Barbara Loeppke

@bryan_johnson I guess you didn’t check into the vaccine they used in those studies. Zostravax is not being used in the US anymore. So you aren’t even getting what you think you are. Shingrix was not studied.

I'm getting two vaccines next week: Tdap and shingles. The Tdap because Kate's family has a newborn and we're visiting. Shingles for the potential longevity benefits. Data we're looking at: 1. Lower Alzheimer risk with vaccination in 1.6 million people, 8 year follow up, age 65+ + Tdap/Td: 30% lower relative risk + Shingles: 25% lower + Pneumococcal: 27% lower 2. Slower biological aging from shingles vaccination in 3,884 people, age 70+ Modest but significant improvements in inflammation, epigenetic and transcriptomic aging, and composite biological age. Molecular signals strongest within 3 years; inflammation benefits emerged later. 3. Better outcomes after breakthrough shingles in 38,092 people, age 50+, median 3.6y follow up In adults who developed shingles, prior vaccination was linked to: + 41% lower all-cause mortality + 21% lower MACE (MI, stroke, PE, sudden cardiac death) + 16% lower dementia risk Note: all three studies are observational. They show association, not causation. A randomized controlled trial on longevity outcomes is not feasible here as you can't randomize people to skip vaccines for years. The signal is consistent across independent large cohorts, which strengthens confidence, but the possibility of healthy vaccine bias exists in all three. People who stay current on vaccines tend to have better health behaviors overall. I find the mechanistic case for shingles specifically compelling. VZV reactivation drives neuro inflammation, and vaccination appears to blunt that cascade which is why we weight this evidence more heavily than the numbers alone.

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of @AaronSiriSG, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

HOLY SH*T! These college students claimed Trump was horrible during the State of the Union. The problem is, it hadn’t happened yet. Their parents should have asked for their money back!

@DrPaulOffit @CDCgov @US_FDA @RobertKennedyJr @nytimes @statnews @PeterHotez twitter.com/aaronsirisg/st…

Virtually all childhood vaccines on @CDCgov schedule, including RotaTeq, were not licensed by @US_FDA based on a placebo controlled clinical trial. @RobertKennedyJr is correct on that point. @nytimes @statnews @DrPaulOffit @PeterHotez are all dead wrong. aaron-siri.com/placebo-trials/

@BarackObama Butt ugly building. Couldn’t you do better?

Chicago is where Michelle was raised, where I got my start as an organizer, and where we built a family together. When the Obama Presidential Center opens next June, it will be our way to give back to a city that has given us so much.

@RobertKennedyJr @JamesOKeefeIII Mandy gave an interview wherein she stated that she was proud that she had the CDC re-do the website and archived 60% of the site. I’m guessing she was part of this action with the GAO.

@JamesOKeefeIII We dont delete data. Not sure what he's talking about.

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS - Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws. Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director, revealed a covert effort inside GAO to preserve vaccine research data. Putansu admitted on hidden camera GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control - a potential violation of several federal statutes, including: - Unauthorized Removal or Destruction of Public Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071) - Theft or Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641) - Computer Fraud & Abuse Act - CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) for accessing or copying government data without authorization. “We've stolen & backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government.” “I'd watch out for the vaccine denying HHS who's going to ruin health care in this country even more than it already is.” “It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control.” @USGAO @willchamberlain @Article3Project @SecKennedy @HHSGov

Here is the live presentation from CHD, which was compressed to 30 minutes, where the real @Judyth Judyth Vary Baker was introduced in the end.

AN INCONVENIENT STUDY - FEATURE FILM youtu.be/mvEuMMAafF8?si… via @YouTube

@PopCrave No kings huh? 🤔

@P_McCulloughMD x.com/stopvaccinatin…

@TWilsthecat @mmpadellan @smc429 Oz doesn’t own prescription leucovorin.

@mmpadellan @smc429 How about this..⬇️⬇️

I'm not a doctor or a scientist, but I'm pretty sure it's a bad idea to take medical advice from a buffoon who can't even pronounce "acetaminophen." Something is fishy with this anti-Tylenol nonsense.

