Jean-Paul Surtr

21.2K posts

Jean-Paul Surtr

Jean-Paul Surtr

@REPHVIM

Katılım Haziran 2018
1K Takip Edilen691 Takipçiler
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@TonklinDiary @ManuelMCruz2 However communist Britain becomes, they remain committed to the Falkland Islands being a quasi-ancapistan #2 in the world for civilian firearms (as under sacred international law such territories must have maximum self governance). Can Argentina offer the same guarantees?
Jean-Paul Surtr tweet media
English
1
0
0
38
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@ManuelMCruz2 Argentina spent the entire 20th century cutting its own dick off with retarded Peronism. Somehow managed to make itself suffer even worse than Britain. Why should any sane person living in the Falkland Islands today want to join Argentina? What does Argentina have to offer?
English
1
0
2
89
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@ManuelMCruz2 The British government possesses the Falkland Islands _now_, for >70% of the time since the islands were first settled they have been a __British possession__, why should anyone give a flying fuck about Argentina's technical legal argument?
English
1
0
2
85
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@Rolibertario93 @MutsuAnjin The Falkland Islands have been economically self-sufficient since the 1990s. The only responsibilities of the UK government are defence and foreign policy.
English
0
0
2
33
RolyARG
RolyARG@Rolibertario93·
@MutsuAnjin Da risa porque hablas de un gobierno independiente cuando dependen exclusivamente del gobierno britanico. O no pagan impuestos para mantener las islas? No destinan subsidios? Da gracia. Son tan independientes como los gobiernos de Gales, Escocia e Irlanda verdad?
Español
2
0
0
410
桜理🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇫🇰🇬🇧
What’s telling about the Falklands issue is the Argentinians keep asking to negotiate with the British government, as if it’s up to the British government to just unilaterally decide to hand over what is effectively a self governing polity separate from the UK.
English
24
21
1.3K
25.9K
Squibbles
Squibbles@SquibbleDeeBop·
@REPHVIM Where in the setting is the human spirit triumphing? It's being ground down everywhere.
English
1
0
3
20
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
The message of WH40K is "the human spirit will triumph despite everything", arguing about whether the Imperium is good or bad completely misses the point.
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock

I will ALWAYS stand by the fact that Imperium are the good guys and they are not cruel by choice but by circumstances they were forced into They are good becouse they're the only ones still fighting for humanity's right to exist at all. Everyone else is either actively trying to end us, feed on us, or turn us into something worse than dead. The Imperium isn't some shining beacon of virtue it's a brutal, unforgiving and a strict nightmare... but it's our nightmare to endure, and it's the only thing standing between mankind and total annihilation If a faction is surrounded by enemies who literally want to eat, enslave, corrupt, or erase them, then extreme measures arent a choice. Not to mention that many factions would become more hostile if the Imperium became less brutal. Fear in this universe is a important tool Maintaining psychic discipline in a galaxy where psychic mistakes get whole planets eaten is pretty important, harshness keeps worlds producing food, weapons for soldiers and new troops and religious fanaticism stabilizes morale when people face literal gods of insanity The Imperium isnt cruel by choice its cruel because any attempt at softness leads to daemonic possession, planetary rebellion, or species-level extinction within months. Other factions cchoose cruelty because it benefits them. The Imperium inflicts cruelty becouse the galaxy punishes any attempt at mercy

English
2
0
27
682
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
The real cost of a $200 property crime is far more than $200
English
0
0
1
108
Squibbles
Squibbles@SquibbleDeeBop·
@REPHVIM The Imperium quite clearly are not "triumphing" though.
English
1
0
2
37
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
The original "good guy" faction based on the USA-NATO was the Tau, who were later retconned into "space socialism with Chinese characteristics and mind control".
English
0
0
1
56
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@Morgan_Anastasi Get whatever crappy retail or dishwasher job you can tbh. Get entry level certs in AI, project management, whatever business stuff is in fashion right now. Save money and look to move somewhere with better opportunities.
English
0
0
1
18
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
Yes but it's not because of local elections. It's because forcing actually unpopular policies results in MPs refusing to cooperate with party whips, pushing the Prime Minister to resign, or forcing a general election. For example: Margaret Thatcher being forced to resign by her cabinet in the wake of the poll tax riots.
English
0
0
0
7
jeremy
jeremy@landvaluetax·
The UK is interesting because the voters simply don't support the policies necessary to restore growth, and also hate the reality of governance under ~0 real per-capita growth. Therefore, any incumbent party will lose the next election, regardless of ideology.
English
17
22
337
12.1K
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@miltonfann @landvaluetax MPs of the party of government can do a "backbench rebellion" and collapse the government at any time. If the PM loses the confidence of the House then Parliament is dissolved automatically: "just don't call an election" doesn't guarantee no election will happen.
English
1
0
0
44
step
step@miltonfann·
@landvaluetax Surely you just ignore the voters and don't call an election until results are showing.
English
2
0
14
2K
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
Overall I think England's system of a large number of commoner nuclear families, stratified predominantly by economic status, with a tiny number of landowning nobles at the top, was not exactly a "caste system". Caste system implies strict occupational segregation, commoners being divided into endogamous tribes each with a particular economic function.
English
0
0
3
140
Jean-Paul Surtr
Jean-Paul Surtr@REPHVIM·
@seld_on "Nobility" can be used expansively to include baronets and armigerous gentlemen. But as far as I know the right to be tried by the House of Lords only ever applied to peers, not baronets or armigerous gentry?
English
1
0
5
164