Daniel Sullenberger

26K posts

Daniel Sullenberger banner
Daniel Sullenberger

Daniel Sullenberger

@Phryj

I enjoy creating stuff: games, music, drawing, 3D models, & more.

Elyria, Ohio Katılım Aralık 2009
252 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Daniel Sullenberger
Daniel Sullenberger@Phryj·
I'm going to miss this most of all. I love you, Snowball. You were a great cat, and a great friend.
Daniel Sullenberger tweet media
English
19
8
125
0
Chris
Chris@jigsawearth_860·
@AzJack65 @ChrisMartzWX Yeah, and unfortunately we know who makes the money to keep this whole ship running (it’s not the red states)
English
1
0
1
33
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
I fully support a national divorce. I don’t care how it is done, but it needs to happen. We cannot coexist at all. We just can’t.
English
258
270
4.1K
133.8K
Timcrossing
Timcrossing@Timcrossintz9v·
@delacruzovich Just curious, if Joe and democrats fled to Hawaii after losing 2024 election, and China stepped in to provide nuclear protection for Hawaii. Do Americans agree Hawaii is an independent country? Don’t be double standard.
English
7
0
36
3.6K
Daniel Sullenberger
@BartDePalma @greggnunziata The word "birthright" means inherited from one of both parents. It has nothing to do with where one is physically born. The intent of the 14th was to grant citizenship to freed slaves, NOT to confer automatic citizenship to anyone born here.
English
0
0
0
14
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma@BartDePalma·
@greggnunziata This is a good argument for why original intent is completely absent in this case. Those seeking to deny birthright citizenship to the children of foreign invaders only need refer to the jurisdictional language.
English
8
0
4
1.6K
Gregg Nunziata
Gregg Nunziata@greggnunziata·
"The framers of the 14th amendment could never have anticipated birth tourism and mass illegal immigration" is the Right's version of "the framers of the 2nd Amendment could never have anticipated assault rifles and high capacity magazines."
Camden, NJ 🇺🇸 English
274
355
2.3K
127.5K
ModisTomica
ModisTomica@ModisTomica·
@Phryj @5382024M @ThomBrady5 And many of those groups were breaking the damn law. So they should have been investigated and punished, as should leftist orgs who break the law. Consistency isn't hard when you're actually principled.
English
1
0
0
8
Daniel Sullenberger
@terrapinwill @neoavatara Alito and Thomas are the only ones that actually understand the Constitution. The rest are scumbags who only care about protecting the corrupt, lawless, broken gov't that they sit on top of.
English
0
0
0
56
william maloney
william maloney@terrapinwill·
@neoavatara She’s not supporting the administrations position. 7-2 because Alito and Thomas are without shame in their blind loyalty
English
2
0
9
1.8K
Daniel Sullenberger
@5382024M @ModisTomica @ThomBrady5 And, yes, EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT VOTER fully supports anything a Democrat gov't does. They even vote for Dems who say they want to kill their opponents. Democrats are already evil, amoral, soulless monsters.
English
0
0
0
6
Daniel Sullenberger
@5382024M @ModisTomica @ThomBrady5 We're supposed to just forget Obama-era abuses of power like using the IRS to shut down conservative groups, right? Democrats haven't cared about norms for decades, they only care about power, and they use that power to crush dissent and silence opposition.
English
2
0
1
18
Daniel Sullenberger
@barnes_law Of course it will. The judicial system exists first and foremost to protect lawlessness, corruption, and abuse of power by officials, and SCOTUS is at the top of that system. They do NOT serve justice OR the rule of law, and they believe the Constitution is beneath them.
English
0
0
0
16
Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes@barnes_law·
Prediction: After hearing oral arguments, #SCOTUS will find Trump's order attempting to reverse birthright citizenship unconstitutional.
English
327
119
1.1K
280.2K
Daniel Sullenberger
@shipwreckedcrew The purpose of a system is what it does. "Our" system protects and rewards lawlessness and corruption, and SCOTUS is at the top of that system.
English
0
0
1
247
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
I think it ends up as a 5-6 vote majority on statutory grounds that applies the doctrine of constitutional avoidance, and a 2-3 Justice plurality in the middle declines to say if the language in the statue and the language of the 14th Amendment mean the same thing. They don't need to reach that outcome to find that the EO is contrary to the statute. The middle will be Roberts, Barrett, and Gorsuch -- maybe joined by Kavanaugh, with the 3 liberals concurring in the outcome but saying they would reach the constitutional question and answer it. That returns the issue to the political branches. If the statute is changed, and the language conflicts with the 14th Amendment, THEN you have a conflict that the Court must resolve -- is the statute unconstitutional?
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley

