eggs’n’things 🇺🇸
9.6K posts

eggs’n’things 🇺🇸
@RktechedT
Reportedly followed by Elon’s mom, and all of the best bots. 🥰
Katılım Şubat 2021
39 Takip Edilen69 Takipçiler


@krjohnstn @Angry_Staffer MAGA doesn’t care about Trump not caring about Americans, because they don’t care about *anything* but their weird racist feelings.
These are the folks supporting a convicted fraudster using his power to shield his past child trafficking friends from accountability, after all.
English

@Angry_Staffer Trump got exactly what he was after... grifting and robbing us blind with no accountability. MAGA still hasn't figured out he doesn't give a crap about Americans.
English

@jhpodesta @Angry_Staffer There is no Republican Party any more. It’s now just a collection of morally bankrupt sycophants eagerly supporting a grifting fraudster and his efforts to shield his past associates from having their child trafficking exposed.
English

@Angry_Staffer Congratulations, we are now a banana republic. Our dictator for life, having been found to have immunity for most anything he does while president, now directs the DOJ to refrain from any audit or bringing charges against Trump or his family. Where is the Republican Party?
English

@Alaskacryptogi1 @Angry_Staffer Why do you want to feel sorry for fraudsters?
He was convicted on 34 counts.
And now he uses his position to shield his past child-trafficking friends from exposure and accountability. Maybe you should reconsider what you’re supporting.
English

@Angry_Staffer I do not care. That family was put through absolute hell with fraud investigations. I say good for him
English

Right after Reparations for Rioters … now comes this clause to make sure that the grifters and fraudsters will forever be free to grift and defraud.
MAGA … no spine, no balls and no morals. Typical, since they’re also supporting Trump’s shielding of past child traffickers.
Angry Staffer@Angry_Staffer
MAGA, yall ok with this? Trump’s DOJ just barred the government from ever investigating Trump, his family, or any of his businesses for any of the crimes that could have been charged in this case. So much for no one is above the law, huh?
English

@SpencerHakimian Oh cry harder pussy ass bitch!
I didn’t hear you say shit about the January 6 committee Anthony, Fauci, or Hunter Biden, and the entire Biden crime family they received presidential blanket pardons!
Next administration can still use the IRS as weaponization dickhead!
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer That’s nice. Neither can you state what you’re arguing about.
You seem terribly confused, here.
Anyhow, I hope to see you post those rules that will definitely prevent any of this cash from making it back into any of the Trump family coffers.
When you’re ready, of course.
English

@RktechedT @Angry_Staffer I did not say you stated that Trump has received anything. Gosh, can you even read?
English

I’d be pretty surprised if he dismissed it without grifting in some way
Scott MacFarlane@MacFarlaneNews
FLASH: Trump seeks to voluntarily dismiss his $10 billion civil suit against his own IRS No detail in the 3-page filing about the reported $1.776 billion settlement with Jan 6 rioters and convicted fraudsters Here it is: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer It’s absolutely true that you can point out as fact that someone stated a lie or stated their belief. But that’s only relevant if I claimed that Vance didn’t say what he’s saying in the video.
You’re not any better at gaslighting than you are with your strawman claims.
English

"The fund will never go to Trump" is an opinion.
"The fund will go to Trump" is an opinion.
JD Vance says the fund will not go to Trump is a factual information. We don't know whether it will or it will not because the fund has not been used, but that Vance says that statement is a fact.
I am sure you learned a lot today.
Again, you are welcome.
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer The confusion stems from your inability to comprehend the language, and your need to accuse others of something that they’re not doing. To wit: you cannot show where I stated that Trump has received anything from this fund yet.
Your defensiveness has led you astray.
English

Of course I can't. That is exactly my point.
The fund has not been used yet, so there is no factual information. If (and it is only an if) I believe that none will go back to Trump, that is my belief or my opinion. I don't confuse the two.
But you are still confused or mixing the two.
Facts vs opinion. Facts vs opinion. Facts vs opinion.
You are welcome.
English