Yesterday, I retired 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP, the @CDCgov external panel that wields the grave responsibility of adding new vaccines to the recommended childhood schedule. Over the coming days, I will use this platform to announce new members to populate ACIP. None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists who will make extremely consequential public health determinations by applying evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense. I will also be tweeting examples of the historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary. The most outrageous example of ACIP’s malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children. Today, a compliant American child receives between 69 and 92 routine vaccines (depending on brand/dictated dosage) from conception to 18 years of age. This is up from 11 shots in 1986. ACIP has recommended each of these additional jabs without requiring placebo-controlled trials for any of them. This means that no one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more problems than they are causing. Many vaccine promoters have challenged this assertion. They are always wrong. Last week, @CNN, which has devolved into a shameless propagandist for Big Pharma, triumphantly announced that it had proof that my pronouncement that “there have been no placebo-controlled safety trials for any routine vaccines” was false. CNN gleefully proclaimed that it had found 257 placebo-controlled studies for routine vaccines. So, allow me a moment to deconstruct CNN’s claims. Warning: this post may only be sufferable for science geeks like myself. CNN is wrong. No routine injected vaccine on CDC’s schedule was licensed for children based on a placebo-controlled trial. In instances where a vaccine was used as a control, it too was never licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. That is not conjecture. It is a fact based on FDA’s clinical trial data. (See sirillp.com/noplacebo). As Secretary of @HHSGov, acknowledging this lamentable truth is part of my promise of radical transparency. The 257 studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the lack of safety trials underpinning CDC’s schedule. Despite CNN’s worldwide effort to crowdsource trials with a placebo control (per @US_FDA/@CDCgov, an “inert substance”*), this list, on its face, reflects that 236 of the studies clearly did not use an “inert” safety comparator in a trial to license an injected routine vaccine for children on CDC’s schedule.** For the remaining 21 studies CNN’s list claims used an inert injection, 9 plainly did not: • RCT 251, 252 (Varivax) injected an antibiotic, neomycin – not inert. • RCT 84, 97 (HPV-16 and 16/18) injected aluminum adjuvant – not inert. • RCT 215 (Almevax) injected another vaccine – not inert. • RCT 55 (Lyophilized PedvaxHIB) injected lactose, aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal – not inert. • RCT 197 (Salk vaccine) injected 199 solution, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenol red, antibiotics, and formalin – not inert.*** • RCT 168 (Dow’s MMR) injected full vaccine minus virus, including all stabilizers, antibiotics, diluent, preservative, and buffers – not inert.**** • RCT 189 (Menveo) injected Tdap+saline or Menveo+saline – not inert. For the remaining 12 listed studies which may have had an inert injection, none was a trial relied upon to license a routine vaccine on CDC’s childhood schedule: • RCT 170, 171, 172 (MMR VaxPro), 228 (PCV11), 136 (Vaxigrip), 242 (Antitetanus), and 122 (Chinese flu shots) trialed vaccines never licensed in the U.S. nor relied upon to license a U.S. vaccine. • RCT 124 (Fluzone IIV3), 102 (WVV/SPV), and 188 (Menveo) trials occurred after each respective vaccine was licensed, hence were not relied upon for their licensure. • RCT 176 (Mumps vaccine) was not relied upon by the FDA to license the current MMR vaccine. (See MMR-II clinical trial report in link above.) • RCT 53 (PRP-D) was for a vaccine withdrawn soon after its introduction and not relied upon by the FDA to license any U.S. vaccine. While these 12 studies were not relied upon to license a routine vaccine on the CDC’s schedule, they do reflect that a placebo-controlled trial of a vaccine is possible. They also reflect what can be learned when a placebo trial is performed. For example: RCT 136 found the vaccine ineffective; RCT 122 found that “severe adverse effects occurred in 69 (0·6%, 95% CI 0·5–0·8) recipients of vaccine compared with one recipient (0·1%, 0–0·2) of placebo.”; and RCT 124 found “the rate of hospitalization was actually higher in the [Fluzone IIV3] vaccine group than in the placebo group.” The unfortunate reality is that placebo-controlled trials, however, do not occur and have not been relied upon when FDA licenses vaccines for injection during childhood or ACIP recommends the shot for addition to the CDC’s routine schedule. CNN would have reached the same conclusion had it reviewed the FDA documentation for each vaccine, instead of relying upon a random, crowd-sourced list from the internet. CNN’s list ironically proves the lack of adequate safety trials for routine childhood vaccines. It is time to stop playing games, such as CNN’s false gotcha. We have gone from 3 routine injections by age one in 1986 (the year the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed) to 25 routine injections by age one in 2025 (which now does not include Covid-19 vaccine). Because of the 1986 Act, every one of these products, save one, was developed by companies knowing they would almost never be liable for serious harm. During this same period, chronic diseases in our children exploded, most of which are caused by immune system dysregulation. If we are to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic of autoimmune diseases, we need to rule out products given dozens of times to young children, specifically to modify the immune system, as potential culprits. Our infants and children deserve the best safety trials possible to keep them safe. We should care as much about every child who could be injured by one of these products as we do every child who could be injured by an infectious disease. We must protect all children. Notes: * fda.gov/media/130326/d… (“Placebos, defined as inert substances with no pharmacologic activity, are commonly used in double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trials.”); fda.gov/media/71349/do… (“the placebo control design, by … including a group that receives an inert treatment…”); cdc.gov/vaccines/gloss… (“Placebo: A substance or treatment that has no effect on living beings, usually used as a comparison to vaccine or medicine in clinical trials.”). ** While the above addresses injected vaccines, CNN’s cited list also includes 10 trials for rotavirus vaccine, given by oral drops, but none of these trials used saline only drops. Instead, RCT 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 213 (Rotarix) contained dextran, sorbitol, amino acids, dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, calcium carbonate, and xanthan; RCT 211, 212 (RotaTeq) contained polysorbate 80, sucrose, citrate and phosphate; and RCT 206, 214 (Rotavac) included neomycin sulphate, kanamycin acid sulphate, trehalose, lactalbumin hydrolysate, human albumin, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate, and trisodium citrate dihydrate. The list also included three trials of an inhaled flu vaccine; the controls in RCT 104 were OPV+saline or LAIV (a vaccine), hence neither inert; in RCT 106 the control “consisted of normal allantoic fluid harvested from uninfected eggs stabilized with sucrose–phosphate–glutamate”; and, in RCT 109, the control was “intranasal spray of egg allantoic fluid containing sucrose-phosphate-glutamate.” *** Note that the current polio vaccines used in the U.S. are a different product than the polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in the 1950s—which was discontinued in the 1960s—including because the currently-used polio vaccines are “grown in vero cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells cultivated on microcarriers.” Hence, the Salk trial was not relied upon to license any current polio vaccine. fda.gov/media/75695/do…; pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6740101/; https://‌admin.phe-culturecollections.org.uk‌media/1222‌49/‌vero-cell-line-profile.pdf; #characteristics" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">atcc.org/products/all/c…. **** Dow Chemical’s MMR vaccine used different strains than any licensed U.S. MMR vaccine and also, after 14 days of safety review, this trial vaccinated all participants.

