@annaroseridgway What's to stop keeping low skill employees in subsidiary companies?
English
Oswaldo Mobray
1.2K posts
Say you are an extremely skilled person who is one of the only people in the world who can do what you do - so you earn a lot of money.
(Let’s use a quant researcher for example…)
🇬🇧: capped at around £250k - after tax this is around £150k
🇺🇸 (Florida e.g.): could make around $1m - after tax this is around £700k
Why would any highly skilled person work in the UK?!?
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK
🚨 NEW: 65% of Brits support the Green Party's policy of capping CEO pay at ten times the pay of the lowest paid employee
English
I just won this game🤩
Can you see what's coming after Kxf7? 🤔
English
Your statement is true if goods & services output doesn’t rise dramatically due to AI/robots, but false if it does.
In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff.
If AI/robots massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. Prices are simply the ratio of goods & services output to number of dollars.
English
If everyone gets a million dollars.
No one has a million dollars.
I'm not sure why no one understands this.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
Oswaldo Mobray retweetledi
@elonmusk If robots produce abundance, we will not need high income. Non-scarcity makes things cheap.
English
@Sean46464708 @StefanMolyneux But maybe not a "LITTLE CHILD"
English
@StefanMolyneux He’s about my age so about 15 here. That’s considered a child.
English
When I was a kid, I remember seeing young women screaming and fainting over The Beatles, and thinking that they were hysterical and insane.
But at least the The Beatles weren't LITTLE CHILDREN.
Old Internet@OldInternetFeel
Justin Bieber in 2010
English
@ImShahinyan Na3!
...Kd3 Qe3# (nice)
...f2 Bg4#
...Ke2 Qe1#
Indonesia
@SigmaSyndikate @fbjornz @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics Monty Hall problem only produces better odds because you KNOW the host only reveals duds
Possibility 1: you have it
Possibility 2: you don't have it, host reveals dud
Possibility 3: you don't have it, host reveals dud
English
@SigmaSyndikate @fbjornz @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics It would not. The whole point of host knowledge is he ALWAYS reveals a dud, making switching have a 2/3 victory.
If he only HAPPENS to reveal a dud, there is no benefit to switching.
Possibility 1: you have it
Possibility 2: host reveals it
Possibility 3: you should switch
English
This question must be filtering for "people who are aware of the Monty hall problem but don't understand it"?
Mercurius@MercuriusFilius
How would you answer this common Goldman Sachs interview question?
English
@fbjornz @SigmaSyndikate @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics Think about it this way. In 1000 times:
1 time you have the letter and shouldn't switch
998 times the host accidentally reveals the letter
1 time you should switch
English
@fbjornz @SigmaSyndikate @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics There's still no benefit to switching without the host having knowledge
Only when the host knowingly reveals bad doors does switching become advantageous
English
@hahahahaahahhh @chris_mcsweeny @Peperino_72 @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics No. If things are eliminated randomly, you're choosing between yours (1%) or another (1%).
Only with host knowledge does it become yours (1%) vs. all the other options (99%)
English
@chris_mcsweeny @Peperino_72 @dmesg @RedRockHangman @PlusEVAnalytics No, that's not ignored.
It's exactly the point that we're in this unlikely situation, however unlikely it was to be random, that 98 boxes from the other pile happen to be eliminated, giving you an advantage.
In OP, we're already in the 67% of cases where he reveals a rejection
English
English
@dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics So if there’s 100 doors and he randomly opens 98 revealing a goat every time it won’t matter whether I switch or not because it’s fifty-fifty?
English
@hahahahaahahhh @dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics It still doesn't matter without knowledge
With knowledge, 99%
Without knowledge, 50%
English
@dmesg @PlusEVAnalytics This doesn't matter.
Let's say there are 100 letters, the winner is more likely to be in the pile of 99 unpicked letters, yes?
Then the interviewer, choosing without knowledge, happens to eliminate 98 in that pile (unlikely but this is where we are). Now which do you choose?
English
@hayscountyHT @sadcox @jmorizwagner @KaleQuiz @3YearLetterman @RepSwalwell @JeffreyToobin @Zoom @repweiner @OnlyFansSupport @BrettFavre @WelfarePetition @BillClinton @CigarAficMag @Whitesnake Dog you're getting trolled
English
@sadcox @jmorizwagner @KaleQuiz @3YearLetterman @RepSwalwell @JeffreyToobin @Zoom @repweiner @OnlyFansSupport @BrettFavre @WelfarePetition @BillClinton @CigarAficMag @Whitesnake Elementary school civics
English
🚨 🚨 BRAKING 🚨 🚨
Eric Swalwell has just announced that he has been impeached (Latin for “terminated”) from the Senate. This is a shameful day for our nation when a Senator gets mistreated like this. Here is why he must stay in office
1. There is literally no non-hearsay evidence of the allegations
2. His HIPPA rights have been violated by news stories made without his consent
3. He has total diplomatic immunity
We can only hope that President Trump vetoes this
English
It would be interesting to follow up on this 6, 9, and 12 months later. Do they upkeep the yard?
English
@lporiginalg What the student wrote is the only correct answer to the question as written.
The teacher's answer is also objectively wrong because the pieces are not equal. Diego's has far more edge, which some people like.
Teachers answer also presumes drawings to scale.
English
Poorly formed questions like this have no wrong answers.
English
@DocLanceP @chesscom There are over a dozen possible stalemates after Kh7
English
