Zak Paine

30.5K posts

Zak Paine banner
Zak Paine

Zak Paine

@RedPill78

Citizen Journalist, @Badlandsmedia_ host - covering politics, public corruption & world events on Red Pill News 5 DAYS A WEEK! Tips: [email protected]

Florida, USA Katılım Nisan 2010
6.2K Takip Edilen118.2K Takipçiler
Zak Paine
Zak Paine@RedPill78·
@SarahisCensored The fact that they’re comfortable reaching out directly in an attempt to buy you, without fear, leads me to believe this has worked for them in the past. Disgusting.
English
1
3
21
351
Zak Paine retweetledi
Sarah Fields
Sarah Fields@SarahisCensored·
Update on my exclusive regarding the assistant principal of Nichols Intermediate School, who is married to a registered child predator in Jacksonville, TX: They are so desperate to silence me that they offered me money to take my post down.
English
274
4K
10.8K
82K
Zak Paine retweetledi
Peter St Onge, Ph.D.
Peter St Onge, Ph.D.@profstonge·
Major study finds voters have statistically zero influence on Congress. In case you’re curious why the 80% issues don’t pass, from crime to open borders to secure elections.
English
491
3K
9.5K
688.1K
Zak Paine retweetledi
Aarvoll
Aarvoll@Aarvoll_·
Help us defeat the NAACP:
English
608
2.6K
16.4K
717.2K
Zak Paine retweetledi
Werkin
Werkin@StayWerkin·
Danny Duncan shares an emotional full-circle moment after bailing Hayden out of jail, finding him locked up again on his 21st birthday while struggling with addiction, then helping him get into rehab where he later reached 6 months clean ❤️🙏
English
166
428
29.6K
1.4M
Zak Paine retweetledi
tetsuo
tetsuo@tetsuoai·
Henry Nowak was 18 years old. A first year accountancy and finance student at the University of Southampton, walking home from a night out with his football team on December 3rd, 2025. On Belmont Road he was met by a 23 year old named Vickrum Digwa, carrying a 21cm ceremonial blade across his chest. Digwa stabbed him four times. One wound went eight centimeters into his lung. Henry climbed over a fence trying to escape. There was already a blood trail on the street behind him. When police arrived, Digwa told them he had been racially abused. Henry told them he had been stabbed. He told them he could not breathe. The officer told Henry he was under arrest on suspicion of assault. Henry repeated that he had been stabbed. A voice on the body cam replied, "I don't think you have, mate." Henry drowned in his own blood on Belmont Road in handcuffs. By the time CPR began his lungs were already full. A doctor flew in by helicopter. There was nothing left to do. The knife was at the killer's mother's house. She had walked it home. Henry's phone, the one he had filmed the whole encounter on, was in Digwa's pocket. All of this came out in Southampton Crown Court last week. The bodycam was played to the jury. This is sworn testimony in a live murder trial. A teenager was killed by a man who then told the police the teenager was the racist. The police arrested the boy who was bleeding out instead of the man who had been carrying the blade. Whatever you believe about institutions, that is what happened on that street. Henry Nowak. Remember the name.
tetsuo tweet media
English
669
6.1K
20.7K
441.6K
Gregory K Bovino
Gregory K Bovino@GregoryKBovino·
Yep, a 100 million. Change my mind. We’re dodging uninsured motorists like locusts, white-knuckling the wheel, praying we survive every drive, while they import third-world driving habits that kill Americans. Mass deportations aren’t extreme, they’re basic survival…
Ben Bergquam - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News@BenBergquam

Crazy scene on our Florida 287(g) Highway Patrol / ICE operation. As we’re picking up one illegal another illegal crashes right next to us. The truth is most Americans can’t comprehend how many illegals are in our country. Thank God, ICE and America First states like Florida are fighting to fix it! Law & Border @RealAmVoice @DHSgov @FHPPalmBeach

English
404
4.6K
20.2K
307.1K
Zak Paine retweetledi
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
Evidence Exonerating "Chud the Builder" discovered: (by friend of family) Screenshots showing premeditation by Joshua Luvv to fight Dalton to launch his "twitch streaming." Joshua Fox / Joshua Luvv Facebook comments from Jan 10, 2026 (18 weeks before the Eatherly incident) Direct quotes from Fox's own account, in a thread with users "Kudo Menace" and "Bishop Reemo Yeezy": • Fox: "I been hopping to run into the chud mf but he don't be on this side of town. But outside of him ima call them a bitch and go about my day 😂😂😂" • Kudo Menace (responding): "chud just trolling us for a reaction. Don't let him bother you either. I don't think he's really racist anyway. Just click bait." • Fox: "trying to get some traction on my end so when I start my twitch I got a little fan base 😂😂😂" • Fox: "oh he don't bother me I just wanna fight 😂😂😂" • Bishop Reemo Yeezy: "on the internet correct. In person? Neutralizing the threat" (followed by a "NO PROBLEM…" meme image) What this establishes: • Fox publicly stated his intent to physically seek out "the chud" months before the incident • Even his own friend characterized the target as "just click bait" and "not really racist" • Fox's stated motivation was Twitch traction and a fan base, not a response to any actual harm • Fox explicitly said "I just wanna fight" • This is documented premeditation. The encounter at the Montgomery County Courthouse was not a chance escalation. It was the outcome Fox had been openly telling people he wanted.
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder' tweet mediaαΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder' tweet media
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'@ArchetypeTheory

Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.

English
160
904
4.3K
398.9K
Zak Paine retweetledi
Weekend at Biden's
Weekend at Biden's@Weekend_Bidens·
Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery. Karen Bass is best for Los Angeles.
English
69
927
3K
120.7K
Zak Paine retweetledi
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
Andrew Branca Show tweet media
English
834
1.4K
10.5K
3M