Omar H. Rahman

5.5K posts

Omar H. Rahman banner
Omar H. Rahman

Omar H. Rahman

@omarrahman

Political Analyst and Writer, Mideast & US foreign policy; Fellow @ME_Council. Exec Editor of Afkār. Ex-Fellow @BrookingsFP @BakerInstitute. Alum @Columbiajourn

earth Katılım Mart 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen4.8K Takipçiler
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Haralabos Voulgaris
Haralabos Voulgaris@haralabob·
What if it wasn’t a vest at all, but a pager. Something designed to explode at any moment, without warning. While you’re out shopping, walking through a crowded market, standing next to innocent women and children who have no idea. Can you imagine that?
The Bulwark@BulwarkOnline

Vance suggests Iran could have used nuclear suicide vests: “You talk about people who walk into a crowded supermarket and have a vest on, and they blow up the vest and a couple of people get killed, and that's a terrible tragedy. What happens when what's on the vest is not something that can kill a couple of people, but can kill many, many tens of thousands of people?”

English
179
2.3K
12.8K
453.2K
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Alan MacLeod
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod·
"Man in military fatigues" is a new one.
Alan MacLeod tweet media
English
582
34K
160.9K
1.7M
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Dr. Annelle Rodriguez Sheline
The idea that the US is powerless to stop Israel is a complete fiction. At any moment, the US could have said, "We are (finally) going to follow our own laws, which require us to stop supporting you: 1) The Leahy Laws: no security assistance to units of a foreign military engaged in gross violations of human rights 2) 620i of Foreign Assistance Act: no security assistance to a foreign government that blocks US humanitarian assistance 3) 502B: no weapons to governments that abuse human rights (this one has never been applied, but it's a law) Instead Blinken broke the law to continue to arm Israel
Jonathan Guyer@mideastXmidwest

How does Tony Blinken reconcile his Gaza legacy? Speaking at the Harvard Kennedy School, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken was asked yesterday about how he sees Gaza — and whether the Biden administration should have cut off arms to Israel. The moderator, New York Times journalist David Sanger, described Gaza as probably the "weakest" part of the diplomat's legacy. "Of course, for me, coulda woulda shoulda, is something that will always be there when it comes to Gaza," Mr. Blinken said. "Given the level of human suffering, given the horrific loss of of life among Palestinian women, men, children — you can't help but ask yourself on a regular basis, could we should we have done something different?" A Harvard student pushed further during the Q&A. He asked the former secretary of state more specifically about the 2024 USAID conclusion that Israel had blocked aid to Palestinians despite Mr. Blinken telling Congress the opposite, overriding experts to continue sending weapons to Israel. "You had opportunities to distance yourself and your administration from arming Israel, which committed what leading Holocaust scholars and human rights agencies call a genocide," the student said. "You rejected them and continued arming Israel. This is your legacy. How do you justify to the countless Palestinians, including thousands of children, that died from your decisions?" The student then read the names of several young children were killed in Gaza. "How do you reconcile with this and how do you reconcile with your legacy?" "This is something that I grappled with and will continue to grapple with for as long as I can see into the future," Mr. Blinken said. "Could we, should we have done things differently such that the suffering that people endured, the loss of the children you just listed and so many others could have been averted. The short answer is: Maybe yes. "We had to make judgments. We had to make judgments in real time about how to try to get to a better place. We made those judgments. People will make their own judgments about what we did and what we didn't do. "But let me just add a few things... and my great friend Samantha [Power] is here and we had this, you know, ongoing discussions in our own administration on the question of the assistance that was getting or not getting to Palestinians in Gaza throughout 2024. I was on this every single day, literally every single day. And we had a series of reports come out suggesting that there was an imminent famine that was about to happen. And then the next report would say actually fewer people are in danger even though people were leading terribly hard and difficult lives. "That didn't just happen. It happened because every single day we were on the Israelis to try to get assistance in, to open more crossing points, to flood the zone. They did that profoundly inadequately. They did that in ways that were not the way I would like to have seen it done, but we got some of that done. "When the report that you referred to came out and this was the product of the so-called NSM, the national security memorandum. If you look at that report, it lays out a lot of the actions that Israel were taking that were of more than deep concern to us. And I think that report actually served a very useful function in motivating the Israelis to do better. Not to do as much as they should have and as we would have wanted, but to do better. And at various points the aid went up, the number of trucks going in went up. The distribution even with the trucks going in was a huge problem. Looting, criminality, etc., all difficult problems that are really hard to control for. "But yes, of course, you couldn't be and I wouldn't be human if I didn't ask myself every day, could we have done things differently. "The one thing I want to suggest to you as well… I believe and look maybe I'm wrong that the nature of the the trauma in Israel, which is, there's no hierarchy of trauma, the trauma in Israel, the trauma among Palestinians, the same. The loss of a Palestinian life, the loss of Israeli life, the same. But on the Israeli side, the trauma was such that I believe the determination across that society to take the actions that they took in Gaza was such that irrespective of what we did, they would have continued to do what they did. And cutting off arms, sure, that was an option. But I don't actually believe that at least in the near term, it would have changed things. "And I also believe it would have led to an even wider war as Israel's enemies, and they were multiple, jumped in and that only would have extended the war in Gaza, not ended the war in Gaza. "We thought that the best way to get to an end, to protect people, to help people, was to get to a ceasefire, with hostages coming out and with aid going in. And you know I fully—more than respect—I empathize with people who felt this so, so deeply. I do remain with a question in my mind about why barely a word was spoken in all those months about Hamas, which was an actor too and is responsible for so much of what happened. "But yes, we all look at it, I certainly look at it, and say maybe we could have done differently. Maybe we could have done better by the people. I wish we could have."

