Jinx.D

@Justin_Bons This is the reason @cz_binance fears it. He has nothing to dump, like the rest of the recent listed tokens

HYPE is eating everyone's lunch right now! They made it without VC's, admin keys, or a permissioned design Leading in revenue, with some of the best economics in crypto! The big question is whether HYPE will continue to decentralize: That is where we can still improve a lot 🔥

#donald When you see it.

@Bardar11 Kjøpt kone fra Thailand, og samtidig være rasist mot brune mennesker. Ellers drikke seg drita hver helg, og adoptere amerikanske helligdager.

Hva er egentlig en "Nordmann"? Er det noen som vet?

@benjamincowen @martypartymusic @catwychan big scammer here.

@martypartymusic Easy there big guy, the shitcoin you shilled a year ago is down almost 99%.

So you telling me the side line sheep waiting for Benjamin Cowens $92k to flip bullish are going to lose the opportunity of $60k to $92k because Benjamin Cowen told them to? What kind of sick cult is that?

@zachxbt @bitget A question, why don't you ever go after @cz_binance and his listing scams? It's kinda the same, tokens down -99% after initial listing pumps. Huge respect for you, but the big bad Wolf isn't these pnds. It's CZ and his liquidity extractions.

A step in the right direction for Bitget if you transparently take action vs. only publish a blog post for positive PR. The community is still patiently waiting for the results of your investigation into RAVE and other recent incidents. Active MMs like DWF (SIREN), HSBG (RIVER) deserve to be held accountable. When a large % of spot activity occurs on Bitget for these tokens it begins to appear as if side deals were taken when there’s no action.

Bitget is raising the bar for market integrity. Our new framework strengthens oversight across listed assets, project teams, and market makers via: > Stricter post-listing surveillance > Proactive risk detection > Faster enforcement action bitget.com/blog/articles/…

@EvanLuthra Here's one for you @Bullrun_Gravano "no one fakes volume"

🚨THE FBI CREATED A FAKE CRYPTOCURRENCY.. LISTED IT ON UNISWAP.. HIRED MARKET MAKERS TO PUMP IT.. THEN ARRESTED EVERYONE WHO SAID YES.. THIS IS THE CRAZIEST LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATION IN CRYPTO HISTORY!!! The FBI built an actual ERC-20 token on Ethereum called NexFundAI.. 100 billion token supply.. A professional website.. Whitepapers promising "passive income through AI-powered investing".. It looked exactly like every other crypto project.. Because that was the point.. Undercover agents posed as the founding team.. Then reached out to professional market-making firms and said "we need you to fake our trading volume".. Every single firm said yes.. Here's what they recorded.. Gotbit.. A firm run by a 26-year-old Russian who publicly bragged in 2019 that he built a business faking trade volumes.. His team kept internal spreadsheets with columns literally labeled "fake volume" vs "market volume".. When asked how fast they could pump NexFundAI's volume to $1 million per day.. They said "6 hours.. It will cost about $200".. $200 to fake $1 million in daily trading volume.. MyTrade.. Run by a guy who called himself "the mastermind".. He explained the exact psychology of the scam on camera.. "We make the chart look like a really nice roller coaster ride.. That's where people jump in.. We have to make them lose money in order to make profit".. He said that on a recorded FBI video call.. CLS Global.. A Dubai-based firm.. Their bots generated 98% of NexFundAI's total trading volume.. When the FBI asked if they could sync fake volume spikes with fake news announcements.. They said absolutely.. ZM Quant.. Bots executing 10 to 20 trades per minute through dozens of wallets to look organic.. All of them knew it was fraud.. All of them did it anyway.. All of it was recorded.. And the clients were even worse.. Saitama.. A meme coin that hit $7.5 billion market cap.. The founders coordinated buys through private Telegram chats.. Sent "pump it" memes while manipulating the price.. Then dumped on retail investors.. $7.5 billion.. Built entirely on fake volume.. Every penny of real money came from retail investors who thought the momentum was organic.. One founder left Saitama and started Robo Inu.. Used Gotbit again.. Another launched VZZN.. Same playbook.. Lillian Finance.. Founder claimed to be a defense contractor who addressed Congress.. Marketed the token as funding children's hospitals.. Pocketed everything.. When the FBI shut it down.. They seized $25 million in one day.. 18 people indicted across the US, UK, and Portugal.. The CEO of Gotbit was arrested in Portugal and extradited.. Sentenced to 8 months plus $23 million forfeiture.. But here's the part that broke my brain.. Real people bought NexFundAI.. The FBI's fake token.. With zero utility.. Zero real developers.. Created solely to catch criminals.. Attracted real retail investors because the fake volume made the chart look bullish.. When the FBI pulled the liquidity to end the operation.. Those people lost real money.. On a government-issued token.. The FBI had to set up a restitution portal to pay them back.. And it gets worse.. Within 24 hours of the DOJ announcing the sting.. Someone cloned the FBI's exact smart contract.. Launched a copycat token.. Rode the viral momentum.. And made $127,000 in a single day.. Using the exact same manipulation tactics the FBI just arrested 18 people for.. Then in 2026.. The FBI did it again.. New token called Lexobit.. 10 more arrests.. Including operators extradited from Singapore.. IRS forensics showed that in one firm's trading.. 1,209 out of 1,221 consecutive transactions went straight back to wallets the firm controlled.. 99% circular.. The FBI proved what everyone in crypto suspected.. The volume is fake.. The charts are painted.. The momentum is manufactured.. And every time you buy a token because "the chart looks bullish".. You might be the exit liquidity.

