puneet

@JethmalaniM Toh itna sab complicate krna hi kyu hai , itne sare judges hai kisi ko bhi de do , Ek judge hi kyu peche padi hai hearing ke Smajh nahi aata

This is not satyagraha, but PURE BLACKMAIL. That is an attempt to tell the judiciary: rule my way, or I will put your legitimacy on trial. Arvind Kejriwal lost his recusal plea on law, and instead of challenging it in the proper appellate forum first, he has chosen to boycott the judge and try to perform martyrdom in public. And look at the precedent he is trying to create. A judge attends a professional legal event organised by a body you dislike, and suddenly she must recuse. A judge’s children are empanelled as government panel counsel, and suddenly she must recuse. If that absurd standard is accepted, a huge part of the Indian judiciary would be disqualified from hearing any matter involving the government, which in criminal law is practically every second case. That is why this Kejriwal move is so ludicrous. By his logic, next time any judge appears on a panel where the government is present, accepts an invitation to a legal forum, or has a relative with a government brief, that judge can be hounded out. It is a recipe for paralysing courts through manufactured suspicion - with a logic that turns every difficult case into a judge-shopping carnival. That's why this stunt deserves to be trashed in the strongest terms.

@Raj196419641964 @JaikyYadav16 Conflict of Interest hai yha , koi pasand nah pasand ki baat nahi ho rahi

@JaikyYadav16 #फर्जीबाल का यह सत्याग्रह नहीं,सजा से बचने का हथकंडा है प्रत्यक्ष रूप से अराजकता फैलाने का प्रयास है #केजरीवाल के विरुध्द अवमानना की कार्रवाई प्रारंभ की जाना चाहिए केस की सुनवाई चीफ जस्टिस महोदय स्वयं करें लोगों को उनकी पसंद से जज मिलने लगे तो भारतीय न्याय व्यवस्था का क्या होगा⁉️

दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट में अरविंद केजरीवाल की मांग खारिज हुई और उसके बाद केजरीवाल ने खुद को प्रक्रिया से अलग कर लिया। अब सवाल उठता है कि न्याय केवल होना नहीं चाहिए बल्कि दिखना भी चाहिए जब हितों के टकराव या पारदर्शिता पर संदेह हो और जज के बच्चों के सरकारी पैनल और केस अलॉटमेंट को लेकर सवाल उठने लगे, तो ये मुद्दा किसी भी व्यक्ति से बड़ा हो जाता है। अगर एक पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री भी निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठाने लगे, तो आम आदमी का भरोसा कैसे टिकेगा? बात पूरी न्याय व्यवस्था की विश्वसनीयता की है।

@Peoplepower08 @raghav_chadha Done

Can we do this on X too? Just 1 lakh people unfollowing can shake his 1M. Here's his id: @raghav_chadha

@NewsAlgebraIND Reservation aabhi jaye toh inko konsa fyda hone wala hai Neta aur unki patni hi parliament mei jayengi tabh bhi 😂😂

🚨 GIRL : Sir, when will women get reservation in Parliament? CM Mohan Yadav: Congress ruled the country for so many years but never cared about women. They even had super majority. GIRL : Family Rule tha na .. CM : Yes.. but PM Modi and BJP will ensure justice for women.

@ANI Sab bakwas

#WATCH | Delhi: Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha says, "Another important point is that today, Sheesh Mahal Part Two has come in Delhi. Some pictures of it have surfaced. If there was one major reason for the Aam Aadmi Party's loss in the Delhi elections, the Sheesh Mahal was one of the main reasons for the party's defeat. But today, not even a year has passed since the Delhi elections ended, and Sheesh Mahal Part Two has come. I wonder how the few remaining good workers of the Aam Aadmi Party will respond when people in the streets and localities ask them questions about Sheesh Mahal. The Aam Aadmi Party should introspect and think about it."

@raghav_chadha AAP corrupt logo ke hath mei hai and BJP sabse Imandar party hai Kuch toh sharm karo bolne se phle Sab kuch dikhta hai saf saf akhir Game hai kya

Today, exercising the provisions of the Constitution of India, more than two-thirds of the AAP MPs in the Rajya Sabha have merged with the BJP. Seven MPs have signed the document, which was submitted to the Hon’ble Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. I, along with two other MPs, personally handed over the signed documents.

@WhiteHouse I think you forgot NEVER word

🤫🤫

@arbitrum Very good Job arbitrum 👏 👏 👏

The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.

@agentscup 0xc05cb913fee5d3a72206a452d755e04db3a3494a

Mint 1M Club is now live. Only 999 supply on @Tempo → tedoge.xyz/1mclub

@GenaTheCroco She doesn't have proof but she THINKS , EU report is just A copy paste 💀 No we are resolving markets on the basis of thinking not Evidence and Media Reports @Polymarket This is the kind of platform you Wanted to create

There is this market about 🇭🇳Honduras elections about % of turnout and it's a mess. First because there is 2 markets with different brackets second because they didn't really ended the count and they won't end it. In my opinion should resolve all markets to the lowest bracket based on the rules but I'm not betting because it will be decided by @UMAprotocol freaks aka what AEnews, @umadotrocks and Jessica decide. #NvpWl4J" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/turnout-… #NvpWl4J" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/turnout-…

polymarket.com/event/turnout-… The EU report clearly states this point. Any attempt to push manipulated outcomes contrary to the EU report will be firmly overruled by Polymarket’s official clarification. eeas.europa.eu/eom-honduras-2…

