transmit it to the next generation. Each of those is individually a crisis. Together they are civilizational suicide in slow motion. The demographic collapse is the terminal condition. 1.3 to 1.5 fertility for a generation means the native population will halve within two generations. Replacement migration from culturally distinct populations is not continuity of the civilization. It’s substitution. The continent will still exist. The population will be different. The culture will be different. The political systems built around the old population will be under stress they weren’t designed to handle. This is happening now and it’s not reversible because the children who would have been the Europeans of 2060 simply were not born. The energy crisis is the near term manifestation of a deeper rot. Europe built its prosperity on cheap Russian gas and cheap Middle Eastern oil while taking moral stances against both. It shut down its own nuclear capacity. It limited domestic extraction. It bet that the transition to renewables would happen faster than the old supply chains would fail. It lost that bet. Now it’s rationing energy in its wealthiest cities and telling citizens to stay home in pajamas to save fuel. A continent that was producing most of the world’s advanced manufacturing in 1990 is now debating whether to run the air conditioning. That’s not a crisis. That’s a collapse. The military situation is the silent emergency that will determine everything else. Europe has functionally disarmed over the last thirty years. NATO defense spending is a fiction in most European countries. Ammunition stockpiles are months, not years. Industrial capacity to produce military equipment at scale doesn’t exist. The continent cannot defend itself from Russia without American support and American support is not reliable. If the US decides Europe’s security is Europe’s problem, which Trump has been explicit about, Europe has no independent capability to protect itself. A continent that can’t defend itself is not a civilization. It’s a protectorate.

English
17
75
409
21.8K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@GBNT1952 Great post Agree on the horrid message of quitting now Corollary is Libya—Qaddafi gave up and Obama killed him. That was also a disaster sending the message that nukes are what you need to survive
English
0
0
1
76
Green Beret Nap Time
Every time I turn around this dude is saying more nonsense… There are many other options, many other Courses of Action, that are likely being played out as we speak, which Joe knows, of course, but he is lying about to fit the narrative framing op he is clearly a part of. He knows damn well this isn’t some Vietnam rerun or endless nation building quagmire we’re stuck in with Iran. He’s peddling this defeatist “just leave” line like it’s principled restraint, but it’s really just condoning waving the white flag on a regime that’s been at war with us for decades through proxies, nukes, and terror. The idea that the region “is not ours to fix” sounds nice in a vacuum, but ignoring a nuclear jihadist theocracy that’s destabilizing everything from the Strait of Hormuz to our own homeland’s interests isn’t “putting America first,” it’s handing the mullahs and their IRGC thugs a free pass to keep building bombs, mining shipping lanes, and funding attacks that kill Americans and our allies. Then he brings up Reagan pulling out of Lebanon in 84 after the Beirut barracks bombing? Such utter horse shit. He’s twisting history to fit his narrative, just like these people always do. What he’s leaving out is that Beirut was a limited peacekeeping mission gone sideways in a chaotic civil war, with no vital US strategic stakes (like preventing a nuclear Iran or securing global energy chokepoints). Reagan didn’t “avoid a deeper quagmire” out of some isolationist epiphany; the mission collapsed when the local Lebanese army partner fell apart, and even then, it came after talks and retaliation signals. Equating that to walking away from Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and Axis of Resistance network is a laughable comparison. Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas didn’t magically disappear after 84, they just grew stronger with Iranian backing, exactly what a full US retreat now would supercharge. Yeah, the IRGC flexing independent muscle in the Strait of Hormuz shows the regime’s hardliners call some shots, not some civilian fig leaf. But that’s precisely why “just leave” is suicidal nonsense. Iran has already signaled willingness to hand over enriched uranium stocks under pressure, and the sticking points are real because decades of weak deals, like the JCPOA (which Kent is also well aware of) let them cheat, spin up centrifuges, and get to near weapons grade. Concessions? No thanks. Maximum pressure, targeted strikes on military and nuclear sites, and enforcing red lines on enrichment have brought them to the table. And pretending a clean exit avoids radicalizing Iranians ignores the reality: the regime radicalizes its own people daily through repression and exported jihad. A decisive hit on their capabilities could fracture that grip. Then he talks about the major escalation leading to destruction for everyone nonsense… This is where it really falls apart into lefty nonsense fearmongering. Target decks are already stacked. The last strategic targets necessary to end this are already identified. The petrodollar doesn’t collapse because America enforces its interests; it erodes when we look weak and unreliable, letting China, Russia, and Iran chip away with yuan deals and blocked shipping (yeah, he knows this as well). And Gulf states aren’t dumping the dollar when we hit Iran, they’re begging for our security umbrella the second missiles fly. Walking away now would spike oil prices, invite Iranian tolls in the Strait, and tell every enemy that nukes and terror pay off. That’s the real sunk cost trap: decades of weak sanctions and fake deals that let the regime get this far. “Leave now” isn’t wisdom after all the blood and treasure spent, it’s repeating the retreats that gave us ISIS and Taliban 2.0. America first means finishing the nuclear threat, securing the sea lanes, and deterring the next fight, not hiding behind isolationism dressed up as realism. Ask yourself… why Joe is lying?
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19