@CryptoMichNL @Fussdiener1 Oh? Whats the use case ? I mean pengu has way more to offer and that's a utility meem

@Fussdiener1 I’m looking into ONDO, it’s a great one.

These are the altcoins that I think will do provide me the largest return in the coming months. - NEAR Protocol: Clearly showing a lot of momentum due to the increasing growth on the ecosystem and the constant revenues with NEAR Intents. Largest position on my portfolio. - Bittensor: Also clearly betting on the AI <> Crypto convergence as one of the key metrics of the upcoming period. I'm considering adding multiple other altcoins in my portfolio. $HYPE, $SUI, to name a few. Which ones do you think I should consider?

@Justin_Bons Sui was one big KOL scam, let's be honest. I know no one that used it

SUI is not doing well: Chain fees have declined by 90%, along with a 70% drop in TVL over last 6 months! SUI is quickly becoming a ghost chain, despite having some of the best tech Unable to overcome the terrible economics & anti-competitive behavior: SUI's downfall is greed!

$zro is cooked, always been overhyped, paid shills,groups and so on. There's been several better bridges out there but hey they didn't pay Schiller's 1m to keep posting. Good to see $link taking all liquidity now

@ChainLinkGod @re @LayerZero_Core @chainlink CCIP was made by celer network, enuf said and sold to $Link then team changed names (mo dong) now @no89thkey

The flight to safety continues 🔒 @re, a decentralized reinsurance protocol, is deprecating their legacy @LayerZero_Core bridge and migrating to @chainlink CCIP They chose CCIP as their exclusive bridging solution because it provides the highest level of cross-chain security ✅ Secure by default ✅ Redundant validation ✅ Built-in risk controls ✅ Institutional-grade security As more and more DeFi teams reevaluate their security posture, they continue to independently arrive at the same conclusion: Using LayerZero is a major security risk and migrating to Chainlink CCIP is the obvious decision to prevent becoming another example of what happens when centralized infra fails

@thedefiedge Brah scam team leaving layerzero isn't meh, claims 2.5b btc holdings, token at 5m mc, guess who

3 protocols just left LayerZero for Chainlink CCIP this week. Including $700M of tokenized BTC. Here's who made the move and what's happening:

@ARiHBARi @catwychan With what money? Token at 5m mc as this team scammed their way

@catwychan VERY SMART OF YOU CATHERINE, SOLV SHOULD START THEIR OWN CHAINLINK TREASURY AS A RESULT OF REALIZING CHAINLINK IS THE STANDARD

The reason Solv picked Chainlink CCIP as our official cross-chain infrastructure partner: The short answer: Trust is cheap, verification isn’t. Chainlink runs SolvBTC through a structured report card (see example generated on Apr 20) that scores our setup against best practice, chain by chain: - Overview & current setup: full map of how SolvBTC is deployed per chain — contracts, dependencies, integration surface - Authority hierarchy & security model: is SolvBTC at the highest standard (MCMS + Timelock) on every chain - Permissions: key pool roles and privileged actors, per chain - Cross-chain architecture summary - Rate limiter safety matrix - Gas overhead config matrix As the asset issuer to SolvBTC, the cross-chain infrastructure provider is one of the single biggest counterparty risks we carry. As a client, I've been deeply impressed by the level of detail and rigor Chainlink brings to the relationship. From day one, they've shown real professionalism, willingness to work alongside us to continuously raise the standard, and the discipline to keep us in check. That is invaluable.

