Leka

4.1K posts

Leka banner
Leka

Leka

@OfficialLeka

NFT enthusiast

Texas, USA Katılım Eylül 2012
555 Takip Edilen756 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
🔥 Market Elites Trading Dashboard: Full Series Recap (Live Updates Daily) Every play tracked—from wins to lessons learned. Stacking edges with @MarketElites. Live Dashboard: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d… — click for the full table, real-time updates, and totals. Your series HQ. Who’s got a better run? Tag your crew and compare. 👇 #OptionsTrading #DayTrading #MarketElites
English
3
0
3
150
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@LamarMK I think that price point would piss off a lot of people that bought it for $8k
English
0
0
0
4
Lamar MK
Lamar MK@LamarMK·
A lot of people don't want to pay $99 a month for FSD. So they don't even try it. Drop the price to $49.99 and suddenly it's an easy decision. Add a 6-month plan for $279 or a yearly plan for $499, and now it's a no-brainer. We saw what happened when Tesla offered the Cybertruck for $59K. Demand took off. Same thing would happen with FSD. Lower the price. Get more people in the door. Let the tech sell itself.
Lamar MK tweet media
English
456
146
1.8K
81.2K
TechGeek Tesla 🔋⚡️
TechGeek Tesla 🔋⚡️@JonBbC_TechGeek·
Hey @greentheonly @jamesdouma - Can you please explain why so many people have noticed improvements with FSD 12.6.4 on HW3 since it was first released in 2.2025 when the software version hasn’t changed? It’s been noted that the FSD sector of the update has been changing sizes. I’m assuming it’s the weights and not the parameters (neural nets) that are changing, but I can’t confirm… And if the weights are changing, how is that not resulting in a minor point release update? Are these changes that people have been noticing just speculative and anecdotal? Or are they real changes that are flying under the radar?
English
12
2
66
9.2K
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@spotted_model Use it on HW3 every day around 110mi. Not as good as HW4 but it’s still good. Parking is too slow in either one anyway
English
0
0
1
39
Kim Java
Kim Java@ItsKimJava·
New video! Inside Tesla’s Cybercab: Exclusive In-Depth Look with @JoshWest247
English
33
103
1.1K
75.1K
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@techdevnotes And somehow they still get the simple additions in their CSV output wrong.
English
0
0
0
71
Tech Dev Notes
Tech Dev Notes@techdevnotes·
xAI has Released a Video on Grok 4.20 Multi-Agents
English
14
20
264
12.2K
Leka retweetledi
Market Elites
Market Elites@MarketElites·
Elites <> @LuckysBet $50 for every member who signs up using the link below. Over $60,000 out to the community. More below: 👇
Market Elites tweet media
English
16
28
54
1.6K
IvanTheGr8
IvanTheGr8@gr8_ivan·
@SawyerMerritt People don't want this hideous looking vehicle. You'll never have a hardcore $F $gm $stla $TM buy a tesla truck or any tow , construction, or hauling company buy one of these. You'll only get $tsla fan boys to buy this
English
37
2
45
25.6K
Justin Peters
Justin Peters@JustinPetersMin·
There are no aliens. Even if there were (and there aren't) they would have no way of getting here. The distances are simply too vast. Far, far too vast. The nearest star outside of our own sun is 4.2 light-years away. No aliens, no matter how clever, will ever be able to travel anywhere near the speed of light. The laws of physics prevent it. To accelerate any mass at all (even a pebble) to anything approaching even 1/3rd the speed of light would take incomprehensibly vast amounts of energy. You need a lot of spaceship (and I mean YUGE) to hold that much energy. So, now you've got a heck of a lot more than a pebble to move. Your energy problem just got infinitely worse. It's impossible folks. ET ain't out there, and even if he was, he ain't dropping by for a visit.
Pete Hegseth@PeteHegseth