@TammyWright21 @SecKennedy @CDCgov And you are who? Just a shrill shill with zero to back up your claim. And stop talking about other people’s dead parents like you knew them - that shows your complete lack of maturity and education.

@SecKennedy @CDCgov A DISGRACE, and LIAR!!! YOU LIED TO GET CONFIRMED!! YOUR FATHER IS ROLLING OVER IN HIS GRAVE RIGHT NOW

@Lorenzo7127 @isyoursoulsaved @JaxenReport Placebo? No. None used inert or saline placebos. A ln active adjuvant or another vaccine is NOT an inert placebo. Call the manufacturer and ask them what the “placebo” was.

@isyoursoulsaved @JaxenReport A check of the free PubMed scientific literature database will show placebo-controlled clinical trials for all the vaccines on the schedule.

BREAKING: RFK Jr. will order ‘placebo’ testing for new vaccines “All new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure - a radical departure from past practices,” an HHS spokesperson told The Washington Post in response to questions about Kennedy’s comments on the measles vaccines and general vaccine policy.”

@IamTybalt79 @ChaseDbc456 @isyoursoulsaved @JaxenReport In a novel vaccine, saline or inert is ALWAYS suitable. And even in non-novel, saline or inert is always suitable. Not sure why you think it isn’t.

@ChaseDbc456 @isyoursoulsaved @JaxenReport Double blind study with a suitable placebo. Saline is not always a suitable placebo. Subjects should be followed in post-trial monitoring for a suitable period. One to six months would be acceptable, but some trials follow for longer. So, what vaccines weren't properly tested?

@isyoursoulsaved @JaxenReport It is difficult to get the unvaccinated to want to be in a trial where they might get the vaccine or the vaccinated to chance not getting the vaccine. Not impossible but harder to recruit.

@JaxenReport New vaccines?! Well it’s a start. Although, we don’t need new vaccines. What about all the other harmful vaccines that were never properly tested?

@MeganSuspended @alketamark @JaxenReport Actually, you’re stating this backwards. Efficacy cannot be tested with a placebo unless you do a challenge group where you expose the trial to the virus. A saline placebo and the vaccine given in the trial will show the safety.

No. It won’t be conclusive, either way. Any side effects from the vaccines, will be dismissed or excused - as they are now. If two people don’t get identical adverse reactions, their symptoms will be chalked up as personal health issues not related to vaccine. Plus, the most damaging autoimmune disorders can take months or even years, to manifest. Vaccines cause the most harm to prepubescent children, who are still developing their natural immune defence system. I can’t see them ‘testing’ placebo vaccine controls with two groups of toddlers. It’s set up to fail.

Stephen A. Smith asked RFK how he’ll improve health while making major budget cuts. RFK’s response did not disappoint. Stephen A. Smith: “HHS reduced your employee status from 82,000 to 62,000 employees… how on earth are you gonna ensure that we're gonna become a healthier society with over 20,000 less employees?” RFK: “I would say during the Biden administration, my agency grew by 38% and Americans got sicker.” “It's not throwing money at it or hiring people that is solving the problem.” “95% of our health care budget is going to chronic disease.” “74% of our kids cannot qualify for military service. So this is an existential threat to our national security.” “It's an existential threat to our economy, and we have to narrowly focus on that.” “That's what the new HHS is doing.”

A little clip I made from another video. It says a lot!