Kaspaas

@RiseAgainstEvil They stood on her face while doing it to her. Testimony from the Bloed sisters confirm that they scraped buckets full of skin from the bathtub of the boy.

In October 2011, in Walkerville, Johannesburg, three monsters, including the family gardener Patrick Petrus Radebe (24), Sipho Mbele (21), and David Motaung (20) broke into the Viana family home. They beat Tony Viana (53) with a golf club and hacked at him with a panga (machete). They raped his wife Geraldine (43) before shooting her dead. Then they turned on 12-year-old Amaro. They gagged him, tied him up, dragged him to the bathroom, turned on the boiling hot water, and forced him face-down into the scalding bath to drown him alive in agony. They even killed the family dog. These animals later pleaded guilty in court, and laughed as they were led back to their cells.

@VersterZelda Great song! So many memories 😊

Baby, I can drive myself! youtu.be/xuZA6qiJVfU?si…

@Jewels_MsJay @XFreeze China is a parasite. They decimated the Cape textile industry and they continue to kill of market sectors in various countries. Watch the motor industry collapsing next.

@XFreeze Black people where never involved then and there is a small number now. South Africa will be just fine. No amount of propaganda and lies will change that. China is a friend to South Africa.

South Africa’s economic timeline is the craziest self-sabotage I’ve ever seen… They were hitting 8% GDP growth while sanctioned by the entire world Then sanctions lifted → they passed 140+ race-based laws and quotas… and completely nuked their own economy Now they’re sitting at 32% unemployment, zero investment, and a massive brain drain Turns out when you criminalize meritocracy to force equal outcomes, you just destroy whatever was actually working No companies want to invest. Chinese and Korean firms have already left They nuked their own economy by choosing racist laws over meritocracy Their game plan: legislate prosperity by making everyone equally poor It’s straight-up economic suicide dressed up as justice

@Mufasa0062 And just like that....he becomes a marter.

Like my prediction, Malema was sentenced to 5 years direct imprisonment. Plus fined.

@mednation @angertab @khamenei_ir He very specifically called Himself God.

@RegteKaspaas @angertab @khamenei_ir Did he ever claim to be God? When the crowd called him a prophet, did he deny it and say, “No, I am not a prophet”?

Prophet #Jesus (pbuh) called people to the path of God & warned against evil & oppression. Immoral, tyrannical powers sought to kill that divine messenger. Lustful, warmongering people couldn’t tolerate the religion of God, His Prophet, and the followers of His path. Jan. 2, 1995

@mednation @angertab @khamenei_ir That's what the crowds said....just like you are now part of the crowd....think about that. Jesus however, had a very opinion about Himself....and He never called Himself a prophet.

@angertab @khamenei_ir That’s not what the bible said Matthew 21:11: Crowds declare Jesus as "the prophet from Nazareth". John 6:14: People say, "Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world" after seeing signs. Luke 7:16: People remark that "a great prophet has arisen among us".

@A_S_O_13 @Nicole_Barlow1 @AardvarkBloody Exactly! Sometimes the conspiracies are just too much.

@Nicole_Barlow1 @AardvarkBloody The US is securing the world’s energy supply.

People who believe they're Jesus are given heavy doses of anti-psychotic drugs. People who support this are beyond help.

@pookiepolls @collen_sambo2 Of course it goes without saying that government is outperforming the private sector by leaps and bounds in progress. I think not....

@collen_sambo2 So, what business is the private sector to you? Do you know what PRIVATE means?

In South Africa we have more unqualified people in the private sector occupying higher positions and most if not all are white people. Government employees are highly qualified and majority are Africans.

@Zintathu_L @collen_sambo2 @D_Molatoli U huh....and that's why we are showing so much progress in Government, né?

@collen_sambo2 @D_Molatoli Many are specialists in their field

🇿🇦What is truly mind-blowing about this 1930's Stalinist style show trial is how the SA regime is milking it for all its worth. The accused have been imprisoned since 2002, yet the end of the trial is nowhere in sight... The state already closed its case in 2007, yet the ANC-controlled judiciary seems determined to deny justice to the accused by delaying the trial for as long as possible, ostensibly for propaganda purposes. Approximately 50 Boer political prisoners are currently being held captive in South African prisons under inhumane circumstances. The Boeremag trial is still ongoing since 2002. Ten of the accused in the Boeremag trial are repeatedly refused bail, still in incarceration, and still being detained for more than 20 years. There are many White political prisoners who are rotting in jail in South Africa, never to see the light of day again. WHERE IS THE WORLD for these men? Why is there no sanctions and international media to condemn the actions of these ANC terrorists? These same organisations couldn't contain themselves during Apartheid - every small incident blown totally out of proportion - all to vilify and demonise the Whites of South Africa. Yet here is the BIGGEST human rights infringement ever in South African history and not a peep from any of these bleeding heart organisations. Where is Amnesty International? Where are the UN's Human Rights committees to investigate?

@Joannacaroll007 @nettermike @realDonaldTrump Sounds you're talking about Killary?