...The ACLU clearly had a lock on the three liberals, but had more justices in play than the government would have hoped. We ended where we began: the odds do not favor the Administration, but there is no firm evidence of a majority.

English
31
56
291
71.5K
Daniel Sullenberger
@KurtSchlichter There is no valid Constitutional reason to preserve "birthright" (born on U.S. soil) citizenship. None. It is a self-evidently incorrect and absurd misreading of the 14th. If SCOTUS preserves it, it's because they are a captured institution protecting the corrupt status quo.
English
0
0
1
31
Kurt Schlichter
Kurt Schlichter@KurtSchlichter·
You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.
English
1.2K
351
3.3K
963.7K
Prez
Prez@PrezLives2022·
@OunkaOnX @rleas Americans could have all new infrastructure including schools, free healthcare for all, and solve the veterans and homeless crisis for a fraction of what we spend on war.
English
3
40
100
1.4K
Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
Rubio says Iran should spend on its people instead of weapons. US spends 1 trillion dollars on military while Americans can't afford healthcare, food, or rent. Rubio wants to add $200 billion for a war he started for Israel. The US is the one that needs budget advice. Not Iran
English
585
4.4K
12.7K
200.4K
Daniel Sullenberger
@VinceGottalotta "Free healthcare for all" = state-funded euthanasia. And it goes from optional to recommended to mandatory real fast.
English
0
0
0
6
🇺🇸 Vin 🇺🇸
🇺🇸 Vin 🇺🇸@VinceGottalotta·
Things stupid people say when they want to sound smart.
Prez@PrezLives2022

@OunkaOnX @rleas Americans could have all new infrastructure including schools, free healthcare for all, and solve the veterans and homeless crisis for a fraction of what we spend on war.

English
3
1
4
461
Daniel Sullenberger
@BlueBoxDave So you're saying nothing should be done? Trump should give up and let the Democrats have everything they want? So you're a Thune "Republican" then. Useless.
English
0
0
1
10
David Marcus
David Marcus@BlueBoxDave·
Conservatives have to accept the real possibility that doing what it takes to carry out mass deportations is more than the public will tolerate. The administration is clearly bending to that popular pressure, and it might be a political reality that can’t be changed.
David Marcus@BlueBoxDave

My problem with ending birthright citizenship is that we are clearly incapable of deporting the tens of millions of illegals already here. So we will create a massive population of non citizens living side by side us. That’s a recipe for disaster.

English
848
39
554
298.8K
Daniel Sullenberger
@DaddyWarpig I'm thinking they have a LOT of empty bottles of Baron Samedi Spiced Rum, and they're adding to the collection every day. So, in a manner of speaking, they are in regular contact with spirits, just not in the way they think they are.
English
0
0
1
18
Daddy Warpig
Daddy Warpig@DaddyWarpig·
You are either deceiving yourself or are being deceived. Either way, you’re wasting your potential. You are capable of becoming so much more.
Daddy Warpig tweet media
English
7
0
8
433
Daniel Sullenberger
"No Kings" is fake, hypocritical astroturf funded by actual commies.
English
0
0
1
9