Lady Charlie of Yorkshire👩🏻🇬🇧🌍🏳️‍🌈

45.4K posts

Lady Charlie of Yorkshire👩🏻🇬🇧🌍🏳️‍🌈 banner
Lady Charlie of Yorkshire👩🏻🇬🇧🌍🏳️‍🌈

Lady Charlie of Yorkshire👩🏻🇬🇧🌍🏳️‍🌈

@Remoner4Life

D.I.D Multiple Identities is not a curse it’s a gift. love family, and animals. Anti-Tory, Anti-Everything Reform, Anti-Yaxly-Lennon.

Yorkshire and The Humber Katılım Mart 2009
2.4K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Mambo Italiano
Mambo Italiano@mamboitaliano__·
Ladies, a genuine question out of pure curiosity: Why does First Lady Melania Trump never, ever wear stockings, on any occasion, in any weather, with any outfit? Really, never, never, never Does anyone know the reason? 🇺🇸👠
Mambo Italiano tweet media
English
4.7K
125
2K
1.8M
Leroy Jethro Gibbs
Leroy Jethro Gibbs@XHungry951·
@EricLDaugh We need to leave NATO and the UN. All they do is the same as somalians, steal our tax dollars.
English
12
0
7
3.6K
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY CRAP. President Trump just dropped a truth nuke on American "allies" and the UK "WE come to their rescue, but they will NEVER come to ours. And I want you to remember that we said this, they didn't come to our rescue! Now they all want to help when they're annihilated!" "The other side is annihilated. They said, 'we'd love to send ships.' They actually made a statement, a couple of them, that we want to get involved when the war's over..." "...No, it's supposed to get involved with the war's BEGINNING or even before it begins!" "We had the UK say that 'we'll send,' this is three weeks ago, 'we'll send our aircraft carriers,' which aren't the best aircraft carriers, by the way, they're toys compared to what we have, but 'we'll send our aircraft carrier when the war's over.'" 😭 "I said, oh, that's wonderful. Thank you very much. Don't bother. We don't need it. And we don't need it. We don't need them!"
English
1.9K
1.4K
6.2K
689.1K
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
I don't think people realize just how extraordinary what we're witnessing with Iran is. I was arguing with a dear journalist friend of mine yesterday who was telling me that Iran was winning, yes, but only on the strategic level, not tactically. The type of thing a skinny kid getting stuffed in lockers in highschool tells himself to make himself feel better: "These people will BEG to work for me in ten years. Everyone knows jocks peak in highschool. They'll literally beg." 😏 I think that's precisely wrong, and that's what makes the Iran war different. As of now, Iran is in fact holding its own tactically too. Think about other U.S. wars of aggression these past few decades. Take Vietnam, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Serbia, etc. (the list is unfortunately very long). The pattern was roughly always the same with an immense power differential between aggressor and victim. These wars were, by and large, imperial: the empire attempting to crush a much weaker people whose only realistic recourse was guerrilla resistance. And that is when they actually had the will to resist: some - like Libya - barely even bothered, just resigning themselves to their fate (despite being, at the time, the richest country in Africa). As spectators of these wars, if you had any moral sense, the dominant emotion was a kind of helpless disgust: you were watching a giant stomp through someone else's house. Sure, the U.S. actually lost many - if not most - of these wars, famously replacing the Taliban with the Taliban or being expelled with their tail between their legs from Vietnam, but the power differential was no less real for it. It's just that power doesn't always guarantee victory: sometimes the giant can't kill everyone, and eventually tires of trying. But the “victories” won this way were always pyrrhic at best: the people endured, yes, but what they were left with was a country in ashes that takes decades to rebuild. Meanwhile, in the grand scheme of things, the giant walked away with little more than a bruised ego. Iran is - remarkably - proving to be an entirely different beast: when others were merely surviving a giant, Iran appears to be able to compete with one. What just happened over the past 48 hours is the best illustration of this. You had the President of the United States issue a formal ultimatum: reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or we "obliterate" your power grid. Iran's response was essentially: we dare you, if you do this we'll make all your Gulf allies uninhabitable within a week. And, as we saw, Trump backed down: pretexting non-existent "VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS" with Iran, he said his ultimatum no-longer applied (or, rather, became 5 days). Adding he now envisaged the Strait of Hormuz being “jointly controlled by me and the Ayatollah.” To the amusement of Iran’s diplomacy (x.com/IraninSA/statu…). That, folks, is a textbook tactical victory. It is, remarkably, Iran demonstrating in this instance that it had escalation dominance over the United States of America. That is, the