Pris

寧為太平犬，不做亂世人 Better to be a dog in times of tranquility than a human in times of chaos

🚨 GMP ARRESTS MAN FOR POSTING A BACON SANDWICH! British police have gone full dhimmi. A man just got charged under Section 5 Public Order Act - a “hate crime” - for posting a photo of a bacon butty online. GMP’s Hate Crime Unit claims it caused “harassment, alarm and distress” to Muslims. Yes, really. Grilled pork = Islamophobia now. Two-tier policing is dead. This is one-tier: protect the easily offended at all costs. Welcome to Britain 2026, where your breakfast is hate speech. Share this before they ban bacon memes too.

Left-wing "progressives" have made their choice: not peace, not freedom, but the comfort of hating the West more than they hate tyranny. London today offered a clean, ugly picture: peace symbols, Palestinian flags, and the face of the Ayatollah carried by the same crowd. Not as a warning. Not as a protest against the Islamic Republic. As part of the display. The Iranian regime's flag waved like a badge of virtue, even as that regime crushes its own people with bullets, rope, and torture. The Islamic Republic is not a hard case. It is not a "grey area". It is a theocracy that polices women's bodies, jails dissent, and kills opponents. And in the recent uprisings, some reports put the death toll at over 30,000. Jake Wallis Simons described it plainly: this is not war, it is mass murder. No combatants. No battlefield. Just civilians. That scale matters because it strips away the usual excuses. There is nothing here to contextualise. Nothing to relativise, dilute, or soften. There is only slaughter. So why do we not see wall-to-wall outrage? Why do we not see the great moral machinery of progressive activism roaring into life for Iranian women, students, and workers? Because this isn't about human rights. It never was. It is about a story. And the story says the West is the root of evil, Israel is the eternal villain, and anyone who stands against them gets a moral pass, no matter what they do to their own people. Iran destroys the Left's theory, so the Left dodges Iran. That is the heart of it. A liberal democracy is treated as uniquely wicked and held to impossible standards, while a theocratic dictatorship is handled with silence, softness, or outright sympathy. The same people who claim to "believe women" can share a march with the symbols of a regime that beats women for showing their hair. The same people who wrap themselves in rainbow flags will stand beside the banner of a state that executes gay men. They do it because their loyalty is not to victims, but to the idea that Western power must always be guilty. This is why the peace symbol has become a prop. It now sits comfortably next to the face of a cleric who rules by fear. "Peace" no longer means the end of violence. It means the right people are being blamed. It means Israel is the target. It means the West is the enemy. That is the bargain. And it is why Islamists and progressives keep finding each other in the street. They do not share values. They share a foe. And then there is the cowardice of the British state and its institutions. Britain still drags its feet over proscribing the IRGC. London can host a visible pro-regime ecosystem and shrug. Sanctions are timid. The ambassador stays put. We are firm with our own citizens and limp with hostile regimes. That is not "diplomacy". It is appeasement dressed as prudence. The media play their part too. Gaza gets saturation coverage and constant moral instruction. Iran gets scraps. That imbalance reflects the same sickness: outrage is directed where it is culturally safe and politically fashionable. It is withheld where it would force a reckoning with Islamist power and with the Left's long habit of excusing it. If you want the simplest test of whether a movement is serious, watch who it can condemn. Real moral courage does not pick easy villains. It does not chant only where it will be applauded. It does not march under the flag of a regime accused of mass killing and call itself righteous. London today was not a march for peace. It was a confession. A confession that for a loud slice of the progressive Left, hatred of Israel and the West now outranks compassion for slaughtered Iranians. A confession that "human rights" has become a slogan, not a standard. A confession that they would rather stand with tyrants than admit a basic truth: some of the worst oppression on earth is Islamist, home-grown, and defended in our streets by people who call themselves the good guys.

@EssexPR @WTF_Every_Day not all disabilities are dribble dribble….

Blue badges for ADHD and anxiety ?? What an absolute disgrace and an insult to the physically disabled. What is going on ?!!

