JustAnotherSoul

“Human beings are under the control of a strange force that bends them in absurd ways, forcing them to play a role in a bizarre game of deception.” - Jacques F. Vallée #uap #ufo

@dwpasulka Diana, I’ve been an avid fan of yours from the day I read your first book. I’ve watched all your interviews read everything you published. I can’t shake the feeling that you know more than you speak openly. I hope the day you can speak freely will come soon… very soon.

"This is a tough topic and we all catch hell for it" -- Representative Burchett A fitting way to end the Sept. 9 Congressional Hearing on UAP/UFOs. 🙏

@UFO_Rabbit_Hole I agree. The timing seems very curious.

You could make a pretty strong argument that they actually found evidence of microbial life on Mars in the 1970s that was dismissed/covered up. So it’s interesting that they’re ready to make this announcement now. I suspect it’s part of a greater story that will unfold in the coming years and decades.

@RedPandaKoala How did @UAPGERB get access to the hearing?

The state of debunker cope 🤣🤣

@RedPandaKoala Why is Lue still platformed?

Lue Elizondo reacts to the new video of a UFO redirecting a hellfire missile

@RedPandaKoala I still don’t trust George. But the dude is the baddest mofo in ufology. I like his style. George was very useful at the hearing. My only concern is if he is working for Mellon.

George Knapp testifies to Congress about Bob Lazar 🛸

I have edited short & easy to watch videos of each witness at the 2025 UAP Hearing, including their statement and all questions that they answered to. All other filler has been removed. All 5 Witness Testimony & Questions are in a playlist on Polarity 2.0 linked below! 👇

@polarityjosh @RedPandaKoala Thanks Josh. Very useful for reference.

Are you feeling that Intel Deja Vu feeling yet...? Remember when the last round of 'UFO' videos came out it turned out that DOD Billionaire Chris Mellon of the Mellon Banking Family was the dubious source of the dubious videos and he eventually admitted it. It was used to promote a CIA UFO Threat Narrative. Now publicity seeking Congressman Burlison says the video he showed to Congress just magically showed up on his desk with no provenance...Hello...anonymous unsourced videos have no place in a Congressional Hearing and to make it more obvious Mellon's statement of UAP Disclosure is read into the record by Anna Luna...Mellon is controlling the whole show...once again...! vice.com/en/article/thi…

@AeroTech_Space @VettedPodcast I agree. Releasing a video without supporting data is useless. It only fuels more speculation and confusion. I don’t understand why congress decided to do this.

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

@bobofango86 @ivanhannelesq @g_knapp @LueElizondo Exactly. I don’t see the point of the recent hearing either. Nothing actionable was presented. It was good for the uninitiated but useless for those of us who are deeply involved in ufology.

@RameeTalks @ivanhannelesq @g_knapp @LueElizondo Lue was pretty much useless at the last hearing. The problem is that he treated it like another podcast interview instead of a congressional hearing where the representatives needed actionable Intel.

@Desal4Cal @UAPJames @LueElizondo Huh?

@RameeTalks @UAPJames @LueElizondo Sources & details please. Thanks.

Lue Elizondo says the Hellfire Missile UFO is evidence of “technology that is making our premiere missile system completely useless.” “The Hellfire missile is one of the most sophisticated, most capable types of air missiles that we have.” “America has a problem right now.”

@delicflower @RedPandaKoala Yes. He is paid to be one it seems

@RameeTalks @RedPandaKoala Lue is a conman. How have you not realized that yet?

Do you support mass amnesty for those responsible for the UFO coverup?

@LueElizondo Dude, perhaps it’s time for you to step back and be quiet. You have done enough to give ufology a bad name.

Today was a very proud moment for our country. Under the leadership of Chairwoman Luna and her fearless colleagues on the Task Force, our nation is finally getting some of the insight it deserves. A special thanks to the brave individuals who testified today. I could not be more proud of the Committee and the process. Special thanks to George Knapp.

@VettedPodcast You’re not obligated to respond to all or any. Engage with those who seem reasonable and useful to you.

Now I remember why I blocked people. I will be going back to that immediately. I tried it, but unfortunately people took that as an opportunity to come at me, all under the guise of CoNsTructIVe CriTicism. If you want to know why real conversations don't happen on twitter....the few ruin it for the many. People writing 20 comments excepting you answer everyone. and then multiply that by 1,000. I get over 2,000 comments a day across all platforms. How in god's name I am supposed to respond to that and do my job?

@AZolin312 @PostDisclosure That’s why I didn’t categorise you as reasonable and say you’re just noise. @PostDisclosure and I 100% agree on this.

@RameeTalks @PostDisclosure I'm not reasonable and have never claimed to be. I'm not here to debunk, merely to mock.

My philosophy is simple: Anyone who mocked, derided, or denigrated the UFO topic, if they end up wrong about UFOs and consequently promoted gov. disinformation, they were bootlickers. It doesn't matter to me if they were sincere in their analysis. The notion that mocking people carries no reputational risk is pure fantasy. It's actually insulting. You may argue I shouldn't care about any of this if UFOs end up being proven alien since that overshadows everything. But I'll throw that back and say, you shouldn't obsess over UFOs if you think it's all fake. You can't have it both ways. Well, you can—but reasonable people will see it for the nonsense it is. And regarding if I end up wrong? Well, you already think I'm mentally ill or in a cult. So, we already have that taken care of. Have a nice day. PS - I think my current posture is fair, balanced, and ethical. Especially when you consider how extraordinarily damaging a real UFO cover-up would be on individuals, society, and the world on innumerable levels. I do not think I'm being petty here. I think I'm holding reasonable standards. We wouldn't give a pass to people for mocking other areas of science, anthropology, or research, and those involved. And none of us can be certain that UFOs are all misidentifications, so it is a reputational risk indeed.

@marklarforever @InsouciantSouI @RedPandaKoala I understand what you say. I don’t think he is trying to be unbiased or asks you to assume his POV. He is just sharing how he see it. I don’t always agree with Patrick but I appreciate him not enforcing his beliefs on me. Doesn’t call himself an expert or journalist. Just a dude.

@RameeTalks @InsouciantSouI @RedPandaKoala He did it with ufogerb, he does it with everyone.. anyone in ufo community he will tall about the news then halfway thru he will then make a comment about something in their past or to create doubt in their messaging .. its not honest and obvious what he is doing

Crazy the accounts who say Vetted is dogshit and Vetted steals people content never say that about all the other shows who have the same format

@AZolin312 @PostDisclosure Nah… you’re just noise. True skeptics, say Mick, are reasonable. I can’t even tell if you’re a real person.

@RameeTalks @PostDisclosure I'm part of the 1% that mocks UFO nutters regardless