
Ryan.hl
175 posts





A month ago Nancy Pelosi spent millions on $NVDA call options that expire 12/20/2024 at $120 Today I copied her trade (paid a little more than her but only by around $3 per contract) We’ll see how this plays out 🍿














DAT @HypeStrat purchased 271,667 hyperliquid:native (worth $15.9M) in 13 days. It also accumulated an additional $9.6 million in cash, bringing its total cash balance to $113.8 million.



HYPE >$50. Some thoughts: Asset prices reflect the last trade in a market’s continuous auction. While this is often treated as “fair value,” only a small share of supply actually changes hands. As a result, price usually reflects the most aggressive buyers and sellers, and the premium or discount they are willing to accept relative to the recent price range. Still, over time, slower-moving supply and demand respond, and the market starts to re-equilibrate. Therefore, while there are many ways to value an asset, the best way to contextualize its current value is: 1) What do short-term flows and asymmetries look like? 2) Where are longer-term buyers and sellers likely to step in? For HYPE, short-term aggressive flows are clearly asymmetric to the upside. ETF access has started ($14.1M volume on May 19th), DATs are buying (Hyperliquid Strategies has $100M left), and the Assistance Fund continues to purchase $10M–$15M a week. On the market side, we are seeing tons of positive catalysts: Circle / Coinbase likely bringing in >$100M of stablecoin-related revenue for Hyperliquid, pre-IPO markets like SpaceX and potentially OpenAI from TradeXYZ bringing outsized TradFi attention, RWA open interest at $2.6B (up 2x from two months ago), and most recently regulatory momentum around tokenized stocks. This leads to the second question: where do longer-term holders sell into this demand? HYPE spent nearly a year auctioning between $20 and $40, rotating supply into a new holder base. My bias is that much of this supply now sits with less price-sensitive holders: Deployers, the Assistance Fund, DATs, and stakers. If motivated sellers already had repeated exits around $38–$40, how much is left to sell above $50? Instead, we may see a reflexive dynamic where investors waiting for lower (e.g HYPE’s $8 Solana moment) are forced to rotate in. My view is that flows and demand have already pushed many TradFi equities into extremely stretched valuations, while HYPE, despite being crypto’s clear winner, has remained relatively anchored to fundamentals. This break above the prior range, along with clear improvements in fundamentals (regulation, diversified revenue, 0-1 pre-IPO / 24/7 markets) and access (ETFs and DATs), could create an environment where price discovery turns reflexive and HYPE grinds much higher, detaching from traditional valuation anchors in the same way many high-growth L1s have in past cycles. Hyperliquid





JUST IN: SpaceX to reportedly file IPO documents publicly "this week"





Korean Bubble Mania: Retail Investors Max Out On Margin Debt, Choose To "Risk Complete Collapse" Than Miss Stock Rally zerohedge.com/markets/korean…

THE S&P 500 IS FLASHING 4 BEARISH SIGNALS AT ONCE Every indicator on this chart is saying the same thing right now: 1. Distribution at the top - smart money is selling into the rally 2. Volume picks up - first real warning sign 3. RSI rejected at overbought - no momentum left 4. MACD bearish crossover - trend is shifting When one indicator signals a reversal, it's a hint. When all four align at the same time, it's a warning Posted the Volume Theory months ago. This is exactly the setup it predicted The next move on the S&P 500 is down FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!













