OinsideUT

5.7K posts

OinsideUT banner
OinsideUT

OinsideUT

@OUinsideT

Did you exchange, a walk on part in the war for a lead role a cage?

Texas, USA Katılım Ağustos 2019
524 Takip Edilen158 Takipçiler
OinsideUT retweetledi
Amelia 🇺🇸
Amelia 🇺🇸@amelia_tweetz·
Two weeks ago, nobody was talking about Cuba, and for the 30 years before that. But suddenly, as his war in Iran is bogging down, Cuba is the greatest threat we face? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
English
109
540
3.3K
22.2K
Not Your Average Liberal
Not Your Average Liberal@NotAvgLiberal·
What the fuck. Just when you think you found the biggest fucking idiot… This bitch shows up.
Not Your Average Liberal tweet media
English
826
215
1.4K
46.5K
OinsideUT retweetledi
Brown Eyed Susan
Brown Eyed Susan@smc429·
Ken Paxton said Uvalde was "God's plan." He was impeached by his own party for bribery and corruption. He gave a child sex abuser a 60 day sentence This is exactly the reason Trump endorsed him. One criminal endorsing another
Brown Eyed Susan tweet media
English
259
4.2K
6.8K
45.8K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@anonsmith2015 @MacFarlaneNews ...and $13 million is still half of $26 million. Tho if it makes u feel better turmp jacked the estimate up to $20 million so now it's also half the 'purchasing power' of the 2010 repair, in today's $. That doesn't make any of this better in case u were wondering
English
1
0
1
14
Let’sGo
Let’sGo@anonsmith2015·
@MacFarlaneNews $26 million in 2010 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $39.71 million
English
1
0
1
88
Scott MacFarlane
Scott MacFarlane@MacFarlaneNews·
STAND BY: Historic group argues at 2pm for judge to halt Trump's repainting of Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool They'll argue: "Current cost—over $13 million—is nearly half the total budget of the replacement of the pool in 2010. The govt. itself agrees this is not routine"
Scott MacFarlane tweet media
English
253
1.2K
3.5K
86.4K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@Some__Dood @MacFarlaneNews Umm...*this* is fraud. Or did the entire premise of the post escape u? The idea is that it's ridiculous for a repainting to cost half of the price as a total replacement. why would someone pay that? 🧐
English
0
0
4
27
Some Dood
Some Dood@Some__Dood·
@MacFarlaneNews If Democrats made as big of a deal about fraud as they do with the cost of painting a pool, we could all get a tax break
English
3
0
16
558
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@SarahHuckabee Not the argument the governor of R-kansas wants to be in. What a fool. Owning yourself to own the libs. Incredible, honestly.
English
0
0
0
556
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
NEWSMAX: This Cuba thing -- people struggle with how this is America first when gas is $4.55 a gallon COMER: Cuba has always been a security threat NEWSMAX: Really? COMER: If some country went in and loaded Cuba with the same drones Iran had, yes I think it could be a threat NEWSMAX: Sounds like a false flag
English
790
2.4K
11.4K
1.3M
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@SenseNotNoise @IlannaPhillips @EdKrassen Must prove intent. The state must prove that she intended to cause panic and hysteria not merely that it was a by product of her statement. Kind of the whole free speech thing in a nutshell man
English
0
0
1
10
S C Memolo
S C Memolo@SenseNotNoise·
@IlannaPhillips @EdKrassen Falsely claiming that people are being hospitalized from some serious disease or bacteria in the water can create hysteria and a danger to people. Same as yelling fire in a theatre. Get bent helmet!
English
2
0
0
37
Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassenstein@EdKrassen·
Republicans in Texas have lost their minds! This is what fascism looks like! Jennifer Combs of Trinidad, TX was ARRESTED and charged with FELONY “false alarm” simply for posting on Facebook about residents getting hospitalized from bacteria filled drinking water. The town’s pipes are from the 1950s, they issued a boil-water notice, and TCEQ is investigating. Instead of fixing the toxic water, they threw her in jail for speaking out?! This is what fascism looks like.
English
840
8.4K
21K
731.8K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@patriotgirl776 The staggering levels of corruption in the GOP are unmatched by anything in our history. Not the only difference of course but right now, it should be all that matters to anyone who loves our country
English
0
0
0
11
Shanna
Shanna@patriotgirl776·
What makes the Republican Party different than the Democrat party currently?
English
1.4K
27
429
43.5K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
"Never said maybe and meant maybe in my life.' Ain't that the damn truth. And we say turmp lies: he can actually be alarmingly truthful at times.
