Philosoflea

@BattlefieldComm I'm sorry, but posting % of games with cheaters isn't convincing when that number is based on whatever you use to detect them--so the number won't go up if more people are cheating because you are failing to detect them. The number of obvious cheaters has gone up substantially.

@stew1ano It is not clear what the issue here is meant to be. Do you think it's not doing the correct amount of damage? It looks correct to me, taking into account damage falloff with distance. It will do 33 damage within 9.5m, but the closest you get in the firing range is 10m.

How's the game ever going to be fixed if they can't even adjust the damage model correctly when selecting the weapon. Like cmon.... #BF6 #Battlefield6

@JU_JU_bee187 @BattlefieldComm No, I don't. I want it to be balanced--but I'm sure life is simpler if you imagine everyone else has the dumbest opinion possible. Right now, air vehicles have essentially zero impact on the outcome of a game.

@Philosofrenzy @BattlefieldComm Stop crying y'all already getting regenerative health. You want it to be like battlefield 2042 again where y'all farmed infantry.

@BattlefieldComm Please revert the change that made the M136 AT one-shot choppers. Making every Engineer on the field a walking TOW missile launcher makes it way, way, way too easy to kill choppers. Air vehicles are a joke right now. Meanwhile, the IGLA does not function as advertised.

@BattlefieldComm "For air vehicles, we’re also making improvements to threat awareness" Fixing the radar would be a big first step. Until this is fixed, dogfights are a dice roll.

@Mazzareece999 @vyvFps @emoAimers @aimpilld slow ROF guns can be excellent in the hands of people with good accuracy, but they severely punish misses, so less skilled players often find them frustrating--"it gets outgunned."

@vyvFps @emoAimers @aimpilld People still sleep on it and I don’t know why

I forget Somtimes how broken this gun is

@EmersonAck74431 @DRUNKKZ3 @tiggr_ What? The many issues with air gameplay have been ignored since the game came out. There have been no improvements to helicopters or jets--only nerfs. The only positive thing was a fix to the bug that made MR missiles ignore flares.

@Tea_Manuel @DRUNKKZ3 @tiggr_ What pilots wants pilots gets! It’s always been like this to the detriment of infantry play!

Another day of asking @DRUNKKZ3 and @tiggr_ to revert the RPG pre update. It’s unusable right now. Only people asking for change are Heli mains …. no one else

@Standingfast85 @BattlefieldComm Whatever, man. Classic case of someone thinking his favourite thing is "just right" when it's OP and underpowered when it's nerfed. That said, the ads time was the wrong lever for them to nerf. Its projectile velocity is the problem imo

@Philosofrenzy @BattlefieldComm At release it was too fast yes, but at 85ms before this last patch, it was perfect, if you got hit it was you flying too low or stupid if you got hit by a complete noob

@Standingfast85 @BattlefieldComm It used to be that getting hit by an unguided RPG as a chopper or jet meant you'd fucked up or there was a real pro on the other team. Now, it's happening every game. Everyone is able to do it. It happens so often it isn't even exciting.

@Philosofrenzy @BattlefieldComm Brother, I have a combined from BF3 to BF6, over 100k shots fired with the RPG and SMAW, not to mention being #1 on the kill leaderboards for years with the rocket launchers...I think I know what I'm talking about lol

@Standingfast85 @BattlefieldComm Then you should know that air vehicles are being killed trivially easily with the RPG in Bf6 compared to all other BF games. Helicopters are a joke. Maybe you don't like how it feels, but you're lying to yourself if you don't think it's easier in Bf6.

@Standingfast85 @BattlefieldComm Wonderful argument you've got there, countering facts with dismissive hand-waving. Have you even played past BF games?

@Philosofrenzy @BattlefieldComm Ok cool, so you have no idea what you are saying. Thanks for stopping by

@Standingfast85 @BattlefieldComm Compared to past BF games, *even after the nerf*, it's still the easiest it has ever been to hit air vehicles with an RPG. RPGs are still OP.

@BattlefieldComm Revert the RPG nerf back to 75-80ms

@EndersFPS I don't watch your shit. I only see your Twitter posts, where you do nothing but complain. If you're not using negativity to engagement bait, you're doing a fine impression. Every single post of yours I have ever seen has been negative. That's not my bias. It's yours.

@Philosofrenzy I don’t just complain, thats YOUR biased view of me. Look at my YT channel. I have the most video variety of ANY creator in this space. I cover everything from news to live commentary to playing in tournaments and everything in between.

"Why do you still play??" BF comm has to be the most passionless comm ever bro. You literally get made fun of for pointing out the problems of the game. I swear most of the people asking me dumb shit like "if you complain why do you still play" have to be drooling on their desk

@vLs_BF @EA_DICE @DRUNKKZ3 @make_good_game The red dot is moving because of your spastic strafing side to side. It's not a bug.

One of the biggest reasons infantry combat in Battlefield 6 feels so inconsistent and somehow nobody talks about it. The red dot often doesn't line up with its sight and moves around in ways that make no sense. Please fix @EA_DICE. @DRUNKKZ3 @make_good_game

@EndersFPS Literally all you do is complain about Bf6. Go play something else.

Most boring game I've ever experienced in my life. None of the new content matters unless they improve the gameplay. It has to take more skill, flat out. BF6 is the most shallow BF, maybe even over BF1. I genuinely think BF1 might be the harder game atp and that's crazy.

@MariaMaham68630 @AlexAndBooks_ More hand-waving pseudo-profundity.

@Philosofrenzy @AlexAndBooks_ I appreciate your interest. The purpose of tweet to be a "message"-this explonation is not for AI or logic. You can understand it only on a non-verbal level. "truths are illusions"-Nietzsche. In my opinion, the tweet doesn't achieve the original goal. Although the idea was good.

Carl Sagan on books: "What an astonishing thing a book is. It’s a flat object made from a tree with flexible parts on which are imprinted lots of funny dark squiggles. But one glance at it and you’re inside the mind of another person, maybe somebody dead for thousands of years."

@MariaMaham68630 @AlexAndBooks_ How does the "context" make it true that the tweet was "inaccurate"? In what context does the existence of dead languages "ruin the point"? No. This is just vague hand-waving.

@Philosofrenzy @AlexAndBooks_ Depends on the context/audience. Carl Sagan spoke to a niche, prepared readership; the passage makes sense in full context. A tweet in 2026 needs adaptation. Youngs today not prepared readerships. This post shows they’re outside the intended audience—and thus its readers.

@MariaMaham68630 @AlexAndBooks_ That doesn't "ruin the point" and isn't even an inaccuracy; it's just another fact--a boundary on the (great!) value of writing. If I say, "telescopes allow you to see distant objects more clearly," this would not be "inaccurate" or "ruined" because the horizon exists.

@AlexAndBooks_ There's one inaccuracy that ruins the point. A book is just processed wood until it reaches someone who can understand it. The world holds many manuscripts in dead languages, their meaning lost to us. You can't meet someone in a book if you don't grasp its style of expression.