Robin Tilbrook

Who else supports flying our flags? I challenge the BBC narrative of it being "Racist" drive.google.com/file/d/1zPEKeT…

@JChimirie66677 @soul4ever @Chris60712 Don’t forget the political purpose of the Judicial Appointments Commission

Hertzi, the answer isn't a mystery. It's a policy and it has a name. The Sentencing Council's guidelines instruct judges that custody is a last resort for young offenders, that rehabilitation is the primary purpose and that criminalising children unnecessarily must be avoided. The judge in Fordingbridge was not rogue. He was compliant. He followed the guidance precisely and produced the sentence it was designed to produce. Behind the guidance is a progressive ideology that has captured the legal establishment over decades. The same long march through the institutions that produced gender ideology in the BBC, trans women in women's prisons and two tier policing on British streets has produced a sentencing framework that prioritises the perpetrator's rehabilitation over the victim's justice. It's not incompetence. It's a worldview embedded in the system by people who share it and who have spent years ensuring the system reflects their values rather than the public's. David Lammy wants to extend that framework to all offenders under 25. Lord Hermer removed trial by jury for thousands of defendants while taking 28 days to decide whether filming a knifepoint gang rape warrants custody. The system isn't broken. It is working exactly as its architects intended. That's what makes it so difficult to fix.

Eleven Rape Convictions. Not One Day In Custody. And Lammy Wants to Go Further. Two girls were raped in a New Forest town in November 2024 and January 2025. They were fifteen and fourteen years old. Their attackers filmed the assaults, shared the footage online and laughed. One of the girls was raped at knifepoint. Three boys walked out of Southampton Crown Court with youth rehabilitation orders and a three month curfew. Eleven rape convictions between them. Not one day in custody. The first girl read her victim impact statement at sentencing. I was caught off guard. I will never get that innocence back. All I want to do is die. I no longer have fear for when that comes. The judge praised her courage. He then told her attackers none of you need to go to prison today. Judge Nicholas Rowland cited their very young ages, their ADHD diagnoses, their low intellectual capacity and the importance of avoiding criminalising children unnecessarily. He was following the Sentencing Council's guidance precisely. Custody is a last resort. Rehabilitation is the primary purpose. The sentence is not the judge's failure. It is the policy's product. Which makes what David Lammy is simultaneously planning considerably more alarming than the sentences themselves. The Justice Secretary is weighing proposals to extend that same framework, treating offenders as children, prioritising rehabilitation over punishment, minimising custody, to all offenders under 25. The Scottish model he is considering produced a killer rapist who set a woman on fire receiving five fewer years than he would have otherwise. It produced a man who repeatedly raped a thirteen year old girl avoiding prison entirely. Lammy wants to bring that framework to England and Wales while Lord Hermer urgently reviews sentences that are its direct and inevitable consequence. The Attorney General who removed trial by jury for thousands of defendants has 28 days to decide whether filming a knifepoint gang rape and sharing it online warrants custody. The same man who ensured extra court capacity was in place for last weekend's Unite ghe Kingdom march is taking nearly a month to answer that question. The second girl's statement was read on her behalf. She described nightmares, inability to sleep and feeling ashamed and insecure in her own body. The person I was before the incident has completely gone and sometimes I feel like I am grieving the person I used to be. Under the framework Lammy is proposing, the boys who produced that grief would continue to be treated as children requiring support rather than adults requiring consequences. Former Met Police detective Peter Bleksley's call to bring back borstals will be dismissed in progressive circles as nostalgic authoritarianism. It deserves more serious engagement than that. The borstal system, whatever its flaws, operated on a principle the current framework has abandoned entirely. That young people who commit serious offences require structure, discipline and consequence rather than community orders and supervision. The evidence that rehabilitation focused community sentences deter serious youth offending is thin. The evidence from Scotland that treating young adult offenders as children produces lighter sentences for grave crimes is documented. The Fordingbridge victims are not statistics in a sentencing review. They are two girls whose lives have been permanently altered by three boys who will be back in their communities within months. The policy that produced their sentences is the same policy the government is planning to expand. Lord Hermer's shock is noted. His government's direction of travel tells a different story. The sentence was not a miscarriage of justice. It was justice as currently defined. That is the most alarming observation of all. "Lammy wants to bring that framework to England and Wales while Lord Hermer urgently reviews sentences that are its direct and inevitable consequence."

They seek to destroy ENGLAND.

