-GhostDog-𐤊 𐤊 𐤊

The hot wallet could fund the vault, but the offline witness was required to unlock it. Lock flow: offline device generated the Merkle witness tree → hot wallet imported the root → 1,000 KAS locked into a covenant vault → normal hot-wallet spend path disabled. Unlock flow: request → offline device → witness → paste back → on-chain spend. No fallback. No hot-key drain. No valid witness, no spend. Just math. Lock: tn12.kaspa.stream/transactions/b… Unlock: tn12.kaspa.stream/transactions/5… $KAS #Kaspa #Toccata #SelfCustody #PoW #Stateless

Post muito bom do @Crypt0Proselyte sobre Kaspa Covenants, junto com uma imagem explicativa que resume bem a ideia. (Agora traduzida para PT-BR) A forma mais simples de entender Covenants é esta: Em vez de suas moedas serem apenas “gastáveis”, você coloca regras nelas. Tipo: KAS que só pode ser movido depois de certa data. KAS que só pode ir para uma carteira específica. Reembolso automático se uma condição não for cumprida. Gasto liberado apenas com múltiplas assinaturas. E o ponto principal é que essas regras não dependem de confiança em terceiros. A própria rede Kaspa faz a validação. Isso abre caminho para carteiras mais inteligentes, cofres, heranças, escrow, assinaturas, pagamentos recorrentes, ativos nativos e ferramentas DeFi. Kaspa começou como dinheiro digital rápido. Com Covenants, se torna dinheiro digital programável. Créditos pela postagem original e pela imagem explicativa: @Crypt0Proselyte #Kaspa #kas #crypto

@AurelienCa80656 @playcanvas Est ce que ça capture bien la tuyauterie? Même de petits diamètres? J aimerais bien essayer.

For architects, I developed a @playcanvas construction monitoring interface integrating Gaussian Splatting, project plans, and AI-generated videos. The goal is to provide better immersion, clearer project visualization, and a stronger understanding of the future space.

On change de cap. 🚀 Depuis le début on fait de la news, on suit l’actu, on explique la tech. Ça, ça va rester. Mais à partir d’aujourd’hui, on passe clairement à l’étape d’après. Kaspa entre dans l’ère du Design-Led Development. L’UX n’est plus la finition, elle devient le point de départ. On ne construit plus la tech pour les geeks. On construit des produits que des gens normaux ont vraiment envie d’utiliser au quotidien. Le but ? Que chacun apporte sa pierre à l’édifice. Je suis hyper ouvert à la collaboration : devs, designers, builders, créateurs, tous ceux qui veulent vraiment avancer. Déjà quelques personnes m’ont contacté suite à ce virage, et c’est parfait. Ça montre qu’on est plusieurs à sentir la même chose. Si personne ne suit, j’avancerai seul. Mais je sais que c’est la bonne direction. Comme dit le dicton : seul, on va plus vite, mais ensemble, on va plus loin. Qui est partant pour construire cette prochaine étape avec moi ? L’image ci-dessus résume parfaitement la vision. On y va ? 👀 $KAS #Kaspa #DesignLed #Toccata

Trustless atomic swaps on Kaspa. No middleman, no server. Alice and Bob swap KAS using HTLCs on TN12. Preimage extracted in real time from the DAG block stream. Fully decentralized, fully on-chain. Air-gapped signing with KasSigner. Watch-only companion KasSee. Private keys never leave the device. Open source. GPLv3. 😎🤟🏼 youtu.be/FQKuEbUdaJI github.com/InKasWeRust/Ka… #Kaspa #KasSigner #AtomicSwap #HTLC #OpenSource #Toccata

🚨 2 Milliarden Transaktionen & das Ende der Geister Chains: @kaspaunchained radikaler Neustart! Schau dir das komplette Update Video an und erfahre, vor welcher ultimativen Bewährungsprobe das Netzwerk jetzt steht: youtu.be/v9DKbcWlHIg Kaspa hat nicht nur einen massiven Meilenstein bei der reinen Netzwerknutzung geknackt, sondern erfindet sich für das Jahr 2026 auch strategisch komplett neu. Anstatt sich weiter hinter einer extrem komplexen BlockDAG Architektur zu verstecken, rückt das Projekt seine Vision nun glasklar und greifbar in den Fokus: Die dezentrale Sicherheit von Bitcoin, kombiniert mit völlig wartezeitfreien Transaktionen. Während tiefgreifende Protokoll Upgrades in Kürze die Türen für eine ganzheitliche, native Programmierbarkeit auf Proof of Work Basis öffnen, liefert der Chef Architekt des Netzwerks gleichzeitig eine schonungslose Bestandsaufnahme der aktuellen Krypto Landschaft. Wir beleuchten seine harte Kritik, warum ein Großteil der heutigen Altcoin Infrastruktur aus reinen "Geister Ketten" mit künstlich aufgeblähtem Volumen besteht und klären, wie sich Kaspa nun positioniert, um in der nächsten Marktphase endlich den echten Product Market Fit abseits von reiner Spekulation zu beweisen. 👇

