Parzival Nikko

@WallStreetApes @GuntherEagleman Make you’re own bread.

Wood chips being found in Dave's Killer Bread Not small wood shavings, not little pieces. These are pretty large wood chips (shown) and they are throughout the entire loaf This has already been reported to the FDA Dave's Killer Bread is the top-selling organic sliced bread brand in the US

👍Colorado we have to remove the blue cancer that is eating away at our freedoms.

The Late Night show hosts were so giddy and celebratory after Trump was banned from social media. They absolutely LOVE censorship until someone accusing one of them of crossing the line. Then they become supporters of free speech.

@alluringmedia I voted for Obama in college and it’s one of my biggest regrets. At least I grew up and realized my mistake though..

I voted for Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Harris. My conscience is clear.

@TheAntiGrifter @ScottBottomsCO True

@ParzivalNikko @ScottBottomsCO It doesn’t matter if we vote for them or not. The elections are rigged and the GOP allows Dems to rig them because they all work for the same masters. They just do performative nonsense to make us think otherwise.

𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗿𝘀 from life without parole to second degree murder with the possibility of parole. School shooters, theater shooters, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗼𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲. This is not justice. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗜 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗢 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹. The radical left continues to protect violent criminals 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗽𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗮𝗺 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗼𝗿, 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗘𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵. ScottBottoms.com #ReclaimColorado #SafeColorado #RuleOfLaw 🌄🙏

If you’re keeping track, Democrats are - running a candidate for Senate with a literal Nazi tattoo, - funding the KKK through the SPLC, - and fighting for racially segregated congressional districts. But Republicans are the racists.

Dear Senator Sanders, Oh, this is RICH. This is so perfectly, exquisitely, weapons-grade rich that I had to put down my anatomy exams and just... appreciate it for a moment. The man who got thrown out of a SOCIALIST HIPPIE COMMUNE in Vermont in 1971 — after THREE DAYS — for refusing to do any actual work while everyone else planted, harvested, and hauled water, is out here telling me the OLIGARCHS want to control everything. Three. Days. The communists gave you a longer trial period than most employers give to someone who steals from the register. Here is what Jim Quinn's Law Number Two says, and I want every single person reading this to tattoo it somewhere useful: "If you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing." Senator, you OWN THREE HOMES. A Burlington residence. A D.C. townhouse. A $575,000 vacation lake house in North Hero, Vermont — purchased in 2016, the same year you were touring the country telling college students the system is rigged. Your net worth sits somewhere between $2.5 and $3 million. You have pocketed over $2.5 MILLION in book royalties since 2011. That elevator is clearly not stuck between floors for you, is it. And then — THEN — during your "Fighting Oligarchy Tour" with AOC, you spent over $550,000 in CAMPAIGN FUNDS on PRIVATE JET TRAVEL. Half a million dollars on luxury jets to lecture working Americans about the dangers of wealth. When Fox News caught you boarding a Bombardier Challenger 604 — a jet that runs up to $15,000 PER HOUR — you did not apologize. You did not even blink. You looked directly into the camera and said, and I am quoting this verbatim because it is the most accidentally honest thing you have ever said: "You think I'm gonna be sitting on a waiting line at United?" Senator. THAT IS OLIGARCHIC THINKING. That is TEXTBOOK "the rules apply to you people, not to me." That is the elevator music of every single billionaire you have spent 35 years pretending to oppose. In a battle of wits with your own stated beliefs, you showed up completely unarmed. Thirty-five years in Congress. You know what your personal legislative output looks like? Eight bills passed. EIGHT. In three and a half DECADES. That works out to 0.23 bills per year. I have produced more graded anatomy exams in a single semester. Your two greatest solo legislative achievements — the ones with your name on top, the thing YOU actually DID — are the naming of a post office in Danville, Vermont, and the naming of a post office in Fair Haven, Vermont. You named. Two. Post offices. You are as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to actually passing legislation, but you want me to believe you are the vanguard of the working class. That sounds like a YOU problem. Quinn's Law #25: "Liberals are great at giving away other people's money." You have been living PROOF of that law for 35 years. You give away everyone else's money — from a vacation home on a lake — while spending half a million on jets because you are far too important to wait in line with the taxpayers funding your lifestyle. You want to talk about oligarchs controlling the media? You have been IN the media for four decades. You just finished a $75 million documentary. You have a book deal. You have a podcast. You HAVE the megaphone and you are using it to tell people that other people have the megaphone. The gene pool really needed a lifeguard for THAT particular reasoning. I am a high school science teacher in Northeast Ohio. I support a family of six on a teacher's salary. I am not particularly impressed by a man with three houses, $550,000 in jet receipts, and 0.23 bills per year telling me he stands with the working class. More famous than wise, Senator. More famous than wise. The hippie commune knew it in 72 hours. How long is it going to take everyone else? IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below — do YOU think a man with three homes and a half-million dollar private jet habit speaks for working Americans? Tell me. And if you want MORE of this — the data, the history, the science, the stories — JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. But what do I know — I am only a science teacher who can actually do math, a retired Army combat medic who knows what genuine sacrifice looks like, and apparently one of the few people left who finds it suspicious that the most vocal enemy of oligarchy just cannot bring himself to wait in line at the airport with the rest of us. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