@realDonaldTrump and his pal at the National Enquirer, David Pecker, used the infamous rag to benefit Trump’s 2016 campaign. The corruption was staggering even for the tabloid. The “catch and kill” scheme used by Pecker kept the true sleaziness of Trump hidden from voters. And here we are. Ugh!

In January 1976, Carol Burnett went out for a quiet dinner in Georgetown, Washington, D.C. She shared a few glasses of wine with her husband and friends, laughed, chatted, and even offered tastes of her dessert to nearby diners—a small, generous moment. On her way out, she was briefly introduced to Henry Kissinger. They exchanged a few polite words, and the evening ended without incident. That was all that happened. But weeks later, millions of Americans read a very different version. The National Enquirer published a short story portraying Burnett as loud, intoxicated, and disruptive. It claimed she had argued with Kissinger, spilled wine on another guest, and laughed it off. The account was brief—but entirely fabricated. What readers didn’t know was that the paper’s own source had never described anything like that. In fact, he had explicitly said she wasn’t drunk. Attempts to verify the story turned up nothing. Still, the tabloid ran it. When Burnett saw the article, it hit deeply. Both of her parents had struggled with alcoholism, and she had long spoken openly about it—not for sympathy, but to help others. Now, a false story had publicly tied her to something she had spent years addressing with honesty and care. The impact was immediate. Strangers began treating her differently. Comments were made. Assumptions spread. A story that wasn’t true had taken on a life of its own. When she consulted her lawyers, they warned her: taking on a publication like the Enquirer would be costly, difficult, and likely unsuccessful. The paper had a reputation for outlasting anyone who challenged it. She chose to move forward anyway. In court, the details emerged piece by piece—the unreliable sourcing, the lack of verification, the decision to publish regardless. After hours of deliberation, the jury reached its conclusion: the tabloid had acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The verdict came in 1981. Burnett was awarded damages, marking a rare and significant win in a case against a major tabloid. Though the final settlement changed over time, the impact of the decision didn’t. For many, it signaled something important—that even public figures have a right to defend the truth about themselves. Burnett later made it clear that the case was never about money. What mattered to her was something more lasting: how her story would be remembered. Because once something is printed, it doesn’t just disappear. It lingers—in records, in archives, in memory. She wasn’t just challenging a lie in the present. She was protecting the truth for the future.

@boredemployee2 @michaelnp1701 @deaflibertarian Shame....you must not know your history very well then? Claimed age without proof is nothing but wishful thinking.

@michaelnp1701 @deaflibertarian Meh, Christianity is only about 2000 years old…

An agent came to our school once to talk about counterfeit money. He brought some to show us. During the talk, someone asked how he could spot fake bills when there are so many different ways to counterfeit them. He said something I’ve never forgotten and still apply that lesson to my life: "If you study and truly understand the real thing, you’ll always recognize what isn’t.”

@jfjoubert This earned my follow 😉

It was in Johannesburg, in the late eighties, when a man discovered that certain arguments, once entered into, have a way of concluding themselves rather more decisively than intended. He was stabbed several times on a Friday night, which is a night not generally associated with moderation. An ambulance was called, and he was taken off with due urgency, "dying" along the way. At the morgue he was received with the full attention of official procedure. A body bag was produced, a tag attached, and a number assigned. His name and identity number were recorded in a manner both precise and comforting, suggesting that whatever else might be uncertain in life, one’s details would at least be in order in death. He was not alone for long. Another gentleman, of roughly the same age and build, arrived shortly thereafter, having been similarly persuaded of the dangers of disagreement. Space was found for him nearby, and the night staff, being practical men, arranged matters as best they could under the circumstances. From there, the machinery of justice took over. Statements were gathered, a suspect was apprehended, and the case made its steady way to the Johannesburg High Court. The accused was tried and, on the strength of the evidence, found guilty of murder. The deceased, as far as anyone could tell, had remained commendably dead throughout. When the time came for sentencing, the courtroom settled into that particular silence reserved for finalities. It is a silence that suggests the matter is now beyond argument. At which point a man in the gallery stood up. “My Lord,” he said, “I am the deceased.” This was not the sort of contribution ordinarily anticipated at that stage of proceedings. There followed a pause of some length, during which the Court, the counsel, and the public each considered the possibility that they had misunderstood something fundamental. It emerged, after some difficulty, that the gentleman addressing the Court had indeed been the victim of the stabbing in question, and had every intention of continuing to live despite the evidence to the contrary. The difficulty, as it then presented itself, was that there remained a body. It had been examined, recorded, and relied upon. It was, in every official sense, dead. It simply appeared to be the wrong man. The explanation, when it came, was a modest one. During the night in question, the deceased - who was not, as it turned out, entirely deceased - had regained consciousness inside his body bag. Finding the arrangement unsuitable, he unzipped it and removed himself from the premises with a degree of urgency. Sometime later, a member of staff, noticing an empty bag and a body lying conveniently beside it, concluded that the situation required correction. The body was placed into the bag, the tag remained as it was, and order, of a kind, was restored. Which is how it came to pass that a man was convicted of killing someone who had not died, while another, who had died quite properly, was mistaken for him. And that, in South Africa, is sometimes the difference between fact and paperwork.

