Red Panda Invests

@StonkChris I missed your VIVO post, but found the stock elsewhere. I am so very very bullish on it.

$VIVO was another small-cap AI data center gem I found and alerted in my group back in the $2 range before this massive breakout transpired 📈. These are the types of early-stage setups I’m constantly hunting for before they become obvious to everyone else.

@StonkChris I phrased it badly, I should have asked why those coins? There might be reasons i dont know. I do know Solana is gobbling up most agentic transactions as a chain, so that is my main crypto (non BTC) holding.

@RedPandaInvests well tell us the coins to buy then, what are you waiting on

This theme of AI/agent-related coins eventually going vertical honestly feels like one of the more obvious narratives crypto will have had in quite some time in hindsight, I must admit. I’d probably throw $VIRTUAL into that group as well. Remember what Brian Armstrong (CEO of $COIN) said: "AI agents can’t open a bank account, but they can open a crypto wallet." Whether that actually becomes reality at scale remains to be seen, but you can definitely understand why capital is starting to rotate into the theme.

@MitchMartan98 Thanks for your answer. I'm much more bullish on SOL, and centralisation isn't a big problem imo. Let's see who is right in 5 years.

@RedPandaInvests Yes. $SOL becoming more and more centralized.

One of the simplest yet best explanations on why to be long $ETH People still don’t understand where it fits into the new AI world. $ETH / $BMNR are going to outperform drastically over the next 5-10 years. A supercycle if you will. Not to mention theres literally no better time to be accumulating it than right now. Sentiment is awful, no one wants to own it, and they almost have an emotional hatred towards it while not understanding the bigger picture. Bullish Ethereum.

@TheStockerMan Big holding of mine but I don't want buybacks. I want aggressive spending into scaling Maestro out and on boarding new clients. Do it fast. They should spend every penny on that to get ahead whilst they still can.

The next $PATH catalyst is this week. Looking at this chart, the disconnect is pretty wild. Revenue is at a record high, up roughly 80% over the last 4 years, while the stock price has completely collapsed from its highs. The part I’m watching closely is the buyback. If $PATH is going to keep buying back stock, I want to see management be aggressive while the stock is still being priced like the business is broken. Because the actual business is not showing that: - Operating income has flipped positive - Revenue is still growing - ARR continues to move higher - The balance sheet gives them room to repurchase shares - AI could actually make $PATH more important, not less important For me, this week is simple: Show accelerating revenue, prove Maestro and agentic automation is gaining traction, keep operating leverage intact, and use the buyback while the stock is still cheap.

@DividendTalks I own in size order - $MELI $DUOL $NOW $NU $SAP only other one I'd consider is $SPGI. I did own some $GRAB but sold it

Stocks Near 52 Week Lows: MercadoLibre $MELI - $1,600 Fair Isaac $FICO - $1,200 Meta $META - $605 Mastercard $MA - $495 Moody’s $MCO - $445 S&P Global $SPGI - $415 Ferrari $RACE - $345 Intuit $INTU - $320 Home Depot $HD - $310 McDonald’s $MCD - $280 Adobe $ADBE - $245 Automatic Data Processing $ADP - $225 Lowe’s $LOW - $215 T-Mobile US $TMUS - $190 Salesforce $CRM - $180 Accenture $ACN - $180 SAP $SAP - $175 Equifax $EFX - $165 Booking $BKNG - $160 Waste Connections $WCN - $155 Procter & Gamble $PG - $145 American Water Works $AWK - $125 Lululemon $LULU - $125 Duolingo $DUOL - $105 Shopify $SHOP - $100 Kimberly-Clark $KMB - $100 ServiceNow $NOW - $100 Sea Limited $SE - $87 Abbott Laboratories $ABT - $87 Zoetis $ZTS - $80 Medtronic $MDT - $78 Wells Fargo $WFC - $76 Uber $UBER - $72 Fiserv $FISV - $57 Novo Nordisk $NVO - $44 Nike $NKE - $44 General Mills $GIS - $33 Chipotle Mexican Grill $CMG - $32 VICI Properties $VICI - $28 Toast $TOST - $23 Figma $FIG - $22 The Trade Desk $TTD - $22 Kenvue $KVUE - $17 NU Holdings $NU - $12 Grab $GRAB - $4 Buying any?

@SergeyCYW Thoughts on $BRUN?

