Sabitlenmiş Tweet
“All idols break the heart of their worshippers.”
Mary will never break your heart. She will lead you to her son.
Mary can never be an idol.
English
Catholic Knighthood
25.9K posts
Catholic Knighthood
@PabloLim7
✝️/Promoting Catholic Christian values for modern men w/ chivalric hearts. Debunker of the "Sola ME" heresy.
Texas Hill Country Katılım Aralık 2021
7.1K Takip Edilen3.8K Takipçiler
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@autopilotoffnow @naplestheartist Is that all for full Christianity? Just believe in Jesus as their Savior, and that He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered death and was buried, and on the third day he rose again?
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
The silliest ‘argument’ against Catholicism is that it is is “Roman”
Yeah, His followers won. Go cry with the pagans.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@autopilotoffnow @naplestheartist Is Christianity?
English
@Kansas_Cash Right.
They make authoritative statements “based on the authority of the word of God” (they assume) but then also say “there is no official teaching authority.”
They are saying, “there is no forrest, only trees.”
English
@PabloLim7 Many such cases, by and large protestants have an incredible lack of self awareness. Rarely utilizing their “made up” rules to analyze their own beliefs.
English
This Constantino guy claims that Scripture does not allow for any authority that can make binding statements, yet he himself keeps making binding statements.
E. Costantino@lovell_julius
It really all boils down to this: The apostles preached the word of truth before the NT was written. Naturally, the Church was required to abide by the apostolic teachings (“traditions”). These were Jesus’ chosen apostles, and the Church had an immediate connection with these very apostles. Makes sense. So the real question is not whether there was a tradition – of course there was. The real question is whether any LATER evolving traditions can be proven to have the same authority as the apostles’ traditions and the inspired scriptures they left us. Since I do not see any proof of Peter’s papacy or apostolic succession in the inspired scriptures, then the Catholic tradition and the Council of Rome are meaningless to me. In fact, when I read that Paul said “Cephas” was one of three men who “seemed to be pillars” (Gal. 2:9), my logical conclusion is that Peter couldn’t possibly have been the pope. It’s not an interpretation that I have to force in order to prove Catholicism wrong. I see it as clearly as I see the blue sky, and I feel it is my responsibility to warn others of what I perceive as the greatest hoax concocted by the evil one. But it is done is sincerity; not malice.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@lovell_julius @PabloLim7 @FightForMary @MrCasey62 I read your post. I see a whole lot of I don’t, I don’t, I don’t. Your whole post was all about you and what you see so YOU deciding all facts. Everything is just about one person YOU!! Point proven!!
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@BishopJaxi @PabloLim7 It's The Interpretation. "Let the Little Children Come To Me and Do Not Prevent Them!" Theologically seems to forbid Birth Control & Abortion, doesn't it? Immediate Wiggle Room Or Contrary Interpretation Results!
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@JamesDitto12 @PabloLim7 Cool so Jesus dishonored His mother and broke the ten commandments. Pretty sure that interpretation is wrong.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@PabloLim7 So true. Whenever I encounter someone who says they go to a "Bible based" Church, the first thing I want to ask is, "So what do you believe?"
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
As if anyone needed anymore proof that @BibleInContext1 is not a follower of Christ- but a grifter along the lines of OnlyFans stars proclaiming themselves Christians for social media status
The Bible In Context@BibleInContext1
Disclose.tv shares a clipped video of Netanyahu, that’s now going viral, completely misrepresenting what Netanyahu actually said. Netanyahu was paraphrasing a statement from the historian Will Durant. He actually says this in original video! The actual quote says this; “…and the universe has no prejudice in favor of Christ as against Genghis Khan.” from The Lessons of History (1968) In that quote, Durant is not attacking Christ, but making a philosophical argument. He’s making a naturalistic observation about history, not a theological conclusion about truth! Context is always important.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
“Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”
No press conference response will ever top it.
English
Sola Scriptura has about 100,000,000 different flavors.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
Sola Scriptura is the ultimate, demonic Motte-and-Bailey.
As soon as you point out "that's not in Scripture", they retreat behind personal interpretation and give all sorts of excuses why that doesn't matter.
Or they'll attack Sacred Tradition, as if that's somehow a good thing
Bishop@BishopJaxi
Chapter and verse? Or is this another man made Protestant tradition?
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@PabloLim7 @lovell_julius @FightForMary @MrCasey62 They always forget this part.
Ira not that they don’t want popes.
It’s that they want to be not only their own pope, but everyone else’s.
English
@VinceIovin43311 @CharlesTingler @MrCasey62 The phrase is made up, as are the conjectures required to believe it:
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
No it isn’t. That’s the church functioning as Christ set it up. Scripture , tradition and Magisterium under the Authority of Jesus Christ handed down through Apostolic succession
To your first four questions , you have no authority other than your self determined interpretation. Sola Scriptura does not settle doctrinal disputes outside the Church. You have Thousands of Protestant interpretations which have no doctrinal authority.
English
Catholic Knighthood retweetledi
@timwmson Ludicrous. The fact that you can’t walk and chew gum at the same time is your problem, not the Catholics’.
We’re capable of “both/and” and know it applies here. Your childish “either/or” is 100% your fault for throwing around the term “Sola” in so ridiculous a fashion.
English