What is $KAS? Kaspa is a next-gen Proof of Work blockchain built on BlockDAG tech, which allows multiple blocks to be processed at the same time instead of waiting in a single line. That means faster confirmations, no network congestion, and strong decentralization without sacrificing security. No delays. No bottlenecks. Just pure speed with PoW reliability. #Kaspa #KAS

Before ❄️ FrostCard ships, we want it attacked. We’re looking for white-hat hackers and security researchers to help penetration test FrostCard. If you’re experienced in: • Hardware wallet security • NFC attacks • Side-channel analysis • Cryptographic review • Covenant logic & wallet security We want you. FrostCard is open-source, which means security doesn’t come from trust — it comes from verification. Try to break it. Audit the code. Attack the assumptions. If you succeed, you make FrostCard stronger for everyone. Security through transparency. Interested? Reach out. Tag the best Dev’s and Hackers you know! #Kaspa

#Kaspa Covenants are one of the most interesting upgrades coming to the $KAS ecosystem. The easiest way to understand them is this: Instead of coins being just spendable you can attach programmable rules to them. So your KAS can behave more like smart digital money with built-in conditions. For example, you could create rules like: These funds can’t move before 2030. This KAS can only be sent to this wallet. If conditions aren’t met in 7 days, refund me automatically. Require 2 signatures before spending. And the important part is: the Kaspa network itself enforces those rules automatically. Nobody can bypass them. What makes this exciting is that Kaspa is trying to add programmability without becoming slow or overly complicated. Unlike traditional smart contract systems with heavy global state, Kaspa Covenants work directly on the UTXO model, which keeps things simpler and closer to Bitcoin’s design philosophy. This could unlock: smarter wallets vaults and inheritance systems escrow payments subscriptions and recurring payments native assets and DeFi tools All while still benefiting from Kaspa’s fast BlockDAG architecture and POW security. Kaspa started as fast digital money. Covenants could turn it into programmable digital moneywithout losing the speed and simplicity that made people interested in Kaspa in the first place. The Kaspa journey continues....

The best asymmetric opportunities always feel wrong while you're in them. Too early. Too quiet. Too little attention. That's not a warning sign. That's the setup. When everyone agrees something is a good investment - the asymmetry is already gone. The crowd priced it in. Real asymmetry lives in the uncomfortable gap between what something is worth and what the market currently believes. Holding through that gap is the job. Most people can't do it. That's why the opportunity exists. The Conviction Series. 4 of 7 $KAS

"Bitcoin made value sovereign. Kaspa’s opportunity is to make coordination sovereign: not through committees, sequencers, or platforms, but through proof, time, and mutually satisfied conditions."

.@Ledger says and markets their new swap support for $KAS as "Your keys stay offline" and "No need to move your assets to an exchange" - partly TRUE. But the swap of $KAS itself? Runs through 3rd-party providers like Changelly. A centralized aggregator. Want decentralized $KAS swaps? @ZealousSwap on @Igra_Labs. There is a reason why you want to use an exchange instead. A decentralized one.