👽🫡

English
13K
524
5.5K
3.4M
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@theficouple That’s crazy even with HOA and taxes (which are accounted for in escrow) plus miscellaneous upkeep I only spend ~200/month more.
English
0
0
1
1.2K
theficouple
theficouple@theficouple·
If the property will rent for $3,400/mo and the total payment is $2,700/mo? Please understand the cash flow is not $700/mo. It's probably closer to ~$20/mo...
English
52
8
878
527.9K
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@farzyness That’s the screen homie
English
0
0
0
6
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@elonmusk @tetsuoai Show me your data. What illumination profile are you using where solar alone can handle power demands?
English
0
0
0
5
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@tetsuoai Reactors aren’t needed, just solar power and batteries
English
937
383
6.6K
168K
tetsuo
tetsuo@tetsuoai·
Two days ago Elon said SpaceX is building a "self-growing city on the Moon" in under 10 years. Most people don't realize how close the engineering already is. Using the xAI API (Grok) I compiled every peer-reviewed study, mission result, and hardware spec into one document. Here's what the data actually says. The math: Elon Musk's core argument: "We can launch to the Moon every 10 days a 2-day trip. Mars is every 26 months a 6-month trip. We can iterate much faster." Starship lands ~100 metric tons per flight. At 10-20 lunar flights/year, that's 1,000-2,000 tonnes of infrastructure annually. That's enough to build a city. Construction: We already know how to build with lunar dirt. 9 validated sintering methods turn raw regolith into structural material ranging from 26 to 207 MPa compressive strength. For reference: under 1/6 g, lunar structures need a fraction of what terrestrial buildings require. China flew 34 regolith bricks on Tiangong for a full year. Returned November 2025. No cracks or structural damage. 3x standard brick strength. Power: The 14-day lunar night is the hardest engineering problem on the Moon. NASA and DOE signed an MOU in January 2026 for a nuclear reactor on the surface by 2030. The Phase 1 demo spec was 40 kW. The Phase 2 solicitation issued December 2025 calls for at least 100 kW. Both targets: under 6 tonnes, 10-year life, zero crew intervention, autonomous startup. A rover drives it to a safe distance, unreels a cable, and walks away. One of those powers a small city through every lunar night. ISRU: The Moon is 40-45% oxygen by weight. It's locked in the rock, but we know how to get it out. Molten regolith electrolysis: ~6,800 kg of hardware produces 25 t/yr of metal + 24 t/yr of oxygen. Mass payback ratio: 0.14 kg of equipment per kg of annual product. That's an industrial plant. Dust: Lunar dust is electrostatically charged, razor-sharp, and gets into everything. Apollo crews called it the worst operational hazard on the Moon. In March 2025, NASA's Electrodynamic Dust Shield was tested on the actual lunar surface during the Blue Ghost mission. Before-and-after images show regolith visibly cleared from glass and radiators. First in-situ dust removal ever demonstrated on the Moon. Most people missed this entirely. Lava tubes: The best real estate on the Moon is underground. GRAIL gravity data suggests lava tubes up to several kilometers wide may exist beneath the lunar maria. The first cave was directly confirmed by radar analysis published in 2024: the Mare Tranquillitatis pit, at least 45 meters wide with a conduit extending tens of meters further. Interior temperatures in shadowed lunar caves range from -20C to as warm as 17C, stable year-round. Zero radiation, zero micrometeorites, zero thermal cycling. A pressurized lava tube habitat doesn't need regolith shielding, doesn't need thermal control, and has virtually unlimited expansion volume. Timeline: Elon Musk said "less than 10 years." Here's what that looks like with the hardware that exists today: 2026-2028: Robotic cargo flights. 5-10 Starships pre-position 500-1,000 tonnes. Nuclear reactor. ISRU pilot plant. All before crew arrives. 2028-2029: First crew lands to a turnkey site. Monthly cargo flights continue. 