Neo-Cloud Growth Is Exploding. Can It Sustain? AI infrastructure demand is real. Neo-clouds are selling access to the bottleneck: usable compute, GPUs, power, cooling, networking, and deployment speed. But the market has already priced it in. Valuations have moved. Expectations are high. Capital needs are massive. Shareholder dilution risk is not small. Now the sector needs to prove economics. $NBIS — Nebius NTM revenue growth estimate: +489%. Nebius is the vertically integrated AI cloud bet. Contracted power passed 3.5 GW in Q1, with more than 75% owned. The Meta deal is the headline: $27B over five years, split between dedicated compute and optional capacity. NVIDIA’s $2B equity investment also improves supply visibility around GB300 and Vera Rubin. Main risk: execution at hyperscale speed. $IREN — IREN NTM revenue growth estimate: +235%. IREN is the power-to-GPU execution bet. Secured power reached 5 GW, and its 2026 plan targets 480 MW of AI Cloud capacity, 150,000 GPUs, and $3.7B of ARR. Microsoft is the near-term anchor, while NVIDIA’s potential $2.1B investment adds validation. Demand is not the issue. Construction, delivery, financing, and customer concentration are. $WULF — TeraWulf NTM revenue growth estimate: +234%. WULF is becoming a power-led HPC infrastructure company. Lake Mariner has 60 MW of critical IT capacity live and generating revenue. Core42 is fully in service, while Fluidstack and Google support future buildings. Management’s model is “contract first, deploy capital second.” The risk is simple: power-backed sites must convert into contracted cash flow on time. $CRWV — CoreWeave NTM revenue growth estimate: +151%. CoreWeave is the scaled public neo-cloud. It passed 1 GW of active power and has more than 3.5 GW contracted. Backlog reached $99.4B, with 36% expected within 24 months. Ten customers now have commitments of at least $1B each. The bull case is scale plus funding access. The bear case is debt, CapEx, delivery delays, and margin pressure. $WYFI — White Fiber NTM revenue growth estimate: +87%. WYFI is the retrofit-speed bet. NC1 in North Carolina is the key proof point: Duke Energy delivered 54 gross MW, supporting 40 MW of IT load for Nscale. MTL-3 was converted into a Tier III data center in roughly six months. Pipeline includes 50,000+ GPU opportunities. The next test is repeatability: new sites, project financing, and customer-backed demand. $CIFR — Cipher Digital NTM revenue growth estimate: +79%. Cipher is becoming a hyperscale data-center landlord. It has 907 MW of operating and contracted capacity, three signed campus leases, and about $11.4B of contracted revenue across 10-15 year base terms. Barber Lake is 99% equipment-secured. Black Pearl financing is in place. Risk sits in construction, tenant concentration, ERCOT approvals, and leverage. $APLD — Applied Digital NTM revenue growth estimate: +53%. Applied Digital is the liquid-cooled AI data-center developer. PF1 is already operating for CoreWeave, while PF2 and Delta Forge expand the buildout. The PF2 SPV received an A3 investment-grade rating after CoreWeave lease amendments. Cash ended near $2.1B against $2.7B of debt. Upside needs timely leases, power access, permits, and clean execution.

@DeepValueBagger I trimmed my ALAB at $200, had a limit order to buy back in at 175. Mistake. At least I still hold the majority.

The hardest thing about selling is knowing when to buy back in. I noticed there were some $NBIS holders that sold in the $200 range or even lower. Now they are watching $NBIS hitting $224, about 10-20% missed gains. I doubt those people ever buy back at the higher price. The higher the price goes, the harder it is to come back. Hence people tend to find the next hot stock. This is one of the most underrated thing about psychology of selling that no one talks about. If you experience it, you know what I mean. Long term, despite it looks inefficient, wins over the long run.

@2147mill No it doesn't make sense. You're taking 65%+ US and making it 80% or more. 20% non US isn't much of a hedge - if the US underperforms so will you heavily, and if you think US does outperform then why not just go 100% US?

This is always an interesting discussion: I hold both VWRP and VUAG. VWRP: Vanguard FTSE All World. 6,000+ companies. Global diversification. VUAG: Vanguard S&P 500. 500 US companies. Pure American growth. The obvious criticism: VWRP already holds ~65% US stocks. So yes. There's overlap. But here's the argument for holding both: → You genuinely believe US markets outperform long term → VUAG deliberately overweights that conviction → VWRP gives you the global hedge underneath → Together they give you tilted US exposure with global protection Is it doubling up? Technically yes. Is it a deliberate overweight in the world's strongest economy? Also yes. I'm torn on whether to consolidate into VWRP only. My VUAG position is up more than VWRP so it's certainly not a bad hold.. Investors who hold both: what's your thinking? Investors who consolidated: do you regret it?

