Pm

@RealJamesWoods Have you checked the mirror, Woods? We all know you resent women, esp. strong women, but this is pathetic even for you. Of course, you’re completely aware that this will get your MAGA Zombie Cultists worked into a pre-climax fervor. Work out your Mommy issues on your own time.

She’s gone, too.

@AmericaFirst850 @RealJamesWoods @Emodius_ Careful, careful. Your misogyny is showing. As well as your fetishizing Trump. Sad. And sick.

@RealJamesWoods @Emodius_ Evil and a Hateful heart is ugly

@MalcolmNance I love all these half-assed “reporters” who run to social media with “I just spoke with Trump and he says…” as if it’s the word of God, instead of the meandering ramblings of a documented serial liar with advanced dementia.

Pure unadulterated bullshit.

@SenatorWicker @JasonMBrodsky What exactly has been accomplished? Deaths of service members? The deaths of thousands in the Middle East? The pummeling of our bases? Waste of our weapons? The high price of oil, gasoline and fertilizers? Spiraling inflation? Food shortages on the horizon? We’ll wait, Senator…

The rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster. Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!

I do not think this article gave readers a particularly balanced understanding of the underlying FDA review. A few reasons why: • Most importantly, the article never really grapples with the fact that the FDA report itself classified the fatal myocarditis findings as “new safety information,” specifically because they “represent greater severity of the known risk of myocarditis” and fatal outcomes were “not currently described in labeling.” • Instead, the paragraph focused specifically on fatal myocarditis findings ends by reassuring readers that myocarditis has “been on the label since 2021,” even though the report itself explicitly distinguished fatal outcomes from the already-labeled risk. • The article repeatedly centers “no deaths definitively linked” without explaining how extraordinarily strict the WHO-UMC “certain” category is in vaccine pharmacovigilance, especially for death. The framework is probabilistic by design, and “certain” attribution typically requires things like rechallenge or similarly definitive evidence, something obviously impossible in death cases and often ethically impossible in serious adverse events more broadly. • The piece technically lists the WHO-UMC categories, but the overall structure still leaves readers with the impression that anything short of “certain” is largely insignificant. That is not really how pharmacovigilance or FDA safety review works. Possible and probable assessments can still factor into signal evaluation, labeling discussions, risk communication, and further investigation. • The article frames the report as “contradicting” Prasad without making clear that his memo itself qualified the claims by referencing likely/probable/possible attribution categories identified by staff, and never claimed a “certain” assessment had been made. One can reasonably debate whether some of his rhetoric overstated what those categories support. But that is a narrower and more nuanced issue than the overall presentation suggests. • It also seems relevant that the email reflected an internal review process before the report was finalized. Movement from an initial ~10 to the final 7 assessments is not inherently surprising in itself, though it would certainly be interesting to better understand what changed in the downgraded cases. • Finally, yes, anyone can submit a VAERS report. But the report itself shows how many cases were screened out because they did not contain enough information for meaningful assessment. The final classifications came after narrowing to reports with sufficient clinical detail for deeper review. The case chart itself also contains relevant details readers deserve to see, including dose timing, myocarditis-related findings, and the distinction between possible and probable assessments. Technically accurate statements can still create a misleading overall public impression depending on emphasis, sequencing, and omitted context. That is what bothered me about this piece.

@TheRickWilson @donnasfineart x.com/i/status/18083…

I don't think she's learned her lesson

“This is the most corrupt thing I’ve ever seen from an American president. Where in the hell are my Republican colleagues?”

@DennisColeHill @SteveSchmidtSES And the crime about Bill Clinton at the time is that he went along with that bs.

@SteveSchmidtSES Very true. The dog whistles were always out there as far back as Reagan and the "Welfare Queen driving a Cadillac." Republicans' appeal to racism, and courting the lowest common denominator of voters, has been a staple of the party.

Donald Trump didn’t hijack the Republican Party. He revealed it. Subscribe to The Warning at steveschmidt.substack.com.

No explanation on how this money is divided up gets around the fact that Trump actually created a slush fund for his supporters who tried to subvert an election, defecated in the halls of our Capitol and attacked our police officers on January 6th. Unreal.

@tommyboy0690 @chacharlycha We're all in!

@gtconway3d How quaint. “ethically challenged”. Why doesn’t she go with Paxton appears to be “fraud adjacent”? Susie is riding that fence so hard her name might as well be Manchin.

@krassenstein 🤣Okay, that I was not expecting. Coincidentally, I just saw a CyberTruck the other day and was following a Tesla too. Both hideous. The truck was parked in front of a residence, and YES, it looked like a renovation dumpster.🤣

I know I might get hate for this but I just got a new urinal in my bathroom.

@RealJamesWoods Awe. Official Hollywood Has-Been MAGA Douchebag sounds upset. That’s too bad. You’ve got all the loyalty in the world. Question is: for what?

Back-stabbing weasel

@SenatorBanks Also, kinda poor timing while Trump (with son tagging along) bounces around China likely offering them specialty chips and coding in exchange for his pockets getting lined. Again. Eric ain’t there for his health: his hand is out too. Dialing for bribes is ugly.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) had a Chinese spy in her office. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) dated a Chinese spy. Mayor Eileen Wang (D-CA) is a Chinese spy. How many more?

@SenatorBanks Senator, it seems like you might worry a little more about serving your own constituents instead of obsessing over other states. Fact is, you have voted to cut services, cut taxes for billionaires and to support a convicted fraudster of a President while he steals from our nation

@SenseNotNoise @krassenstein What a MAGA man of faith you are. Eric is working a bitcoin deal with a company that is in bed with the CCP. So there’s that. Also, you think he isn’t right there with Daddy trying to extract personal enrichment money any way he can? Euphemism for seeking bribes, for edification.

Eric and Lara went along on an official trip in personal capacity zero secret meetings, zero business deals, zero foreign cash wired to the family. The Trumps ran a legit billion-dollar empire before office and actually made less money while in government. Hunter? Real 2013 Air Force Two rides with Dad to China, BHR Partners, CEFC payoffs all documented with emails, witnesses, and bank records showing the family cashing in on Joe’s name and power while he was VP. Then Hunter partied with crack and hookers before Dad pardoned him. One’s a family meme on a diplomatic trip. The other’s textbook influence-peddling grift. Keep manufacturing fake equivalence, Brian. It’s embarrassing at this point.

OMFG!! This is ridiculous, even from the viewpoint of a Biden supporter. Ashley Biden just posted this previously undisclosed image of her, Hunter Biden and her Father Joe Biden, boarding Air Force One in 2023, headed to China, with the words "Team CHYYYYYNA 🇨🇳" above it. Oops... never mind, that image was AI. My mistake. That was Trump's daughter-in-law who posted an image of Trump's son and her boarding a plane to China with the words "Team CHYYYYYNA 🇨🇳" above it.