Project Victoria

169 posts

Project Victoria banner
Project Victoria

Project Victoria

@ProjVictoria

Project Victoria A new way for Victoria: community-focused, efficient, accountable. Under construction

Victoria Katılım Mart 2025
434 Takip Edilen188 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
Victoria is the perfect size to run itself. Why are we sending money to Canberra, getting less back, and pretending like we need a big federal government? Let’s change it. #auspol #springst
English
5
0
7
2.7K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@TheKouk @AlanKohler You mean he spoke to you and some friendly senior bureaucrats and said things consistent with that backgrounding?
English
0
0
10
320
Stephen Koukoulas
Stephen Koukoulas@TheKouk·
Fantastic to see @AlanKohler on Insiders this morning. Facts, insights and ideas on the economy that is always absent from the show. They need an economist with knowledge on the show each week to offset the political mamby-pamby that tends to dominate
English
50
201
820
13.4K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@JourneyMacro @GeoffWilsonWAM @cjoye Yes. Funding cuts are about more than ndis though - there’s waste right across the bureaucracy. I’ve seen it up close and personal. And there’s a stack of things that have duplication costs between cth and states.
English
0
0
0
12
Geoff Wilson
Geoff Wilson@GeoffWilsonWAM·
We must stop this from happening. The new CGT regime is a direct attack on Australian entrepreneurs, small business owners and young Australians trying to build wealth. Build a successful company in Australia and the government now wants to take nearly half. This is anti-aspiration, anti-investment and anti-productivity.”
christopher joye@cjoye

Labor’s new capital gains tax of up to 46% to 47%, which is far and away the highest in the world, hammers all businesses, including small companies, harder the more successful they become. By applying the most expensive CGT regime in the world, Labor is taking almost half of the upside of any successful firm, encouraging owners and executives who own shares in the business to look at relocating overseas. The question, however, is how many small businesses will actually pay this tax in practice. We prepared the following simulation to highlight the impact. We took the long-term 20 year returns from Cambridge Associates for smaller venture capital companies, which grow by 12.2% pa. We adopted the ASX equity market volatility of 15% pa, which would understate the true volatility of small firms (and thus lead to a lower proportion of very high growth companies paying 46-47% tax in our analysis). We then ran a simulation to estimate the proportion of businesses paying CGT of more than 40%. We find that within 10 years more than half of all Aussie small businesses will be hammered by CGT over 40%, which rises to 78% of all small businesses by 20 years... By giving Australia the most uncompetitive business valuation tax in the world, this policy will crush innovation, entrepreneurship, spending, productivity, growth and our global competitiveness. We already have among the lowest productivity growth rates in the world: by reducing productivity further, we could raise the cost of living, inflation, and interest rates.