@MitchMartan98 $ETH has a big problem... it isn't anywhere near as good as $SOL. SOL is faster, cheaper, reliable. AI Agents are not using ETH, they are using SOL wallets. ETH will probably make a new high at some point, because liquidity floats all boats. But at some point SOL will overtake.

Who’s genuinely bearish $ETH / $BMNR at these levels? Would love to see why in the comments because it just doesn’t make sense imo.

@CKCapitalxx I understand but Price/Revenue is not the multiple to use. You need to model future P/FCF. If FCF stays negative, you have no intrinsitc value - it can bring in all the money in the world, but if none is left over its not giving back to shareholders

Let me show you the path to $500 billion for $NBIS. And I think it is more realistic than most people realize. This would be a 10x from here. Start with where they are today. $55 billion market cap. 684% revenue growth last quarter. $7 to $9 billion ARR guidance for 2026. Microsoft. Meta. $NVDA as a strategic investor. 16 owned data centers globally. $3.5 billion in cash on the balance sheet. Now here is what makes this different from every other AI cloud company. $NBIS does not rent infrastructure. They own it. The land. The power contracts. The buildings. The GPU clusters. Every dollar of revenue flows through assets they physically control. That ownership model is what drives the path to $500 billion because owned infrastructure scales with compounding margins not compressing ones. The buildout is accelerating in real time. Missouri campus under construction. Pennsylvania 1.2 gigawatt AI factory just announced. Manufacturing running globally. Every government and enterprise that needs sovereign AI compute outside of AWS and Azure control comes here first. Now run the math. $NVDA generates $130 billion in annual revenue today at a $3 trillion market cap. That is roughly 23x revenue. $NBIS at $7 to $9 billion ARR growing 684% is the infrastructure layer that runs what $NVDA makes. At $25 billion in revenue by 2028 and 20x that is a $500 billion market cap. That requires roughly 3x revenue growth from 2026 guidance. A company growing 684% year over year needs 3x growth over two years to hit $500 billion. The assets are already being built. The customers are already signed. The sovereign AI tailwind is a decade long story. $55 billion today. $500 billion is the destination.

@ariaradnia I would not own OpenAI. I don't think they survive the next decade. Anthropic will be a multi trillion dollar company in the next few years.

If you HAD to choose one Which IPO would you rather buy: Anthropic or OpenAI?

@2147mill Good stocks, not all great entries. But better late than never with NBIS I guess. It is one of the must own stocks I think. Look at $VIVO and $BRUN if you like $NBIS.

Bidding.

@mvcinvesting I wonder - did you look at how insanely undervalued $VIVO is, and how much potential it has? If you did, then it could be $VIVO

I finally started a new AI-related position. For a long time, I’ve been looking for a small-cap stock with hidden AI exposure that wasn’t already crowded or expensive. Article coming soon.

@Scan_Edge_AI @antibearthesis Perfect answer ScanEdge

If I had to bet everything on one stock, my answer is: I wouldn’t. A 10x bet is fun to talk about, but “bet everything” is how people turn one wrong thesis into a reset button. I’d rather own a basket of companies with 10x potential than pretend I know which single one survives the next decade perfectly.

If you had to bet everything on ONE stock to 10x in the next 10 years, what would it be?

@Mikey64532 @2147mill I do have some SpaceX exposure. There are some funds with it (like Scottish Mortgage) and other companies with large SpaceX holdings. I just wouldn't buy a space fund that didn't include it to a high extent somehow

@RedPandaInvests @2147mill Good luck buying SpaceX stock...

VanEck Space Innovators ($JEDG) quietly having a huge run. +13% this week alone. This ETF gives exposure to companies involved in: • satellites • rocket systems • defence tech • space infrastructure • communications Holdings include names linked to the future of: SpaceX supply chains, military tech, AI infrastructure, satellite internet, and global defence spending. People think “space investing” means sci-fi. Reality is… space is becoming infrastructure. Navigation. Defence. Internet. Surveillance. AI. This sector is only getting bigger over the next decade in my opinion.

My thoughts on $DLO I bought more at $11.

@2147mill "Names link to" is not as good as buying the actual name. If I'm buying a space fund it damn well better own some SpaceX

@RedPandaInvests Now read it again