Ancient Rome’s Benefits Doom Loop dailysceptic.org/2026/05/25/anc… via @LD_Sceptics

This is why we must not let them destroy our jury system conservativewoman.co.uk/thank-god-for-… via @theconwom

This is the kind of explosive interview every British voter needs to watch right now. In a hard-hitting sit-down with Alex Phillips on TalkTV, Raja Miah lays bare the systematic election fraud that has become routine in Labour’s Muslim-dominated strongholds. They’re not even trying to hide it anymore. One of the candidates they fielded was literally called Muhammad Ali — you genuinely couldn’t make this stuff up. “Chip shop Ange” (Angela Rayner) gets linked straight into the scandal too, with serious questions now swirling about what she knew and when. The pattern is clear: fake independents, postal vote manipulation, intimidation at polling stations, and a bloc-voting machine that treats democracy like a private family business. All while the authorities look the other way for fear of “Islamophobia” accusations. This isn’t a few rogue activists. This is organised, industrial-scale rigging of our elections in areas that have been effectively handed over to one community. Labour isn’t winning seats fairly — they’re engineering them. And the British people, the ones whose ancestors built this democracy, are being treated like naïve bystanders while their votes are diluted and their voice is stolen. Raja Miah and Alex Phillips have done the country a huge service by putting this on record. The rest of us need to demand answers, not more cover-ups. Britain deserves clean elections. Not this third-world farce dressed up as “diversity.” Enough is enough. Watch the full interview and share it far and wide

The Sewage Doesn't Lie. Polly Toynbee Said So. In 2010, Polly Toynbee wrote in the Guardian that the census was missing millions of people and that Britain had no reliable idea of how many people actually lived here. Her evidence? Sewage. Thames Water, she explained, could calculate true population numbers from outflow data regardless of who was registered, who had filled in a form, or who the authorities knew about. The sewage doesn't discriminate. It counts everyone. In Slough alone, she reported, Thames Water's data revealed 30,000 more people than officially registered. She was making the argument that inner city constituencies were being underfunded because the state couldn't count its own population. She was right. Fifteen years later, Thames Water commissioned a study using precisely that methodology. The results were obtained by the Telegraph under freedom of information. The study estimated that up to 585,000 people are living illegally in the London water supply zone. Nationally, the figure exceeds one million. David Wood, the former Director General of Immigration Enforcement at the Home Office, told the Home Affairs Select Committee the same thing in 2017, before the Channel crossing surge had even begun. Since 2018, over 200,000 people have arrived by small boat alone, with a removal rate of just 4 percent. The methodology Toynbee championed in 2010 to argue for more funding for Labour inner city seats has produced a number the Guardian would never publish. The sewage still doesn't lie. It has simply started telling a different story. This matters for several reasons. The official population figures used to allocate public services, draw constituency boundaries and calculate per capita spending are wrong. They have been wrong for years and the undercounting runs in one direction only. The people not on the register, not in the census, not in the ONS migration statistics, are overwhelmingly concentrated in the cities and inner suburbs that have absorbed the largest numbers of unregistered arrivals. The schools that are overflowing, the GP surgeries that cannot cope, the housing that is unaffordable: these are not random failures of public administration. They are the predictable consequence of a population that the state either cannot or will not count honestly. The political class that calls concerned citizens far-right for raising these questions has known about the undercounting problem for at least fifteen years. Toynbee's 2010 piece was not a fringe complaint. It was a mainstream left-wing argument made in Britain's most prominent left-wing newspaper, citing official ONS data, Thames Water analysis and the testimony of sitting MPs. The numbers were smaller then. The methodology was the same. What has changed is not the tools for counting. What has changed is what the counting reveals. In 2010 it revealed underfunded Labour constituencies. In 2026 it reveals a population of over a million people living here without authorisation, in a country whose government describes 171,000 net migration as a secure Britain and calls anyone who disagrees a bigot. Polly Toynbee was right in 2010. The sewage doesn't lie. She just didn't anticipate where the truth would eventually lead. theguardian.com/commentisfree/… "The study estimated that up to 585,000 people are living illegally in the London water supply zone. Nationally, the figure exceeds one million."

See Andy Burnham denying that he is English and wants the break-up of England!

The Great Realignment of British politics, of which we’re currently still in the foothills, will eventually see a two-party rivalry reassembled. But they will be two parties which differ not on class interest, but on whether one’s primary loyalty is to one’s country, or to internationalism. In a sense we’ll be returning to the Court versus Country divide of the late 17th century. Where will you stand?

Andy Burnham not in favour of an 'English' Parliament. youtu.be/OTjgz6Dr8Ns?si… via @YouTube

This is why the Makerfield by-election could matter far more than people realise. On paper, Labour should be vulnerable. Their vote is down. Reform UK are in a position to challenge. Robert Kenyon has already stood there before and built a base. But this is where the establishment game kicks in. If the anti-Labour vote splits between Reform UK, Restore Britain and the remaining Conservative vote, while Labour benefits from a tactical squeeze from Lib Dem and Green voters, Labour can still hold the seat even with reduced support. That is the point of this hypothetical. It is not saying this exact result will happen. It is showing the mechanism. Split the right. Consolidate the left. Labour survives. And this is why all the sudden attention, attacks, tactical positioning and “anyone but Reform” behaviour matters. Because in a first-past-the-post system, you do not need to be popular with the country. You just need your opposition divided in the right places. Makerfield could become a very clear test of whether people want change, or whether smaller parties and establishment actors end up handing Labour the seat by default. That is the real danger here. #Makerfield #ReformUK #LabourParty #UKPolitics #ByElection #TacticalVoting