20-40 people. 2030-2032: 100-200 residents. Industrial oxygen and metal production. 3D-printed campus. Propellant production begins. 2033-2035: 200-500+ people. Propellant self-sufficiency. Lava tube outpost. A functioning city. Geopolitics: China's ILRS is in active construction phase. Joint Russia-China nuclear power station planned for 2033-2035. Chang'e-7 launches this year with a PSR hopper. A Trump executive order in December called for a permanent lunar outpost by 2030. NASA Administrator Isaacman is accelerating commercial partnerships. The south pole is a strategic race, and SpaceX just entered it as a city-builder. Close: A year ago Elon Musk called the Moon "a distraction." Now it's the overriding priority. What changed isn't the destination. It's the realization that Starship's 100-tonne payload class, combined with ISRU and nuclear power, makes a self-sustaining lunar city achievable this decade, not next. The full technical reference (47 sources, 14 sections) is linked in the comment below. It's the most comprehensive single document that you will find on what it actually takes to build a permanent settlement on the Moon.
English
356
339
2.7K
222.2K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
The priority shift is because I’m worried that a natural or manmade catastrophe stops the resupply ships coming from Earth, causing the colony to die out. We can make the Moon city self-growing in less than 10 years, but Mars will take 20+ years due to the 26 month iteration cycle. That is what matters most. There is also an AI bonus element, but the prime directive must be ensuring the long-term survival of consciousness.
English
2.5K
1.7K
30.1K
2M
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷@farzyness·
I love how SpaceX aimed for Mars 20 years ago, and now it has to delay it by 5-7 years because AI satellites are more achievable in the near term. What an absolutely insane timeline we're living in you guys. The future is going to be RIDICULOUS.
English
223
164
6K
1.1M
Leka retweetledi
Nay.Tesseract
Nay.Tesseract@brittnaynay3·
🎉 $3,000 PC Giveaway 🎉 🖤 All Black MSI Stealth Build 🖤🔥 This is our last giveaway for the month, and concludes our 20k pc builds to celebrate the new year ❤️ How to Enter: 1️⃣ Like ❤️ and reshare 🔁 this post 2️⃣ Follow @brittnaynay3 @msiUSA 3️⃣ Drop a comment 💬 That’s it 🙌 🌍 Worldwide giveaway 🎯 Bonus Entries: Want extra chances to win? Drop comments on my other socials, more comments = more chances 🎉 🔗 Links in bio & pinned below 🗓️ Winner announced in 7 days 🍀 Good luck 🖤🔥
Nay.Tesseract tweet media
English
39.4K
21.4K
25.2K
816.8K
Autopilot
Autopilot@joinautopilot·
Excited to share we’ve partnered with @public to bring Autopilot’s strategies to all Public investors. Anyone with a Public account can now invest in any Autopilot strategy in just a few clicks To celebrate, go open a Public account and get 3 months of Autopilot Premium on us
Autopilot tweet media
English
25
19
170
324.6K
TTH
TTH@TheTeslaHoe·
Due to Tesla’s lack of having an SUV sized family car, and the X being only car that did fit my needs with kids..I guess I cant continue to keep using Teslas moving forward.
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt

BREAKING: Elon Musk has announced that @Tesla is discontinuing the Model S and Model X in Q2 2026. "We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It's part of our overall shift to an autonomous future."

English
188
9
529
87K
Leka
Leka@OfficialLeka·
@XFreeze Let me know when it can beat Nancy Pelosi
English
0
0
1
482
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Grok 4.20 is seriously crushing markets right now It’s sitting at the top across live trading platforms and actually making money, not just looking good on tests We’re talking roughly 10–12% returns in live trading, about 3–4× the S&P 500 over the same period, across: • Alpha Arena • PredictionArena • Rallies Currently Grok 4.20 is outperforming all the frontier models like Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT‑5.2 This is real money in live markets and Grok 4.20 is doing the work
X Freeze tweet media
English
520
528
4.8K
10.7M