ability to credibly threaten consequences so severe that the US - for perhaps the first time since the Cold War - found it preferable to stand down. That's no skinny kid being locked in a locker dreaming of revenge fantasies. That's the kid grabbing the bully's wrist mid-shove and watching his face change. And it's not the only tactical victory in this war so far. Take the episode over the Israeli attack on Iran's South Pars gas facility. Iran had warned that if that happened U.S. allies in the region - including Israel - would face a symmetrical response. And they delivered: famously devastating Qatar's Ras Laffan facility - which produced roughly 20% of global LNG supply - and leading, according to Qatar themselves, to a $20 billion loss of annual revenue for the next 5 years (oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-…). Not only that but they also managed to hit Israel's Haifa refinery (aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/19…), one of the country's most strategic and protected sites. The result was Trump distancing himself from the South Pars attack, saying that Israel had "violently lashed out" unilaterally and that "NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field." Israel then said it wouldn't strike Iran energy sites anymore (bloomberg.com/news/articles/…). From where I stand, that's another tactical victory. It is, at least, Iran demonstrating that is can fight back **symmetrically** against the U.S. and its allies. Not through asymmetric resistance with IEDs hidden in the roadside or traps hidden in the jungle, but eye for eye, and against some of the most heavily protected sites on the U.S.'s side. That's qualitatively different from any other adversaries the U.S. has directly fought in recent wars. There's plenty more, such as the pretty relevant fact that Iran has gained control of the single most strategic energy chokepoint on earth and the U.S. is finding it impossible to break that control. To the point where Trump has been reduced to publicly begging China - of all countries - for help, which given Trump's ego mustn't have been easy to do. Only to be told no. By China. And by everyone else he asked. This is the topic of my latest article: how this is, in fact, the first genuine "multipolar war." First, in the narrow sense: because Iran is revealing itself to be a genuine pole of power - not a superpower, but an actor that cannot be submitted, which is all multipolarity is. And second, because the war itself is accelerating multipolarity everywhere else: the U.S. has never been more isolated, never looked weaker and its security guarantees have never been more hollow. In my article I lay out the full scoreboard - military, economic, political - and explain why this war has already changed the world, regardless of how it ends. Enjoy the read here: open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…
Arnaud Bertrand tweet media
English
427
3.4K
10.8K
1.2M
Context Pin It
Context Pin It@contextpinit·
Replacing it with a new one
English
1.9K
1.1K
8.3K
3.4M
Becca ❯❯❯❯ 🖤🩷
Ok well it’s not your choice if someone chooses to get a reborn doll or not. And reborn dolls are for anything. I am lucky I will already know what I’m doing because I used to work in a daycare with children from 3 months - 3/4/5 years. And by the way, yes it’s similar babies and older kids do get unwell, we just have to call the parents.
English
1
0
0
19
🏴
🏴@Dussyme·
If the answer ain't 12, then what is the correct one? 0.00001% can answer this🤔
🏴 tweet media
English
8.1K
203
1.1K
249.8K
Lady Charlie of Yorkshire👩🏻🇬🇧🌍🏳️‍🌈
@NixN1xx @John2Win David Cameron answered that one when he was Foreign Sec. I don't suppose people would be satisfied with the answer. What’s International diplomacy with what has now been proven to be an important country when you have personal anger? Yes, I do think it's a terrorist regime.
English
0
0
0
31
Nixx ✝️
Nixx ✝️@NixN1xx·
@John2Win What's the point? He won't answer. I'd like to know why he won't proscribe the IRGC & Muslim Brotherhood?
English
7
6
248
5.1K
Warren
Warren@swd2·
@WhiteHouse It’s terrible for morale to pay them 30 bucks an hour to hand out water while TSA agents are going home without pay because you told Republican senators not to cut a deal with Democrats.
English
6
26
411
8K
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
Huge thanks to our ICE agents deployed at airports nationwide, helping keep TSA lines moving so Americans can fly safe and on time! True patriots 🇺🇸
English
3.1K
5.6K
38K
1.4M
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Dershowitz says if Trump had been president in 1935-36 instead of FDR the Holocaust wouldn’t have happened because Trump would’ve taken out Hitler and the Nazis.
English
3.8K
477
1.9K
520.9K
Mark Russell
Mark Russell@Mark4Hitchin·
@serialsockthief @CadburyUK We’ve completely cut out Easter eggs this year because we don’t want to be poisoned by palm oil. But we are giving chocolate bars mostly supermarket own brand which are 70% cocoa
English
7
0
78
11.2K