Randy Goolsby

@AbcAbc347433 @rustbeltkid1 Agree completely. It's programmer. The word "programmer" takes me back to when it was precise, logical, grounded in reality and kept the end user in mind. Not sure it's that way much anymore.

@Randy_Goolsby_ @rustbeltkid1 I would call myself a programmer, not engineer precisely for this reason and I do. I don't know where this terminology sprang up about programmers but it's dumb.

When you say "engineer" you mean SF kid who vibe codes an app When I say "engineer" I mean a chud farm boy from South Dakota who builds commercially viable equipment at 18 years old

The Talmud says: "A gentile who engages in Torah study is liable to receive the death penalty," because the Torah is the Hebrew manual for goyim subversion and genocide. Once a Gentile learns what the Hebrews are up to, he becomes their worst enemy and must be destroyed.

I have a question for morons: Why would you merge onto the highway at 45mph?

@NC_Governor Where are you from Stien? You are the out of stater than needs to go.

In 2018, actor Isaac Kappy stood before the world and dropped a bombshell that shook Hollywood to its core: "Steven Spielberg is a ped*phile." "I'm not going to talk about Tom Hanks either... who is also a ped*phile. Tom Hanks, folks, is a ped*phile." Then, in May 2019, Isaac Kappy was found dead after jumping from a bridge in Arizona. Officially ruled a suicide. Coincidence? Or the ultimate price for daring to speak the forbidden truth?

That time Zionist tunnels were discovered under synagogues in NYC. Stained mattresses and baby high chairs were found inside. Yet, no real conclusions. This seems to be slipping into the memory hole of time

Alice Cooper speaking about Redemption👇

Life got you down? You should go take advice from a liberal woman in her 30s.

🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own. (Link in the comment)

Been getting suspicious about the genuineness of this @Jason2bartlett account. It looks really synthetic. An endorsement from @catturd2 certainly doesn't help his credibility any.

If you've seen all the recent chatter about how you can literally starve cancer cells to death by denying them sugar, you probably have an impression that this a new breakthrough that was just discovered. IT'S NOT. This was originally observed by a scientist back in the 1920s, who actually won the NOBEL PRIZE that year for observing that cancer cells NEED glucose. Make sure you read all of this post below. "What if cures already exist?" Not expensive medical treatments to slow the cancer/diseases. Not expensive petroleum-based drugs to manage the symptoms of the cancer/disease, provide marginal release. Not expensive surgical interventions to try to 'cut out' the cancer/disease. CURE. A **cure** that makes the cancer GO AWAY.

At least the education is 914% better and college graduates are 914% smarter than they were back then. Otherwise this would be insane.

Agreed. I’ll take it one step farther: There are entirely too many Yankees in my beloved South.

NO! BAD CALI! BAD! GO HOME!

We DO NOT want more of you here! Stay in California!

"When their population reaches ten percent, radicals rise into key positions." (The late Scott Adams) From there the domino effect begins with control domination and rule over nations. It’s an existential threat rapidly unfolding across the West.

😀😀😀