Most people are still reading Kaspa’s next phase as “smart contracts are coming,” but that is too small. The deeper shift is that Kaspa is being shaped into real-time settlement for conditional truth. Crescendo already moved Kaspa into the 10 BPS regime, giving it the cadence needed for faster decentralized ordering. Toccata’s roadmap then pushes the next layer: covenant-style spending constraints, ZK verification paths, and sequencing commitments designed to let external computation anchor back into proof-of-work settlement without turning Kaspa into another bloated global VM. That matters because the next internet will not only need money that moves quickly. It will need commitments that become enforceable when reality satisfies their conditions. This is where Staghunt becomes interesting. A coordination market is not just another DeFi primitive. It is a mechanism for turning private intent into collective action: “I will move if enough others move.” Liquidity can migrate without first-mover exposure. Users can switch platforms without being stranded. Communities can coordinate capital, attention, labor, or exit without trusting a central broker. The hard part is not a single user proving a single valid state transition. The hard part is coordination: hidden intents, threshold logic, capital multiplexing, conflict resolution, and atomic execution. That requires more than cheap talk, and more than a public pledge. It requires a settlement layer that can enforce the final snap while higher layers handle proofs, privacy, and computation. Kaspa’s advantage is that it does not need to become Ethereum with faster blocks. Its strength is staying a lean proof-of-work ordering engine while external systems prove computation into it. vProgs point directly toward this model: applications running next to L1, using ZK verification and shared state standards, not normal on-chain smart contracts. Bitcoin made value sovereign. Kaspa’s opportunity is to make coordination sovereign: not through committees, sequencers, or platforms, but through proof, time, and mutually satisfied conditions.

Fast, secure, and simple: swap Kaspa (KAS) in Ledger Wallet! No need to move your assets to an exchange. Approve your swap directly on your Ledger signer and keep your private keys offline 🔐 Head over to Ledger Wallet now to swap KAS.

“我正在尝试一条平行的轨迹，以在 kaspa 上启动协调市场。” 协调市场到底是什么？以下是我问GROK的解释和举例： 核心武器叫「Intendo（意图/条件承诺）」协调市场（CMs） 不是普通交易市场，而是一类围绕「绑定原语」构建的市场。 它的核心是 Intendo（条件承诺）： 「我会在 N 个人（或 N 美元资本）也做 X 的情况下，才做 X。」它不是空谈（cheap talk），而是加密签名、链上可执行的绑定承诺。 一旦阈值（threshold）达到，所有承诺原子执行（atomically）：大家同时行动，没有任何人能中途退出或被甩下。 支持私密累积（opaque accumulation）：你看不到别人承诺了多少，避免被狙击或提前暴露。 支持资本多路复用：同一笔钱可以同时承诺多个市场，谁先触发就用谁。 支持可组合（composable）：一个市场的输出可以直接成为另一个市场的输入，像乐高一样拼接。 这套机制让「猎鹿博弈」的（stag, stag）均衡变成现实，而不需要任何人牺牲个人理性。3. 工作流程（三阶段：Stag → Pack → Hunt）Stag（发现猎物）：有人（或 DAO）在链上发一个「Hunt」——定义目标、阈值、执行逻辑。例如：「迁移 5000 万美元流动性到 Kaspa，如果达到就全部执行。」 Pack（集结狼群）：用户悄悄提交 Intendo（加密签名承诺）。承诺可以是匿名的、私密的，持续累积直到阈值。 Hunt（集体狩猎）：阈值一到 → 智能合约原子触发，所有人同时行动（迁移、支付、启动平台等）。无人能抢跑或落单。 整个过程无需中心化平台，完全依赖 Kaspa 的实时高吞吐量 blockDAG（目前已达高 BPS，未来目标 100 BPS+），实现真正的实时、去中心化执行。4. 和「预测市场」（如 Polymarket）完全不一样预测市场：你押注「某事会不会发生」，猜对赚钱。纯投机。 协调市场：你承诺「某事发生后我才行动」。实际执行集体行动，不是赌结果。 例子 1：DeFi 流动性迁移（Kaspa 最直接的应用）当前问题：大量流动性卡在老链（如 BNB Chain 上 57 亿美元），大家想搬到 Kaspa（速度快、费用低、去中心化），但没人敢第一个搬——怕新池子没流动性，自己被套利或滑点吃掉。 Intendo 解决方案：每个 LP（流动性提供者）提交承诺：「如果总迁移资金达到 500 万美元，我就把我的 100 万美元也迁到 Kaspa。」 不同人设不同阈值（5M、50M、500M 美元）。 同一笔钱可以同时承诺「迁 Kaspa」和「迁 Solana」，先达标先执行。 结果：阈值一到，所有 LP 的资金同时原子迁移，新池子瞬间就有足够深度，大家一起「猎鹿」成功，无人落单。 这就是 Michael Sutton 说的「并行路径」：不用等 BD 团队一个一个拉项目，而是让流动性自己协调搬家到 Kaspa。 例子 2：新内容平台/社交平台启动场景：无数家长讨厌 Netflix/Disney+ 的内容，想换新平台，但新平台没人就活不下去。 Intendo 解决方案：发一个 Hunt：「如果有 100 万人承诺每月付 10 美元订阅费，我就启动新平台。」 用户提交 Intendo：「我会在 100 万人也承诺的情况下，每月付 10 美元。」 阈值达到 → 平台原子启动，订阅费同时到账，平台直接有用户、有资金、有内容创作者。结果：创业者不再靠 VC 烧钱，而是靠预先绑定的用户群直接起飞。 例子 3：政治/社会集体行动（带隐私保护）想支持某个候选人或发起抗议，但提前公开会被针对。 用 Designated Verifiable Proofs (DVPs)：你的 Intendo 可以私下发给可信朋友验证（证明你真的承诺了），但对外完全不可证明（deniability）。 阈值达到后原子执行（投票、捐款、集体迁移等）。

