Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸

6.2K posts

Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 banner
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸

Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸

@PatRabbitte1

ExPATistan Katılım Ocak 2013
518 Takip Edilen557 Takipçiler
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 retweetledi
Seyed Mohammad Marandi
Seyed Mohammad Marandi@s_m_marandi·
Don't be deceived by the Western media. The Epstein Coalition is targeting Iranian civilians.
English
151
3.9K
8.4K
89.8K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 retweetledi
Bruce Fenton
Bruce Fenton@brucefenton·
If the preposterous notion that “Iran bombed its own school” was true there would be evidence. If there was evidence the US would not just be sharing it, they would be blasting it everywhere. Instead, what has the pentagon and White House said? “It’s under investigation.” This is exactly what you’d say if you did something horrible and don’t want to admit it. There was a missile misfire hundreds of miles away and a widely pushed image of this combined with a false narrative saying that this was the missile and Iran hit its own school. And no, Iran did not “admit they did it”. This was false. Why would someone make up such a lie and push it? To cover for a horrible truth. The UN, who is aligned with the US also seems to have admitted it was US & Israeli bombs that hit the school. Because it’s impossible to lie about something so horrible they try to pivot. Now the narrative seems to be shifting to “well maybe the US/ Israel killed those school girls…but it was an accident because Iran was using them as human shields and hid the school inside a base…” The simplest explanation of things is often the truth. The two psychopathic countries who have killed thousands of kids in their wars launched an unwarranted and illegal war of aggression on a country and bombed them. Those bombs killed the girls. Most tragically is that the US has already announced it will have a more major and extensive bombing campaign. These deaths will likely be surpassed with thousands more. Just as in the rubble of Gaza, the human toll and life lost will be hard to comprehend. As more dead take up we won’t be talking about this first loss of life. Soon they will drop all pretense that we are “helping Iranians” and move to the true goal, doing what the US and Israel do best: mass murdering civilians. How many will die? 10,000? 100,000 or more? And for what? Psychopaths. The murder of these girls is only the first in a long line of horrors and crimes to come. If you support this war then their deaths and the more to come are on you.
English
21
16
97
5.1K
Wu Blockchain
Wu Blockchain@WuBlockchain·
CZ: Recalling the Decision to Exit FTX Investment in 2021 On Feb 10, 2026, CZ discussed the 2021 FTX exit on the All-In Podcast. He cited SBF's Washington comments and 5x salary offers to VIP managers as reasons. Despite holding veto rights, CZ chose to divest, finalizing the deal in July 2021—1.5 years before the crisis. He emphasized that as a passive investor with competing futures platforms, he did not review financial statements and was unaware of internal issues. Source: youtu.be/vQwXgxJxwnw?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
33
13
109
28.9K
Lord Bebo
Lord Bebo@MyLordBebo·
🇪🇺🇩🇪🧑‍💻 Video cards are running out! in Europe, deliveries of cards from Nvidia have been halted. The owner of a large electronics store reported that a supplier from Germany canceled all orders for RTX 5090, RTX 5080, and RTX 5070 Ti due to stock shortages. As an alternative, only RTX 5070 is offered - no more than five video cards per store. The reason remains the same, due to the "AI race", Nvidia is directing its resources to data centers, and the global memory shortage is exacerbating the situation. As a result, demand exceeds supply, and there are almost no video cards left for home PCs.
Lord Bebo tweet media
English
20
36
322
38.7K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 retweetledi
₿/Quantum safe ❤️ /Jason❤️
As one of the most influential leaders in Bitcoin, please seriously investigate whether Bitcoin can migrate to being quantum-resistant, as this could potentially result in serious harm and losses to institutions and investors. 🙏 #Bitcoin 1. No suitable quantum-resistant algorithm 2. Hash-based and lattice-based algorithms have excessively large public keys and signatures 3. Migrating to quantum-resistant algorithms could cause severe on-chain congestion and even paralysis 4. Quantum-resistant algorithms result in a significant reduction in transaction efficiency 5. Increased node and transaction fees 6. Who has the authority to freeze or burn Satoshi’s addresses and other lost addresses 7. The aggregation threshold in quantum-resistant algorithms is challenging 8. Taproot makes the transition to quantum-resistant even more difficult 9. High hardware upgrade costs 10. 1MB block size is not suitable for quantum-resistant algorithms 11.Achieving global consensus is extremely difficult I could probably list ten more obstacles to the migration...
Michael Saylor@saylor

The Bitcoin Quantum Leap: Quantum computing won’t break Bitcoin—it will harden it. The network upgrades, active coins migrate, lost coins stay frozen. Security goes up. Supply comes down. Bitcoin grows stronger.