“You cannot simultaneously have a welfare state and free immigration.” — Milton Friedman

Why are UK taxpayers paying for foreigners to live in social housing? This is utter madness 48% of London social housing is occupied by people born abroad Only citizens should receive benefits We must abolish Indefinite Leave to Remain Citizenship requirements: * 15 years residence + * English fluency + * evidence of integration + * not being a burden on the state during those previous 15 years + * ability to support yourself or, if a housewife etc., to be supported by your partner

Pure propaganda to suggest they're getting a grip on asylum In 2025, the H.O. approved c. 60%-65% of asylum applications (incl. appeals) Portugal approved only 3% - 8%! Even France only approves c. 40%-50% Crucially, UK approves those who were REFUSED in EU countries The EU average is 36%, almost HALF our 60%-65%. The Home Office's high approval rating is a major pull factor. A significant percentage of certain nationalities (Eritreans, Afghans, Sudanese, Iraqis etc.) apply for asylum in the UK after having their applications rejected by other European nations Disgraceful for the Home Office to try to put a positive spin on this. There is no reason the UK can't be more like Portugal - other than a lack of political and civil service will.

🇬🇧 Makerfield Tory Candidate Michael Winstanley DESTROYED over Tory IMMIGRATION track record by @willcoleshill. He claims the Tories will protect the borders, exploit North Sea oil, and make up for past failings including the Boriswave. Will is having NONE of it⬇️

The TRUTH they're not telling you about the new migration figures in the UK, by @GoodwinMJ open.substack.com/pub/mattgoodwi…

>Gypsy travellers commit premeditated gang rape of a child. >It lasts 90 minutes. >They film the attacks, laugh at the child they're raping, encourage their friends to rape her, mock the child asking “why do you look sad?” >They know they won't be punished so they rape an even younger child at knifepoint, cut her clothes off with knives. >The child victims are left petrified and wanting to die. >Judge praises the gang rapists' behaviour in court. >Judge lets them walk free saying “I should avoid criminalising [the rapists] unnecessarily”. >Gives them "youth rehabilitation orders". >Other gang rapists now know that activist judges have effectively decriminalised the violent gang rape of British children. >None of this is accidental.

I grew up in a council house in Cumbria. Their purpose was to stabilise the lives of a working class which up until then had been dependent on the whims of private landlords. But in the 1970s a change was made to the law which made it a statutory obligation to house not the traditional working family, but those deemed to be in most immediate need of housing. It is this law which explains why an immigrant who comes here illegally and may end up homeless is often put to the front of the queue for housing, even before local people. As with everything, there are specific legal reasons for the dilemma we’re in. We don’t need to change our culture, we simply need to change the law.

A reminder that when the @SpeechUnion overturned Hamit Coskun’s conviction for burning a Koran (originally on the CPS charge paper it said he had allegedly harassed “the religious institution of Islam”), the CPS tried to overturn his acquittal to find him guilty of blasphemy. The evidence that he had caused “harassment, alarm or distress” was that a Muslim man swung a knife at him whilst saying “I’m going to kill you” in response. That guy was spared jail time, but the CPS tried everything to find Hamit guilty.

Authoritarianism Doesn’t Arrive With a Coup. It Arrives With a Login dailysceptic.org/2026/05/20/aut…

NHS MANAGER TOLD HER WHISTLEBLOWERS GO MISSING OVERNIGHT Totally normal stuff from a world-class health service. Victoria Rixon @Victoria_Rixon spent six and a half years as an NHS midwife. She watched labour wards run on two members of staff. She watched colleagues go 12.5 hour shifts without food, water, or a toilet break, each responsible for up to 20 patients at once. She watched a woman labour alone for ten hours behind a curtain with no care whatsoever. The baby needed emergency resuscitation. She reported what she saw. Because that is literally what the @NHS told her to do during induction. What happened next is a classic in how Britain's most trusted institution handles inconvenient truths. She was falsely accused of being responsible for the death of a baby. Her employer sent a cease and desist letter after her exit interview. And a member of NHS management delivered her a friendly warning: 'whistleblowers go missing overnight' An NHS manager. Said that. Out loud. To a midwife who raised patient safety concerns. On 9 April 2024, Victoria handed back her Nursing and Midwifery Council @nmcnews registration and walked away from the career she had trained four years for and loved every day of. Because she says the institution she worked for was actively harming the women and babies in its care and punishing anyone who said so. She is still speaking publicly. She is still being harassed. The NMC @nmcnews, NHS England @NHSEngland, and the Royal College of Midwives @MidwivesRCM have had inquiry after inquiry, report after report, and the wards are still dangerously short staffed. But sure. The system is fine. It just needs another review. Sources: Victoria Rixon personal testimony @Victoria_Rixon | @CartlandDavid Substack | The Dozen with Liam Tuffs podcast,