POTUS is laying out two courses of action—a negotiated settlement, or a major escalation. There is a third option, and he should take it: recognize there is no way to force a positive outcome and simply leave. The region is not ours to fix. President Reagan chose this path in Lebanon in ‘84, withdrawing U.S. forces after the Beirut barracks bombing once it became clear the mission’s stabilization goals could not be met, effectively ending direct American military involvement and avoiding a deeper quagmire and long-term entrenchment in the region. A negotiated settlement is unlikely to work or be taken seriously by the Iranians unless we make concessions on the enrichment issue. As we saw yesterday in the SOH, the IRGC is empowered to act without the consent of the civilian leadership, so it’s likely they won’t honor any deal reached. A major escalation will lead to a very destructive outcome for Iran, the region, and eventually the U.S. If POTUS chooses brute force and targets civilian infrastructure, we will create another generation of radicalized Iranians who will rally around the regime and escalate the war by any means possible. If POTUS opts to strike the civilian infrastructure, declare victory, and then leave, we will only further erode our standing in the world, the petrodollar, and eventually our status as the world’s reserve currency holder. We need to get out now. Don’t double down on failure. Avoid the sunken cost trap, leave now, and put America’s interests first.

English
142
308
1.2K
26.9K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@PodSaveAmerica Hey genius were the Muslims colonizers? because they took over Christian land, so why couldn't Christians try to defend the land they had held? or you just going to keep that crappy smug smile on your face?
English
0
1
11
95
Pod Save America
Pod Save America@PodSaveAmerica·
"Remember the crusades? That was bad."
English
40
12
117
24.7K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@Purplefox7777 @shipwreckedcrew but what is your alternative? Tim Waltz in the Senate? no way Minnesota is voting for Ted Cruz so get a good GOP senator on most issues and avoid the impeachment fiasco that will destroy the next two years.
English
0
0
5
170
Jackie
Jackie@Purplefox7777·
@shipwreckedcrew Minnesotan conservatives will never vote for a Republican candidate that even considers amnesty for criminal aliens. Michele is tailoring her campaign to Democrats. She lost my support and vote.
English
4
2
12
9.5K
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
AI robots meeting all of our human needs for free? I have questions: 1. Someone must pay money to build the AI robots that build/provide the "free" goods and services. Such someone will have control over the AI robots. Why will that someone allow those goods and services to be given away for "free"? That's not human nature (see my next question). 2. Goods and services are wealth. Wealth is power. Mankind craves power, always has and always will. Why would mankind give away wealth when it means giving away power? 3. What if the someone controlling the AI robots and the "free" goods and services is named Karen and if you don't adopt the woke political views that Karen demands you adopt, you get no goods, no food, no services, bupkis, no nothing, you starve? And if your answer to all of the above is "the AI robots will be autonomous," think about what you just said, Mr. John Connor. I just see this as a variation on the dangers of the lure of communism, except after the AI robots use us as human batteries in THEIR Five Year Plan, "We never have had REAL AI robots" will be cold comfort. Sorry for the negative waves, but I think this concept fails to account for human nature.
DogeDesigner@cb_doge

"Assuming the current trend of AI and robotics continues, which seems likely, the AI and robots will be able to do anything that that humans want them to do, essentially, so hopefully not more than that, but AI and robotics will be able to provide us all the goods and services that anyone could possibly want so you wouldn't need to work. People will be able to wherever they want with their free time. Work will be optional. I just want to separate out from like what I wish would happen versus what I predict will happen. Because people get confused about that. They think that what I predict will happen is what I wanted to happen. What I predict to happen is not the same as what I want to happen." 一 Elon Musk

English
514
282
1.5K
56.8K
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@lanebrown_3 This is wonderful. I love the joy and gratitude of the kids jumping around happy for this hero. Fantastic.
English
0
0
1
72
Lane Brown
Lane Brown@lanebrown_3·
Hero Principal Kirk Moore—who tackled a school shooter at Pauls Valley High School in Oklahoma is crowned prom king! This man deserves a raise! Hero.
English
811
9.1K
67.2K
1.3M
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@EmmanuelMacron OMG this is hilariously idiotic. you worthless toothless figureheads over islamic countries that you imported. you have nothing to offer to stop the terror masters
English
0
0
0
3
Emmanuel Macron
Emmanuel Macron@EmmanuelMacron·
Aux côtés de plus de cinquante pays, nous portons une initiative pour la liberté de navigation dans le détroit d’Ormuz.
Français
11.3K
2.4K
10.6K
1.4M
Nobody special
Nobody special@Nobodyspec4502·
@stengel how do you assholes just ignore the whole bombing nuclear and ballistic sites and killing the IRGC leadership thing? I mean hey I know you and your boss preferred to send pallets cash to the IRGC--but that should disqualify you from talking
English
0
0
4
197
Richard Stengel
Richard Stengel@stengel·
It seems like the main goal of the US campaign in Iran is to open the Strait of Hormuz which was open before the US invaded.
English
315
597
3.4K
72.5K