Pathfinder

@KayB_Sej @D_Preacher_1 You're talking about physical reality, not math. That math will continue to map to reality is an article of faith.

@Pathfinder4545 @D_Preacher_1 This "unreasonable effectiveness" suggests math maps to an objective external reality, making it an evidenced-based model rather than a blind belief.

Math isn’t something people “believe” in the way religion is. Math is a system we can test, verify, and use to predict real-world outcomes consistently, whether you were taught it as a child or not. 2 + 2 = 4 doesn’t depend on culture, faith, or upbringing. It works the same in Lagos, Tokyo, or anywhere else. If it didn’t, engineering, technology, and science would collapse instantly. God, on the other hand, is a matter of faith. Different cultures believe in different gods, and those beliefs often come from upbringing, not universal proof. So no, it’s not the same. One is demonstrable and repeatable. The other is belief-based.

@KayB_Sej @D_Preacher_1 That is false. And irrelevant. Math is either incomplete, or internally inconsistent, or both. And we can't know which.

@Pathfinder4545 @D_Preacher_1 Math predicts the physical world with 100% accuracy (e.g., orbits). Its utility in reality proves it’s more than just a circular trust.

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Your fictional "expectations" are a contradiction of your rationalization with reality. The Bible does not communicate a geocentric Creation, and there is nothing at all wrong with the sun being created on Day 4.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Again, nothing to do with propping up my worldview, everything to do with demonstrating that the bible contradicts reality on at least one point. The geocentric "immovable Earth" themes are another. The sun being created 3 days after Earth is another. It isn't the word of God. 🥂

Atheism can make a claim and it still isn't offering an explanation for anything, and atheism doesn't aspire to do so. It is the belief that there are no gods. That's it.

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Not grounded in anything. Your "expectations" are expectations. They're just ad hoc complaints that have no basis in anything other than your desperation to prop up your worldview. That you cant articulate anything to the contrary.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Not grounded in anything 🤣 scripture? Of course you will shrug it off as though it means nothing. Meanwhile, we're not as seperate as the bible says we are. He couldn't even seperate our code from every animal on earth. He basically took a chimp and made it slightly less chimpy.

@MasterMaliq Because he was a pedophile warlord.

Muslims accept Jesus as a prophet of God. So as a non Muslim, why is it so difficult for you to accept Muhammad as a prophet too?

@Saganismm Carl knew when he said those words that God is. He more than many had the evidence placed before him. He is now beyond denial.

“I have some discomfort both with believers and with nonbelievers when their opinions are not based on facts. I am extremely uncomfortable with dogmatic atheists, who claim there can be no God; to my knowledge, there is no strong evidence for that position. I'm also uncomfortable with dogmatic believers; to my knowledge, they don't have any strong evidence either. If we don't know the answer, why are we under so much pressure to make up our minds, to declare our allegiance to one hypothesis or the other?” — Carl Sagan, Interview for U.S. Catholic magazine

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture But you have no justification. See above. You have fictitious "expectations" that are not grounded in anything. Completely meaningless.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Ironic, i feel the same way about yours.

@sapienshasan There are no good people. People do not earn hell for "disbelief". People earn hell for their sins. God is not simply merciful. He is just.

• Tanrı, iyi bir insana inançsızlığından dolayı sonsuz işkence ederse sonsuz merhamet sahibi değildir. • Tanrı, sonsuz merhamet sahibiyse iyi bir insana inançsızlığından dolayı sonsuz işkence etmez.

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture See above. Your objections are entirely fictitious.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture If there was a good reason, that would've been your cue to say it.

@JoelMCurzon False.

The ethics of Aristotle are better than the ethics of Jesus.

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Yes dear.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture False. I don't want to be autonomous at all, i just see no reason to believe i'm not.

@ateo_digital At the moment of the crucifixion, the path for salvation was made. God would begin taking back all of the people groups from which he had divorced himself. One at a time. As corruption had spread and conquered humanity, now the truth spreads to take it all back. 8/8

@ateo_digital That people was the Hebrews. They demonstrated that even God's chosen people would not live rightly, from the ongoing corruption of sin. Thus, that savior had to be God incarnate: Jesus. His self-sacrifice made possible the reconciliation of God's justice w/ his mercy. 7/

📌 ¿Una verdad “universal”… que depende de en qué continente naciste? 🤔 Durante más de 1500 años, millones de personas en América vivieron, construyeron civilizaciones, desarrollaron conocimiento y murieron… sin haber escuchado jamás de Jesús o Yahvé. Y no, no eran sociedades primitivas. Eran culturas como los mayas, aztecas e incas: con astronomía avanzada, arquitectura impresionante y sistemas sociales complejos. O sea… funcionaban. Y bastante bien. Entonces, aquí viene la pregunta incómoda que muchos prefieren evitar: Si Dios realmente quiere que todos lo conozcan, ¿por qué dejó fuera a todo un continente durante siglos? Porque no… Jesús no cruzó el océano caminando sobre el agua. La Biblia no apareció mágicamente en América. El cristianismo llegó después, en barcos, con colonización y evangelización forzada. Antes de eso, nadie “necesitaba” esa creencia para existir. Y ahora, en pleno 2026, con acceso a internet, ciencia y tecnología, se supone que sí es indispensable creer… ¿por qué? ¿Porque es verdad… o porque te tocó nacer en el lugar donde esa idea se impuso? Piénsalo bien. Si una “verdad absoluta” depende de la geografía para existir… entonces no es tan absoluta. 🔥 Un dios que necesita colonización para darse a conocer… no es universal. 💬 Te leo en comentarios: ¿Crees que la verdad debería depender del lugar donde naciste… o debería ser evidente para todos sin importar el continente? 🔁 Comparte este post si crees que estas preguntas incomodan… pero son necesarias.

@ForeverKuffar @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture You worldview is to discredit God. That's the whole point of it. You want to be autonomous.

@Pathfinder4545 @DillerMug @ScienceQriosity @Leophilius @feedfracture Not so much to justify my worldview, more to discredit yours, not that it needs any help from me. And i don't even have a problem with belief in God, it's not unreasonable, but reality doesn't align with the bible. Everything in it is recycled from earlier fables and religions.