Toccata hard fork Kaspa wallets could be insane. Imagine: - trusted wallets = instant transfers - unknown wallets = 72 hour delay + withdrawal limits So even if your hot wallet gets hacked, the attacker can’t instantly drain your life savings. Programmable money changes everything.

Discussion très intéressante avec @CodesXBT sur l’adoption de Kaspa 👀 Je comprends sa frustration : on a une tech exceptionnelle et on veut que ça avance plus vite. Mais voilà ma position claire : Kaspa n’a pas de « Kaspa Head » qui doit tout tracter depuis le haut. C'est une communauté, sans dirigeants. Ce n’est pas comme Ethereum avec une fondation qui signe des partenariats. C’est l’esprit Bitcoin : la core team nous a donné les briques (BlockDAG, Toccata, covenants…). À nous, la communauté, de construire dessus. Une bonne idée n’a pas besoin d’être « missionnée » par quelqu’un. Il suffit qu’une personne y croie vraiment. Exemple concret 👀🎯 Le développeur français @eliottmea travaille depuis plus d’un an sur AppKaskad, un oracle décentralisé pour Kaspa. Il n’a pas attendu qu’on lui donne un budget officiel. Il a bossé. Pourquoi c’est intéressant ? Aujourd’hui, la plupart des oracles sur Bitcoin et les grandes chaînes sont hyper centralisés (un seul fournisseur ou une seule source comme Binance contrôle les données). AppKaskad veut faire exactement l’inverse : fournir des données fiables et décentralisées directement utilisables par les covenants et les applications futures sur Kaspa. C’est une brique essentielle pour passer des contrats intelligents « théoriques » à des usages réels (prix, événements, données externes…). En octobre 2025, l’incident de l’oracle centralisé de Binance a montré les risques concrets : une simple désynchronisation a fait plonger USDe à 0,65 $, provoqué des liquidations en cascade et un deleveraging record de plusieurs milliards de dollars. Quand un seul acteur (ou un seul point de défaillance) contrôle le prix affiché, un market maker ou un simple bug peut tout impacter. C’est exactement ce qu’AppKaskad vise à éviter. Résultat : son projet a trouvé écho auprès du Kaspa Ecosystem Fund (KEF) qui le finance aujourd’hui. Mais je crois aussi profondément au bon sens communautaire : lorsqu’un outil est réellement utile, il trouve naturellement son adoption. Et ce sont souvent les membres de la communauté qui, par conviction profonde, choisissent de le soutenir financièrement de manière volontaire, même sans attendre un gros mécène. Je ne suis pas contre les gros partenariats, loin de là. Mais je crois profondément au bon sens communautaire : si un outil est vraiment utile, il sera adopté naturellement. Nous sommes tous, après Tocatta, acteur de cette transformation. Et avec le temps et l'énergie de chacun, des consortiums se créeront, amplifiant les initiatives. Lien de la discussion : x.com/i/status/20540… $KAS #Kaspa #Toccata @michaelsuttonil @hashdag

