Ⓝolan

It’s fascinating that AI psychosis seems to affect such an identifiable Type of Guy. It has something to do with the way LLMs start breaking down and spiraling into nonsense when conversations go on too long and the user keeps pressing, and there’s a certain type of user that’s just smart enough to trust their own intelligence (accepting the LLM’s flattery, confirmation, continuing to dig, etc) but not smart enough to see they’re not uncovering some big secret, they’ve just made the chatbot break.

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.

Let’s straighten this out: ‘83 - 87 Elder millennial. No Uranus-Neptune conjunction 88 - 92 Millennial. Saturn in the mix too 1993 Flawless indigo children beyond all labels. Uranus-Neptune exactly conjunct 94 - 95 Zillennial. Uranus egress half the time

This is terrifying... Smoking just 1 joint per day is linked to a long-term decline in lung function comparable to smoking 20 cigarettes a day

I'm thinking this shift is permanent. I can see no scenario where AI won't pay more for GPUs than consumers will. Compute is moving to the cloud. There are over 2000 datacenter being built and more planned. We're heading towards end-point viewers on our phones and screens.