English
90
1.5K
4K
158.1K
Omar H. Rahman
Omar H. Rahman@omarrahman·
The inability to comprehend the dynamics of this war is quite shocking. Threats of escalation are not going to change the Iranian calculus. They are absorbing a massive joint air campaign and can retaliate effectively. Does Johnson think a few thousand soldiers changes the equation? In fact, I’m certain Iran’s enormous army would prefer the opportunity to fire at soldiers on the ground! Their entire strategy is based on raising costs, and there’s no more effective way to do that than raising the U.S. body count.
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson says Iran better WATCH how many troops President Trump floods to the region and make a deal "The buildup of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should WATCH that buildup, and they need to take note of that!" "They have to reopen the strait. They have to be good neighbors to their Middle East neighbors over there in the region." "They cannot have a nuclear warhead. They cannot have that capability. And they cannot declare war on the United States and Israel, which is what they did decades ago." "Our mission will be accomplished. I think that will wrap up in a short time period, and I know that's the intention of the administration and the Department of War." "We have the greatest, most powerful military fighting force ever conceived in the history of planet Earth." "It's an amazing, an amazing power that we have, and we willed it for good. We've done it here. That job is almost done, and I think it will wrap up soon."

English
0
0
0
164
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Trita Parsi
Trita Parsi@tparsi·
In times of crises, some nations shrink, others rise. Not through force, but through wisdom Germany & much of Europe are shrinking Qatar is rising Despite being betrayed by the US & struck by Iran, Qatar speaks with wisdom, not anger. It looks to paths for peace, not revenge.
English
239
1.5K
7.2K
369.4K
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Omar H. Rahman
Omar H. Rahman@omarrahman·
@jackmirkinson @MazMHussain But that wouldn’t exactly explain it because U.S. politicians have been making these statements for decades without effect on public opinion of Israel.
English
1
0
7
548
Jack Mirkinson
Jack Mirkinson@jackmirkinson·
v underrated aspect of israel's slide in us public opinion is that hardcore pro-israel politics make people sound like complete weirdos. the normal reaction to the phrase "i revere the state of israel" is not "sure makes sense" it's "what in the what"
Clash Report@clashreport

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Israel: I revere the state of Israel. I’m proud to support the state of Israel. I deeply, deeply oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership, his opposition to the two-state solution, and deeply oppose how he is indulging the far right as it relates to what’s going on in the West Bank.