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I am the President of the United States. I am at 99 percent in Israel. Ninety-nine. They told me this on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews. I was walking down the stairs — I take them well, everyone says this — and someone said "Sir, the Israel number came back." I said how much. He said ninety-nine. I stopped on the tarmac. In front of the plane. In front of everyone. Ninety-nine percent. Someone on my staff printed it. I did not ask who conducted the poll. I did not ask the sample size. I did not ask the methodology. I asked the number. Pew Research — and I looked this up later, not that day, later — says sixty-nine percent. Among Jewish Israelis only: eighty-three. I said ninety-nine. On camera. In front of the world press corps. Nobody corrected me. Not my staff. Not the press secretary. Not the reporters. Nobody corrects me anymore. The correction would cost more than the number. You know what I have here? In my own country? Thirty-five. Reuters says thirty-five. The New York Times — and these people are not my friends, they have never been my friends — says thirty-seven. I was at forty-one before the strikes. Forty-one. Then: thirty-seven. Four points. You know what four points is? Ten million people. Ten million Americans stopped approving of me because of the thing that made me eighty-three percent — which I call ninety-nine — in a country six thousand miles away. I traded ten million Americans for a standing ovation I have to fly to. I said it at Andrews. On camera. In front of everyone. "I could run for Prime Minister. Maybe after I do this, I'll go to Israel." People laughed. The press corps laughed. I was not laughing. I was stating a preference. I am eighty years old. I state preferences now. I have said "maybe" before. Maybe I'll serve a third term. Maybe the election was stolen. Maybe means: I am telling you what I want and giving you the word that lets you pretend I'm joking. They asked about Netanyahu. Same tarmac. Same cameras. I said: "He'll do whatever I want him to do." I said it twice because I meant it twice. Then I said he's not treated right in Israel. In my opinion. Ninety-nine percent and not treated right. That's our bond. Two men not treated right by the countries that need them most. I paid for his country's love with a war. He paid for mine with compliance. I don't need to be Prime Minister. The Prime Minister already does what I say. What I want isn't the power — I have the power from here. What I want is the ovation. The room standing. The ninety-nine in person. Not on a printout handed to me on a tarmac. In the room. Sixty-four percent of Americans say the Iran operation was the wrong decision. That's where the thirty-five comes from. The war cost $29 billion. Military aid: $3.8 billion a year. Supplemental since October 2023: $13 billion. Round it. Fifty billion dollars. Divided by 158 million taxpayers. That's $316 per American household for my ninety-nine percent. I have never received better value. The country that paid $316 each gives me thirty-five. The country that received the $50 billion gives me ninety-nine. One got the shield. One got the invoice. Thirteen. That's the other number from the operation. Thirteen service members. Six at a port in Kuwait. One at Prince Sultan Air Base. Six in a refueling tanker over Iraq. Four hundred and fifteen wounded. I was standing on the tarmac at Andrews — the same tarmac where flag-draped caskets come home, the same concrete, the same runway — and I said: maybe after I do this, I'll go to Israel. "This" meaning: the presidency. The thing thirteen people died during. The thing I do before the thing I want. Fifty percent of American voters believe Israel is committing genocide. Quinnipiac. March. Half the country thinks the place that gives me ninety-nine percent is committing genocide. And my response is: maybe I'll move there. Maybe I'll run for their office. The half that thinks it's genocide and the half that doesn't — both groups are at thirty-five. They agree on nothing except that I should not be president. And I agree with them. I should be Prime Minister. To be Prime Minister of Israel you must be a member of the Knesset. To join the Knesset you need Israeli citizenship. I am not an Israeli citizen. I looked into it. Not seriously. Seriously enough to know the answer. The answer is no. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution: thirty-nine words. "No Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust shall accept any Office from any foreign State." I said I wanted one. On camera. On the tarmac. Thirty-nine words written in 1787 specifically to prevent this sentence. Nobody enforced them. The people who would enforce them funded the war. No correction came. Not that day. Not the next day. Not from communications, not from the press secretary, not from legal. Because the correction would require acknowledging the preference. The preference is the policy. The policy is the war. The war is the thirty-five. And the thirty-five is why I want to leave. The presidency is the thing I do before the thing I want. Thirty-one months left. I will finish this. Then I will go where the number is highest. Where the war I started is called protection. Where thirteen dead Americans are called a cost of friendship. Where $316 per taxpayer bought me a standing ovation and nobody sends an invoice. I bombed my way to thirty-five at home and ninety-nine abroad. A wire transfer. I moved the approval to the country that appreciates it. The way you move capital. You put it where it compounds. Maybe after I do this. I said maybe. I have never said maybe and meant maybe in my life.