@DukeWarWagon @RobSchneider @scott350306 @FBI So Trump couldn’t call the police or Guard?
What an ineffective cuck.
English

Yes the Dem party led by Pelosi conspired w FBI and DOJ deep state lackeys to set up Jan 6 to entrap Trump to impeach him and get him out of politics. He was too authentic, independent and with his magnetic personality and charm drawing/unifying Godfearing Pro family hardworking Patriots against the Establishment. So they had to stop him permanently. So they ensured there was inadequate security and ops to incite agitate the protestors to riot. Trump’s advisers should have expected this kind of dirty trick and not held the rally.
English

Dear Bill Maher,
I am waiting for your apology for you yelling at me on your podcast about the Jan 6th “Insurrection” that turns out to be an inside job WITH 26 @FBI CONFIDENCIAL HUMAN SOURCES…
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer No strawman here. I’m just torching yours.
Don’t forget to post the ‘facts’ of how none of this money can or will make it back to Trump or into his family’s coffers. And don’t forget to be confident enough to affirm that you believe that none will.
Can you do either? 😉
English

@RktechedT @Angry_Staffer That is really a good advice... for yourself.
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer And you need to stop erecting straw men as I haven’t stated that it’s a ‘fact’ that Trump and his family will end up with ‘X’ amount from this action.
But history indicates the likely outcome.
Try building a better straw man next time.
English

@RktechedT @Angry_Staffer Your belief might be 100% or 1000% correct. It does not matter.
But you still need to be able to distinguish between belief and factual information. That is all I said and all I will say for now.
English

@FactualGraphics Vance used this ludicrous example as someone deserving of a payout. His words. It’s no one else’s ‘belief’ but his, unless you want to tell me that you also believe her to be worthy of a cash gift for betraying the law and public trust.
Do you? Commit to an answer, if you can.
English

@RktechedT He didn't even say that Tina will surely get the money. He is using her as an example for eligibility to apply. It will be determined case by case.
No handing out gobs of taxpayer cash to people.
Gosh. You keep reading your belief into what others say.
English

JD Vance explains the "Weaponization Fund" (settlement fund from Trump v. IRS):
• not going to Trump admin, Trump or his family
• not an amount to be spent automatically
• will be used for lawsuit settlements for people disproportionately prosecuted
tinyurl.com/yy5zphxx
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer My belief is based on the past actions of a man with 34 fraud convictions and a history of product and real estate scams, some of which needed to be settled in court.
The Trumps aren’t even allowed to operate a charity in NY State without special regs because of their history.
English

It is a government fund and will be government by US law.
I didn't mention anything about my belief. I only say what was mentioned by the Vice President of the US. You don't have to believe him, but so far that's all the info we have.
But you said the fund will go to the president one way or another. That is your BELIEF as there is no facts yet. The fund just started. Your belief might even be right, but it is still your belief.
America needs the ability to distinguish between factual data and opinions/beliefs.
English

@_Postive_Vibes Yes, I’m sure that Trump just happened to be driving by in a golf cart past a family that was piloting their own golf cart randomly around a secured area after driving 40 hours.
Or this could just be another arranged photo op attempting to persuade gullible minds.
English

@FactualGraphics @Angry_Staffer Feel free to post the rules of this deal that you believe will keep that ‘promise’ in force, and then balance that against the reality & actions of this Admin elsewhere vis-a-vis the law and the courts.
Otherwise the person mixing reality with belief would appear to be … you.
English

@RktechedT @Angry_Staffer You call it empty and unenforceable promise. I would even say that is understandable, but then you continue with unproven allegations.
That is why communication can never continue reasonably because you are mixing reality and your own beliefs.
English

@RobSchneider @FBI Oh, right. “Human sources”. That’s good, because most of us were thinking that you thought that your cat was talking to you.
Turns out that you have no ‘inside job’ (lol, Trump was Prez anyway) and that MAGA snowflakes rioted, looted and caused an officer to die. Cucks.
English