For Kaspa to make Staghunt-style coordination markets real, it has to supply the hard settlement layer while leaving most coordination logic to higher execution environments. The base chain should not become a global smart-contract VM. That would violate Kaspa’s design advantage. Instead, Kaspa needs to act as the fast, censorship-resistant ordering court where conditional commitments become enforceable once a valid proof says the coordination threshold has been reached. The first technical requirement is conditional spending logic. Users need to sign intents that pre-authorize an action only under specific conditions: enough capital joined, enough users committed, a deadline passed, an oracle confirmed an event, or another coordination market resolved first. This requires covenant-style transaction constraints, stronger scripting primitives, native asset control, and wallet-level support for persistent commitments. Second, Kaspa needs proof verification at L1. The chain should not compute the entire Pack itself. Solvers should aggregate encrypted intendos off-chain, search for a valid internally satisfied subset, and submit a compact proof that says: these commitments are valid, thresholds are met, signatures are authorized, and the execution can trigger. L1 verifies the proof and enforces settlement. Third, Kaspa needs atomic execution paths. A Hunt cannot execute partially. If 1,000 users commit liquidity, either the qualifying subset moves together or nothing happens. That demands deterministic ordering, composable transaction bundles, congestion-safe inclusion, and mechanisms that prevent one party from being exposed before the rest execute. Fourth, it needs privacy-compatible infrastructure. Opaque accumulation means the chain cannot leak how close a Pack is to snapping. The hidden data likely lives off-chain using encryption, threshold cryptography, ZK proofs, or MPC-style coordination, but Kaspa must support the final proof and settlement interface. Finally, it needs vProgs or a similar verifiable execution layer. Staghunt is too complex for raw L1 scripting alone. Kaspa provides the clock, ordering, and final court. vProgs provide the programmable coordination logic. Solvers provide computation. Wallets provide usable intent signing. Without all four, Staghunt remains theory. With them, Kaspa becomes a real-time coordination substrate.

Petit tour d’horizon des avancées en cours sur Kaspa en ce moment 🔥 L’équipe core est discrète, mais il se passe pas mal de choses intéressantes ces derniers jours sur GitHub. 🔹 SilverScript prend de la vitesse C’est le langage haut niveau qui va permettre de créer des covenants beaucoup plus facilement. Michael Sutton et l’équipe poussent régulièrement des améliorations : meilleur debugger, gestion des tuples, sanity checks, etc. En clair : au lieu d’écrire du code ultra-technique proche de la machine, on va pouvoir écrire des contrats plus lisibles, presque comme dans un langage moderne. Et avec l’IA, même les non-devs pourront bientôt décrire ce qu’ils veulent (« je veux un contrat qui libère 10 % tous les 3 mois ») et obtenir le code prêt à l’emploi. 🔹 Toccata avance en silence Michael Sutton continue de merger des commits sur la branche toccata dans rusty-kaspa. On parle ici de l’activation des covenants natifs L1, du script engine et des préparatifs pour rendre tout ça opérationnel. C’est du travail de fond, mais on sent que les pièces du puzzle se mettent en place. 🔹 Le pivot vers l’usage réel Après le post de Yonatan qui appelait clairement à passer de la « tech pure » aux usages concrets, l’écosystème commence à bouger dans cette direction. C’est exactement l’esprit derrière les prototypes KasVault (Dead Man Switch, Time-Lock, libération progressive, etc.) : transformer la puissance des covenants en outils simples et utiles pour le quotidien. En résumé, on est dans une phase très saine : la tech continue de progresser sérieusement, et la communauté commence à se concentrer sur ce qui va vraiment faire la différence à long terme : l’usage concret. C’est motivant de voir que tout s’aligne dans la même direction. Vous suivez aussi l’activité GitHub ou vous préférez attendre les annonces officielles ? Quel sujet vous excite le plus en ce moment ? Repo SilverScript : github.com/kaspanet/silve… $KAS #Kaspa #SilverScript #Toccata

Sure tho I consider based apps a natural extension and usage of (what you called pure) covenants: if you impl covenants seriously rather than thru op_cat workarounds, you unlock their programmability potential by extending the txn commitment scheme to allow the covenants to govern based logic. This extension is straightforward, requires no research / theoretical novelty, and is highly useful even if it's the end form of programmability on the layer (ie no further syncompo/vprogs solutions ever develop). --- @KaspaSilver There's nothing wrong with implementing an EVM L2 as an interim solution, but this requires an interim agenda. If in contrast a project aims to become the main gateway for builders on our money network, then our hard-fought efforts - and the prices we paid - for decentralized fairlaunch go to waste. Such a takeover is far from inevitable, and fwiw I know of no other crypto project that had to cope with independent L2 attempts that early in its growth efforts (to be clear I never attribute to malice that!). To spell it out further: If an L2 has an interim agenda, or at least focuses on its own bizdev rather than general builder devrel -- ie, it uses L2 tech as a enabler rather than as an value prop -- then the risk of fragmentation is restricted to liquidity and standards, which is tolerable and solvable down the road. I wouldnt endorse it but I would get it, and I'd respect those who dont give an f about my endorsement