English
6
70
583
28.3K
Omar H. Rahman retweetledi
Firas Modad
Firas Modad@firasmodad·
I'm increasingly of the view that these are false flags. 1. No religious rationale whatsoever. No Quranic verses, no hadeeths, nothing. Not even a Bismillah or Hamdulillah. 2. Not a single Muslim I know refers to Antwerp as Jerusalem of the North. NO ONE SAYS THAT. This is intended for Jewish consumption, not for Muslims. 3. The logo is an AI copy of the IRGC/Hezbollah logo with. 4. The music is derived from Hezbollah's videos, with an edit in the middle. 5. There is a mistake in the Arabic grammar that is typical of non-native speakers. 6. They're finally referring to Palestine as Beloved Palestine, but not giving it any religious connotations. Odd for aspiring jihadis. 7. There's nothing in the videos calling for action, or inspiring recruitment. Most Islamist movements do that or give some kind of moral justification to encourage others. 8. The term Ashab al-Yamin is odd. It exists as a concept in the Qur'an, but its meaning is disputed and has no jihadi connotations. It literally translates as The Friends of the Right, or Those of Righteousness. This is a BS psyop.
Joe Truzman@JoeTruzman

Ashab al-Yamin has claimed an attack in the city of Antwerp, Belgium. This is the seventh attack the group has claimed against Jewish and Western targets in Europe since March 9. Ashab al-Yamin claimed that Appelmansstraat, a central street in Antwerp known for its diamond district, was a target of its attack due to the street's connection with the local Jewish community. The group's messaging casts the attack as part of a broader, escalating campaign tied to the "liberation of Palestine" and retaliation for Palestinians, Lebanese, and other Muslims. --- The video appears to be authentic but it shows some signs of amateur production. It is important to examine if local reports in Antwerp have verified that an arson attack occurred in the area in recent days. Oddly the video does not provide a date of when the arson occurred unlike the previous videos published by the group. Also, it appears the group used a translator like Google Translate to publish its message in English. There is a period at the beginning of the last sentence in the group's statement, indicating a translation app may have been used.

English
86
1.1K
4.4K
116.6K
Power to the People ☭🕊
Power to the People ☭🕊@ProudSocialist·
BREAKING: Gavin Newsom says he is a proud supporter of Israel. “I am proud to support the state of Israel.” Imagine being proud to support a state that committed genocide in Gaza and is now actively trying to steal South Lebanon. This is disqualifying.
English
542
2.2K
7.9K
132.3K
Omar H. Rahman
Omar H. Rahman@omarrahman·
Why are you hiding behind Tom Friedman @GavinNewsom? Apartheid is not a direction, it’s a reality. Go visit yourself if you want to see it; it’s in plain view. Or go read the International Court of Justice ruling on the illegality of occupation and the existence of apartheid. Or go read @alhaq_org or @hrw or @amnesty or @btselem, they all have thorough reports documenting the crime. Be courageous Governor.
The Tennessee Holler@TheTNHoller

POLITICO: “Do you regret using the word ‘APARTHEID’?” NEWSOM: “I do, in this context…” @GavinNewsom walks back his criticism of Israel (to @PodSaveAmerica) — saying he meant it about the “direction” 🇮🇱 is going, as a word “others may use” if they annex the entire West Bank

English
0
1
1
150
Omar H. Rahman
Omar H. Rahman@omarrahman·
He can’t even defend an argument that has already been made for him by every credible expert, international legal body, and human rights organization. That doesn’t bode well for him as a candidate. The public wants courageous leadership.
Alex Kane@alexbkane

Governor Gavin Newsom says he regrets using the term apartheid in relation to Israel, and says he used it the same way Tom Friedman does--as a term that describes where Israel is heading under Netanyahu, not a term describing the current reality. politico.com/news/magazine/…

English
0
0
3
177