Eddie, the argument that Israel is the only state actor committing crimes against humanity that Britain politically supports contains two errors before it even addresses the consistency question. The first is the claim itself. Israel is fighting a war against an organisation that massacred 1,200 of its citizens, took 251 hostage and has repeatedly stated its intention to repeat October 7th until Israel is destroyed. The International Court of Justice has not ruled that genocide is occurring. It issued provisional measures. That is a fundamentally different finding. A state defending itself against an existential threat is not committing crimes against humanity by definition, however uncomfortable the images of that defence may be. The second error is the consistency principle itself. Britain has sold arms to Saudi Arabia throughout a Yemen war that has killed over 400,000 people, a conflict the UN has documented as including deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure, hospitals and food supplies. Britain provides aid to Pakistan while it ethnically cleanses over a million Afghan refugees, deporting children as young as thirteen. Britain maintains diplomatic and economic relations with China while it operates what the UN has described as mass arbitrary detention of Uyghur Muslims on an industrial scale. None of those relationships have produced mass marches, parliamentary obsessions or wall to wall BBC coverage. Whoever decided that government complicity was the distinguishing principle did not do their homework. Applied consistently it would require the same fury directed at Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and China that is currently directed exclusively at Israel. It is not applied consistently. It is applied to one state. The same one every time. On Danny Cohen being an Iranian royalist propagandist. He is a former director of BBC Television who spent his career inside the liberal establishment you claim to represent. Dismissing his argument as propaganda because it challenges your narrative is the oldest deflection in the book. The argument stands. The suffering of Palestinians is not what determines who marches. The identity of the party that can be held responsible is.

@MatthewStadlen i agree, so lets not have one at all. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Chopping and changing Prime Ministers like football managers isn’t a serious way forward for Britain

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Rosa, whataboutism is what you call an argument you cannot answer. My piece does not deflect from Gaza. It asks why the same passion, the same marches, the same parliamentary fury and the same wall to wall coverage are absent for three simultaneous catastrophes affecting vastly more people. That is not deflection. It is a question about consistency. The fact that you find it uncomfortable is rather the point. On government support being the difference. Britain has sold arms to Saudi Arabia throughout its conduct of the Yemen war, a conflict that has killed over 400,000 people. No mass marches outside the Saudi embassy. No parliamentary obsession. No social media accounts documenting every casualty with forensic intensity. Pakistan is receiving international aid while ethnically cleansing over a million Afghans. Sudan is in receipt of UN humanitarian funding while its armed forces commit mass sexual violence and summary executions. The principle of government complicity, applied consistently, would fill the streets every weekend for a dozen different causes. It is applied to one. On opposing western involvement in Afghanistan. The piece is not about western involvement in Afghanistan. It is about the ethnic cleansing of Afghans by Pakistan. A Muslim majority state expelling Muslim refugees to overcrowded camps, deporting children as young as thirteen with no idea where they are being sent. Where are the marches for them. Where is the BDS campaign against Pakistan. Where is the social media outrage. But there is a more fundamental problem with your argument than the inconsistency of its application. You have just admitted that your concern for Palestinian suffering is conditional on who is causing it. If Gaza were being bombed by Iran, by Russia, by any non Western power, you would not be marching. You have said so yourself. The suffering of Palestinians is not what drives you to the streets. The identity of the party you can hold responsible is what drives you to the streets. Nothing more than a case of politics masquerading as humanitarianism. And it is precisely the argument my piece is making.

@RachelReevesMP @bphillipsonMP you cannot ‘upgrade’ something that does not exist. my paypacket doesnt get ‘upgraded’ ffs🤦🏻‍♀️

The IMF upgrading its growth forecasts for the UK and backing our fiscal strategy is yet more proof that this Government has the right economic plan.

really? i beg to differ, when the ‘results’ of an experiment are peer reviewed is it not true that when several reviews take place they do not always concur and that within this ‘science’ there is in fact a HUGE proportion of differing opinion on outcome et al ergo review 1 says A and review 2 says B and they having had the same information to work from have inflected within their report a belief that aspects of the experiment would therefore result in variations on the reported outcome.

Science is not a belief system where you pick the answers you prefer.

@daviddunn177 @OperaSocialist ill educated simps are more annoying than bank holiday weekend rain.

Uneducated voters are more dangerous than illegal immigrants.

The WHO knew Hantavirus was too weak to cause a global pandemic. And since only Canada and Australia would've been retarded enough to play those Covid era lockdown games again... They moved to Ebola and declared it a global health emergency. The WHO is a terrorist organization!