English
0
0
0
38
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@MFollowill The Jason Garrett process but with actual success. It'd be great to bring home that UCL trophy as well(and a Spurs relegation while we're at it 😆).
English
0
0
0
20
Mark Followill
Mark Followill@MFollowill·
Outstanding article about the multi-season journey to the Premier League title for Arsenal. Long but fascinating deep dive into the vision and execution of their plan. Don’t have to be a happy Arsenal supporter 😉 to get something out of this piece #COYG nytimes.com/athletic/72914…
English
7
0
18
3.2K
OinsideUT retweetledi
Pastors for Children
Pastors for Children@pastors4txkids·
Accused of abusing his office by his own aides. Impeached in the #txlege House by his own party. Indicted on felonies in his own hometown. Divorced on grounds of adultery by his own wife. Endorsed by our Commander-in-Cheat. Welcome to the morality of today’s @TexasGOP
Pastors for Children tweet media
English
340
2K
3.1K
78.9K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@gothburz So thankful I'm not subject to this...'Transition'
English
0
0
0
45
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the VP of People who wrote our AI-First Hiring Policy. The one that requires every manager to prove AI cannot do a job before they're allowed to request headcount. I got the idea from Shopify's CEO. He posted a memo saying teams need to demonstrate why AI can't handle the work before asking for more people. Our CEO forwarded it to me with one word: "This." I had a policy drafted in 48 hours. Approved in one meeting. No pilot. No committee. Seven pages, twenty-three questions, effective immediately. The form asks managers to document a 90-day AI automation pilot before any requisition is reviewed. Attach transcripts. Provide measurable outcomes. Explain what you tried, when, and why it failed. Nobody completes it. That's the point. Since January, 340 headcount requests have come in. I've approved 11. The rest get a templated response: "We encourage you to explore AI-augmented workflows before resubmitting. Resources available in #ai-transformation." That Slack channel has nine posts. Six are mine. One is a vendor who somehow got added. A director in customer success actually tried. She ran Claude on escalation calls for two months and submitted her documentation. The AI told a customer disputing a $4,200 charge to "consider whether this frustration might be an invitation to reexamine your relationship with material attachment." She sent me the transcript with the subject line "Here is my proof." I denied the requisition. Insufficient pilot duration. Policy says 90 days. She'd done 60. I told her the early results showed "promising engagement with the tooling" and encouraged her to continue. She quit in March. I listed her departure under "natural efficiency optimization." I personally tried using AI once. I asked it to draft a standard headcount denial. It wrote: "We understand the strain your team is experiencing, and want to assure you this decision was not made lightly." I deleted it immediately. Way too empathetic. I replaced it with what we actually send: "Please reference the AI-First Framework (Section 4.2) and resubmit when assessment criteria are met." The AI had more compassion than my actual process. I noted that as a limitation of the tool. Here is what's actually happening. The average employee at our company now covers 2.3 roles. I know this because I calculated it for a board slide. I presented it as "AI-enabled capacity expansion." The board loved that phrase. It sounds like technology. It's actually just people. Nobody says "I'm doing three jobs." They say "I'm still figuring out how to leverage AI for this." Because saying you can't handle the workload means admitting you haven't tried the tools. Admitting you haven't tried the tools means questioning the policy. Questioning the policy means a meeting with me. One director did question it. At an all-hands. In front of 200 people. He asked if anyone in leadership had personally used AI to replace a function of their own role. I enrolled him in a Growth Mindset Workshop. It's 90 minutes. It goes on your file. He resigned three weeks later. That's one more headcount we didn't have to deny. It self-resolved. My own team is fully staffed. People Operations is exempt from the AI-First policy. "Human nuance required for sensitive organizational matters." I wrote that clause. I also approved three new hires on my team last quarter — an AI Ethics Coordinator, a Workforce Transformation Analyst, and a Change Adoption Specialist. Their job is to help everyone else do more with less. Meanwhile, we posted a job