DigitalFoogazi

@INArteCarloDoss Parallel reality, worlds busters edition

Which is it? Dementia or pathological lying? Why not both…

@RadioFreeTom Plan B: blame Biden, Zelensky and Europe

Trump’s Plan A was to hit Iran hard, watch the theocrats flee, and then hand power to a government of his own choosing. Should such things not come to pass, Plan B was … well, apparently, there was no Plan B. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…

@TheWarMonitor If 🇺🇸 scaled up and improved upon the frontline fpv tactic they could take on Iran land remotely. Drones range up to 50km in tens of thousands grind the enemy effectively from a safer distance than snipers. How come they ignored it?

Sen. Angus King says the U.S. should’ve learned from Ukraine's drone experience, but instead “we’re shooting down $35,000 drones with $2.7 million missiles.”

@pl_european He never blames Russia. For some reason.

Trump loves blaming everyone for his fuck ups, just not himself. He is a prime example of a weak person.

@ItsBorys Pretty sure Trump will, he got an excuse "allies didn't help me ". Also pretty sure Putin will not stop supplying Iran with intelligence. How you prove him? Double win for Russia.

It was only a matter of time before the Russians leveraged this and I guess the Trump admin will agree to it

@notthreadguy Step 1: accept insane president acting insane. Everything becomes the new norm.

i am once again asking how tf did we get here man

@StealthQE4 The fact 🇺🇸 didn't take Ukraine tech and scaled it up tells everything about the plan for Iran. No plan, no intelligence, just big chaotic show. All fun, big bombs, until people die for real. Putting ignorant in the top position has enormous consequences.

Drones are a total game changer when it comes to modern warfare. So cheap to make($20k) and you can mass produce them. I read that Ukraine can make 3-4 million of them in a year. We use million missiles to shoot these things down.

@calvinfroedge When kids accidentally make fire best you can do is put them aside, deal with the fire and clean the mess. You don't want to see what happens when the kids will try to put it out themselves. If unqualified people create a problem, the solution to the problem maybe even worse.

Look, I really hope this crisis ends But to all of the people who were mocking and downplaying, maybe next time don't be so stupid And for the love of God, don't believe a word that Trump says

@INArteCarloDoss But he's ready for the sacrifice the whole 🇺🇸, that's why 🇺🇸 exist for, to sacrifice for him, so the plan better work out, if he goes down, America goes down.

orange fat psychopath is not gonna get out of this hole he dug himself into by performing his usual retarded little dance this time

@ZelenskyyUa Trump goal is to bring you as close to surrender as possible. May use tricks and paper warranties. If that fails backup plan is to blame you to have fake reasons to withdraw help or even block help you get from others or even block starlink if he likes.

At the planned Ukraine–U.S. bilateral meeting in the United States, a full range of issues will be addressed. First. Preparations for a trilateral meeting with the Russian side. Ukraine wants clear dates for such a meeting, or at least approximate ones. Everyone understands that the war in the Middle East is affecting the postponement of this date, but nevertheless, greater clarity is needed. Second. Dialogue with the American side must continue in close coordination, because the easing of sanctions by the United States on Russian energy creates risks. This increases Russia’s revenues and, accordingly, Russian capabilities on the frontline. This is dangerous. Therefore, from this perspective as well, the meeting in the United States is important. Third. Work on bilateral documents related to ending the war, future security guarantees, and the reconstruction of Ukraine. This work is ongoing, and our negotiating team will be clarifying specific issues. The team’s main tasks are, first and foremost, clear parameters for continuing the trilateral talks. Second – the status of the documents. Third – the PURL initiative, through which we procure missiles for the Patriots. It is important to discuss with the American side the continuation of this program. And fourth – discussion of our bilateral relations and the Drone Deal. From a conversation with journalists (1/3).

@MalcontentmentT Reminds me of "missiles must be pointy, pointy is scary" 😅

Donald Trump becoming increasingly involved in tactical decisions for Operation Epic Fury, believes some at Pentagon undermining the ongoing "success" to make him look bad.