@conroy_david @tmsilverman How would this happen? Exactly the way it did, slowly, quietly. Then small rising voices, support from community members like you, and then.....forced acceptance of every degenerate desire you can think of. That.....is how it happened.

@tmsilverman Oh please, among all the things that didn't happen this is the most didn't happen thing of all time. I have been teaching since the late 1990's and no way, no how would this happen without parents being in an uproar.

The first time I learned about homosexuality was in elementary school when a homosexual gym teacher forced all of the young children she had obtained access to to hear about her degenerate lifestyle and the ways she was obtaining children with her homosexual partner. This happened 25 years ago. Myself and all the other children should have had innocent childhoods where these predators didn’t have access to us. It’s even worse nowadays. It is so important to HOMESCHOOL YOUR CHILDREN.

@AlicePretorius4 @pookiepolls Of course.

@RegteKaspaas @pookiepolls Those particular graves?

On 27 March 1985, South Africa was struck by one of its worst civilian tragedies when a double-decker school bus carrying seventy-six learners from Hoërskool Vorentoe left the road and plunged into Westdene Dam in Johannesburg during the afternoon trip home. In the chaos that followed, bystanders rushed to help, repeatedly diving into the dark water to try to save the trapped children, while emergency teams worked under extremely difficult conditions. Despite every effort, forty-two learners died. The disaster shocked the entire country. Parents and families gathered at the dam as the rescue operation continued, clinging to hope that more children would be brought out alive. In the aftermath, questions were raised about the cause of the crash, the condition of the road, and the safety standards of learner transport, leading to renewed concern about the protection of schoolchildren on South African roads. More than four decades later, the Westdene Dam Disaster remains one of the saddest days in the country’s history. It is remembered not as a moment of political struggle, but as one of overwhelming national grief. Memorials and yearly commemorations continue to honour the children who lost their lives, keeping their memory alive and reinforcing the importance of preventing such a tragedy from ever happening again. RIP.

@ma68390 @CrownBishop73 @pookiepolls Why are black youths regularly destroying the graves of if the dead children. You know nothing.

@CrownBishop73 @pookiepolls 1. Are you ok upstairs?? 2. Innocent black children suffered too, their lives were just as precious and valuable. 3. Don’t do this in 2026. That’s lame.

@pookiepolls What is very interesting is the bus drivers history. Right after the accident joined the terrorist MK organization. Few years after that apartheid's fall got a cushy position at the municipal. Everything about him stinks to high heaven. Bus was mechanically in perfect condition.

@AlicePretorius4 @pookiepolls Nope. Graves are destroyed. There is footage of black youths engaging in this.

@pookiepolls Part of West Park Cemetery has been allocated to the little ones. I have not been there lately and hope it is still intact.

@NoFear_DogHere @bennyjohnson Your post, dragging Christian values into it.... totally unnecessary. This is not admonishing a fellow Brother. You are trying to score points.

So the "moral" of the story according to Benny is ... "Hey, I knew what I was doing back at Buzzfeed was wrong, but I did it anyway because a bunch of other people were too. I passed off plagiarized content as my own because we were just "content aggregators" "I've never admitted it was wrong or apologized for not displaying higher standards of journalistic integrity and ethical conduct." My only statement: "I should've sued them". THIS☝️is what faux-Christianity looks like folks. All optics, zero substance and NO attempt to live life by Christian principles.

I’m really glad you posted this. The biggest regret of my career was not fighting back against this op. In the early days, BuzzFeed was just an aggregator. The editors trained us how to drag and drop content from all over the internet. No regard for copyright or publishing standards. But things change fast. BuzzFeed leaders hung their massive editorial problems around my neck and fired me, all while mass deleting tens of thousands of articles from other BuzzFeed staff who faced zero consequences. They tried to kill my career. It was a lot for a 26 year old to handle. And I almost killed myself. But here’s why I’m writing this today… No matter what you’re facing, no matter how dark or unfair or insurmountable, God’s got you. God created you. God has a purpose for your life. Today, my media business is thriving. We have 17 million subscribers. I love my job and the company we’re building. And none of it would have happened without me being fired from BuzzFeed. Don’t ever give up.

@ShadowPrezElon @bennyjohnson @grok He wrote what he wrote. So what's your point?

@grok Benny Johnson was fired from BuzzFeed in 2014 for 41 instances of plagiarism. He faced additional plagiarism accusations from colleagues at Independent Journal Review in 2015, which contributed to his suspension and departure in 2017. In 2024, smaller creator Arynne Wexler publicly accused him of stealing her original 'Liberal Math' video, adding only a brief line and GIF, overlaying his watermark on her face, using her as the thumbnail, and posting it on his monetized YouTube channel before she could—without credit. She even made a satirical 'Benny Johnson Math' response video calling it outright theft for profit. Given these examples spanning a decade, does this demonstrate that Benny Johnson has continued a pattern of stealing and repurposing content from others, including small independent creators, long after leaving BuzzFeed?