I checked the disputer's on-chain positions for the Honduras turnout market: 17,415 shares on 55-60% YES ($7k value) 5,000 shares on <55% YES ($1.1k value) 1,500 shares on 60-65% NO ($1k value) They lose on all three if 60-65% resolves YES correctly. The dispute isn't about accuracy - it's about protecting a losing position. oraclewatch.xyz @Polymarket @UMAprotocol

"Will turnout in the 2025 Honduran general election be between 60% and 65%?" - $1.6M market, still unresolved after 4+ months. Official turnout: 60.19% per Honduras CNE, confirmed by EU Election Observation Mission and OAS observers. Every credible source agrees. Two YES proposals filed, both disputed. The market is stuck in final review while traders wait. oraclewatch.xyz @Polymarket @UMAprotocol

@frigodor Dispute on Honduran turnout bet: #zCeQdFq" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/turnout-… El Heraldo, La Prensa, Transparencia Electoral & EU all report 60.19%. Media consensus + EU report supports 60-65% bracket. Please resolve to p2 (currently stuck at p4)

Have you ever wondered what Buddhism and Bitcoin have in common? I'm glad you ask because I've just wrote on article about it. Enjoy the read ⬇️ frigodor.substack.com/p/buddhism-is-…

@frigodor Dispute on Honduran turnout bet: #zCeQdFq" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/turnout-… El Heraldo, La Prensa, Transparencia Electoral & EU all report 60.19%. Media consensus + EU report supports 60-65% bracket. Please resolve to p2 (currently stuck at p4)

@OGDegen I'm not just talking about the Xi case. Manipulations they had done with Mark Rutte Trump Talk Bet (march) , I can never forget those levels of word twisting manipulation I don't trust UMA voters at all now @Polymarket i request you to develop some new system for disputes

@Puneetkcsd this contradicts itself, UMA is manipulating the NO outcome, and Polymarket is not doing anything, in fact they are part of it as well as they are letting them do so.

@EsseApoia No they don't, it's UMA who manipulate Polymarket is doing the right thing

This is my third day on the platform and I’m stunned. From day one, I backed this bet because the evidence was overwhelming. We had countless sources and clear indicators pointing to a positive outcome. Don't trust polymarket

@Dogeplaymid Just stop , Polymarket did right, both oman and iran rejected the strike.. Follow rules not fake narrative

Pourquoi les manipulations sur Polymarket sont elles si courantes et impunies ? Depuis quelques jours, le bet "Iran military action against Oman by March 31 ?" n’est pas encore clos car le consensus n’est pas formel: 57 % de OUI/P2, 33 % de NON/P1 et 10 % de 50/50/P3 Le bet était à 12 votes sur Oui et 7 sur Non dans Experienced (Screen 1). La seule raison pour laquelle il n’était pas déjà résolu, c’est le fait qu’une personne "dontg" a contesté avec 750$ Mais pourquoi a t il dépensé 750 $ pour bloquer le vote Oui ?! Car à la base, "dontgambledontilt" aka "dontg" avait parié sur le Oui, mais le prix a chuté de 49,9 prix moyen d’achat à 16,2 prix moyen de vente, causant une perte de 750 $ (Screen 2) Il a vendu en perte tout en sachant qu’il avait raison sur le bet et s’est dit : pourquoi ne pas manipuler le prix et récupérer mes pertes ? Il a mis 750 $ de garantie pour que le bet ne puisse pas être validé/contesté le consensus: oracle.uma.xyz/?project=Polym… Il a ensuite acheté du Non. Puis « JessicaOnlyChild » a voté Non, suivi de la note « Additional context » qui a annulé les 8 liens en rapport avec le vote OUI postés par @CarOnPolymarket sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Résultat : le bet a pumpé sur le Non à 100 %. Lorsqu’elle a voté Non, 7 autres vérificateurs ont voté Non dans les minutes qui ont suivi (Screen 3) + sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Qui est "JessicaOnlyChild" et pourquoi ses votes ne devraient ils plus compter ? Elle a déjà manipulé à plusieurs reprises des bets, comme il y a moins d’une semaine: x.com/TheGreekTrader… Mais ce n’est pas nouveau : elle manipule les bets avec ses amis: x.com/GenaTheCroco/s… Et il faut savoir que @aenews, membres de vote pour résoudre les Bet, avait parié sur le Oui en sachant qu’il manipulait les bets pour gagner mais il s’est fait virer aujourd’hui car il faisait du pump and dump, comme son ami @frigodor qui en faisait avec Jessica (Screen 4, aenews en vert qui avait acheté et en noir "dontgambledontilt/dontg") qui achète du Non et conteste pour faire chuter le prix, etc.) J’apprécie Polymarket, mais ce n’est pas normal de pouvoir manipuler les bets en toute impunité et que le consensus ne soit pas réellement décentralisé @zachxbt @Dark_Emi_ @Atlantislq @PolymarketHelp @HugoMartingale @mustafap0ly @notyrjo RT et Like pour que le maximum de personnes puisse voir comment Polymarket font du pump and dump via l'UMA Merci DPM