@mathelirium Is there anything in math that is not modeling and can't be used for?

Theres so much we can model using Mathematics

Funny question: who is more reliable: Trump or IRGC terrorists?

Seen ai hallucinations more often recently. My bet on cost optimization and downsizing models. Bubble top behind us and energy costs may accelerate it. "AI - use at your own risk" -soon, may be labeled as cigarettes.

@DabsMalone What about capable retard with strong supportive loyalist team 😅

Nothing is more dangerous than a capable retard

@MalcontentmentT You elect incompetent leader, he place incompetent people as head of agencies, and these heads, guess who they employ as leaders and managers? Corruption goes deep and it stays. You may pick different president later but the corruption implanted below in the structures stays.

Can't say that I'm shocked at all. Some of this we already knew.

@Ember421 @Object_Zero_ Transforming use energy but if done before the only cost is transport, which rise costs destroying value but not the gas itself.

@PassCombo @Object_Zero_ You consume it (or other energy) to run the compressors for liquifaction and the engines on the ships to move it...

Energy Policy Outlook Renewables don’t really compete with oil, but they do compete with gas. Gas is not priced internationally, it’s priced locally. Transporting it far destroys a large fraction of it, so it’s only shipped when large arbitrage exists. Oil is priced internationally and is easy to transport huge volumes in a stable manner. Energy is a complex space, which is why there are so many conspiracies and poor understanding of the basics. Lots of complexity and nuance for strong hyperlocalised opinions to form and stick. Many countries have laypeople with strong political opinions on the matter, and in democratic countries that introduces policies that are usually counterproductive to the economy and the environment. The best energy policy is to have some sort of social cost enforced to represent the environmental cost to wider society, where environmental burdens exist, and then to have a free and open market on top of that. Pretty standard regulated market stuff. The challenge is that it has so far been too difficult for the international community to reach any sort of mutually enforced environmental cost structure, consensus is necessary as the environmental sink for this industry is not local but is the shared atmosphere of Earth. Anyone adopting such a cost structure locally/unilaterally quickly destroys their own competitiveness and fades their economy toward irrelevance. It’s a prisoner’s dilemma. Humanity is very unlikely to reach a collaborative outcome, so the optimal strategy for any sovereign entity is to outcompete everyone else in a race condition. This is what is happening in the world. Lots of countries who can’t do strategy are doing random, bad, self defeating unilateral things, and a few strategic sovereigns are racing away. Pretty obvious who is who. What the world needs isn’t a political or market solution, those have already failed. China escaped. What we need is a technology solution, and that’s going to be a residential fabric of PV + BESS and high density industrial node of deep nuclear concentration. Oil and gas will only get more expensive as they deplete, the solution is to race the 21st century technologies to the cross over point as fast as possible, so that the switch is economic (competitive) and not political (collaborative). This is the system strategy approach that is going to unfold. But it’s not what is currently underway.

@skdh There are also some things that are conveniently assumed but not explained: the slit is treated like only geometrical object while it's actually full of electric particles that interact with anything EM related. Saying photon interferes with itself is deeply wrong.

The double slit experiment is the probably most misunderstood experiment ever. I have no idea who created the myth that if you 'look' at one of the slits, then the particles (photons/electrons) stop behaving as waves. It's wrong! They of course STILL behave as waves! Because particles are also waves, always. Photons and electrons make a self-interference EVEN ON A SINGLE slit. Don't believe it? Below an actual measurement from a laser diffracting on a single/double slit from Wikipedia. What happens if you measure which slit the particle goes through is that you get no interference between BOTH slits. And no, you don't need a conscious observer for this. Believe it or not, there have actually been experiments where they had people literally look at a double slit to see if that makes any difference and the answer is no, it does not. The entire mystery of the double slit is in the path of the particle TO the double slit. Because it seems that the particle must "know" whether it WILL be measured at one of the slits before it even gets there. It must "know" whether to go through both or just pick one. Seems like the future influences the past? Not really, it just means you have a consistency condition on the time evolution.