Britain has 17.5 million hectares of agricultural land. 65% of it cannot grow a single crop. Too thin. Too high. Too wet. Too steep. The kind of slope where a tractor becomes a story they tell in the village pub for generations. It grows grass. Because grass is what evolved to grow there. The cow eats the grass. The sheep eats the grass. Your stomach cannot eat the grass. Take the ruminants off and the food production from that land becomes zero. Not lower. Zero. The ruminant is not blocking a better option. The ruminant is the only option. The activist who wants the ruminant removed is not reducing meat consumption. He is outsourcing it. To Brazilian feedlots on cleared rainforest, shipped six thousand miles in a refrigerated container. The British hill goes to bracken. The Amazon goes to soy. The supermarket label changes from Hereford to Mato Grosso. This is presented as the ethical position. It is the most expensively packaged self-deception in modern politics.

The current head of HMRC a state body who supposedly “exonerated” Angela Rayner’s tax dealings is John-Paul Marks. He was previously Yvette Cooper’s private secretary. This raises more questions than answers.

🚨🚨DURO GOLPE A LA UE de Von der Leyen💥 La abogada holandesa Meike Terhorst ha destrozado los planes ilegales de la UE para el control masivo 🔥 «¡La UE NO ES un Estado soberano, NO PUEDE imponer NADA a los países miembros!» ¿La tiranía de la IDENTIDAD DIGITAL? ¡Podemos tirarla a la basura! BRAVO 👏🔥UN GRAN EJEMPLO este es el trato que hay que dar al totalitarismo de Von der Leyen 🔥

@angelaroosee they all have sociology degrees but no law training

The police took my content, so the police became the only content I have of the trip.😂 I’m 100% certain this situation was not handled correctly by the yellow vest baton holders. Police aren’t allowed to seize property like they did. Section 19 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) says these police would’ve needed a search warrant or consent from me. Under Section 22(4) of PACE, police cannot retain your physical property for evidence if taking a photograph or making a digital copy would be sufficient for the investigation. “An officer cannot pop open your camera on the sidewalk and confiscate the memory card under this power.” (That’s exactly what they did) I was pushed by pro Palestine guys and then had my property seized, what the actual bloody hell! 😂 They don’t even follow or know their own rules. What kind of police force is this? It’s a free for all for them…

@dshensmith it is interesting to note that tiktok is a chinese company…. 🤔

This, if true, is an alarming abuse of political censorship: link for discussion below 👇

@DailyMail daily fail spouting shite again

First case of hantavirus from cruise ship confirmed in North America trib.al/epcYTAI

Of course Rayner should have faced a penalty over unpaid stamp duty, everyone knows it. Like everyone knew Starmer should have faced a penalty over attending a curry & beer party in Durham at the height of Covid restrictions. But they are Labour so laws don’t apply to them.

🚨⚠️Von der Leyen LANZA UNA GRAVE AMENAZA Llama a tomar los Medios de Comunicación y las Redes Sociales para "prevenir" la desinformación ⚠️ Se ha CONFIRMADO que Von Der Leyen "FINANCIÓ campañas dirigidas contra voces políticas incómodas" utilizando fondos de la UE. Gastó 132 MILLONES EUROS de los IMPUESTOS de los europeos en financiar campañas mediáticas… Sólo los Tiranos silencian a los críticos. LA UE DEBE SER ABOLIDA; CONTRAATACAR 🔥 EXPONER A LOS TIRANOS 🔥 NUNCA DEJES QUE REESCRIBAN LA VERDAD 🔥

@AmyMek @JohnHann04 looks like a MAP

To all the Tommy Robinson supporters around the world... This is Nick Lowles, the leader of the radical left-wing group Hope Not Hate. He is one of the primary individuals who has been relentlessly hunting Tommy Robinson and his supporters for years. He collaborates with the UK police, using his extremist organization to try and destroy conservatives, torment them, smear them, and have them arrested. Instead of stopping this man from terrorizing citizens, the police seem to be working with him to inflict the maximum amount of torment on Tommy and his family. P.S. Nick Lowles, don't even waste your time targeting me again. I laugh at every one of your pathetic attempts.