English
46
91
536
16.9K
The Way of Jerz
The Way of Jerz@TheJerzWay·
Aussie crypto holder sitting on $2.1M in unrealized gains. ATO would take $987K if he sold. His plan: "Just hold and hope." Hope isn't a strategy. We moved him to UAE first. 0% personal income tax. 0% capital gains. Sold after establishing residency. From $987K tax bill to $0. His mate back home: "Must be nice being a criminal." He's not a criminal. He sold in the right jurisdiction. That's not evasion. That's sequencing.
English
277
87
1.7K
695.7K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@BhagsNStonks @NoelWhittaker Perhaps you and Noel should apply for jobs at Treasury and ensure that all these things appear in Budget papers. They generally run recruitment processes at least once a year. Keep your eyes out.
English
0
0
0
4
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@BhagsNStonks @NoelWhittaker It's not. It should stay for simplification. It's not obvious - issues get worked through when drafting legislation and landing things, not in Budget papers, which would run to 10s of thousands of pages if accompanied by the legislation answering every question.
English
1
0
0
5
Noel Whittaker
Noel Whittaker@NoelWhittaker·
The Budget exempts "Age Pension recipients" from the new CGT rules. But the Budget papers are silent on a glaring question: Does a couple collecting $5 a fortnight in part pension—sitting on $1 million in assets and a $5 million mansion—dodge the entire 30% minimum CGT? If the answer is yes, this isn't tax reform. It's a farce.
English
46
28
182
21.2K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
We need all tax rates to coalesce around 30% - that's the next big target. Forget about CGT etc. That's the game. For those keen on 20 - it's unrealistic. 30 is achievable within most ppls' lives. Thresholds and incremental decreases are the interim game.
English
0
0
0
20
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@parnellpalme Sounds like a line employer's could use when dealing with unions making demands for inflation-tied wage demands: we'll give you pay rises when it's responsible to do so.
English
0
0
0
59
Parnell Palme McGuinness
Parnell Palme McGuinness@parnellpalme·
“This is a government which returns bracket creep when it is responsible to do so.” - Jim Chalmers. Translation: your whole wage belongs to him, to be returned to you in part as he sees fit.
English
12
9
135
1.9K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@BrentHodgson @NoelWhittaker What people like Noel don't appreciate is the issues these structures are cause families when (usually) patriarchs die and there's "distributions" and "loans" that have only ever been journalled and the like. Also in separations, family business disputes etc.
English
0
0
3
56
Brent Hodgson
Brent Hodgson@BrentHodgson·
@ProjVictoria @NoelWhittaker You’re absolutely correct. Guardian AIT sharpened 100A significantly - particularly where the 19 year old daughter in Noel’s scenario didn’t actually receive the ultimate benefit of the distribution. But who are we mere mortals to question Noel’s eminence in this field. 🤷‍♂️
English
1
2
14
170
Noel Whittaker
Noel Whittaker@NoelWhittaker·
I'm running numbers on family trusts. If the trust owned by mum, dad, and 19-year-old daughter earns $180,000 a year and they distribute $60,000 to each the tax will be three times $9,000 = $27000. At 30% flat, it's $54,000. That's double - The only way out is to change distributions to wages, but they must be able to justify the wage. It's a shameful attack on business
English
602
251
2.1K
513.5K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@BrentHodgson @NoelWhittaker Most of the trusts stuff is really about perception because ppl have continued to believe they're a bigger rort than they are. The measure would raise significantly more if that were true. The real kicker is that it's no longer viable to distribute to bucket companies.
English
0
0
0
2
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@BrentHodgson @NoelWhittaker Not quite Part IVA and the firmer application of s 100A and other provisions has dealt with some of it. I doubt there's many discretionary trust beneficiaries being taxed at much below 30% on average.
English
2
1
6
152
Gray Connolly
Gray Connolly@GrayConnolly·
I suspect, like most Catholic conservatives, I have never really had a major ideological awakening (and hope never to, really) so I found this ⁦@clairlemon⁩ piece to be both bracing and necessary reading about when reality mugs you … bravo Claire
Gray Connolly tweet media
English
16
35
239
74.1K
Aaron Smith
Aaron Smith@aaronsmith·
@AvidCommentator Not a single party promising to cut immigration has bothered to model what that actually looks like. No plan. No detail. Just slogans designed to harvest your anger.
English
10
21
129
1.9K
Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺
I will say one thing for the current Australian migration debate, it is revealing who is debating in good faith. The idea that we are uniquely unable to control migration and run an intake ~2x or more developed world norms in per capita terms is absurd.
English
30
36
496
9.1K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@TheKouk Also what do you think about unions that use inflation as the reference point for bargaining - should employers just retain the inflationary gains until they can “afford” to pay more?
English
0
0
0
133
Stephen Koukoulas
Stephen Koukoulas@TheKouk·
If the indexation of income tax scales was in place now, given inflation is 4.6% there would be huge income tax cuts coming. This would stimulate household spending & add significantly to inflation. Crazy ah? RBA would be forced to hike interest rates aggressively ICYMI
Stephen Koukoulas@TheKouk

Opposition leader Angus Taylor is promising, if elected, to index income tax scales to the inflation rate. This is not a good idea. For example, if inflation was 2.5%, the level at which a worker moves from a tax rate of 30% to 37% is lifted from $135,001 to $138,376. They are automatic income tax cuts in line with inflation. If inflation is 5%, as it is not, that tax scale would rise from $135,001 to $141,751. A huge rise and a huge tax cut at a time when inflation is ripping along. The problem with such a scheme is clearly that it is pro-cyclical. In an era of high inflation and an overheating economy, the rise in the tax scales will be big which gives large income tax cuts to the workforce. This would see the policy working against the RBA's anti-inflationary stance in this example. Interest rates would be even higher as a result. The proposal would make it much harder for the RBA to meets its inflation target and / or will require much greater volatility in interest rates as the RBA fights to offset the pro-cyclical nature of the the indexation of tax scales. And it costs a fortune - a chunky $23 billion in 4 years. youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZG2…

English
150
60
174
20.8K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@SamKSS This is absolutely spot on. The problem has and continues to be this. But there’s opportunity now for someone - hopefully sooner rather than in 10-20 years - to run this as the next big reform piece. A move to 39 would be sellable.
English
0
0
2
318
Sam Kennard
Sam Kennard@SamKSS·
The concerns commentators have about the CGT discount and Negative Gearing are created because our income tax rates are too high. If Australia’s top marginal rate was around 25-30%, then all the anomalies and structuring incentives disappear.
English
32
15
291
13.9K
Project Victoria
Project Victoria@ProjVictoria·
@TheKouk How are they cuts? The phrase “cuts” has always been inaccurate. Why should gov revenue rise on the back of the inflation it is a significant contributor to? It’s so lazy that the system allows politicians to come along and sell tax cuts every so often.
English
0
0
9
207