English
2
4
13
911
Jan Kotas
Jan Kotas@kotasjn·
Jeez, it seems I really kicked a hornet's nest by criticizing Bukele. 😅
English
3
0
0
392
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, examples include: - Christine Lagarde (current ECB President): Convicted of negligence in 2016 over the Tapie affair as French Finance Minister; no penalty imposed. - Peter Kažimír (ECB Governing Council member, Slovakia's central bank governor): Convicted of bribery in 2025, fined €200,000; he denies guilt and refuses to resign. Sources: BBC, The Guardian, Euractiv. No other major cases found in recent searches.
English
1
0
0
56
Bitcoin Junkies
Bitcoin Junkies@BitcoinJunkies·
🇪🇺 European Central Bank President says Bitcoin will not be included in any EU central bank reserves. "Reserves have to be liquid, reserves have to be secure, they have to be safe, and they should not be plagued by money laundering or other criminal activities."
English
739
178
1K
232.4K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 retweetledi
Adrian Morris
Adrian Morris@_Adrian·
THE TIMELINE OF THE $MSTR HIT JOB IS COMPLETE: It All Makes Sense Now JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley are launching leveraged $IBIT products. The Connection: Who is MSCI? Morgan Stanley Capital International. The Play: The Index (MSCI) threatens to displace their competitors (MSTR/MTPLF, etc), and the banks (MS & JPM) file products to capture displaced capital into IBIT. The UPDATED Timeline - May 14: Jim Chanos announces his "Long $BTC, Short $MSTR" trade; a blatant attempt to sway market sentiment. July 7: JP Morgan implements a firm-wide margin hike on trading $MSTR (50% to 95%). Aug 29: JP Morgan releases a fact sheet and preliminary pricing supplement for leveraged products linked to $IBIT. (Image attached) Sept 12: Metaplanet announces a capital raise. MSCI panics, realizing more companies are adopting the Saylor Playbook at scale. Oct 10: MSCI announces “...an extension of its ongoing consultation with the investment community…” exactly 16 minutes before President Trump’s tariff announcement (4:50 PM EDT) that triggered the global flash crash. Oct 14 (4 days later): Morgan Stanley (the creator and former parent company of MSCI) files with the SEC for a "Contingent Income Auto-Callable Security" linked to IBIT. (Links below) Nov 14: JP Morgan files for its own IBIT structured note. Nov 20 (THE KILL SHOT): On the exact same day - JPMorgan releases the "Free Writing Prospectus" to sell its IBIT note. JPMorgan dredges up the 42-day-old MSCI note to scream "Delisting Risk." Present Day: We still see reports of frozen $MSTR share transfers out of JPM and failure-to-deliver (FTD) spikes in $MSTR. They aren't protecting you from risk. They are trying to kill $MSTR to engineer a migration to their products for Bitcoin leverage exposure.
Adrian Morris tweet media
Adrian Morris@_Adrian

THE TIMELINE OF A HIT JOB MORE PROOF of a coordinated attack against $MSTR and Digital Asset Treasury Companies. They want you to think this delisting decision is organic. The timeline proves it is discriminatory theater. I went back and tracked the dates. This didn't start with MSCI. It started with a short seller, a liquidity squeeze, and an overreaction to Metaplanet. THE TIMELINE May 14: Jim Chanos announces his "Long $BTC, Short $MSTR" trade; a blatant attempt to sway market sentiment. July 7: JP Morgan implements a firm wide margin hike on trading $MSTR (50% to 95%). Translation: They choked off leverage to force liquidations, in a clearly hostile act to manufacture selling pressure. Sept 12: Metaplanet announces a capital raise. MSCI panics realizing that more companies are adopting the Saylor Playbook at scale. THE SMOKING GUN - In the (attached) Sept 12 announcement, MSCI admits the quiet part out loud: “...to avoid potential reverse turnover, MSCI will exceptionally not implement the public offering of METAPLANET...” They froze $MTPLF out to obstruct the trend of $BTC on corporate balance sheets. This wasn't "consulting” with the market, this was gatekeeping. Oct 10: MSCI announces “...an extension of its ongoing consultation with the investment community…” at 8:34 PM GMT. Translation: They need more time to build out a retroactive cover story. The Kicker: This was exactly 16 minutes before President Trump’s Tariff announcement (4:50 PM EDT) that triggered the Global Flash Crash. No way this is just coincidence. They used the macro panic as a smoke screen to bury the announcement. Nov 20: $MSTR | $BTC sentiment is in the tank. JP Morgan sees an opportunity. They dredge up the 42 day old MSCI note (that was prompted by the 69 day old Metaplanet note) and raise the alarm on the "de-listing" for Strategy. The Reality? They make NO MENTION of the other 38 companies this rule impacts (List attached in that comments to this post). Present Day: We are seeing reports of frozen $MSTR share transfers out of JPM and Failure to Deliver (FTD) spikes in $MSTR. This is a wanton, shameless targeting of $MSTR dressed up as "responsible oversight”.  Look behind the veil, don't fall for the theatrics.