🚨 COLORADO ALERT: The Democrats are at it again, and this time they’re coming for your commute. 🚨 A new bill moving through the Capitol would allow speed cameras to ticket you for going just 6 MPH over the limit. First, it’s a “warning,” and then the $40 fines start rolling in. 💸 This isn't about "safety"—it's about a dystopian police state where every move you make is monitored by a machine to fill the government's depleted coffers. They want to tax you for trying to keep up with the flow of traffic while they struggle to manage their own budget shortfalls. The hypocrisy is deafening: ❌ Hardworking citizens get shaken down for going 6 over. ❌ Law-abiding taxpayers are treated like ATMs. ✅ Meanwhile, illegal aliens are given a pass, sanctuary status, and taxpayer-funded benefits while the rest of us are surveilled and penalized. They want us living in a high-tech surveillance state where the "punishment" only applies to those who actually follow the law. Enough is enough! Colorado deserves better than a government that views its citizens as a revenue stream. 🛑🏔️ #Colorado #COPolitics #StopTheShakedown #Denver #SurveillanceState #TaxHike #SpeedCameras #Freedom kdvr.com/news/local/col…

@TheRiceProphet @moresnoshages @royaldman @newstart_2024 You’re deflecting like a liberal…

@ParzivalNikko @moresnoshages @royaldman @newstart_2024 More big feelings

This MRI study on young kids just exposed something terrifying: They scanned the brains of 60 children aged 3–5 — including 5-year-old Rose — and found interactive screen time is causing measurable loss of white matter in their developing brains. Even just 2 hours a day is linked to impaired neural connectivity, language, and literacy development. Professor Mike Nagel (neuroscientist and father) said his first reaction was simply: “Wow… I was not anticipating seeing anything like that.” We’re physically changing children’s brains before they even start school — and the damage is visible on scans. This one actually unsettled me. I’ve always suspected too much screen time was bad, but seeing real white matter loss in toddlers hits different. Parents of little ones — has this kind of research changed how much screen time you allow?

@TheRiceProphet @moresnoshages @royaldman @newstart_2024 Yea, my brain is developed. Would you let your young children drink alcohol if done moderately? Stop making excuses for shitty parents that let devices babysit their kids.

@moresnoshages @ParzivalNikko @royaldman @newstart_2024 Seems like a lot of childless men with big feelings responding to you in here 🤣 All of which are doing so on a device they would never let their child have! Moderation in everything is key. My kids play outside at least 5 days a week for more than 2 hours each day.

@moresnoshages @royaldman @newstart_2024 Good for you. I’m guessing you wouldn’t call out physically abusive parents either then? Acting tough when someone calls out a parent that lets a device babysit their kid, but not the shitty parent is weak af.

@ParzivalNikko @royaldman @newstart_2024 That’s presumptuous of you. We don’t do screen time other than the occasional movie here and there. What I don’t do is tell people they’re failed parents because their kid has an iPad.

@RealxRebellion @royaldman @newstart_2024 No, but I’m fairly certain they’ll have to deal with anxiety and other mental health issues from their liberal parents and won’t be any competition for my kids 🤣

@ParzivalNikko @royaldman @newstart_2024 well you don’t know me or my child so shut up

@0000idc @208_dad @SarahisCensored Not even a close comparison

@208_dad @SarahisCensored so if a mormon knocks on my door i get to pepper spray and push them for harrasing me?? lets goooo 🙌

If this is the new definition of masculinity in America, count me the hell out. She had no weapon. At worst, she was irritating. But this response was completely over the top - and flat-out violent. A real man would have told her to get off his property or called the authorities. This? This is coward behavior.

@mikebirdwatcher @royaldman @newstart_2024 I’m a programmer and it 100% will.

@ParzivalNikko @royaldman @newstart_2024 If you think AI is going to replace programmers and computer engineering you're mistaken

@mikebirdwatcher @royaldman @newstart_2024 There will be little to no need for programmers by the time your child is career ready. Fucking up his/her brain for a career that’s going to be non-existent is retarded.

@royaldman @newstart_2024 You're insane. My child is going to be a computer programmer and engineer, hence why I want them on a computer from age 4 onwards.

@RealxRebellion @royaldman @newstart_2024 A wild take is thinking it’s a good idea to give a young child a tablet

@royaldman @newstart_2024 this is a wild take -

@moresnoshages @royaldman @newstart_2024 I guess you’re one of the brainless he’s referring to..

@royaldman @newstart_2024 Get a load of this fuck. Parent of the year needs a trophy

🤣🤣🤣

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.