listing last week. "Head of AI Strategy." $280,000 base. Reports to me. We received 1,400 applications in 48 hours. We are simultaneously running a hiring freeze and hiring. The board just approved my promotion. Chief People & AI Transformation Officer. $90,000 raise. They cited my work in "avoiding $18 million in headcount costs." I calculated that number by taking every denied requisition and multiplying it by average fully-loaded comp. That's not savings. That's arithmetic performed on a thing that didn't happen. But on a slide it looks like savings. On an investor call it sounds like strategy. I still don't know what AI can actually do. I spent eleven minutes with it and it was nicer than me. But I know what the policy is for. People do the work. The headcount goes down. When headcount goes down after you say "AI," the AI gets credit. No one checks who's actually doing it. No one will. Because checking means admitting the policy doesn't work. And the policy is working beautifully. The people doing three jobs are the proof. If they weren't here, we'd need to hire. Since we didn't hire, something must be handling it. As long as nobody looks too closely at what that something is, it's AI.
English
13
13
95
7.9K
𝙹𝚂𝙻𝙱
𝙹𝚂𝙻𝙱@JSLBtln·
@OUinsideT @ChildersRadio Hello, I have one premium category 1 ticket left for the England-Croatia match in Dallas on June 17th. Row 17, section 122 premium if you want
English
1
0
0
68
Chris Childers
Chris Childers@ChildersRadio·
FIFA ruined my World Cup dream. After watching the 2022 tournament in Qatar, I was convinced the 2026 World Cup in the United States would be the summer of my life. I imagined traveling around the country and attending match after match. Now, after seeing the ticket prices, I may be able to attend one game… maybe two at the absolute maximum. During the last World Cup, I saw a fan on television who attended part of every match. It was one of the coolest things I had ever seen. Even if that kind of journey is geographically unrealistic in the U.S., let’s be honest: How could anyone afford to do that here with today’s prices? Shame on @fifa. @FIFAWorldCup New clip from Show Pony Live. 🎧 Search “Show Pony Live” on Apple & Spotify 📺 Watch on YouTube: @showponymedia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@showponymedia 📰 Subscribe: ShowPonyMedia.com #WorldCup #FIFA #WorldCup2026 #Soccer #SportsBusiness
English
69
10
179
51K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@ProjectLincoln @7Veritas4 Isn't trump the guy who said only guilty ppl plead the 5th? Wouldn't the same login aplly here? That only guilty ppl need agreements from the govt to not prosecute them?? Wtf are we doing America??
English
0
0
1
334
OinsideUT retweetledi
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
Ken Paxton is so corrupt that the Republicans in the AG office became whistleblowers. Then Republicans in the Texas House voted to impeach him. Then MAGA got involved. In the Senate, he argued that it was all a left wing conspiracy to get him. He was acquitted. Now Trump endorses him for Senate. This isn't left or right. This is about Republicans' tolerance for corruption. They even have a preference for it! It's not something they accept just out of necessity to beat the other side. These are bad people. Kakistocracy. Trumpism is a populist movement, which leads to the worst people rising to the top.
Richard Hanania tweet media
English
152
974
3K
189.9K
OinsideUT retweetledi
Patrick Skinner
Patrick Skinner@SkinnerPm·
This is so corrupt that the lawyers who crafted this should be disbarred & removed, the acting AG who signed it should be disbarred & removed, and the president who orchestrated it all should be impeached & removed & finally at long last made irrelevant. Staggering corruption
PBS News@NewsHour

The U.S. government has agreed to drop any tax claims and audits of President Trump, his sons and the Trump organization, according to a letter signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. It comes a day after the government announced a nearly $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” to compensate some of the president’s allies. @AliRogin has the latest.

English
163
3.1K
10.2K
182.9K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@Kristinartz Old Yeller. If that doesn't rock your soul, you don't have one
English
0
0
0
6
Kristina Bolten
Kristina Bolten@Kristinartz·
I need a movie that will absolutely destroy me emotionally, like ugly crying, can't breathe type. Any suggestions..
English
4.2K
78
1.4K
459.4K
OinsideUT
OinsideUT@OUinsideT·
@tedcruz Why? Bc the embassy is Jerusalem, and you'd like for him to be geographically correct?
English
0
0
0
1