English
219
761
3.5K
599.5K
Fred Krueger
Fred Krueger@dotkrueger·
I don't think people are ready for how disruptive AI is going to be. Within just a few years, there is not a single job that you can do at a desk that AI won't be able to do better. Within a decade, every factory job and a great deal of manual labor jobs will also be replaced. People are going to furious and will demand handouts. It won't be $2,000 a person. It will be $20,000. They will print it. But they can't print Bitcoin.
English
290
104
1.4K
78.2K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸
@kotasjn Isn't that the whole point of state?Otherwise wouldn't we dump these shysters? There are certain things that need to be done at that level. Should we keep that to an absolute minimum? Sure...but these things still need to be done. Which countries set the standard?
English
1
0
0
13
Jan Kotas
Jan Kotas@kotasjn·
I agree that a healthy society should support its disadvantaged. But should the state be the one doing all of it? Some countries have strong traditions of charity and community support, driven by people who genuinely feel a calling to help. And usually, these organizations allocate resources much more efficiently because they’re run by people who truly care about their mission.
English
1
0
0
26
Jan Kotas
Jan Kotas@kotasjn·
People keep demanding the state pay for EVERYTHING - healthcare, education, safety, pensions, public spaces, science, sports, you name it. But nobody wants to admit the obvious: the government isn’t a magical ATM with infinite money. YOU pay for it - through your paycheck, your taxes, money printing and ultimately your future (and your kids’ and grandkids’ futures too). And yes, you’re forced to bankroll services you don’t use, policies you don’t want, and systems you never asked for. So tell me again - how is that “fair”?
English
3
1
8
623
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸
@kotasjn I don't believe anyone applies Gresham's Law clinically. Hardly anyone is 100% in BTC, in which case you can do some periodic rebalancing to maintain whatever level is appropriate and still use BTC as a means of exchange.
English
1
0
2
29
Jan Kotas
Jan Kotas@kotasjn·
Bitcoin is meant to be money - not just a “store of value” or “digital gold.” To be money, it has to actually be used as a medium of exchange. The more bitcoin circulates, the more adoption grows - and with adoption comes long-term appreciation, because bitcoin is scarce. That’s why it’s crucial to spend sats and support businesses that accept bitcoin. When sats move, business owners take Bitcoin seriously - and once they do, others follow. Moreover, the more places accept bitcoin, the more sovereign we become, because we rely less on government-regulated intermediaries. I hear this all the time: “Why spend bitcoin when I can spend fiat?” or “I save in bitcoin, but I’d rather spend fiat.” Yes, we all know Gresham’s Law - bad money drives good money out of circulation. But we must also remember Thiers’ Law, which applies in the late stages of failing currencies - when bad money becomes so worthless that no one wants to accept or hold it anymore, and good money finally wins. If we want that future, we need to pay with bitcoin today. Spending it incentivizes businesses to accept it and a real circular bitcoin economy starts to form. As adoption grows, reliance on fiat shrinks, and people naturally move away from bad money. So yes - every bitcoin payment counts. Every merchant you convince is one more small win on the path to the Bitcoin Standard. And even if you only care about price, spending and replacing sats still drives adoption - and adoption drives appreciation. TL;DR: Spend. Replace. Onboard. Repeat. ✌️
English
3
1
4
321
Charles Edwards
Charles Edwards@caprioleio·
Welcome to the banana zone
Charles Edwards tweet media
English
21
3
164
11.5K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸 retweetledi
Mike Benz
Mike Benz@MikeBenzCyber·
For this post on X in Germany, police raided the poster’s home, seized his phone, took his biometrics, demanded his DNA, and warned he’s under now police surveillance.
Mike Benz tweet media
Reclaim The Net@ReclaimTheNetHQ

A man in Germany called government workers “parasites” on X. A few hundred views later, police raided his home, seized his phone, took biometrics, demanded DNA, and warned he’s under surveillance.

English
572
4.6K
20.7K
990.5K
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇮🇷🇵🇸
@nsquaredvalue Ok, but some are saying that Bitcoin Devs, due to the nature of BTC protocol governance & development, can't react quickly enough if the worst were to happen or it became evident that the worst was imminent whereas some others similarly affected could...
English
0
0
0
64
Timothy Peterson
Timothy Peterson@nsquaredvalue·
Stuff Quantum Computing would Break that is Not Bitcoin/Crypto but Nobody Talks About 1. Nuclear command-and-control encryption 2. Military and intelligence communications networks 3. Global internet security 4. Brokerage, and banking systems including credit cards 5. Stablecoins and central bank digital currencies 6. Government databases and digital IDs 7. Cloud platforms and data centers including AI servers 8. Secure messaging and collaboration tools 9. Software update signatures 10. Password managers and personal data vaults
Goku 🗞@Crypto__Goku

🗣️ Vitalik Buterin signale que la cryptographie à courbe elliptique pourrait être compromise par l'informatique quantique d'ici 2028. Il exhorte Ethereum à passer à une cryptographie résistante au quantique dans les quatre ans. Il a également déclaré que l'innovation future devrait se concentrer sur les Layer2, les wallets et les outils de confidentialité, plutôt que sur la couche protocolaire principale.

English
7
5
56
7.8K