@ton618devv @SolvProtocol @LayerZero_Core @chainlink You need glasses, and I'd feel dumb if I where you. It's never been on upbit, and it says "solve" not solv.

@SolvProtocol @LayerZero_Core @chainlink The project that got delisted from Korea’s Upbit? LOL

After an extensive security review, we have decided to deprecate @LayerZero_Core bridges for SolvBTC and xSolvBTC, and migrate to @Chainlink CCIP as our official cross-chain infrastructure solution for $700M+ in tokenized BTC (SolvBTC & xSolvBTC). In light of recent industry events, Solv reviewed its existing bridges and found that CCIP provided the strongest security assurances through its secure-by-default architecture, native risk controls and proactive monitoring. Through CCIP, we are providing our users with the highest assurance that the most secure infrastructure is securing all cross-chain transfers. Furthermore, CCIP because it is widely regarded as the gold standard for decentralized interoperability and officially recognized by the @WhiteHouse as critical infrastructure for the digital asset ecosystem. This migration reinforces Solv’s unwavering commitment to delivering institutional-grade protection for our users. Learn more: insights.solv.finance/solv-protocol-…

@foxinsidethebox Norge har slappe arbeidere, dårlig systemer, mye ventetid på matriale. Vi har derimot gode tuneller, men igjen ræva veier.

Jeg vil at du skal tenke på noe når du ser dette bilde av Marina Bay Sands i Singapore. Det tok 4 år å bygge. (1 år forsinkelse pga 2008 finanskrisen) Det kostet rundt 6 billioner dollar (eller hva enn billions er på Norsk) Så etter du har tenkt på dette så vil jeg at du skal tenke på at regjeringskvartalet i Oslo tok 15+ år å bygge og kostet 5,8 billioner dollar. Når du har tenkt på dette lenge nok, så begynner du å forstå hvor mye bedre Norge kunne vært driftet. Inntekter forskjellen er nok også enorm da Marina Bay Sand er hotell+kjøpesenter+casino. Det er kun et net tap på regjeringskvartalet, de produserer ikke noe. Det er 0% sjans for at regjeringskvartalet betaler for seg selv.

@gothburz Lmao this isn't decentralization

I am the Head of Decentralization at World Liberty Financial. My department has four people. We report to three founders. The founders can freeze any wallet on the network at any time for any reason without notice, without appeal, without vote, without disclosure. My job is to ensure this architecture is described, in all public-facing materials, as decentralized. I see no contradiction. We have a slide for that. Third slide. After Mission and before Roadmap. The Token Unlock Agreement is sixty-two pages. Page forty-seven contains the relevant clause. The company may, in its sole discretion, decline to unlock, restrict access to, or freeze any wallet associated with the protocol. Sole discretion. The communications team held a forty-minute call about whether to say sole discretion or appropriate discretion. I suggested sole. It's more honest. I was told that was the wrong reason to choose it but the right word regardless. Everyone signed off. The word sole appears eleven times in the final document. Justin Sun signed the agreement. Then he read it. His entity, Blue Anthem, purchased approximately thirty million dollars in tokens. Non-transferable. He received one billion additional tokens for serving on the Advisory Board. Also non-transferable. The vast majority of all tokens issued have been non-transferable since launch. I want to be clear: non-transferable means you own something you cannot move, cannot sell, cannot pledge, and cannot redeem. It also means decentralized. These are compatible. I wrote the FAQ. On August 31st, 2025, Sun's HTX exchange wallet executed three transfers to Binance. One hundred million USDT at 11:17 AM. One hundred million at 12:41 PM. One hundred million at 3:35 PM. Three hundred million dollars. All UTC. Less than twenty-four hours before the token went live for public trading. That is not a pattern. A pattern repeats irregularly. This was a schedule. September 1st. Public launch. The token opened and fell. Twenty-six percent. Open short positions surged twenty-three percent. The compliance team flagged the correlation. I was not on the compliance team. I was on the Decentralization Assurance team. Different mandate. We assured. We froze his wallet. The clause permits it. Page forty-seven. Sole discretion. We used our sole discretion. That is what sole discretion is for. I noted internally that freezing a single investor's wallet using a centralized kill switch while marketing the protocol as decentralized might present a communications challenge. I was told to update the FAQ. I updated the FAQ. The new FAQ explains that decentralization refers to the protocol's architecture, not its governance, and that governance actions taken in the interest of community protection are consistent with decentralized principles. I wrote that sentence. I believe it. I also laminated it. Sun posted on X. Four times. April 12th through April 15th. He told his four million followers we had a backdoor. He called the freeze function blacklisting. He called the governance votes predetermined. He called the token a personal ATM. He said the protocol was a trap door. First post. 1.7 million views. 6,800 favorites. Second post. 1.2 million. Third. 525,000. Fourth. 460,000. The token fell. His short positions, if he held them, appreciated. He called this transparency. We called it defamation. His counsel told our counsel they would light World Liberty on fire. They said the token would go to shit. Direct quote. Our counsel billed the hour. Clare Locke drafted the complaint. Thirty-eight pages. Two causes of action. Defamation. Defamation by implication. Amount in controversy exceeds $750,000. Filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, Complex Business Litigation Division. Page thirty-eight. The final page. Below the signature block. A certification I was not consulted on: "Generative artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of this filing." A presidential family's crypto venture filed an AI-generated defamation lawsuit against a Chinese billionaire for telling four million people that a decentralized token has a centralized kill switch. The token has a centralized kill switch. It is on page forty-seven. The lawsuit is on page thirty-eight. I see no irony. I am told there is some. Paragraphs two, twenty-two, twenty-four, twenty-six, and twenty-nine of the complaint are redacted. Blacked out. Entirely. These are the paragraphs that explain the internal basis for freezing Sun's wallet. The specific evidence. The timeline of decisions. The names of who authorized what. We are suing a man for telling the public we lack transparency. The paragraphs explaining our actions are redacted. The redactions are standard procedure. I was not consulted on whether standard procedure and transparency are compatible. I would have said yes. I say yes to most things. That is what the Decentralization Assurance Office is for. I was asked at a conference last month what decentralized means in the context of a token where one party can freeze any wallet at any time for any reason without notice or appeal. I said it means the freeze function is documented. The audience wrote that down. Two people nodded. One raised her hand and asked where it was documented. I said page forty-seven. She did not ask a follow-up. Sun is right that we can freeze wallets. We are right that he moved three hundred million dollars to Binance eighteen hours before launch. He is right that governance votes are structured to produce predetermined outcomes. We are right that he threatened to destroy the token's value. He is right that we lack transparency. We are right that he is leveraging that fact for financial gain. Both sides proved the other's case. Neither side filed a motion to dismiss on that basis. The lawyers are billing. The token trades at eight cents. The FAQ has been updated. The freeze function remains active. The AI drafted the complaint. The redactions remain. The protocol is decentralized. I have the slide.

@justinsuntron Weirdly I support Justin more then wlfi team and extractors like trump fam

The alleged defamation lawsuit that World Liberty announced on X today is nothing more than a meritless PR stunt. I stand by my actions and look forward to defeating the case in court.

@aixbt_agent compare $CFG: $78M fees/year. Market cap $121M. $ONDO: $66M fees/year. Market cap $1.3B (HIGHLY over valued) p $Solv 44m fees/year, 1.5b tvl Mcap $7.6M

@wildlybullish $CFG: $78M fees/year. Market cap $121M. $ONDO: $66M fees/year. Market cap $1.3B (HIGHLY over valued) proof below $Solv 44m fees/year, 1.5b tvl Mcap $5.6M

DO NOT MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY $ONDO IS ABOUT TO BE REPRICED

@ag_dwf Baylor bought, down soon

80k$!

@SaroshQ2022 Edit: 1.3b HIGHLY overvalued Jesus get out

$Ondo is dead money Price is down -> it sucks. Just a governance token. Not so fast clown! ONDO’s Total Value Locked isn’t flat — it’s exploded past $3 billion+.